GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Pit Bull Who Mauled Child Sentenced To Life In Jail (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1139760)

Roald 05-03-2014 12:03 AM

50 pittbulls

Dirty F 05-03-2014 12:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20072305)
Yea but, there are inherent behaviors in each breed. Black labs are more prone to jump into the first body of water they see, beagles will pick up a scent and take off, and I don't think it's an accident pit bulls lead the list in attacks.


.

He doesn't have the braincells to understand something as basic as this.

Dirty F 05-03-2014 01:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 20072647)
I am really trying to understand what point you are trying to make.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...hris_Burke.jpg

nico-t 05-03-2014 02:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20071853)
How about we instead penalize,

A) The baby-sitter for having a dog that bites
B) Parents that would drop their kid off at a sitter's that has a breed known to bite and bite hard

:thumbsup

nico-t 05-03-2014 02:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20072594)
Your kidding right? Where the hell did you get that bit of knowledge?

A major reason people have dogs is to feel protected.

If you even have a small dog in the house, they will alert you to anything going on the house so you can shoot them with that gun you were talking about.

A dog barking in the back yard will keep people out.

Walking with your dog can keep stray dogs away and protect you from encounters with people that want to do you harm.

My mother has a 105 lb dog , he's a lot more than companionship

Most all dogs have a built in sense of protecting it's owners

Have you never had a dog?

Maybe if you're living in fear protection is the reason for a dog. But every single dog owner I know and have known including my parents get a dog because they like them, that's the ONLY reason. Either you have mental issues or you're living in a very, very bad neighborhood.

Emil 05-03-2014 02:30 AM

Reminds me of:
"Police in Nigeria are holding a goat handed to them by a vigilante group, which said it was a car thief who had used witchcraft to change shape."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7846822.stm :1orglaugh

CamTraffic 05-03-2014 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 20071867)
I had 2 immediate thoughts:

1) What kind of babysitter has a pit bull?
2) What kind of parent's take their child to a babysitter with a pit bull?

The Democrats kind ;)

georgeyw 05-03-2014 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 20072647)
I am really trying to understand what point you are trying to make.

Don't waste your time.

RyuLion 05-03-2014 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bushwacker (Post 20072411)
Anytime a dog mauls somebody they should be put down. :2 cents::2 cents:

EXACTLY! Because they'll do it again..:2 cents:

Vendzilla 05-03-2014 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 20072839)
Maybe if you're living in fear protection is the reason for a dog. But every single dog owner I know and have known including my parents get a dog because they like them, that's the ONLY reason. Either you have mental issues or you're living in a very, very bad neighborhood.

You think I live in fear of anything?

I posted from Ceasar Millan's website, but I guess you are too fucking retarded to read it, it was about how dogs have been used for protection since the beginning of time. I'm glad in your neighborhood no one thinks about protection, but the first time the dog is barking, they jump up in the middle of the night to see what's going on, like the house is burning down

You always attack my position on anything I post, that's called trolling.

You're nothing but a fucking troll and not worth answering, just like when you talk to your parents and they don't answer you!

Roald 05-03-2014 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20074242)

You're nothing but a fucking troll and not worth answering, just like when you talk to your parents and they don't answer you!

uhm.........

:error

topnotch, standup guy 05-03-2014 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20072548)
It's kinda funny when you think that people get a dog for protection, but if it harms anyone, they want to destroy the breed.

It's a pretty safe bet that the dog will get a pass each and every time it attacks a home invader, burglar, repro man or any likewise human trash.

Bad analogy.
.

Vendzilla 05-03-2014 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topnotch, standup guy (Post 20074251)
It's a pretty safe bet that the dog will get a pass each and every time it attacks a home invader, burglar, repro man or any likewise human trash.

Bad analogy.
.

I think it's spot on.

