![]() |
Quote:
Mitch |
Quote:
Hey Markul, how about you go suck on a tube :321GFY . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nice try, but still not an answer. Fraudulent transactions are a part of all websites that use Visa or MC, so why are adult sites targeted with higher rates and an annual fee? Go get an account to sell baseballs at Pay Pal at be charged 3% with NO annual fee, but sell adult content and the processors ring the dinner bell at 14.5% with an annual fee. The bank's problems are not the webmaster's problems. Why are we being charged to cover the bank's ass on fraud charges? We already pay the fees for the charge back and the money is sent back to the bank. The bank doesn't lose any money on a charge backs because the webmaster pays for the fees. Money is reversed electronically and the bank MAKES A FEE from the webmaster. The processor is a simple bookie, making bank on the charge if it goes thru or is charge backed. We don't even know the charge back fee amount?? The bank is probably charging $1.00 and CCbill jacks that up to 1/2 the charge amount, so CCBill makes money regardless. Zombaio charges 1/2 for a charge back. So tell me this, if the charge is $ 20.00, you pay that back plus $ 10. BUT, if the charge is $ 30, you lose $ 15, plus the $ 30. If it is the same amount of work to process a charge back, why should the processor get a bonus if the amount is higher? Shouldn't it be a flat rate, "Charge back fee is $ xx.00 ?? But no, because it's a money fuck and it's all set up to make as much money as they can on any type of charge or charge back. It's all one big fucking money scam and webmasters pay for it all. That is how it's set up. Banks and processors don't lose a fucking penny. It's all set up to make money on any type of transaction made. You keep singing the "higher risk" song, but again WHAT IS THE RISK? There is no risk, it's a term shoved down adult webmaster's throats to extort millions of fees that are not justified and should be against the law. High risk. I laugh at that term. The risk is IDENTICAL for a website selling baseballs.... but a guy selling baseballs online would NEVER pay an annual fee or believe in the term "high risk" ...but adult webmasters are morons thinking it's a legit charge and 'have to pay it" because, it's the cost of doing business. OOOOHHH.. ADULT CONTENT IS SCARY AND HIGH RISK... OOOOH MY... GOTTA PAY A HIGHER FEE TO SELL IT. And the first webmaster that agreed, started a chain reaction. We let them get away with it so it is our dam fault. 14.5% and $ 1250 a year. MY GOD PEOPLE WAKE THE FUCK UP. CCbill and the other adult processors are all fucking us royally in the ass for years, and we let them!!! |
I'm not saying what this NewOldPlayer guy is saying is right since I have not worked in banking for a good while and in those days VC/MC use to shake things up quite often. However, risk always use to be determined by the percentage charged.
Example, a flower shop that took sales over the phone would have an agreement that had them pay 3.5% per sale (plus a transaction fee) while a jewellery store that only dealt with cardholder present transactions 1.5% (plus a transaction fee). My point is, VC/MC never determined the risk factor of merchants; they had guidelines but the ultimate decision on risk fell on the acquiring bank. If, and this is a big if, things still work the same, an IPSP will get a quote from their acquiring bank; let's say it is 6%. The IPSP then factors in their own costs and profit margins and come up with a figure of say 14.5% which is what they charge their end users. Their acquiring bank should already have risk factored into the percentage and while I pay the VC/MC fees to 3 different processors and put it down as a cost of doing business, I am not totally convinced that this is a charge for being "high risk" as most people are pointing out. |
Quote:
reliable!!! I wish there is more billing companies like them.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Have a read of this: http://usa.visa.com/download/merchan...Guide_2010.pdf Quote:
Quote:
https://usa.visa.com/download/mercha...-merchants.pdf then read the merchant's guide to risk management https://usa.visa.com/download/mercha..._ecommerce.pdf Nobody is making these fees up, in fact I would hazard a guess that at times through the dispute resolution process that companies like CCBill don't pass on the full economic cost of what they do. Remember there is manual work involved here that people on all sides of the equation often have to process through their various systems. If you were charged for the true economic cost of every dispute it would likely exceed the chargeback fee. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Nobody is forcing you to use a PSP, you can go get your own merchant account and acquirer relationship if you want to. I suspect that it's probably not worthwhile to do so if you're worried about a few yearly fees though. |
Quote:
|
Ok, but WHAT IS THE RISK???
