Let him help you then. I didn't realize you were that challenged:

Because if you feel so strongly about your opinion that you have to voice it out everyday, then you should have the balls to reveal yourself.

That's an opinion, a value maybe, but most certainly not a strong argument. A simple "no you shouldn't" is enough to refute it.

So, again:

Why, if you feel so strongly about your opinion that you have to voice it out everyday, should you have the balls to reveal yourself?

Good job Sherlock! Of course it's an opinion! You asked "why" about my previous opinion so I answered back with an opinion. Am I missing something here?? lol

It's ok dude. Read my opinion over, study it, and you'll see the "why" in my opinion. I'm not going to sit around an explain to a little kid something that's so obvious.

Are you expecting some legal reason? Some Internet standard?

I don't understand what you're asking. Many of us have already told you "why". Of course those are our opinions. We think someone who doesn't have the balls to reveal themselves while making hurtful comments is a pussy. Just like a schoolyard bully. A pussy.

If someone wishes to go on and write nasty anonymous letters, or maybe stalk the neighbor girl, or look at someone funny. Fine, so be it, you aren't going to change anyones opinions of why this person would be a pussy.

You have seen our "why". We have seen your "why". What's left to talk about? Bottom line, it's a difference of personal opinions and personal ethics.

You state something, I ask why that would be the case, you fail to supply any arguments whatsoever for your statement, but rather resort to derogatory remarks and evading the question.

So, in short, you have no arguments.

I am expecting argumentation supporting the statement. Even personal ethics should require thought.

Example:


Statement:
"If you beat up random innocent people, you're an asshole"

Arguments/proof:
If you beat up random innocent people, you are hurting people for your own gratification.
Hurting people for your own gratification is generally considered contemptable.
Someone who displays contemptable behaviour is referred to as an "asshole" in common (vulgar) English.

http://www.unc.edu/courses/jomc050/idog.jpg

Caption: On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog.

His wife was American from what he says.

How can anyone take the guy seriously or take anything he says as something other than jealousy or bitterness over the fact he needs us at this point?