How can someone be sued by a burglar if a dog bit him?
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/i...5150725AABP3DC
Quote:

If the state follows the common law rule - which imposes liability on a dog owner who knew a dog was dangerous - technically, the fact that the injured person was trespassing doesn't matter. So if the common law rule were applied strictly, if you know your dog is dangerous, and it bites a burglar who breaks into your house, you're liable. In practice, however, courts and juries are reluctant to hold a dog owner liable to a trespasser. Many courts have softened the rule to avoid unjust results. Some have modified the rule to say that a dog owner, even one who knows a dog is dangerous, isn't liable if the dog hurts a trespasser. Some say that the common law rule doesn't apply to trespassers if the dog is a guard dog.
It's unlikely the burglar or whatever will win, but the court system is pretty fucked up at times.

Vendzilla 05-03-2014 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 20074246)
uhm.........

:error

Roald, the guy comes into threads and makes insults to me, that's all he does, if he can't take what he dishes out and gets his tighty whities in a bunch, fuck'm.

He never did answer me what does the T stand's for?

KaliC 05-03-2014 12:06 PM

Just put him down, trapping a dog for life is just torture.

EngineCash 05-05-2014 07:43 AM

Good... Nonsense... There should be penalty for a babysitter, or public authorities, or I don't know who exactly... Not the dog...

bronco67 05-05-2014 08:08 AM

That's good because I hate his music.

bronco67 05-05-2014 08:10 AM

Pitbulls should be owned by people who know how to handle and train dogs. Most of the doggies are doomed to be bad because the breed largely attracts macho douchebags and ghetto thugs. These are people who will not raise a good dog.

L-Pink 05-05-2014 08:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20076112)
Pitbulls should be owned by people who know how to handle and train dogs. Most of the doggies are doomed to be bad because the breed largely attracts macho douchebags and ghetto thugs. These are people who will not raise a good dog.

:2 cents:

When my old dog died I took her left over food, beds, medicines and some toys to my local animal shelter. It was disgusting to see well over half the dogs there were pit bulls or pit bull mixes. The manager said pit bulls are constantly being brought in by owners that give up or can't move into new housing because of the dogs. She also said they are un-adoptable and make up the majority of animals put to sleep.

Fucking sad.

.

TurboAngel 05-05-2014 09:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20072285)
Kill the fucking shit and be done with it. We kill people for killing people, dogs shouldn't be any different. .



People live for a very long time in jail before they are killed. Tax payers pay good money every year they aren't killed.


:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

TurboAngel 05-05-2014 10:10 AM

I would like to add that my dog being as submissive as she is and all the training she has I have more confident that she wouldn't attack anyone. I allso hope that if someone broke in or hurt me she would attack them it's kinda of a double edged sword to say that.

If my dog did attack a kid I would probably have her put to sleep. Thank goodness my dogs are not around kids much and for sure if there are kids I have control of them.

Vendzilla 05-05-2014 10:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurboAngel (Post 20076264)
I would like to add that my dog being as submissive as she is and all the training she has I have more confident that she wouldn't attack anyone. I allso hope that if someone broke in or hurt me she would attack them it's kinda of a double edged sword to say that.

If my dog did attack a kid I would probably have her put to sleep. Thank goodness my dogs are not around kids much and for sure if there are kids I have control of them.

Even if your dog didn't attack someone trying to do you harm, they would most certainly alert you to danger, like someone breaking into the house, giving you a better chance of survival.

stopitbrrruce 05-05-2014 10:57 AM

Last week I was riding my bicycle on a trail and passed a man and woman who were walking their 4 giant rottweilers, with no leashes! I can't tell you how many times I've had similar experiences with people having their dogs off leash... running full speed at me, leaping in front of me and nearly getting ran over...

A good friend of mine has a pit bull and aside from the time i was alone with it and it tried to rape me, its a very nice dog

Vendzilla 05-05-2014 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stopitbrrruce (Post 20076342)
Last week I was riding my bicycle on a trail and passed a man and woman who were walking their 4 giant rottweilers, with no leashes! I can't tell you how many times I've had similar experiences with people having their dogs off leash... running full speed at me, leaping in front of me and nearly getting ran over...

A good friend of mine has a pit bull and aside from the time i was alone with it and it tried to rape me, its a very nice dog

Big dogs can be trained to be off leash, apparently those dogs weren't.

