![]() |
Quote:
Anyone who thinks that is unfair can easily create their own Paysites and promote them. Affiliates have all the power. We can create Paysites, tubes, do SEO work, create new businesses any time we want. All it takes is work, money or both. |
Quote:
You will get two main answers: 1. It's all available for free. Nobody pays for porn these days! 2. All adult programs shave like crazy. I don't entirely agree with #2 but that is the perception the industry has largely built for itself- a reputation of cheating affiliates. Again, don't ask 12clicks or oldjeff go ask the affiliates themselves. I think most of the affiliates here will tell you the same thing too. But somehow the input from actual affiliates tends to get ignored in favor of the BROtalk. And that's another reason why you can't find affiliates. Treat people like shit and they will eventually leave. |
Quote:
The affiliate model died for most Webmasters way back when WEG, Maxcash and Quickbuck wrapped up operations. For many businesses it became more profitable to build hundreds of sites, or hire a handful of professionals to build them, than to have hundreds of webmasters build one each. Site owners can make one traffic deal with another site owner and bring in more sales than hundreds of webmasters would send in a month. That's not a sad day for being an affiliate, it's a smart day to become a site owner or professional service provider. If a guy who used to send two sales a year quit... What do you think happened to those same two sales in the future? They still bought two sites, they just don't buy them through him anymore and he earns nothing from them. It's not like affiliates made more people buy porn or like affiliates do something site owners can't do (or hire a professional to do). The "affiliates" who still exist are either running their own Paysites, work as paid professionals, have sites earning quietly on autopilot, are hobbyists doing it for fun, or have massive traffic. The rest have retired or changed business models. Shaving didn't cause any of that. A shift in the cost / benefit of paying affiliates or building traffic sites in house caused a lot of it.... Years ago. :2 cents: |
Quote:
In short, many at that time made a commitment to move traffic in-house and away from some of this slavery where they were overly dependent on the affiliate traffic model. The tubes came along at the right time, and made that even easier centralizing traffic and simply making it a pay to play. Now an affiliate program was no longer held ransom and could afford to stay in business. :2 cents: |
Quote:
To sum it up: "Adult. An Industry in constant denial." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
:2 cents: |
Quote:
And something else. I work the amateur niche. When I see established amateur girls, and most of you know who I mean, start sending out promo by email, that tells me they need that affiliate to start promoting them. A lot have had a huge fan/member base that maybe they have taken for granted. When the membership starts to drop off, it's time to start hustling again. Who do they need? Affiliates. |
Quote:
In the last few years, I see less and less active affiliates from US, CA, UK etc., but I see more from countries I never noted before, such as: Georgia (the ex-ussr country, not USA state), Bangladesh, Egypt. Still there's the filipino, romanians, indians, south americans around, adult that's still worth for many, there. Note that in the past, lots of signups it was from (between) member areas & pay user newsletters, cross site advertising often not accounted to affiliates. Cam sites also had lots of signups from cam plugins inside member areas. When member areas lacked of users, this cross-sell (no original affiliate paid in most cases) also went down. Where the westerns (and some high profile russians) who was affiliates (tgp) or pay site owners ended? In tubes and tube/forums advertising networks. Adultking blames this often, as well as Mike South's. So what the programs do today? They Shave? I think no, this was worth before, perhaps. They buy from ad networks, and on the side, they keep lots of 3rd world affiliates happy. In the past, when you launched a new program/site, you could rely on affiliates to launch it, in just revshare. I was around pre-2003 when you just order custom shoots in russia or ukraine to build a site, launch it and thehun etc. it was full of submissions magically, ccbill handled all, and you only cared to pay the bill of fhg server. Now instead, the fhg hosting is cheap, but you need to buy ads to make some volume (this needs media buying skills, you did not needed if using affiliates only!), and the (mostly non-western) affiliates will contribute only a little, and find you late. About the fact that there are other ways to make more money online than adult: there was in the past too, think at gambling affiliation, or the dot-com bubble funded naive's who paid lots of dollars per install of "internet optimizer" software (I made nice cash pre-2001 with that). Of course there may be programs still shaving, for example think at cams revshare: if you shave just very few big whales, it is 1% or less of users you shave, but that's relevant difference like 30% of sales. That's sneaky as signups number it keeps real. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I can't even begin to tell you how many affiliate review sites were launched that ripped ideas from mine, copied code (which was easy to detect since it was all custom coded to begin with), spintaxed original reviews published to my sites and so on... then tried to push the same programs. At one point I even had a guy who ripped my content email me to ask why his clone wasn't converting for him :1orglaugh Affiliates are supposed to bring something to the table. An ability to generate traffic, an innovative way of pushing sales... something, anything, that the sponsors they push aren't already providing for themselves. That has gotten much harder now that so many sponsors are building their own traffic networks. The one thing that has remained simple all along is that it is very easy to figure out exactly how much each sponsor is paying you per click. :2 cents: |
Quote:
If a sponsor claims 50/50 revshare, 30PPS, or any other payscale... it's a meaningless number. A sponsor who pays you 8 cents per click is bidding 8 cents per click for your traffic. The moment that number changes, his bid is now different. You are auctioning your traffic to the highest bidder... who cares why they bid more or bid less. :pimp |
Quote:
Would like to stick around a play some more, but there is an Adirondack Chair on my deck that greatly requires my ass attached to it. Stop by again tomorrow, in the meantime, I suggest Desitin for a bunch of you |
Quote:
