Interesting picture...

Video http://www.nowthisnews.com/news/vlad...tin-submarine/

is this deja vu , all over again ? :helpme

if this thread and 1 other makes deja vu, sure, i guess.

Putin under Red Squear :-)

http://sta-sta.ru/wp-content/uploads...0%BB%D0%B8.jpg

that guy doesnt even remotely look like Putin

if that is putin, i am M. TACHER!

The guy with the camera does look like Putin. If it wasn't him he sure as hell looks a look like him.

This is a known picture of him in 1988, pretty much same hair style, age and looks as the picture with Reagan.

http://www.ticketsofrussia.ru/photos...utin/masha.jpg

Above maybe? :upsidedow

...and he dyed his hair blonde for the occasion?

It's more like a dirty blonde. If you look at even his more current pictures he always has different shades of hi lights. My hair does the same, specially when I was younger. My hair would get a lot of natural highlights and almost be a dirty blonde if I spent a lot of time in the sun. As I've aged my hair is now much darker than it was when I was younger.

Btw he was a KGB agent at the time, so it wouldn't be out of the realm that he might dye his hair..

i assumed you were male. my bad.

Ok that takes care of the pet..

this certainly puts your thread about me in perspective.

Putin against Putin



Shit happens or back to the future :eek7

...and wore a pointy nose?

Jesus, now you are attacking me in threads I'm not even in?
Again with the right wing bull shit, because I hate Obama, what I fucking moron van dweller!

Small dick? I'm sure you would gag on it twinky. Maybe that's what you are fishing for?

My team didn't lose you fucking moron, the Nation did!~

New CNN poll finds that 56% of those questioned disapprove of Obama's performance.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com...w-in-cnn-poll/

BTW dipshit, that's the same for Bush at this point, Reagan on the other hand, his approval was at 63%, the highest recorded for this point in his presidency.

Do you have to remind yourself to breathe?

just keep reminding him he's a dipshit living in a van and he'll ultimately put you on ignore! score!

I think he is delusional thinking that maybe Obama's numbers will go up because of his efforts, maybe we should pull together and have the exhaust checked for leaks?

:1orglaugh

the funniest part is i tried to be nice to the guy, i've never even started shit with him, he took a comment i made about obama, putin and homos and quoted it and spun it back to insult me, that's when i started the van comments.

truly a bizarre poster.

I just wish he had some imagination, it's like trading jabs with a 13 year old

He kept telling me I was wrong, I had to continually show him that I wasn't till he finally agreed. Then he went in another direction that had nothing to do with it

Great share man ...

You wish I had some imagination, while you are talking to a guy that has posted the same thing about 20 times in a couple different topics and somehow he thinks it's funny. The three of you do nothing but bitch and moan non stop and take jabs at people that don't agree with you. Then you get all high an mighty when someone does the same back at you? You being the king of imagination, the guy that just posts regurgitated BS you hear on Fox News each day and calling everyone that disagrees with you a moron.

Btw I just knew you couldn't enter a topic with out somehow bitching about Obama..

i find nothing funny about pointing out dipshits who live in vans.

it's kinda sad actually. but, hey, you asked for it.

That's what I said

Ok, let's talk about this picture.. Since you seem to think everything Obama does is wrong, what are your thoughts about Reagan supplying the Taliban with weapons and training. Do you think he made a mistake for short sighted progress or do you think it was worth it?

http://0.tqn.com/d/politicalhumor/1/...terrorists.jpg

So you are changing the subject, OK. Yep,
This photograph is from 1983, when Reagan and the CIA were dancing around the idea of arming Mujahadin fighters in order to fight back against Soviet incursion in Afghanistan. The result was a well-armed, well-trained group of jihadis who resisted (some say defeated) the onslaught of superior Soviet weaponry.

Once the Soviets retreated, the U.S. lost interest and pulled the funding. Osama bin Laden took interest, and filled the vacuum, later fathering the Taliban.

Oh, one last thing, you are a stupid shit that lives in a van!

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I would bet my homes and everything else that that is not Putin with the camera behind the kid.

Putin is the real G

Actually I didn't change the subject, you not once even talked about the the actual topic. You just came right in bitching about Obama because your small brain can't focus on two things at once it seems.

Also you should read your history books, the Soviets were actually requested by the Afghan govt, their so called invasion was requested by the afghan govt whom was very unpopular at the time and had led to a rebellion against that govt. The soviet army was meant to come in an assist the new govt whom had just gone through a unpopular coup and stabilize the country.

The soviets never invaded, that's BS propaganda from the US and our allies, it was called a invasion of Muslim lands by the religious extremist. The fact is the Soviets were asked to be there but because of that, the tribal villagers saw it as an assault on a Muslim country. ie their beloved chance at jihad. Due to the soviets backing a unpopular govt, it grew into a bigger rebellion which was then supported by the US and our allies.