I bet that got your heart pumping

dyna mo 05-05-2014 11:14 AM

it doesn't matter if a piece of shit dog owner has his pos dog on a leash or not. Was walking my dog this weekend and coming up to a street corner noticed a pos pitbull has laser beam locked his eyes on my dog and was at the end of his leash towards us. I've seen this shit before and already knew to pick my dog up when we went by.

the POS pitbull lunged at my dog that I was holding in my arms anyway. the owner had his face in his smartphone the entire time, oblivious.

stopitbrrruce 05-05-2014 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20076365)
Big dogs can be trained to be off leash, apparently those dogs weren't.

I bet that got your heart pumping

It has definitely motivated me to pick up a can of bear mace.

Vendzilla 05-05-2014 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stopitbrrruce (Post 20076406)
It has definitely motivated me to pick up a can of bear mace.

If you are going to get some mace, get the stuff with the marker dye in it, that way it identifies the attacker. You then report it to the police and when they find the dog, a simple black light check will tell them they have the right animal. They have a combination mace, pepper spray with the marker dye .

nico-t 05-05-2014 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20074242)
You think I live in fear of anything?

I posted from Ceasar Millan's website, but I guess you are too fucking retarded to read it, it was about how dogs have been used for protection since the beginning of time. I'm glad in your neighborhood no one thinks about protection, but the first time the dog is barking, they jump up in the middle of the night to see what's going on, like the house is burning down

You always attack my position on anything I post, that's called trolling.

You're nothing but a fucking troll and not worth answering, just like when you talk to your parents and they don't answer you!

lol, yes they have been used for protection, but it's not the reason people get a dog nowadays. The point of discussion was the reason people get a dog, and it's because they like dogs, period. It doesn't have anything to do anymore with medieval times where they were solely for protection. You always miss the point, that's probably why i respond to you to tell you this. I just try to help out :smilie_we

Vendzilla 05-05-2014 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 20076369)
it doesn't matter if a piece of shit dog owner has his pos dog on a leash or not. Was walking my dog this weekend and coming up to a street corner noticed a pos pitbull has laser beam locked his eyes on my dog and was at the end of his leash towards us. I've seen this shit before and already knew to pick my dog up when we went by.

the POS pitbull lunged at my dog that I was holding in my arms anyway. the owner had his face in his smartphone the entire time, oblivious.

Sad that the owner is such an asshole

nico-t 05-05-2014 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20074315)
Roald, the guy comes into threads and makes insults to me, that's all he does, if he can't take what he dishes out and gets his tighty whities in a bunch, fuck'm.

He never did answer me what does the T stand's for?

Tranny? :1orglaugh

bronco67 05-05-2014 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20076297)
Even if your dog didn't attack someone trying to do you harm, they would most certainly alert you to danger, like someone breaking into the house, giving you a better chance of survival.

Most dogs would never bite someone. My Lab can seem like a ferocious guard dog, but he'd probably lick the guy who breaks into my house. But, at least I'd know the guy is coming in so I can grab my bat. He's a brown, furry alarm system.

L-Pink 05-05-2014 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20076677)
Most dogs would never bite someone. My Lab can seem like a ferocious guard dog, but he'd probably lick the guy who breaks into my house. But, at least I'd know the guy is coming in so I can grab my bat. He's a brown, furry alarm system.

My kind of guard dog.

Roald 05-06-2014 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20076677)
Most dogs would never bite someone. My Lab can seem like a ferocious guard dog, but he'd probably lick the guy who breaks into my house. But, at least I'd know the guy is coming in so I can grab my bat. He's a brown, furry alarm system.

Same with my lab, they broke into my car and I am sure he heard it but was probably to lazy to bark and alarm us. Fucker!

Vendzilla 05-06-2014 07:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 20076576)
It doesn't have anything to do anymore with medieval times where they were solely for protection. You always miss the point, that's probably why i respond to you to tell you this. I just try to help out :smilie_we

You are missing the point, I said a major reason is for protection, I never said solely, you are trying so hard to prove a point against me, you miss the point

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20076677)
Most dogs would never bite someone. My Lab can seem like a ferocious guard dog, but he'd probably lick the guy who breaks into my house. But, at least I'd know the guy is coming in so I can grab my bat. He's a brown, furry alarm system.

