Yawnnnnnnnnnnn..

Recovery fund now 1,325

I'll donate too.

http://www.gofundme.com/ShannonRecover

Welcome to the police state. The new Amerika...enjoy your stay fucker!

The only good pig is a dead pig!

http://31.media.tumblr.com/9a8b51ec3...erzpo1_500.jpg

Actually you are an arrogant retard, that motorist did nothing wrong whatsoever. Citizens have rights, just because someone is a cop doesn't mean he can say or do whatever he wants and you just bend over.

You heard the man say 'I've heard the stories about SPB around here, I'm not getting out of the car so you can beat me'. The second he cooperated they got physical. How some of you fuckin baffoons can defend that is simply defending against your own rights.

And then also said i am not from this area lol

I dunno mate, but that just sounds a bit like the excuse they give out for the 'war on terrorism'. Are there 'xyz people' yes. Is everyone one? no. Are the majority one? no. Is it 50/50? no. Is it a minority? yes. But let's brainwash people into thinking we need to do 'insert policy here', 'because.....'.

Is there really any need for a copper to get shitty, condascending, lairy, and lose charge of their emotions, because some guy is being a jerk (or even if they aren't - I'm talking generally now, not just this specific incident)? People can justify/rationalise it all they want, that's what we do, but meh, why is it that people like me can't say 'ACAB' without being (rightly, if I'm honest lol) tarred as an idiot for tarring a whole group with one brush, but the coppers can treat every citizen like a piece of shit with their hi my name is bertie big bollocks, and you better be deferential because I have a uniform on, and I'm mad because my wife wouldn't blow me last night so I'm being a dick and stopping people to let off steam?

This is correct at least in my state of Indiana. every few years in our area someone will try to pull over females with a fake unmarked police car and there have been a half dozen rapes in just the last year in my area cause of this.. On the News they said that you are allowed to drive to a well lit area if being pulled over and if you are uneasy to call 911 before pulling over.

this is all I found with a quick google

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors...m#.U_2sbaNGiSo


with that being said the guy in the car was being a dick about it and was looking for a youtube video in the making with his attitude

Thats usually the case. People are stupid or looking for 15 minutes.

I met a white trash wigger neighbor a few years ago in south carolina who did these go fund mes all the time - said it was easy money and beats working. And the trend continues.

i noticed the guy in the screenshot was black and thought 'that's weird, the media doesn't yell racism at this' . Then i saw the video and the cop is black as well. So now no media mentions race. I think the media is dissapointed it wasnt a white cop so they could play the race card all over again for more views. Brassmonkey must be dissapointed as well.

The keyword their is to cooperate.

:thumbsup :2 cents:

Same here, his intent was to get the officer all pissed off before he was stopped, he was clearly seeking a reaction and had his phone filming.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

That's not true at all and it has nothing to do with 9/11 or anything in recent history. It's always been like this here and all of my life, i've been aware of the very different attitudes that Europeans (western) and Americans have towards authority and police. It's not something new here to know you absolutely do not argue with a police officer. People expect you to comply with the police officer. It's always been like that. Everyone knows exactly what happens when you don't... its always been like that. It's not about abuse of power as much as it is that everyone knows perfectly well that you don't argue with police here (or in most other countries in the world)... .you comply, you say "yes sir", "no sir" and ultimately end up going about your day. Thats why people don't rush to defend the guy.

These conversations are usually nothing more than arguing "i don't like authority figures" and have little to do with the facts. But as you can see, most people here think that someone told to stop, should stop. Thats what we want as a society. Thats what people expect. Thats what the law requires. As a whole, we don't want people arguing with cops. We want people respecting the law and the rules.

look at the sheep in this thread defending violent police:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You should read the post I made before you posted this.

:helpme

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nation...822-story.html

So, do you think the cop was right or wrong?

:1orglaugh

I find myself disappointed by the comments these days more than stunned. This kind of ignorance has run rapid on GFY and other places for years now so I'm ore or less used to it. :(

The "suspect" handled the situation very well and was WELL within his legal rights. The cop had absolutely no reason or right to act the way he did. He also had no reason or right to ask the guy to get out of his car. Just another "bully with a badge."

I hope he gets fired over this but that's not likely to happen. :disgust

He did not handle this within his legal rights. When you pull over you pull the fuck over, not drive to your apartment. When you are asked for your ID and insurance, you give them your ID and insurance. When you are told to exit the car, you exit the fucking.

NONE of this is open to discussion. Ever.

The first fifteen seconds of this episode became a felony crime when he refused to pull over.