I also still see lots of program owners on gfy talking about how they still value their affiliates. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I value all affiliates because you never know when one will magically make a sale or begin promoting your stuff. Besides, what 'competition' is a small affiliate providing for larger affiliates who actually produce sales? Little to none. But I agree the #1 thing affiliates (should) bring to the table is traffic. Problem is, the ways affiliates used to get traffic is drying up, consolodating, and disappearing. |
Quote:
But I'll do some "testing" when I attend the New Orleans show and report back! :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
But there is plenty of speed crushed up into a white powder that LOOKS like cocaine! :1orglaugh Unfortunately, instead of having a nice, alert feeling with a slight head buzz (like you do when you have the real stuff)...you end up jittery, your cock shrinks to the size of a thimble, and your nose burns like hell! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh We need some "Bolivian Bros" to get in the industry so we will stop being fooled into this crushed up speed shit that's being passed off as the real thing! :1orglaugh :pimp |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Webmasters keep confusing themselves thinking they're business owners. You're not. Your people who are wasting valuable working years at a dead end job. Get out. Thinking that someone is shaving and that shaving is the reason you're failing is a lie. You're failing because you're lazy, stupid, or a combination of both. Think you're being shaved? run your own program and get back to us with your results |
Quote:
how about we're just sick of hearing children for the 1000th time claim they're being cheated because they WANT X but only earn Y and blame it on someone else? |
Quote:
fucking 3rd world loser.:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The trick to using GFY posts as a metric is to do the exact opposite of what 99% of the posters suggest. Most haven't got a clue, they are marginally in the business, they have a free site somewhere so they are in the club. I've been reading for years that the TGP site is dead, so I built one successfully. Ask some of the other TGP owners here, including some that sold out and started again. You want a tube site, build one. Fuck what anyone else says. I'm surprised so many take as gospel whatever any anonymous poster that has jacked his/her post count up into the thousands says. I guess a high post count infers porn cred. (not to insult high post count webmasters that actually contribute something) |
Quote:
christ, the inability to think is deep with this one. which is it, there aren't many affiliates or shaving a lot of affiliates is profitable. If you clowns would work as hard on your pretend business as you do looking for excuses for why your pretend business is failing, your pretend business might actually become a real one.:thumbsup |
Quote:
I approve |
Quote:
I believe shaving exists and believe it has happened (and probably still is happening) to me. But it is not the biggest reason my income has declined. Any mention of shaving and you guys go ballistic. But, if you are talking about the guy who sends 30 hits and then complains about shaving then I am on your side. He's lazy and not really deserving of anything. But some of us here have been around awhile and are better able to get a feel for what's going on. |
Quote:
The industry has evolved into three groups: Business owners and service providers (many who used to be affiliates) making a good living. A tiny handful of hobbyists or massive traffic webmasters and profitable free site owners (the only real affiliates left) making a good living. Whiners, conspiracy theorists and trolls (many who used to be affiliates) making nothing but noise. Which group someone is in is mostly a matter of their own choices, based almost entirely on where each chooses to focus time and energy. To a very large degree this is an effort based business not an aptitude based business. I don't think most people are lazy. I do think they are prone to distractions. Shaving, tubes, .xxx, and many other topics are distractions more than anything else. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
However, if you feel you're being shaved, change sponsors. If you think all sponsors shave, do yourself a favor and switch jobs as you're not bright enough for long term success here. I'll buy all the regular joins I can from good affiliates. The value is there. you don't run off good affiliates by shaving them. Did guys shave in the old days? I'm sure they did. Do they do it now? I just don't see how its profitable. you keep good affiliates, you NEVER give them a reason to doubt you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For some of us it's not. |
Quote:
As a (cam) program I can tell that of those affiliates who signed up from GFY (and some I got from there it was rather good, I mean more than $1k/week), nearly no one got high post counts, or posts at all, or account at all: busy guys googleing for "alternative to [chaturbate/whatever]" or so, lands on GFY without having or wishing to open a GFY account, finds my signature in post replies, signup and sends tonds of joins. On the contrary, nearly no one who posts a lot (esp. complaints about my program) ever signed up or tested my program (and did not answered to question "and what's your affiliate account, if ever asked), so I assume they really sent traffic to no one they talk bad about. Or if signed up, sent 10 hits a year max anyway. Finally, about all those saying that there are less and less affiliates every year - really, for new programs that starts with zero affiliates, there can be a growth. I have more active affiliates on tubecamgirl now than a year ago, and a year ago I had more than 2 years ago (2012 is when I opened the program). However I lost lots of affiliates in chatgf which was around from 2010 and mostly targeted pay site member areas. Think at crakrevenue I bet everyone agrees they had growth of affiliates each of past year, right? It all matters to open new affiliate programs, more up-to-date, time to time. And not to cry on old affiliate programs dieing, or wrong new ones no one cares at. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In general I have good relationships with my program managers/owners and have for years. |
Quote:
that one will leave a mark. what's it like to be part of the world's absolute bottom and get to interact with someone who earns more than your whole fucking mudhut village?:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Thanks for clearing it up. As for signupdamnit he does bring good arguments forth and he doesn't call people asswipes or anything like that. |
Quote:
That's my experience anyway. If traffic is mostly from search or CJ etc., then I don't think the plateau should apply. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123