Bronco67 gets the point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 20076683)
My kind of guard dog.

L-Pink gets the point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Roald (Post 20077019)
Same with my lab, they broke into my car and I am sure he heard it but was probably to lazy to bark and alarm us. Fucker!

Roald gets the point, but his dog didn't see it as a danger. I'm sure he would let you know if anyone came in the house. Labs are good dogs.





People get dogs for all sorts of reasons, but they depend on them to announce if someone is breaking in the house, even to let them know someone is at the front door. A toy poodle is better than most any alarm system.

Look in Holland where you say you live
http://www.k9trainers.com/holland.htm

They train protection dogs


I've had the following breeds
Weimaraner - couldn't swim
Vizla- too damn hyper
French Masthiff - Funny dog
German Shepard - Patrolled the property
Border Collie - Smartest dog ever, very protective of children, herded them together to keep an eye on them.
Bull Mastiff- ate more food than most could afford
Black Newfoundland- This one didn't bark, but killed anything that came in the back yard
Dog also smiled, which scared people
I don't have one right now, but thinking about getting something

TheSquealer 05-06-2014 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20072259)
I have friends with pit bulls, it's not the breed, it's the owners
And animal shelters euthanize all pit bulls, at least the ones I know about

I understand you are unusually irrational. I also get that in these discussions, you are really expressing affection for your animal and emotional attachments and not really trying to make a valid point. And though instant flashes of moral intuition and intuitive emotions/responses guide the bulk of our decisions through those initial flashes of emotions we feel and where everything said after the fact is often little more than a nonsense post hoc rationalization of the emotion.... there are those who such as yourself who are wholly incapable of later engaging rational reasoning to at least attempt to use reason to rationalize the emotion and the manner in which you irrationally expressed it.

Never the less... i am going to try to help you with some obvious, indisputable facts, knowing full well that it will certainly be in vain.

This is all very simple stuff.

It is all Basic Genetics 101.

You can take any group of animals, select the ones with the traits you desire (aggression) and breed it with animals with similar traits and in a few generations, you have a completely different animal with new behavioral traits.

This stuff has been done since the beginning of time.

Here is a very common scenario with certain breeds such as pitbulls.

Dogs have been bred to fight.
Dogs that like to fight attracts dickheads who think its cool to own such dogs.
Dickhead knows other dickheads with ill tempered pitbulls.
Dickheads are proud of their aggressive animals
Dickheads are likely to breed their aggressive/large animals to create more aggressive large animals.
... and on it goes

That doesn't mean every single pitbull is bad. It means the genes are out there. It means the genes for aggressive behavior in certain breeds are always out there and always spreading.

But its pretty fucking obvious that when cunts gravitate towards pitbulls, there is always going to be an increased likelihood of them having animals that are ill tempered, aggressive and they will be more likely to be bred to similar animals... creating more of the same and worse. Those animals are then out there breeding with other animals. Just because a particular animal does not visibly possess certain behavioral traits, does not mean those traits are not in his genes and are not being passed along to other similar and dissimilar breeds.

It's also quite insane to pretend this has not happened to a great extent in the past with certain breeds, such as pitbulls... particularly when these dogs are and have been specifically bred to fight.

Pretending animals don't have genetic behavioral traits requires an irretrievably deluded perspective (i.e. a sheepdog will instinctively try to herd anything around it that moves - in spite of having no prior exposure or training to herd anything).

A simple fact of genetics is that any individual here could create a crazy strong, violent and aggressive dog through breeding alone and it can be done in just a few generations of proper selective breeding.... and it will not matter in the slightest bit how good the owners are with the dog when their genes are wired for certain behavioral traits and dispositions. They can act out violently at any moment, regardless,... as they frequently do.

Additionally, just because someone can point out attacks from Lab happen - that doesn't mean those tendencies didn't originate from a pitbull or animals specifically bred to be agressive in its lineage.