Obviously I disagree and so does the U.S. Constitution. However, you've shown several times that you don't believe in that so there's no need for us to continue this discussion.

Thats what I was thinking before I saw your post.

It needs to be where they can't turn it off during a traffic stop.



If that happens, shit will change over night for the better.


Just Dave

Here in Vegas there is a public outcry for cops to wear uniform cameras.

And you would THINK that the cops would be all for that.

But HELL NO! They are fighting against it all the way. Funny how they don't want their actions recorded isn't it?

Looks like passive resistance to me.

Take your time when sirens go off and keeps driving to your residence.

Leisurely back into your parking space.

Crack your window only a bit not allowing the officer to see if you're armed.

If the stop would have been resolved in a peaceful way rest assured this guy would post the video on YouTube saying "That's how you handle the pig cops!"

That being said I had a fixit ticket recently. The cops pulled me over for a tail light out and took 45 minutes to "process" me, a block away from my house. I called the courthouse to see my options as the website is shit, no phone help because of budget cuts, so I gott GO TO THE COURTHOUSE, wait in line, etc. etc. Bullshit.

The U.S. Constitution does not disagree.

If you fail to pull over, it's called felony evasion. It's fucking felony. Every city has this law.

but he did pull over.

Cop lied in the police report. You only lie when you know your actions were in the wrong

He did not. He drove to his apartment and parked in his parking spot.

They just did this somewhere and they saw a 80 percent drop in complaints. I think it was Rialto, California. I first I thought "Well, cops must be on their best behavior now that they are being watched". Then I realized the complaints had dropped because in the past it was their word against the officer's, and now they caught red handed on video.

so he was involved in a pursuit?

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

man oh fucking man

When the police pull you over, you pull the fuck over. You don't drive two blocks to your apartment complex.

Was he involved in a pursuit? Yes. If police follow you for more than a block with it's lights on and through your apartment complex, yes, that's a pursuit.

Free OJ NOW

They are public appointed officials, to protect and serve. Period

Gotta love the armchair lawyers here. When the bubble gum machine lights up you do as you are told. Compliance, then a lawsuit is better than planning a funeral.
Ask Michael Brown's family. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Purpose

3-1. Code of Ethics: To insure that all peace officers are fully aware of their individual responsibilities to maintain their own integrity and that of their agency, every peace officer, during basic training, or at the time of appointment, shall be administered the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics, as prescribed in Regulation 1013.

Code of Ethics

3-2. AS A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safeguard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disorder; and to respect the Constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality and justice.

I WILL keep my private life unsullied as an example to all; maintain courageous calm in the face of danger, scorn, or ridicule; develop self-restraint; and be constantly mindful of the welfare of others. Honest in thought and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the laws of the land and the regulations of my department. Whatever I see or hear of a confidential nature or that is confided to me in my official capacity will be kept ever secret unless revelation is necessary in the performance of my duty.

I WILL never act officiously or permit personal feelings, prejudices, animosities or friendships to influence my decisions. With no compromise for crime and with relentless prosecution of criminals, I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or ill will, never employing unnecessary force or violence and never accepting gratuities.

I RECOGNIZE the badge of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am true to the ethics of the police service. I will constantly strive to achieve these objectives and ideals, dedicating myself before God1 to my chosen profession...law enforcement.


FOOTNOTE:
¹Reference to religious affirmation may be omitted where objected to by the officer.


https://www.post.ca.gov/commission-p...of-ethics.aspx

They mixed religion with ethics??? See the common thread???
Bat shit crazy the whole damn lot!

This also happened with fighting DUI's once dashboard cams became the norm. It used to he that cops would be challenged, attorneys would be making cops do field sobriety tests in the courtroom to show it's hard, they'd be arguing the driver was sober etc etc. that doesn't happen much because their actions, their stumbling around, their failng the test, all their arguing and shit talking, admitting to drinking etc is on video now.

You'd think everyone understands this simple concept
I was at a party the other day and this girl was bitching how her constitutional rights were violated when she got pulled over on Saturday night at police road block. Cops were checking everyone for insurance, tags and booze. She got popped for no insurance and DUI. I couldn't hold myself and asked her about my rights if she was to hit my car or kill me.
So many dumb people out there. Black, white or purple :2 cents:

Really? He said he turned on his hazards and drove the block and a half. How is that a felony?


http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors...m#.U_2sbaNGiSo


As I said before his attitude after he was pulled over was just asking for trouble but he did not try to evade the police

WOW, your good at making excuses for them, round of applause :1orglaugh