Why VPS is faster than DEDICATED?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RummyBoy
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2009
    • 2157

    #1

    Why VPS is faster than DEDICATED?

    Here's the server issue:

    I'm comparing loading times for two IDENTICAL html sites with no dynamic content. I took score 10 times and then took average of the speeds. This is the result:

    (A) Site on DEDICATED in Canada:

    From New York - 174 ms
    From Texas - 685 ms
    From Amsterdam - 1.04 second

    (B) Site on VPS in USA:

    From New York - 130 ms
    From Texas - 432 ms
    From Amsterdam - 1 second

    So my questions:

    (1) Why is (A) slower than (B) - it cannot just be geographic distance from the server can it?

    (2) What is the best way to optimize servers for getting increase in response time?

    (3) Can anyone suggest an awesome dedicated server provider with rates as competitive as iweb.com ?
  • martinsc
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jun 2005
    • 27047

    #2
    if the pages have static content and are identical, i'd look not into the server's performance but into the network configurations, routing and net connectivity...

    tracert both servers and comapre the hops....
    Make Money

    Comment

    • blazin
      Confirmed User
      • Aug 2002
      • 2781

      #3
      1) Yes. Latency will influence your tests.

      2) Tons of ways to do that. Check Pingdom and get your site speed score for options.. You could try using a CDN to deliver your content closer to your user given your current metric.

      3) Sorry. I can not recommend anyone for adult.
      I don't endorse a god damn thing......

      Comment

      • Emil
        Confirmed User
        • Feb 2007
        • 5658

        #4
        1: Yes it can since it's ms.
        Free 🅑🅘🅣🅒🅞🅘🅝🅢 Every Hour (Yes, really. Free ₿itCoins.)
        (Signup with ONLY your Email and Password. You can also refer people and get even more.)

        Comment

        • martinsc
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jun 2005
          • 27047

          #5
          As for a great host I can recommend Certified Hosting.
          Great host, great prices
          Make Money

          Comment

          • RummyBoy
            Confirmed User
            • Dec 2009
            • 2157

            #6
            If youre running other things on server, it will slow down the DEDICATED right?

            So also, what about the UNIX operating system?
            Is CENTos slower than others?
            Is one UNIX better for delivering pages Faster?

            My DEDICATED is:

            Intel Core2 Quad 2.66 GHZ
            5 GB Ram
            3 x 400 GB HD
            3000 GB Band
            100 MBPs Port Speed
            Runs CENTos
            Cost: $100/mo

            Is there something I could do to really speed it up?

            Would something like this be better:

            Intel® Core™ i3-540
            3.06GHz H/T
            8GB
            2 × 1000GB SW
            20TB

            Does 3GB extra ram make a big difference?
            Last edited by RummyBoy; 05-10-2014, 02:32 AM.

            Comment

            • fris
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Aug 2002
              • 55679

              #7
              dedicated should be faster since you arent sharing resources with other people.
              Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.

              Comment

              • PornDiscounts-V
                Confirmed User
                • Oct 2003
                • 5744

                #8
                This is do to distance.

                Your VPS is not bogged down. You can try using cloudflare and having it cached.
                Blog Posts - Contextual Links - Hardlinks on 600+ Blog Network
                * Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net

                Comment

                • AndrewX
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 574

                  #9
                  Provider A is slower than provider B. Provider B has better bandwidth.

                  Just spend a little more and go for a provider with a faster network, $100 for a server like that one is extremely cheap and it is logical it will perform much worse because most likely the network is oversold.

                  CentOS is a form of Linux, so is Debian. Linux is again based on Unix, real Unix does not really exist anymore in its original form. CentOS or Debian? I can tell you which one is best, but first you must tell me which car is best, which song is best and which color is best. It's just an opinion.

                  Oh by the way, the dedicated server with 3 drives will outperform the VPS any day once you start using PHP and MySQL. Try a benchmark test, if it takes you dedicated server to crunch a fully loaded Wordpress site in lets say 1 second, and deliver it over the network in 800ms, it is still faster than your VPS which would be chewing it for lets say 3 seconds, and deliver it in 500ms.
                  Last edited by AndrewX; 05-10-2014, 07:40 AM.