There is a reason we all do not own tigers or rattlesnakes or grizzly bears and are not constantly say "its the owners, not the grizzly bears - so we need to stop all this grizzly bear specific legislation" - Animals are exactly what their genetics and environment made them to be. We, as with animals are all the product of genes+environment. It's not an "either / or" discussion. With certain breeds, there is undeniably bad owners and bad owners selecting (intentionally or not) for bad genes.

nico-t 05-06-2014 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20077348)
You are missing the point, I said a major reason is for protection, I never said solely, you are trying so hard to prove a point against me, you miss the point

wrong. Also not a major reason. Maybe 1 in 100 people get a dog where the major reason is protection. 99 our of 100 get a dog because they think it's fun. You are thick and remind me of Sleazydream, he never understood anything either.

Vendzilla 05-06-2014 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nico-t (Post 20077424)
wrong. Also not a major reason. Maybe 1 in 100 people get a dog where the major reason is protection. 99 our of 100 get a dog because they think it's fun. You are thick and remind me of Sleazydream, he never understood anything either.

Well at least you are saying "major" again.

Let's just agree to disagree.

Every dog I have EVER seen will bark or do something if a noise happens in the middle of the night in a persons house.

A major reason people have dogs is to feel protected, that's the first line
http://www.veterinarypartner.com/Content.plx?A=2019

Vendzilla 05-06-2014 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 20077415)
I understand you are unusually irrational. I also get that in these discussions, you are really expressing affection for your animal and emotional attachments and not really trying to make a valid point. And though instant flashes of moral intuition and intuitive emotions/responses guide the bulk of our decisions through those initial flashes of emotions we feel and where everything said after the fact is often little more than a nonsense post hoc rationalization of the emotion.... there are those who such as yourself who are wholly incapable of later engaging rational reasoning to at least attempt to use reason to rationalize the emotion and the manner in which you irrationally expressed it.

Never the less... i am going to try to help you with some obvious, indisputable facts, knowing full well that it will certainly be in vain.

This is all very simple stuff.

It is all Basic Genetics 101.

You can take any group of animals, select the ones with the traits you desire (aggression) and breed it with animals with similar traits and in a few generations, you have a completely different animal with new behavioral traits.

This stuff has been done since the beginning of time.

Here is a very common scenario with certain breeds such as pitbulls.

Dogs have been bred to fight.
Dogs that like to fight attracts dickheads who think its cool to own such dogs.
Dickhead knows other dickheads with ill tempered pitbulls.
Dickheads are proud of their aggressive animals
Dickheads are likely to breed their aggressive/large animals to create more aggressive large animals.
... and on it goes

That doesn't mean every single pitbull is bad. It means the genes are out there. It means the genes for aggressive behavior in certain breeds are always out there and always spreading.

But its pretty fucking obvious that when cunts gravitate towards pitbulls, there is always going to be an increased likelihood of them having animals that are ill tempered, aggressive and they will be more likely to be bred to similar animals... creating more of the same and worse. Those animals are then out there breeding with other animals. Just because a particular animal does not visibly possess certain behavioral traits, does not mean those traits are not in his genes and are not being passed along to other similar and dissimilar breeds.

It's also quite insane to pretend this has not happened to a great extent in the past with certain breeds, such as pitbulls... particularly when these dogs are and have been specifically bred to fight.

Pretending animals don't have genetic behavioral traits requires an irretrievably deluded perspective (i.e. a sheepdog will instinctively try to herd anything around it that moves - in spite of having no prior exposure or training to herd anything).

A simple fact of genetics is that any individual here could create a crazy strong, violent and aggressive dog through breeding alone and it can be done in just a few generations of proper selective breeding.... and it will not matter in the slightest bit how good the owners are with the dog when their genes are wired for certain behavioral traits and dispositions. They can act out violently at any moment, regardless,... as they frequently do.

Additionally, just because someone can point out attacks from Lab happen - that doesn't mean those tendencies didn't originate from a pitbull or animals specifically bred to be agressive in its lineage.

