Seriously, who sends tweets from a funeral ??
 

Prob not the deceased... :2 cents:

(Fiddy Smart Ass Remarks) :thumbsup

http://www.getbullish.com/wp-content...ad-in-sand.jpg

See, that's why you relish in your own ignorance and just make yourself look more and more foolish everytime you post, you'll only accept anything if its within your own paper-thin narrow list of accepted sources, anything outside that and it just never happened for you did it? I've proved my point, that it was reported to have happened, which is what I said from the start. You was wrong, you just cannot accept that.
The sad thing is that you'll think that somehow you won the "argument" and with your own inflated sense of forum importance will proudly go off in search of other thread to spread your own one-man legend of Little Daimo, continually painting yourself into a corner as you go.

Hmm, I'm beginning to wonder exactly who has the issues here!

I would like to add that we are born fighting about politics - Not actually beating each other up...

except before and after football games?

Good point - Saturday nights and bank holidays as well...

You found one tory blog as a source.

You are claiming women (plural) were refused the right to vote because of how they were dressed. Your laughable source said ONE woman was TRIED to be turned away.

Think about it for a second. Just a second.

You were taught about the suffragettes at school, right? You remember the importance of the woman's right to vote, yeah?

So, if what you think happened happened, explain to me why not a single news source covered it.

Nothing to do with it not being the The Guardian. It wasn't ANYWHERE. Even your amusing tory blog didn't even say what you claim happened happened.

So please, explain to me why you think no one covered it. Mass cover up? The muslims now control the media? Just ONE reason why it was 'whitewashed' (pun intended).

Look, it's cool that you have your own little belief system, I would defend to the death your right to think what you want. But you just can't go around posting things that didn't happen as fact to back up your view that Tower Hamlets is bad. We all know it is bad. There are LOADS of things you could say that really happen there that are bad. So just don't make up shit that clearly didn't happen, it weakens your case.

No it wasn't. The ONE laughably weak source you found said that ONE woman was TRIED to be turned away. But she wasn't. This is really simple stuff man.

BBC TV London - I've mentioned this a few times but you keep on ignoring it.

Huffington Post UK :) Read up on the past edits on Wikipedia (his cronies keep removing his exploits) to see their political editor for what a vile piece of racist Muslim shit he is that makes little miss Abbot appear as clean as Mother Teresa.
Its also not hard to see their agenda just by reading their news stories and blogs.

Well, if you cannot even be bothered to read the report then there is no talking to you. Have fun wearing your rose-tined specs that block out what's actually written.

I read it. It says this:

"In the case of Andrew Gilligan, he was present at a polling station in Mile End, when some of these men have tried to turn away women voters for “not being modestly dressed”"

So, and I am sorry you are still struggling with this, you said that women were denied the right to vote because of how they were dressed. I asked you for evidence of this, and you found something that didn't back up your claim.

As I said, this is really not hard stuff.

If you *still* think it happened (despite no evidence), why do you think no-one covered it? Don't you think it would have gotten HUGE coverage?

Make your mind up, admit it, you have trouble connecting what it said with what you wished it said. poor little confused Daimo.

Never mind, your forum reputation is at the same level. :1orglaugh But you are in serious danger of being relegated to the Conference League.

Help me with my reading comprehension then, as you are so much better than me.

You said women were denied the right to vote.

The article you link to says someone claims some people TRIED to stop women voting.

Now, I am only a lowly English grad, but to me, TRIED means that someone tried to do something, but didn't achieve that thing, right?

What am I not 'getting'?

Do you have a different definition of tried?

And again, why do you think no one apart from one tory blog covered it?

You're cute when you're backed into a corner.

If i saw someone on their phone either texting, tweeting or whatever at a member of my families funeral, i'd quickly arrange for another funeral for that person...

LOL, poor little Daimo. You've already proved that you have trouble with reading comprehension, why not claim you have dyslexia like your unrequited crush, DVT. Tell you what, why don't you think that you are winning, just to make your poor little feelings recover!
:1orglaugh

Look, it's OK you can't find a *single* article to back up your lie. No need to keep sidestepping my painfully simple question.

You said women were denied the right to vote, they weren't. Someone said that allegedly someone TRIED to stop them, but didn't succeed in that.

And you still can't come up with a reason why no one covered it? I'll help you:

It. Didn't. Happen.

:)

Ahh, look, it's getting desperate. diddum's :) It's already forgotten the other posts in this thread. Its also already forgotten that it posted about an article that it failed to read properly!

Did the article say that women were denied the right to vote as you claimed?

(Clue: it didn't)

Keep digging though, this is hilarious!