                  █ ► XenLayer - Paravirtualization Professionals since 2008 - [ICQ: 297820698]
                  █ ► Reseller Hosting | OpenVZ VPS | XEN VPS | Dedicated Servers

                  Comment

                  • FINESEC
                    Registered User
                    • Nov 2012
                    • 59

                    #10
                    VPS is typically a dedicated server running some kind of virtualization e.g. XEN, OpenVZ, Vmware so that you're sharing resources (HDD, CPU, RAM, connection) with others. Some providers do oversellling in which case one dedicated server runs hundreds of virtual servers (VPS), but if you're lucky you can get a decent VPS which is not overloaded.

                    For static content, page loading time usually depends on connection latency of your server (assuming connection / hdds are not overloaded). Since all users will not have the same routing to your server, it may seem slow for one person but fast for another. You can check latency of your server from various locations here: http://lg.he.net/ (select ping, lower ping = better).

                    It's hard to say what kind of hardware you need without knowing what kind of software you're using (apache, nginx, mysql, some 3rd party soft maybe?) or how many clients you have.

                    Any professional hosting should be good for hosting adult content if you choose a dedicated server option (just check TOS to be sure). I can recommend OVH, leaseweb.
                    Last edited by FINESEC; 05-10-2014, 07:40 AM.
                    http://SiteDefensor.com - secure authentication, password cracking and sharing prevention, site ripping protection
                    http://SiteCaptcha.com - free, secure and simple CAPTCHA solution

                    Comment

                    • RummyBoy
                      Confirmed User
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 2157

                      #11
                      Originally posted by AndrewX
                      Provider A is slower than provider B. Provider B has better bandwidth.
                      Provider (A) is of the biggest provider in Canada which is another reason why im wondering....
                      Last edited by RummyBoy; 05-10-2014, 08:12 AM.

                      Comment

                      • AndrewX
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jan 2004
                        • 574

                        #12
                        Originally posted by RummyBoy
                        Provider (A) is of the biggest provider in Canada which is another reason why im wondering....
                        Not saying iweb is a bad provider, but hosts like that focus more on quantity, less on quality. Lots of cheap sales, bigger server farms per admin. iWeb has low prices, but enough money for advertising. Makes you wonder where they cut the corners.

                        Edit: I wouldn't worry about it too much. The difference in latency is minimal. Low ping is important for gameservers. Waiting for 0.02 seconds longer for an established connection can be neglected. As long as the network is stable and there aren't huge swings in latency.
                        Last edited by AndrewX; 05-10-2014, 09:25 AM.

                        █ ► XenLayer - Paravirtualization Professionals since 2008 - [ICQ: 297820698]
                        █ ► Reseller Hosting | OpenVZ VPS | XEN VPS | Dedicated Servers

                        Comment

                        • facialfreak
                          Confirmed User
                          • Feb 2005
                          • 3018

                          #13
                          Our VPS are generally much faster than a lot of dedicated servers, and it has really nothing to do with bandwidth ...

                          Most of our dedicated servers are configured with RAID1, RAID0, or Linux software RAID ... but ALL of our VPS offerings use a 6-disk RAID10 redundancy ... so the disk I/O on the VPS is at least 300-500% better than a dedicated server with common 2-disk configurations.

                          With the shift in recent technologies, we have had many clients previously on a dedicated server, make the switch to a well-appointed VPS. And with Google giving the most love to sites that load quickest nowdays, you want as high an I/O rate as you can get!

                          Most of our clients who choose to stay on dedicated machines, are either A) old-school webmasters who still believe that VPS is only a bridge from shared hosting to dedicated -- or B) running scripts that require unconventional server configurations that cannot be setup on shared hardwares.

                          A large site utilizing a CDN setup, is also a series cluster server setups - similar to VPS.

