WHO: Ebola is a genetically modified organism

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wehateporn
    Promoting Debate on GFY
    • Apr 2007
    • 27176

    #1

    WHO: Ebola is a genetically modified organism


    http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/worl...lespeak-ebola/

    ?Ebola is a genetically modified organism (GMO),? declared Dr. Cyril Broderick, Professor of Plant Pathology, in a front-page story published in the Liberian Observer.

    We have come to know the World Health Organization as a pet of the multinational pharmaceutical complex, and in the case of Ebola, it has not disappointed anyone. The WHO did its job as fear-monger in chief during the manufactured H1N1 ?crisis? and is doing its part to make Ebola another doomsday episode.

    According to the WHO, Ebola is in full geographic expansion in the three most affected countries: Liberia, Guinea Conakry and Sierra Leone, and the threat looms over border nations due to the lack of local and international staff to deal with the outbreak. While the WHO scares the populations in places where Ebola has allegedly appeared, it has launched the usual psychological game where it assures the world that it is still possible to halt the ?epidemic?.

    That is the hope expressed today by the Deputy Director General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Bruce Aylward, coordinator of the operational response in the fight against Ebola.

    In a press conference, the head of the WHO highlighted two aspects, the situation is serious and will be even worse, so that not only we must not lower our guard but intensify and multiply exponentially every effort. He said that if everything is implemented correctly and promptly, the world will be able to control the epidemic.

    Continued http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/worl...lespeak-ebola/
  • just a punk
    So fuckin' bored
    • Jun 2003
    • 32385

    #2
    Originally posted by wehateporn
    WHO: Сis a genetically modified organism
    Ebola is non an organism. Ebola is a virus.
    Obey the Cowgod

    Comment

    • XXXBizXXX
      Confirmed User
      • Sep 2014
      • 405

      #3
      Originally posted by CyberSEO
      Ebola is non an organism. Ebola is a virus.
      %100 agreed. viruses and bacterias are two different stories.
      CLICKADU PAYS YOU BIG! average CPM: 2.1$ - 5.2$ Make More $$$

      Comment

      • 2MuchMark
        Mark of 2Much.net
        • Aug 2004
        • 50931

        #4
        Pretty lame when the first sentence of the first post from a "Doctor" gets it wrong.

        WehatePorn you should like to the true fact sources for things like this such as http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/. Spreading disinformation by idiots can be dangerous.

        Comment

        • wehateporn
          Promoting Debate on GFY
          • Apr 2007
          • 27176

          #5
          Originally posted by CyberSEO
          Ebola is non an organism. Ebola is a virus.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus

          'they lack key characteristics (such as cell structure) that are generally considered necessary to count as life. Because they possess some but not all such qualities, viruses have been described as "organisms at the edge of life".'

          Comment

          • seeandsee
            Check SIG!
            • Mar 2006
            • 50945

            #6
            ebola plus aids = ebids
            BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

            Contact here

            Comment

            • wehateporn
              Promoting Debate on GFY
              • Apr 2007
              • 27176

              #7
              Originally posted by MarkPrince
              Pretty lame when the first sentence of the first post from a "Doctor" gets it wrong.

              WehatePorn you should like to the true fact sources for things like this such as http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/. Spreading disinformation by idiots can be dangerous.
              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microorganism

              "Some microbiologists also classify viruses as microorganisms, but others consider these as nonliving"

              Comment

              • just a punk
                So fuckin' bored
                • Jun 2003
                • 32385

                #8
                Originally posted by wehateporn
                Haven't you been to school? Virus is just a simple DNA/RNA chain in a shell. It's not something alive (every live organism has at least one cell). Virus has no cells, it's like a program code.
                Obey the Cowgod

                Comment

                • wehateporn
                  Promoting Debate on GFY
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 27176

                  #9
                  Originally posted by CyberSEO
                  Haven't you been to school? Virus is just a simple DNA/RNA chain in a shell. It's not something alive (every live organism has at least one cell). Virus has no cells, it's like a program code.
                  In high-school they teach the very basics and oversimplify science, it's easier to teach kids that way. People like to put things into tidy categories, yet nature almost never fits into them. Putting things into categories can be useful at times, but we have to remember that the categories are usually artificial and should not get in the way of understanding the diversity out there.

                  http://serc.carleton.edu/microbelife...viruslive.html

                  "Viruses straddle the definition of life. They lie somewhere between supra molecular complexes and very simple biological entities. Viruses contain some of the structures and exhibit some of the activities that are common to organic life, but they are missing many of the others. In general, viruses are entirely composed of a single strand of genetic information encased within a protein capsule. Viruses lack most of the internal structure and machinery which characterize 'life', including the biosynthetic machinery that is necessary for reproduction. In order for a virus to replicate it must infect a suitable host cell".

                  Comment

                  • XXXBizXXX
                    Confirmed User
                    • Sep 2014
                    • 405

                    #10
                    viruses ARE NOT alive. that's why Antibiotics are not gonna KILL them. EVER
                    CLICKADU PAYS YOU BIG! average CPM: 2.1$ - 5.2$ Make More $$$

                    Comment

                    • wehateporn
                      Promoting Debate on GFY
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 27176

                      #11
                      Originally posted by XXXBizXXX
                      viruses ARE NOT alive. that's why Antibiotics are not gonna KILL them. EVER
                      You are right that antibiotics won't kill viruses, but your reasoning is incorrect, if we follow your logic then antibiotics would kill fungi, but they don't

                      Comment

                      • just a punk
                        So fuckin' bored
                        • Jun 2003
                        • 32385

                        #12
                        Do viruses eat? Do they grow? Can they give birth? No they can't. That's why they are not live organisms. They just simple chains of nucleic acid molecules. I really don't understand what exactly you are trying to prove here.
                        Obey the Cowgod

                        Comment

                        • arock10
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2006
                          • 6217

                          #13
                          he is trying to prove he is an idiot as usual


                          but my guess it has something to do with his tagline... "Aiming for 20,000 Posts"
                          Sup

                          Comment

                          • PR_Glen
                            Confirmed User
                            • Oct 2006
                            • 9058

                            #14
                            The thread title is a lie and he proved it himself. Not only did the WHO not say that, his kook website article didn't even say that. It was written by a random journalist not a doctor of anything.

                            this piece of shit needs to be banned...
                            webmaster at pimproll dot com

                            Comment

                            • NewNick
                              Confirmed User
                              • Mar 2009
                              • 7230

                              #15
                              Who gives a shit, you cure Ebola with Orange Juice.

                              Right wehateporn ?
                              "Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
                              “There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
                              “a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com

                              Comment

                              • PAR
                                Confirmed User
                                • May 2005
                                • 1835

                                #16
                                Welcome to grade 5 biology:
                                To day we will learn about : The 7 Characteristics of Life...
                                http://infohost.nmt.edu/~klathrop/7c...cs_of_life.htm

                                Open your text books to page 73

                                Comment

                                • baddog
                                  So Fucking Banned
                                  • Apr 2001
                                  • 107089

                                  #17
                                  I wish WHP would catch Ebola

                                  Comment

                                  Working...