No one cared that we were backing religious extremists, giving them billions of dollars in training and weapons, then dropping them like a hot potato after the Soviets withdrew. The fact is we funded the groups that would come back and attack us.. The soviets final withdraw was in 1989 and al Qaeda was formed in 1988 while still getting weapons and money from the US govt.

It's wasn't sometime later.. They were already active while we were funding them. That is actual fact and it wasn't much longer that they started attacking the US due to our continued involvement in the region.

So once again, since you avoided the question, do you think Reagan was right in funding these religious extremist for a short term goal, or do you think now that we know how that ended up, do you think that was a mistake?

So you changed the subject again?
You posted a picture calling the Arabs in the picture Terrorists. Were they, no. But because they were Dressed in garb liken to Afghanistan men, you call them terrorist, so anyone dressed like that is a terrorist?

Reagan funded them to be a pain in the ass to the Soviets you fucking moron, we were in a cold war against them, or are you too fucking thick to get that?

Go back to your van, check for exhaust leaks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign...administration

On July 20, 1987, the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the country was announced pursuant to the negotiations that led to the Geneva Accords of 1988,[85] with the last Soviets leaving on February 15, 1989.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Qaida

Al-Qaeda (/ælˈkaɪdə/ al-ky-də; Arabic: القاعدة‎ al-qāʿidah, Arabic: [ælqɑːʕɪdɐ], translation: "The Base" and alternatively spelled al-Qaida and sometimes al-Qa'ida) is a global militant Islamist organization founded by Osama bin Laden in Peshawar, Pakistan,[15] at some point between August 1988[16] and late 1989,[17] with its origins being traceable to the Soviet War in Afghanistan.

Mujahideen was still in effect in 1992 Mujahideen forces caused serious casualties to the Soviet forces, and made the war very costly for the Soviet Union. In 1989, the Soviet Union withdrew its forces from Afghanistan. Many districts and cities then fell to the mujahideen; in 1992 the DRA's last president, Mohammad Najibullah, was overthrown.

Seems your dates are a little fucked up, maybe check the internet connection to your van?

They weren't terrorist? You mean they weren't terrorist because they were fighting the soviets. They had however kidnapped and killed a US ambassador to Afghan but they weren't terrorist.. LoL

Funny how when they fought against the US enemy they were freedom fighters but when they fought against the US they were terrorist. They were always Islamist extremist, in fact the CIA even used that to get more jihadist into the fight against the Soviets from other Arab countries. Do you even know what Mujahideen means? It means the people doing jihad..

We propped them up and funded them and then almost soon as the Soviets leave we invade Iraq and then wonder why the Islamist extremist attacked us.. Suddenly then it's ok to call them terrorist.. You act as if there were some great amount of time in which Islamist came into power.. Umm hello that's who we funded.

Somehow you claim once again that I have changed the subject, yet once again you fail to answer.. The question I've asked you twice. Seems like you are the guy that is dodging the topic..

What dates are fucked up? You just proved what I said.. It even says right there in your post, that they started during the war in Afghan in 88-89. The soviets completed their pull out in 89, which is what I said. Do you think the guns the US had given them as well as the training and funding just suddenly vanished into thin air?

I guess you don't have a fucking clue again, what a surprise!

A mujahid is one who strives or struggles on behalf of Islam; mujahideen is the plural of the same word. The word mujahid is an Arabic participle drawn from the same root as the Arabic word jihad, to strive or struggle.

Fuck, how many times do you have to prove how fucking stupid you are?

I'm done with you, you are just too fucking retarded.

We used them for a purpose to fuck with the Soviets and they changed after that. You fucking act like we sent them money in hopes they would attack us, you're a fucking retard living in a Van that needs the exhaust leaks fixed.
Someone was attacking a country that we helped the other side, you act like that's wrong. We helped Afghanistan

You called them terrorist in a picture with Reagan stating they were terrorist, when at the time they were allies you fucking moron!

Then when I called you on it, you changed the message you fucking moron

Fuck you are stupid

LoL just like always when you can't win the argument it's name calling and you running off. They were always radicals and they were always Islamist extremist, the fucking CIA used that to our advantage and we gave them money and funding.

They didn't suddenly become radicalized or change, they were always that way hence the reason they were already trying to over throw the Afghan govt prior to Soviet or US involvement. The simple fact is the soviets backed the Afghan govt and we backed the radicals to continue destabilizing the region and as Reagan's own guys said it.. "Make the soviets bleed".

This is the problem with your little neo con heroes.. They just went around pushing sticks into bees nests and over 30 years later we are still dealing with the problems they stirred up.

Hey shit for brains, you do realize that Reagan left office in Jan 1989

And I didn't run off fuck wad, I took my girl for a ride, then drinks and finally dinner. You should find a woman and maybe give up your hate for those that are not even in power


And again, one last time, that picture was taken in 1983, they were are allies during that picture, admit you have the brain capacity of a block of wood.