                          That being said, yes you will in some cases see a much better speed with a VPS than you will with many dedicated servers, and it has really very little to do with the bandwidth.

                          Virtualization has improved so much in the past 5 years, that I have even unfortunately seen some "Dedicated Server" companies sell 'virtualized dedicated environments' as dedicated servers -- as they tend to be much more cost effective when you share the hardware with multiple users -- and 90% of webmasters will never know the difference or be any the wiser.
                          Last edited by facialfreak; 05-12-2014, 12:43 AM.

                          Managed Shared Hosting starting at $4.99/mo
                          Managed VPS starting at $29.99/mo


                          Comment

                          • Denny
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 17393

                            #14
                            Originally posted by facialfreak
                            Our VPS are generally much faster than a lot of dedicated servers, and it has really nothing to do with bandwidth ...

                            Most of our dedicated servers are configured with RAID1, RAID0, or Linux software RAID ... but ALL of our VPS offerings use a 6-disk RAID10 redundancy ... so the disk I/O on the VPS is at least 300-500% better than a dedicated server with common 2-disk configurations.

                            With the shift in recent technologies, we have had many clients previously on a dedicated server, make the switch to a well-appointed VPS. And with Google giving the most love to sites that load quickest nowdays, you want as high an I/O rate as you can get!

                            Most of our clients who choose to stay on dedicated machines, are either A) old-school webmasters who still believe that VPS is only a bridge from shared hosting to dedicated -- or B) running scripts that require unconventional server configurations that cannot be setup on shared hardwares.

                            A large site utilizing a CDN setup, is also a series cluster server setups - similar to VPS.

                            That being said, yes you will in some cases see a much better speed with a VPS than you will with many dedicated servers, and it has really very little to do with the bandwidth.

                            Virtualization has improved so much in the past 5 years, that I have even unfortunately seen some "Dedicated Server" companies sell 'virtualized dedicated environments' as dedicated servers -- as they tend to be much more cost effective when you share the hardware with multiple users -- and 90% of webmasters will never know the difference or be any the wiser.

                            Comment

                            • TurboAngel
                              H.B.I.C.
                              • Jun 2003
                              • 30122

                              #15
                              If you want great support go with NatNet for dedicated server.

                              Comment

                              • seeandsee
                                Check SIG!
                                • Mar 2006
                                • 50945

                                #16
                                check pings from same location distance for start, it could be latency from god knows what reason
                                BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

                                Contact here

                                Comment

                                • HomerSimpson
                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                  • Sep 2005
                                  • 13826

                                  #17
                                  tried just-ping.com
                                  Make a bank with Chaturbate - the best selling webcam program
                                  Ads that can't be block with AdBlockers !!! /// Best paying popup program (Bitcoin payouts) !!!

                                  PHP, MySql, Smarty, CodeIgniter, Laravel, WordPress, NATS... fixing stuff, server migrations & optimizations... My ICQ: 27429884 | Email:

                                  Comment

                                  • AndrewX
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • Jan 2004
                                    • 574

                                    #18
                                    Disk i/o rises somewhat incrementially with the amount of containers per master node. You can check your I/O wait percentage via top (CPU % wait is your I/O load). Try this command, it should give you a result similar to this one:

                                    [root@master ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
                                    16384+0 records in
                                    16384+0 records out
                                    1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 34.3023 s, 31.3 MB/s

                                    Anything below 20MB/s is very unusual. FYI, RAID1 mirrors contents over 2 drives. 2x 250 GB makes 250 GB mirrored on 2 drives, which has faster read speads but obviously the same write speed. 2x RAID0 makes 500 GB and different parts of data are written accross the 2 drives simultaneously. It has faster read AND write speeds, with double the risk of a drive crash. RAID5 does not have that problem due to added parity but requires 3 drives.

                                    So make sure your server has the right RAID configuration, and obviously hardware RAID is better than software, make sure which one you have so the benefit of your 3 drive server is not wasted.
                                    Last edited by AndrewX; 05-12-2014, 07:56 AM.

