![]() |
Quote:
|
As long as Shap gets his $ who gives a fuck.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You must not have been reading them very long they are for sale cheap..... and they dont have enough money to buy me either.... |
The interesting thing here in my eyes is that the adult models who got fucked over by manwin are pulling together and taking a stand.
Porn Valley on the other hand bent over and said Thank You Sir May I Have another, |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Some opportunistic investor will get behind them, give them a push, and put together a fan/pay site I'm sure. Always someone looking to make something off the current buzz. |
Quote:
|
Twisty's was sold off to another company, they can do whatever they want it
|
Quote:
|
The members on twistys are extremely critical, lots of harsh remarks about the physiques of certain models or the direction of a scene.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Who's got the motherfucking money. |
I don't care what they do with the site. If Rob wasn't running things I probably wouldn't have logged in. Truth is he was there and I stepped in to back him up.
I'm always there to step up for my old crew members whether they are working Manwin Twistys or another company. |
Quote:
|
I was established years ago on the evils of Manwin and Manwin/Mindgeek related sites.
At the end of the day it was just accepted and it pretty much is what it is. People were loud and disagreed with what Lars and others were doing when CAMS were giant, the ads everywhere, on all different types of sites, but again, nothing was really done. Maybe if more time was put into doing more positive, supporting those who are doing things right, and just trying to create a positive environment would benefit everyone, and also make people more money. You will post 3000 more threads about how evil they are, who is upset, but in the end it really will make no difference. Sure this gets a lot of views, and it gets lots of people to your site and increases what you can sell ads for, but all in all we should probably all start giving props to those doing good, doing right, and supporting them in any way we can. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Both he and Michael provided the right amount of guidance and support. Twistys was my first "office" job. Too many guys in this business can't let go of their ego and insist on micro-managing. Only after leaving the company, did I come to appreciate how much Sean and Michael worked at being good managers in order for the employees to feel appreciated, and the company subsequently thrive. You don't get that sort of understanding by working alone at home. And of course you don't want to get into a fight with a guy who can bench 500lbs :Oh crap |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Rewarding those doing it the right way is a good idea. The good people in the industry ought to band together more for sure to support one another. |
Quote:
|
as in politics: it's the bungled cover up that creates the shit storm
banning models from the forum, which is one aspect Twistys still has going for it, was a dumb move to solve things banning Shap and members, that's just sad members cancelling, will most lickely be the miost shitty for revshare affiliates |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Its interesting to me the success that this handful of models has had in impacting Twistys bottom line...admitted it isnt huge and it wont likely bankrupt them anytime soon but I guarantee you they feel it |
Quote:
It's always a few focal people raising hell and cancelling but for 99% it's business as usual. Edit, that site is Robs site. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Say what you want but Manwin/MindGeek IS struggling financially, almost all of those businesses they bought up are in the red and the few that arent like Twistys are in decline and may well end up as a net loss. I hope that I played some part in them missing out on any mainstream deals, Charlie Gasperino assures me that I have. I assure you I will continue to fight this "war" |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
so the question is will any model put any effort in promotion next year? I think that will be the biggest loss |
|
Quote:
Do you get a feeling of a hunch that there is a possibility to think about mulling over so you can form a hypothesis from which to draw a possibly probable conclusion? :1orglaugh |
Quote:
Then again, judging by some of the people here... http://i.imgur.com/wYVJk67.jpg Who knows :|. |
Quote:
Porn companies should be maturing and recognizing their paying customers are not blindly opening their wallets like 2004. Ramster/Rob was one of the few trying to improve the quality of the product, which really separates your paysite from free sources like tubes |
Quote:
Specific reasons of decline are told by many to be, except obvious financial crisis which hits every business not just this: 1) piracy (dvd and HD rips, mainly torrents and filelockers) and 2) tubes (low quality, but enough for most of the people who just fap 5-10 mins). If it is correct to say that tubes do cannibalize the (prerecorded content) pay sites, then I do not understand why a leading tube company as Mansef->Manwin should have invested money into buying the main (prerecorded content) pay sites. In fact other tube companies (xhamster, xvideos, ...) did not spent money in purchasing (prerecorded content) pay sites, that I know of - more probable they re-invested in real estate or bitcoin, all except pay sites. A tube buying pay sites (if really tubes cannibalize pay sites as most people imply), it is like if the first digital audio/photo/video makers ( = tubes, the future) invested into purchasing the dieing (cannibalized) analogic kodak film, slide projectors and magnetic cassette makers ( = pay site) to continue produce the old stuff no matter what. If a flat LCD monitor maker purchased a dieing CRT monitor company to keep it up producing CRT monitors. An USB flash drive maker purchasing a floppy disk maker and so on. If an online digital media company purchased a printed (paper!) magazine, such as... Playboy. If Mansef->Manwin had to invest money to buy something "because had to spend investor/advertising cash flow money anyway", it made more sense to buy in a growing or at least stable sales market, for example, cam sites: streamate, myfreecams, imlive, nothing smaller than that - and only that, no any twistys, digital playground etc., and even sell out brazzers ASAP, divesting completely from pay sites, leaving only tubes + ad network + cams, nothing else. Was it South who said Manwin wanted to buy Streamate? Perhaps could do it if had not purchased anything else first, I assume you can't buy both big cam and big pay sites (funds limit), choice was made it was pay sites, now what? PS: Was it the christian teachers pension fund who invested in Manwin via new york banks? |
Quote:
think someone from FreeOnes could give a pretty good view of what happened to paysite conversions across the board over the years |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123