i don't see how saddam can nuke us when nkorea , iran, india, and other countries have nuclear weapons. We got saddam under high surveillance... what can he possibly do? nothing... he has no option but to be a good boy from now on.. does he? i dont think so. its the other countries that we dont have inspectors in that we should be worried about. the idea of giving fear to saddam wasn't a bad idea but going to war for real.. is just.. not worth it considering the people that will be killed. imagine 10,000's of kids growing up knowing americans killed their parents.. what would you expect to make out of these kids? i say they'd ask for revange.. which would lead to more terrorism. i dont really care if these comments been said before or not, it is common sense.

STOP bumping this goddamn old fuckin thread already!

After me.

:glugglug

Cluck,

I did a search for depleted uranium and i found lots of articles about it.... anyways, I also found some sites saying that the
US sold biological warfare to Iraq and purposely had their own military infected with biological warfare... and that its infectious, veterans would spread it to their families, and the doctors treating them would get it too.

And it said that 50% of Gulf War Veterans Are No Longer in the Service - More Than 10,000 Are Dead ??

And that it could be part of a plan for either mass genocide or experiments from the US government? Anyone ever heard of this? I really hate to be a paranoid and conspiracy theorist like MassiveCock.... but.....

you might wanna skim this??

That's a funny article.

Some of my favorite parts ...

The US government created AIDS.

There are ancient underground alien facilities in the Middle East

The author is surprised that many soldiers that were in the military in 1991 were no longer in by 1996.
(Cue Twilight Zone music).

Yes, India does have nukes and they should. There's a balance as their enemy Pakistan also has nukes.

The fact that N.Korea and Iran have nuclear programs doesn't make it okay for Saddam to pursue nukes. Take for example N. Korea. Whether N. Korea can trully strike us with nukes is debatable. What isn't debatable is that if we used force on N. Korea they'd use force on S. Korea. Likewise if it were Saddam, we wouldn't be able to use force once he has nukes because he would have no problem nuking Israel or any other friendly neighbor.

Moreover, we need to get topple Saddam. Then move our troops from Saudi Arabia to a more western friendly Iraq. Having as many trooops in Saudi Arabia--home of Islam's most holy places--is a provactation to terrorists. Moreover, who wants to kiss the Saudis ass anyways?