                                    █ ► XenLayer - Paravirtualization Professionals since 2008 - [ICQ: 297820698]
                                    █ ► Reseller Hosting | OpenVZ VPS | XEN VPS | Dedicated Servers

                                    Comment

                                    • EddyTheDog
                                      Just Doing My Own Thing
                                      • Jan 2011
                                      • 25433

                                      #19
                                      https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/service - Is a pretty good service that is similar to CloudFlare - At the moment it is free but they have said they will charge in the future...

                                      Comment

                                      • FINESEC
                                        Registered User
                                        • Nov 2012
                                        • 59

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by facialfreak
                                        Our VPS are generally much faster than a lot of dedicated servers, and it has really nothing to do with bandwidth ...

                                        Most of our dedicated servers are configured with RAID1, RAID0, or Linux software RAID ... but ALL of our VPS offerings use a 6-disk RAID10 redundancy ... so the disk I/O on the VPS is at least 300-500% better than a dedicated server with common 2-disk configurations.

                                        With the shift in recent technologies, we have had many clients previously on a dedicated server, make the switch to a well-appointed VPS. And with Google giving the most love to sites that load quickest nowdays, you want as high an I/O rate as you can get!

                                        Most of our clients who choose to stay on dedicated machines, are either A) old-school webmasters who still believe that VPS is only a bridge from shared hosting to dedicated -- or B) running scripts that require unconventional server configurations that cannot be setup on shared hardwares.

                                        A large site utilizing a CDN setup, is also a series cluster server setups - similar to VPS.

                                        That being said, yes you will in some cases see a much better speed with a VPS than you will with many dedicated servers, and it has really very little to do with the bandwidth.

                                        Virtualization has improved so much in the past 5 years, that I have even unfortunately seen some "Dedicated Server" companies sell 'virtualized dedicated environments' as dedicated servers -- as they tend to be much more cost effective when you share the hardware with multiple users -- and 90% of webmasters will never know the difference or be any the wiser.
                                        While reading some ads about VPS you can get an impression that VPS is so great that running a virtual machine inside a virtual machine inside a virtual machine ... gives you a perpetual motion ;-)
                                        http://SiteDefensor.com - secure authentication, password cracking and sharing prevention, site ripping protection
                                        http://SiteCaptcha.com - free, secure and simple CAPTCHA solution

                                        Comment

                                        • sandman!
                                          Icq: 14420613
                                          • Mar 2001
                                          • 15431

                                          #21
                                          there are still plenty of Unix-like systems dumbass.



                                          Originally posted by AndrewX
                                          Provider A is slower than provider B. Provider B has better bandwidth.

                                          Just spend a little more and go for a provider with a faster network, $100 for a server like that one is extremely cheap and it is logical it will perform much worse because most likely the network is oversold.

                                          CentOS is a form of Linux, so is Debian. Linux is again based on Unix, real Unix does not really exist anymore in its original form. CentOS or Debian? I can tell you which one is best, but first you must tell me which car is best, which song is best and which color is best. It's just an opinion.

                                          Oh by the way, the dedicated server with 3 drives will outperform the VPS any day once you start using PHP and MySQL. Try a benchmark test, if it takes you dedicated server to crunch a fully loaded Wordpress site in lets say 1 second, and deliver it over the network in 800ms, it is still faster than your VPS which would be chewing it for lets say 3 seconds, and deliver it in 500ms.
                                          Need WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]

                                          Comment

                                          • sandman!
                                            Icq: 14420613
                                            • Mar 2001
                                            • 15431

                                            #22
                                            either the dedicated server is miss configured or the network sucks.


                                            Originally posted by RummyBoy
                                            Here's the server issue:

                                            I'm comparing loading times for two IDENTICAL html sites with no dynamic content. I took score 10 times and then took average of the speeds. This is the result:

                                            (A) Site on DEDICATED in Canada:

                                            From New York - 174 ms
                                            From Texas - 685 ms
                                            From Amsterdam - 1.04 second

                                            (B) Site on VPS in USA:

                                            From New York - 130 ms
                                            From Texas - 432 ms
                                            From Amsterdam - 1 second

                                            So my questions:

                                            (1) Why is (A) slower than (B) - it cannot just be geographic distance from the server can it?