There is a reason we all do not own tigers or rattlesnakes or grizzly bears and are not constantly say "its the owners, not the grizzly bears - so we need to stop all this grizzly bear specific legislation" - Animals are exactly what their genetics and environment made them to be. We, as with animals are all the product of genes+environment. It's not an "either / or" discussion. With certain breeds, there is undeniably bad owners and bad owners selecting (intentionally or not) for bad genes.

A valid point would be to say that if I owned a Pitt Bull, I wouldn't let it around children unless I was there. I would train the dog like every dog I have trained. I would never let any dog run around other people without a leash.

This isn't emotional, it's educated. I've been around large dogs most of my life, the most aggressive are chihuahua's and toy poodles. The most dangerous are any large dog that wants to protect their owner. Pit bulls do not have the most powerful bite, rottweilers have a much more powerful bite. They can be just as aggressive.

L-Pink 05-06-2014 12:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 20077415)
I understand you are unusually irrational. I also get that in these discussions, you are really expressing affection for your animal and emotional attachments and not really trying to make a valid point. And though instant flashes of moral intuition and intuitive emotions/responses guide the bulk of our decisions through those initial flashes of emotions we feel and where everything said after the fact is often little more than a nonsense post hoc rationalization of the emotion.... there are those who such as yourself who are wholly incapable of later engaging rational reasoning to at least attempt to use reason to rationalize the emotion and the manner in which you irrationally expressed it.

Never the less... i am going to try to help you with some obvious, indisputable facts, knowing full well that it will certainly be in vain.

This is all very simple stuff.

It is all Basic Genetics 101.

You can take any group of animals, select the ones with the traits you desire (aggression) and breed it with animals with similar traits and in a few generations, you have a completely different animal with new behavioral traits.

This stuff has been done since the beginning of time.

Here is a very common scenario with certain breeds such as pitbulls.

Dogs have been bred to fight.
Dogs that like to fight attracts dickheads who think its cool to own such dogs.
Dickhead knows other dickheads with ill tempered pitbulls.
Dickheads are proud of their aggressive animals
Dickheads are likely to breed their aggressive/large animals to create more aggressive large animals.
... and on it goes

That doesn't mean every single pitbull is bad. It means the genes are out there. It means the genes for aggressive behavior in certain breeds are always out there and always spreading.

But its pretty fucking obvious that when cunts gravitate towards pitbulls, there is always going to be an increased likelihood of them having animals that are ill tempered, aggressive and they will be more likely to be bred to similar animals... creating more of the same and worse. Those animals are then out there breeding with other animals. Just because a particular animal does not visibly possess certain behavioral traits, does not mean those traits are not in his genes and are not being passed along to other similar and dissimilar breeds.

It's also quite insane to pretend this has not happened to a great extent in the past with certain breeds, such as pitbulls... particularly when these dogs are and have been specifically bred to fight.

Pretending animals don't have genetic behavioral traits requires an irretrievably deluded perspective (i.e. a sheepdog will instinctively try to herd anything around it that moves - in spite of having no prior exposure or training to herd anything).

A simple fact of genetics is that any individual here could create a crazy strong, violent and aggressive dog through breeding alone and it can be done in just a few generations of proper selective breeding.... and it will not matter in the slightest bit how good the owners are with the dog when their genes are wired for certain behavioral traits and dispositions. They can act out violently at any moment, regardless,... as they frequently do.

Additionally, just because someone can point out attacks from Lab happen - that doesn't mean those tendencies didn't originate from a pitbull or animals specifically bred to be agressive in its lineage.

There is a reason we all do not own tigers or rattlesnakes or grizzly bears and are not constantly say "its the owners, not the grizzly bears - so we need to stop all this grizzly bear specific legislation" - Animals are exactly what their genetics and environment made them to be. We, as with animals are all the product of genes+environment. It's not an "either / or" discussion. With certain breeds, there is undeniably bad owners and bad owners selecting (intentionally or not) for bad genes.

I grew up with a father who was a major hunter. We always had dogs (Labrador Retrievers) that led two lives, house pets and hunting companions for my father. My father always took great pains finding dogs with hunting backgrounds in their lineage. It was obvious from 10 weeks on the dogs just "got/understood" what game my father was training them for.