One woman? Keep digging though, this is hilarious!
Tip, like I said before try the same route as your little crush and claim to have some kind of mild handicap, you might regain a tiny amount of sympathy. I doubt it, but it might be worth a try?

Please cut and paste the part where women were denied the right to vote.

No?

Didn't think so.

Lollington lol.

This is like groundhog day. I keep pwning you, you keep pretending not to read me pwning you. I pwn you again, you pretend you are not reading it.

:)

Source please? Where did you get this from, you didn't misread anything did you?

It's OK you claimed women were denied the right to vote and were mistaken.

No need to go full retard.

"female voters were forcibly turned away from voting booths because they weren't dressed "modestly" enough for Muslim sensibilities"

There, I found a source for you. Sadly, it's just you.

:D :D :D

Compare and contrast:

"female voters were forcibly turned away from voting booths because they weren't dressed "modestly" enough for Muslim sensibilities"

"some men have tried to turn away women voters for “not being modestly dressed”"

please answer my question. you are doing your usual, ignoring your mistakes and trying to pretend that you haven't made a complete tool of yourself ... again.

No-one will think any less of you if you just admit that your mouth ran away with yourself - lets face it, they couldn't.

Lollington.

deflect
dɪˈflɛkt/Submit
verb
1.
cause (something) to change direction; turn aside from a straight course.
"the bullet was deflected harmlessly into the ceiling"
synonyms: turn aside/away, divert, avert, sidetrack; More

Yes, I made a tiny little totally unimportant error when I said WOMAN rather than WOMEN.

You, on the other hand, claimed "female voters were forcibly turned away" when in fact, they weren't at all, and the source you claimed backed up your spurious nonsense, didn't back you up in the least.

But carry on if you think it will help you look less pointless.

no, its wasn't a spelling mistake now was it?

You just didn't bother reading it properly, you got carried away with your blinkered right-on views and just merrily prattled way for post after post failing to realise you was on a quicksand of self-delusion. I've already posted my source numerous times (sorry it isn't in internet format) but even if you had seen the interview, whatever it is that ticks in your brain would have just let it disappear into your enormous blind spot as it would obviously be some kind of cheap Union Jack flag waving propaganda. If it doesn't appear in print in the Socialist Worker then it never, ever happened did it, eh?

So, you *claim* you saw a news report about women being denied the right to vote and not a SINGLE online source can verify this? Weird, eh?

Are you drunk?

It's 2014, if it happened the media would be ALL OVER IT.

But, sure, you carry on pretending you 'saw' a news report about something as important as that but conveniently the whole country is covering it up.

Those fucking muslims are controlling the media now clearly.

I "saw" a news report saying pigs can fly. Sorry, can't back it up. Just take my word for it.

Lolsome lollington lol.

You are deluded. I know you hate those pesky darkies, but really, making stuff up is just a bit, well, weird.

Are you a card carrying member of the EDL?

Sigh, Look little Daimo PLEASE actually read what people say, you are making yourself look very silly.

this is what I said ..
now, slowly and using your finger as a guide, read it and try and let it sink into your denser than usual grey matter.

LOL, I was waiting for this - the classic reply from a loony lefty with his back against the wall, you've made yourself look silly (well, ever so slightly sillier than you usually do.) so have to resort to the old childish "oh, but you must be racist!" to try and shut people up. listen love, it doesn't work, it never did.

Now then, Little Daimo, time for beddy byes and let the big boys chat.

:1orglaugh

scott, i love ya man,
one thing, you uk people take yourselves too seriously. Picture the usa in 100 years from now and you have the uk at *present*
no hate
duke

Stupidest derailment of a thread I've seen in a long time

I dunno if thats 100% correct mate - My 9 month old Grandson gave me a wicked headbut when I picked him up the other afternoon....

Made me see stars, but he seemed to find it hilarious... :2 cents:

Sorry it took me so long to realise you're trolling me.

No one can be this stupid.

Well played, Sir! You got me hook line and sinker.

I thought that too but I was wrong.

If your ego can only accept you thinking I was trolling you then okay then, tend to your bruises and come back thinking the sun shines out of your arse again.

No hate for the Duke.

Plan ahead then and move country before it's too late... :winkwink:

Twitter is gay, nobody gives a fuck what your doing unless they wanna anallly invade ya. :2 cents:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

DamianJ is just sick.

For sure.
:)
Duke

So Little Daimo, what do you think about the latest claims of intimidation at the voting booths of Tower Hamlets? What about the counting irregularities? Or are you still shaking the sand out of your ears from having your head buried in the ground?

I believe their would have been a media outcry, had it been UKIP representatives.

As it is......

http://www.free-lebanon.net/wp-conte...aghdad-Bob.jpg