                                            (2) What is the best way to optimize servers for getting increase in response time?

                                            (3) Can anyone suggest an awesome dedicated server provider with rates as competitive as iweb.com ?
                                            Need WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]

                                            Comment

                                            • AndrewX
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Jan 2004
                                              • 574

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by sandman!
                                              there are still plenty of Unix-like systems dumbass.
                                              Care to explain? BSD is dead and MacOS is tablet software. Even Android is based on Linux.

                                              Last edited by AndrewX; 05-12-2014, 03:52 PM.

                                              █ ► XenLayer - Paravirtualization Professionals since 2008 - [ICQ: 297820698]
                                              █ ► Reseller Hosting | OpenVZ VPS | XEN VPS | Dedicated Servers

                                              Comment

                                              • lonerunner
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Nov 2010
                                                • 305

                                                #24
                                                also no one mentioned if you have ssd on your machine it will respond faster and perform faster in some situations, specially when its on vps.
                                                Premium wordpress themes VividThemes

                                                Comment

                                                • sandman!
                                                  Icq: 14420613
                                                  • Mar 2001
                                                  • 15431

                                                  #25
                                                  BSD is not dead besides being used on servers its use for the ps4, tv's and other devices.

                                                  IBM sells more unix systems in a year then your shitty hosting company will sell in its lifetime.

                                                  Stick to bumping year old threads and reselling burst.net servers.

                                                  Originally posted by AndrewX
                                                  Care to explain? BSD is dead and MacOS is tablet software. Even Android is based on Linux.

                                                  Last edited by sandman!; 05-12-2014, 07:13 PM.
                                                  Need WebHosting ? Email me for some great deals [email protected]

                                                  Comment

                                                  • martinsc
                                                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                    • Jun 2005
                                                    • 27047

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by EddyTheDog
                                                    https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/service - Is a pretty good service that is similar to CloudFlare - At the moment it is free but they have said they will charge in the future...
                                                    Make Money

                                                    Comment

                                                    • HomerSimpson
                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                      • Sep 2005
                                                      • 13826

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by AndrewX
                                                      Disk i/o rises somewhat incrementially with the amount of containers per master node. You can check your I/O wait percentage via top (CPU % wait is your I/O load). Try this command, it should give you a result similar to this one:

                                                      [root@master ~]# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
                                                      16384+0 records in
                                                      16384+0 records out
                                                      1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 34.3023 s, 31.3 MB/s

                                                      Anything below 20MB/s is very unusual. FYI, RAID1 mirrors contents over 2 drives. 2x 250 GB makes 250 GB mirrored on 2 drives, which has faster read speads but obviously the same write speed. 2x RAID0 makes 500 GB and different parts of data are written accross the 2 drives simultaneously. It has faster read AND write speeds, with double the risk of a drive crash. RAID5 does not have that problem due to added parity but requires 3 drives.

                                                      So make sure your server has the right RAID configuration, and obviously hardware RAID is better than software, make sure which one you have so the benefit of your 3 drive server is not wasted.

                                                      My Digital Ocean VPS

                                                      # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
                                                      16384+0 records in
                                                      16384+0 records out
                                                      1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 5.7137 s, 188 MB/s

                                                      My dedicated

                                                      # dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
                                                      16384+0 records in
                                                      16384+0 records out
                                                      1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 8.98492 s, 120 MB/s
                                                      Make a bank with Chaturbate - the best selling webcam program
                                                      Ads that can't be block with AdBlockers !!! /// Best paying popup program (Bitcoin payouts) !!!

                                                      PHP, MySql, Smarty, CodeIgniter, Laravel, WordPress, NATS... fixing stuff, server migrations & optimizations... My ICQ: 27429884 | Email:

                                                      Comment

                                                      Working...