![]() |
|
Before the Big Bang? I think Freaks and Geeks
|
There was nothing before I was here.
And everytime I blink my eyes, all "reality" is gone for a few milliseconds. And of course it all disappears while I sleep. I would like to thank all of you for being part of this reality that I created in my mind... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
http://i0.wp.com/amradaronline.files...tatue-tall.gif |
Quote:
If the answer is 'nothing', define 'nothing' and how can something come from nothing? |
Quote:
the cake analogy. i want a cake. i have all the ingredients for a cake, a cake pan to put them in and an oven to bake it in. but until i mix those ingredients in the proper ratio, adding the ingredients in the proper order, and cook it, i have nothing. no cake. this was the case pre-bb, a lot of particles, etc, but at some point, particles mixed, combined, smashed, created friction, etc. to create the proper ratio and environment neccessary for the bb. |
This may answer your question.
|
Quote:
|
50 GFY Physics Majors.
:) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
i believe this is beyond human capability to understand, Einstein had the same belief, doubted we'd ever find out. |
Quote:
the person who explained things that way to me is much smarter than you and me put together. i tried to share with you a very reasonable and very simplified version of what you think nothing is/was. you're the one confused about what nothing was. no need to try and use einstein to support your lack of understanding a basic example, although that's pretty fucking funny.:1orglaugh |
Quote:
The collision of two universal membranes (warning: brane theory is largely tenuous) would have released enough energy to allow matter to dominate anti-matter during the cosmic expansion of another proto-universe (ours). Anything short of this energy release runs into the chicken/egg problem. However, remember that chicken/egg (causality) is only a problem in OUR universe, with OUR physics. That doesn't mean that causality isn't even a THING in another universe. |
Quote:
i'm not claiming to be a physicist. i'm not stating this is my own explanation, i'm not misquoting einstein to prop up my sharing the example. i simply shared an analogy on what nothing could very well be in this sense. |
Quote:
You cannot think of concepts outside of our universe using restrictions that can only be proven to exist in our universe. If A, then B > A, therefore B Is only logical within the context of how things function in our physical surroundings. Outside of our universe? Who knows and, more to the point, who can prove it? :thumbsup tl;dr: the inability for 'something' to come from 'nothing' is a boundary attached to our universe and thus, it is incorrect to assume outside of our universe this is the case. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123