Training and environment is important but training a dog with the right DNA traits is much easier and natural. To say Pit-Bulls aren't pre disposed to be aggressive is to ignore basic dog breeding facts.


.

tony286 05-06-2014 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20072387)
And you're going to tell me you know all about a breed because of stats?

I lived with my buddy for about a year and his pit named ZZtop. That dog is awesome. I wouldn't put him around young kids, but then again, some of the pets I have had, I wouldn't either. Yes they are aggressive breeds, but responsible owners of pits know what a great dog they are. You can't have them around small kids, they will play with them till they fall over. I wouldn't let them off a leash either. They are powerful and beyond playful. That doesn't mean there isn't a place for them in the world.

I use to have a Military McCaw. I was the only person that could handle him, any one else would have their fingers bit off!

I agree with you. The dog in the little rascals was a pit. it was called the nurse maid breed because it was so good with kids. its not the dog, its these pieces of shit that misbreed them and think its cool to have an aggressive dog.

tony286 05-06-2014 03:32 PM

Boston Terriers were originally breed to be fighting dogs. Things can be breed in and breed out as Squealer stated its the breeding.

Jel 05-06-2014 03:48 PM

dogs are delicious :)

Vendzilla 05-06-2014 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20078049)
I agree with you. The dog in the little rascals was a pit. it was called the nurse maid breed because it was so good with kids. its not the dog, its these pieces of shit that misbreed them and think its cool to have an aggressive dog.

The same people look down the barrel of a gun to see if it's loaded

tony286 05-06-2014 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20078101)
The same people look down the barrel of a gun to see if it's loaded

You actually made me laugh out loud. Thanks brother.:thumbsup

Vendzilla 05-06-2014 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 20078112)
You actually made me laugh out loud. Thanks brother.:thumbsup

You're very welcome

Dogs are a serious matter to me. I have trained dogs for a good chunk of my life, not professionally, just the dogs I had. My Border collie would get you a tissue if you sneezed. My french mastiff would walk without a leash next to my side as we went on walks. Even other barking dogs didn't effect that dog.
Living in a condo now, no yard really. I figure I will retire to the mountains and get a good dog then. To me a dog has to weigh over 50 lbs to be a fit for me. Border collie is as small as I would ever want

rapidworkers 05-09-2014 10:38 PM

My spouse and i wouldn't place down the dog.

TurboAngel 05-12-2014 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20076365)
Big dogs can be trained to be off leash, apparently those dogs weren't.

I bet that got your heart pumping

I have a boxer pitt mix and she hasn't been on a leash in years. The only word I need to say is heel and boom she's right by my knee. I did spent $1500 on a dog trainer who then became my friend. Thank goodness I called her. I worked very hard as did my dogs with there training as I didn't want an unruly dog.


I don't have either of my dogs around kids.

Vendzilla 05-12-2014 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TurboAngel (Post 20083975)
I have a boxer pitt mix and she hasn't been on a leash in years. The only word I need to say is heel and boom she's right by my knee. I did spent $1500 on a dog trainer who then became my friend. Thank goodness I called her. I worked very hard as did my dogs with there training as I didn't want an unruly dog.


I don't have either of my dogs around kids.

My Uncle helped me train my first dog, it takes a lot of your time, but you end up with a great companion. I never used common words for commands. Funny is most of my commands I used were from being around horses as a kid. Instead of heel, I would say Ho. My dogs wouldn't listen to others. And if a kid came up that the dog didn't know, I would tell the kids to keep their distance unless I could introduce them to my dog.

TurboAngel 05-12-2014 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 20084223)
My Uncle helped me train my first dog, it takes a lot of your time, but you end up with a great companion. I never used common words for commands. Funny is most of my commands I used were from being around horses as a kid. Instead of heel, I would say Ho. My dogs wouldn't listen to others. And if a kid came up that the dog didn't know, I would tell the kids to keep their distance unless I could introduce them to my dog.

It does take alot of time but if you take the time any breed of dog can be a great one.


:thumbsup

TurboAngel 05-12-2014 01:34 PM

Do we have a new page?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123