Unless the Fed's decide to step in and charge you Federally with the same thing you were just acquitted of on a state level.

True. Very true.

And let's not forget Civil Suits.

Good point and civilly you can lose with much less evidence being presented. So, you can be tried 3 times in the US for the same crime.

I just know from personal experience that when a serious legal matter is prolonged, the stress you and your family goes through multiplies.

So, it is understandable that she is upset - wether she is TRULY guilty or not. I don't care one way or the other.

What baffles me is the way people react to her, as if she has behaved like a thug in the manner of Zimmerman and O.J. since the original crime was committed. No arrests for drug possession. Not a single paparazzi shot of being a drunken slut. No TMZ moments with an intrusive cameraman or photog. No altercations in a nightclub. No accidental shotgun blasts to her lawyer's face during hunting season.

She won an appeal, was set free, wrote a book, did some interviews.

The press across the Pond must obsess about her the way our press obsesses over Royal Weddings.

Great story, it does not have much in the way of facts, lots of opinions...

What baffles you is that she is guilty for the second time.

Do you think she should go to jail for claiming her boss committed the murder and letting him sit in jail for 2 weeks?

.

Were you there during the interrogation?

Did you beat a confession out of her with your big black cock?

No one ever wrongfully implicates themselves or other people under duress during a police interrogation. It never happens, I tell you. Never.

* reaches for the aspirin *

I thought it was only politics but seems you are dumb in every conceivable way.

No, it's more like you're a blind idiot that didn't follow the case.

:2 cents:

You've got an excuse for everything and apparently have some sort of black cock envy complex.

:1orglaugh

50 years of prison for the two love birds.




.

You mean, the media . . . IS BIASED?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

I don't know who it belongs to but it doesn't seem to belong to Amanda Knox. None of the footprints tested positive for her DNA. If they were her foot prints, why weren't they in her room?

Other than the fact that Knox lived with the murder victim, there not one shred of evidence that leads me to believe she had anything to do with it.

http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/Luminol_Traces

http://themurderofmeredithkercher.co...fore_After.jpg


http://themurderofmeredithkercher.co...ndmixeddna.jpg

+this with bubble bath

Something is not right with that site....

They discovered seven footprints in the corridor between Meredith's bedroom where she was murdered and Amanda Knox's bedroom. No similar footprints were discovered anywhere else in the cottage. The three footprints in Knox's room yielded Knox's genetic profile and one of the footprints in the hallway contained both Amanda and Meredith's DNA.

Later on the same page says:

The footprints were also limited to the part of the corridor between Meredith and Amanda's room and were not found anywhere else in the cottage.


HUH?

On top of that, it seems these foot prints might not be blood at all.

http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/footprints-01.html

The footprints were never proven to be made in blood. The footprints were detected with luminol. As mentioned above, the stains were tested with tetramethylbenzidine which is extremely sensitive for blood. All of the stains detected with luminol tested negative for blood.

So now we aren't sure where the footprints are, and then when they tested them for blood they didn't find any?

Sorry, you got nothing. There is no evidence proving she did anything here.

You are hopelessly locked into trying to explaining away hard evidence with theories that defy common sense.

Those prints were cleaned up with bleach; but bleach doesn't remove all the properties of blood so the print is still lighting up even if you can't find a blood cell.

The footprints are blood by any reasonable analysis.

You are in a "belief state", this is your God and I can't make you see that it doesn't exist.


.

You just don't get it.

It was/is a murder trial, of which there are thousands every year in the U.S. that barely register a blip in the news.

The only thing making Amanda Knox newsworthy here in the U.S. is the sensationalistic journalism produced elsewhere that you seem to have swallowed a load of.

I was merely questioning what makes THIS one so special, THIS woman so despised?

Let us know when you come with a reasonable explanation.

I'm curious...do you think OJ killed two people?

Italy was obviously railroading this girl.

You're not curious; just a racist with a fake nick.

:2 cents:

lol, just what I thought. A useless troll who has nothing but insults and accusations to hurl when confronted with their own hypocrisy.

By not answering the question it's clear it's YOU who's the racist. So go fuck yourself halfwit.

Don't start a gunfight when you're brandishing a toothbrush.

You dug up a fake nick for this.

:1orglaugh

Only 800 posts in 10 years is called having a life. I'd suggest you look into it, but your personality makes it perfectly clear why you have to live online.

I think he is a sociopathic lunatic better off not free to roam the streets based on his post trial behavior, which is a convincing argument for the murders itself.

http://i.imgur.com/4PynE9i.jpg

Amanda Knox's recent death threat directed at Raffaele.

lol 'death threat'

I wouldn't rely on the Daily Mail for your facts. Fucking idiot.

Huh, where is the death threat?

I don't see a death threat either.

She does say she will defend herself and R will lose everything and he knows it.

I don't have a way to make someone in Italy lose everything if they accuse me of a crime.
So what does she have?
And how does R know what she has?

Translated : "If you accuse me, I will accuse you and win and you know why."


.

The fact that you figured out how to breath is a modern miracle. You should be probed, for science.

You should pull the probe and your head out of you ass.

You feeble minded fool.

You're so goddamned dumb that monkeys cry for you.

:1orglaugh

right next to where she's having all the hot sex!

I never cared or followed the story but recently read quite a bit about the strong evidence and testimony against her.

Guilty as Charged

That must be where all the drugs are too.

yep. horses, giraffes.. i have even heard they fucked, butchered, then ate an elephant before they did this woman in.

i can't seen to find any record of it.. but hey!

Oh, I thought you were talking about the porn star

Because she is pretty and everyone wants to see her locked up....

like trevon martin and oj simpson??? the press is biased???