Editor of Lancet "scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue."

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wehateporn
    Promoting Debate on GFY
    • Apr 2007
    • 27176

    #1

    Editor of Lancet "scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue."


    "The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, ?poor methods get results?."

    http://www.thelancet.com/journals/la...696-1/fulltext
  • MaDalton
    I am Amazing Content!
    • Feb 2004
    • 39865

    #2
    lol - says the one that says vaccination is bad based on one guy that fucked up because he got money for it.

    you are a very amusing person
    AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
    Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
    Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
    Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

    Comment

    • wehateporn
      Promoting Debate on GFY
      • Apr 2007
      • 27176

      #3
      Originally posted by MaDalton
      lol - says the one that says vaccination is bad based on one guy that fucked up because he got money for it.

      you are a very amusing person
      You obviously haven't checked out any of the extensive sources I've been providing, I won't give up on you just yet though

      Oh, by the way a CDC whistleblower has come forward and confirmed that the Autism link is being covered up, he was part of that cover-up, so Wakefield was right all along.













      Comment

      • CaptainHowdy
        Too lazy to set a custom title
        • Dec 2004
        • 94193

        #4
        Scientificism is a religion too ...

        Comment

        • MaDalton
          I am Amazing Content!
          • Feb 2004
          • 39865

          #5
          i look at billions of people that did not die thanks to vaccination over the last 100 years vs. a couple of weirdos with Youtube video proof and decide that listening to you would be like listening to an eunuch about his group sex experiences
          AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
          Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
          Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
          Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com

          Comment

          • takethebluepill
            So Fucking Banned
            • Dec 2014
            • 241

            #6
            Originally posted by MaDalton
            i look at billions of people that did not die thanks to vaccination over the last 100 years vs. a couple of weirdos with Youtube video proof and decide that listening to you would be like listening to an eunuch about his group sex experiences
            This sums it up quite nicely.

            Nothing else to see here. Move along...

            Comment

            • wehateporn
              Promoting Debate on GFY
              • Apr 2007
              • 27176

              #7
              Originally posted by MaDalton
              i look at billions of people that did not die thanks to vaccination over the last 100 years vs. a couple of weirdos with Youtube video proof and decide that listening to you would be like listening to an eunuch about his group sex experiences
              You assume vaccines save lives, you assume people didn't die or become disabled from vaccines, you also assume it's a couple of weirdos on YouTube. For you this is a religion, not a science

              Comment

              • wehateporn
                Promoting Debate on GFY
                • Apr 2007
                • 27176

                #8
                Originally posted by CaptainHowdy
                Scientificism is a religion too ...
                Spot on!

                Comment

                • wehateporn
                  Promoting Debate on GFY
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 27176

                  #9
                  Originally posted by takethebluepill
                  This sums it up quite nicely.

                  Nothing else to see here. Move along...
                  Only to those of the pro-vaccine religion

                  Comment

                  • takethebluepill
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Dec 2014
                    • 241

                    #10
                    If pro vaccine means being happy that I did not die of some hedious disease thanks to a vaccination, then yep....pro vaccine I am.

                    Comment

                    • wehateporn
                      Promoting Debate on GFY
                      • Apr 2007
                      • 27176

                      #11
                      Originally posted by takethebluepill
                      If pro vaccine means being happy that I did not die of some hedious diesese thanks to a vaccination, then yep....pro vaccine I am.
                      Which diseases do you fear?

                      Comment

                      • dyna mo
                        just a fucking jerk
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 68522

                        #12
                        hey, thanks for the heads-up that the federal government recently ended its flouride conspiracy

                        US lowers fluoride levels in drinking water for first time in over 50 years | Environment | The Guardian

                        Comment

                        • wehateporn
                          Promoting Debate on GFY
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 27176

                          #13
                          Originally posted by dyna mo
                          hey, thanks for the heads-up that the federal government recently ended its flouride conspiracy

                          US lowers fluoride levels in drinking water for first time in over 50 years | Environment | The Guardian
                          They need to remove it completely

                          Comment

                          • wehateporn
                            Promoting Debate on GFY
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 27176

                            #14

                            Comment

                            • dyna mo
                              just a fucking jerk
                              • Dec 2008
                              • 68522

                              #15
                              Originally posted by wehateporn
                              They need to remove it completely


                              Comment

                              • wehateporn
                                Promoting Debate on GFY
                                • Apr 2007
                                • 27176

                                #16
                                Originally posted by dyna mo
                                Yes, some progress, they knew they were losing so they offered a compromise, hoping that the public wouldn't still demand for the complete removal of the toxin

                                Comment

                                • MiamiBoyz
                                  fgfdftre6
                                  • Oct 2012
                                  • 6688

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by wehateporn
                                  "The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, ?poor methods get results?."

                                  http://www.thelancet.com/journals/la...696-1/fulltext
                                  FUCK HIM

                                  Comment

                                  • Barry-xlovecam
                                    It's 42
                                    • Jun 2010
                                    • 18083

                                    #18
                                    97% of YouTube CT videos are total horseshit.

                                    If you don't want fluoride in your water get an under the kitchen sink reverse-osmosis unit -- $300 -$500 -- that will remove 97% of the fluorides in the water.

                                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qr2bSL5VQgM

                                    Comment

                                    • PR_Glen
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Oct 2006
                                      • 9058

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
                                      97% of YouTube CT videos are total horseshit.

                                      If you don't want fluoride in your water get an under the kitchen sink reverse-osmosis unit -- $300 -$500 -- that will remove 97% of the fluorides in the water.
                                      why bother? its in just about every single product we consume regardless...

                                      harmless
                                      webmaster at pimproll dot com

                                      Comment

                                      • wehateporn
                                        Promoting Debate on GFY
                                        • Apr 2007
                                        • 27176

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by PR_Glen
                                        why bother? its in just about every single product we consume regardless...
                                        Depends where you live, in the Europe most drinking water is not Fluoridated.

                                        Even in your situation you should be thinking about the future generations, your children and grandchildren, just because you have been poisoned doesn't mean they should be too.

                                        Comment

                                        • Barry-xlovecam
                                          It's 42
                                          • Jun 2010
                                          • 18083

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by PR_Glen
                                          why bother? its in just about every single product we consume regardless...

                                          harmless
                                          I have my own water well so it's to remove trace elements and sodium from the water softer. It's used for making coffee, tea, cooking and drinking water.

                                          I am more concerned about trace arsenic and other heavy elements.

                                          There probably is trace fluoride in most processed foods.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...