Everybody keeps saying the same thing... "it falls in a risk category" and "it's more riskier than selling baseballs" and "risk requires a higher rating." I get it, but I'm still waiting for somebody to explain to me, WHAT is the RISK?? Why is it riskier to by an adult site VS. buying a baseball?? I would think the baseball is riskier because it relies on more steps, ie; shipping and receiving. So many things could go wrong, I would consider buying a baseball much more riskier than buying an adult site. With the adult site, you get the product instantly and the transaction is complete. So where is the risk? Can somebody explain this to me? Thank you. I feel that everybody has been brainwashed over the years and programmed to believe their content is "high risk" so we just take the term and the higher rate as normal. But thru the years hasn't anybody asked, "what is the risk?" and gotten a real answer other than, "oh, it's high risk because it's adult content." Yeah, So?? WHERE AND WHAT IS THE FUCKING RISK?? |
Quote:
Sorry you cannot wrap your head around that. There is the entire story. If next week Visa says selling Bibles is high risk, it is. |
Quote:
There is no risk. Just because Visa and Mastercard "say" there is risk, doesn't mean there is risk. The entire premise for 'adult billing' is based purely on greed, deception and theft. If Visa and MC can't define "why' adult content is legally labeled risk, I think it's time to get a lawyer and sue them. These fucking credit card processors in adult are the lowest scum sucking online thieves ever. 14.5%, Rolling reserves and annual fees? Why do you and I put up with it? The rest of the free market gets hit with 3% and that's it. We have fucked ourselves by putting up with this all these years. Something has to be done. Doesn't anybody know a lawyer that knows credit consumer law and wants to sue these bastards? Or is everybody so used to sucking CCBill's cock and getting fucked by Epoch and all the rest that fighting Big Brother is a pointless thought? It would be an awesome and amazing lawsuit to sue thieves in a class action lawsuit and regain all of the money that was stolen from us thru the years. Just because they are getting away with it doesn't make it legal. |
Quote:
You cry about what should and shouldn't be. Successful people focus on what is and use that to their advantage. Piriod. |
Quote:
|
What I think sucks the most for adult site owners is that we are being flagged as taxpayers by Visa as high risk now and that information is being reported to the IRS. We have a special MORAL designation that, for honest business people offering good products, should never ever be attached to our federal identities. With Operation Choke Point and the FBI and IRS and banks working together to target people it's baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad. Or am I just being paranoid?
Really it's the big fuckers in this industry who've scammed customers with pre-checked cross-sales and total thievery and shady tactics who have gotten all of us painted with a brush of dishonesty / "high risk". And the totally ignorant puritanical anti-sex media-illiterate hysterical masses going along with all of the brainwashing telling us we need our sex lives and thoughts regulated. It's sad that small site owners trying to create unique content that they love have to pay as much as corporate porn sites for this high risk designation. $1000 *is* a lot to indies -- too much for it to be worth it in many cases -- and as those folks go out of business and only mainstream cookie cutter porn survives it's now most people's only concept of what porn is/can be, and everybody thinks all of us pornographers are teaching the world that sex must include chargling and butt-ramming and forty-five minutes of desensitized balls-deep boredom. |
Quote:
1. The card is not present when the transaction is made. 2. The card is processed over the Internet and stored for rebilling by the PSP 3. The MCC is one that has been shown over time to produce more fraud and abuse than other MCC's 4. The MCC is one that plays a greater than average chance in causing a card holder to default on the credit card. 5. A PSP is processing the transaction on behalf of a seller who is not a merchant. These factors combined place certain business categories in a higher risk group. Quote:
Quote:
Selling baseballs via telemarketing would definitely place you in high risk. Quote:
Quote:
I am sure you have not read the Visa guides I linked to in my previous post or you would already begin to have some understanding of the issues involved. Quote:
Telemarketing is also high risk, selling toasters or fry pans or steak knives. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Then we will continue this debate. |
Quote:
What 3rd party processors do is up to them, some pass along the fees, some eat them, mayb e some mark them up, dunno. But I am probably wrong, I only have 17 years and hundreds of adult merchant accounts to get my information from. |
Quote:
Amen to your point about how these developments have made the field less diverse and more cookie cutter and that is not a good thing. Do you have a link for the IRS/bank/Visa thing? Doesn't the IRS just expect everyone to render unto Caesar? |
Quote:
|
I am still waiting for someone to post that the solution is Bitcoin :)
|
Quote:
We are direct to CC Bill and can get you down to 10% instead of 14%. Additionally what we would do is offer you additional MIDs priced at 7%. We would use CC Bill to vette all new customers because they don't charge for chargebacks and then funnel them to the accounts at 7% after they have been screened. We can easily do this buy creating a customized solution for you at the gateway. Funding is 2-3 days but after a couple of months we can get you to next day funding. Let me know if this is of interest to you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1145606 Cool, but let me look... I still see Visa/Mastercard sales happening. |
This fee can sometimes be negotiated down or even removed. If your provider can't or won't remove the fee, they may let you pay it monthly. Call your rep at and ask what the options are.
|
|
I work for a merchant processor and if you want to talk about a merchant account with good rates and stable contact me. We specialize in high risk accounts like adult sites. Email is [email protected] or Skype DanielKnapp179. We can negotiate the annual fee.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123