GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Everything You Know About Columbus Is a Calculated Lie (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1151919)

RyuLion 10-14-2014 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by American Psycho (Post 20252789)
None if us know shit about what transpired.

So , take ur best guess and move on.

:2 cents::2 cents:

dyna mo 10-14-2014 07:50 AM

the mistake with this sort of history of columbus is looking back 500 years with a modern view and attitude. the key to good history is to explore it with a sense of the time the event happened.

for instance, the modern view of rape is no where near the view on it from Spain in the 15th century. so to call Columbus a rapist is not necc. accurate.

slavery, conquest, gold, sex, all need to be fully understood OF THE TIME prior to taking slices of events like this and looking at them from a 2014 north american moral viewpoint.

CDSmith 10-14-2014 12:20 PM

You're all wrong. Aliens discovered N America 1,972 years before Columbus, and 512 years before those mythical native N Americans supposedly hit the Netherlands (presumably in their birchbark canoe)

I know this because the aliens that abducted me back in 1981 told me.

PR_Glen 10-14-2014 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by American Psycho (Post 20252789)
None if us know shit about what transpired.

So , take ur best guess and move on.

Most of us know the gist of it, but these winners are basically saying we should be telling our 7 year olds a history filled with rape, torture, slavery and genocide... you know? for accuracy sake...

They will be much better off in the end learning all the horrible sides of everything, it wont breed psychos and damaged individuals in the least..

dyna mo 10-14-2014 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith (Post 20253446)
You're all wrong. Aliens discovered N America 1,972 years before Columbus, and 512 years before those mythical native N Americans supposedly hit the Netherlands (presumably in their birchbark canoe)

I know this because the aliens that abducted me back in 1981 told me.

I didn't realize they could transfer all that info with an anal probing. :warning :winkwink:

_Richard_ 10-14-2014 12:49 PM

no native americans landed in holland, furthermore, the native americans picked up scalping from the europeans

PornDiscounts-V 10-14-2014 01:14 PM

Now I'm bummed.

dyna mo 10-14-2014 01:55 PM

since we're moving away from a romanticized history of Columbus, we should do the same re: American Indians.

Myth
Quote:

Many people believe that the first English to settle North America found an ancient, impenetrable wilderness stretching uninterrupted from the shores of the Atlantic to the banks of the Mississippi. The popular view of a pristine wilderness inhabited by American Indians who left no trace on the land is rooted in the Romantic notion of “the forest primeval” promoted by such poets as Henry Wadsworth Longfellow.

The Romantic view entered the early conservation movement through the writings of Henry David Thoreau and others (Williams 1999). It plays a strong role in today’s environmental movement (Brown 1999) and has even influenced the science of ecology (Whitney 1994).
the truth

Quote:

Native Americans significantly altered the local ecosystem by clearing and burning forests, probably to make fields and enhance the growth of nut trees, Springer said. It’s a picture that conflicts with the popular notion that early Native Americans had little impact on North American landscapes.

Early Native Americans caused more carbon dioxide emissions than previously thought—and they thus contributed to global warming even before the industrial era began, a new study suggests.

This long-ago land clearing would have impacted global climate, Springer added. Ongoing clearing and burning of the Amazon rainforest, for example, is one of the world’s largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions.

_Richard_ 10-14-2014 02:00 PM

the truth isn't popuhalar!

_Richard_ 10-14-2014 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 20253578)
the truth isn't popuhalar!

edit: popular!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

DWB 10-14-2014 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 20253469)
Most of us know the gist of it, but these winners are basically saying we should be telling our 7 year olds a history filled with rape, torture, slavery and genocide... you know? for accuracy sake...

Of course, it is part of history. If you're going to teach about a certain event or time in history, don't we have an obligation to tell them everything we know about it, the good and the bad?

People only leave out parts of a story, or re-write it completely, when they have an agenda.

420 10-14-2014 03:23 PM

Come on humans don't have agendas. They just want the kids to think of pleasant thoughts and take stimulants to calm them down.

dyna mo 10-14-2014 03:27 PM

the constraints are time and ability. There simply is not enough time in the day to teach kids everything, plus they are new to learning, they couldn't absorb that much information and they don't have the learning skills to process it properly either.

DWB 10-14-2014 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20253704)
the constraints are time and ability. There simply is not enough time in the day to teach kids everything, plus they are new to learning, they couldn't absorb that much information and they don't have the learning skills to process it properly either.

If someone is important enough to get a national holiday named after him, schools should find the time to tell his entire story.

I took history 5 days a week, 1 hour per day, for 8 years or so. Then in high school I took American history on top of that for 4 years, 5 days a week, 1 hour per day. Hardly anything bad was said about Columbus, the guy is a hero. However, they spent plenty of time teaching us about Mao, Hitler, Castro, and others, and where every single gun was fired during the Civil War, but the truth about Cristobal Colon somehow slipped by. Of course, you can learn about it in college if you go down that road, but it should be taught in every high school.

CaptainHowdy 10-14-2014 04:49 PM

Lies ... but they make great Ridley Scott movies:


dyna mo 10-14-2014 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 20253722)
If someone is important enough to get a national holiday named after him, schools should find the time to tell his entire story.

I took history 5 days a week, 1 hour per day, for 8 years or so. Then in high school I took American history on top of that for 4 years, 5 days a week, 1 hour per day. Hardly anything bad was said about Columbus, the guy is a hero. However, they spent plenty of time teaching us about Mao, Hitler, Castro, and others, and where every single gun was fired during the Civil War, but the truth about Cristobal Colon somehow slipped by. Of course, you can learn about it in college if you go down that road, but it should be taught in every high school.

I would tend to agree and my history classes added up to about the same as your's. But I don't know enough about education and how it works. Because several subjects are sanitized/simplified to facilitate learning. both math and science are great examples.

We don't learn calculus until we've fully learned algebra, but algebra doesn't apply to real world problems like calculus and such do, it's bullshit really, but we need it to teach our brains how to process math. Same with physics, every time I moved up a level in physics, the prof would start with saying "forget everything you've been taught about physics up until now." Same with chemistry, have to take inorganic chem before taking organic.

I'm not saying it's OK to romantize history

theking 10-14-2014 06:43 PM

There is no single truth when it comes to a historical event. There are multiple truths based upon different perspectives. Even eyewitness testimony to an event is not reliable as eyewitness testimony has been proven to be wrong time and time again. The best way to view any historical figure or event is to read as many books as you can find about any given figure or event and take a little from this book and a little from that book along with a grain of salt...scratch your head and wonder about what the real truth actually is/was.

ilnjscb 10-14-2014 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 20253873)
There is no single truth when it comes to a historical event. There are multiple truths based upon different perspectives. Even eyewitness testimony to an event is not reliable as eyewitness testimony has been proven to be wrong time and time again. The best way to view any historical figure or event is to read as many books as you can find about any given figure or event and take a little from this book and a little from that book along with a grain of salt...scratch your head and wonder about what the real truth actually is/was.

very very true

John-ACWM 10-15-2014 06:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 420 (Post 20252272)

:1orglaugh :thumbsup


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123