![]() |
Quote:
You fucking idiot. Did you really say that ? "watch this and if you do decide to vaccinate your child you can know it was an informed decision". So a youtube clip suggested by a raging conspiracy loon is going to give me all the facts ? In Germany it is illegal to deny the holocaust. Not just frowned upon, but actually a felony offense. Now you might say that is a bit severe, free speech and all that, but the more I see the nasty harmful shit that you post, the more I am starting to see that completely free speech can actually be dangerous. Some regulation has its benefits. You are not deserving of the privilege of free speech. The stuff you posted about the school massacre kids still being alive was particularly unpleasant, you are clearly lacking in any kind of empathy to the parents. You are no better than those wackos that protest at funerals. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
For a fucking moron like wehateporn to say anything about a brain disorder which neuroscientists worldwide, have yet to fully grasp and understand is idiotic at best. |
|
I thank Jesus every morning that WHP cannot find a chick to have kids with him.
|
Quote:
|
Its not particularly nice watching your new baby get vaccinated however I, as I am sure the vast majority of parents believe it's necessary. The risk of problems caused by vaccination are minute compared to the dangers of not getting the vaccination in the first place.
At 2 months your baby is given a 5 in one dose which protects against diptheria, whooping cough and polio amongst others. At 3 months the child is given a topup which protects the above plus meningitas C At one year old they are given the MMR jab which protects against measles, mumps and rubella. I, as have all my friends and everyone I know taken our children to the doctors for these injections and I am not aware of a single case of it causing anything more than a slight temperature. I don't know a great deal about the viruses that these injections protect us all from but I am pretty sure, cos I am not stupid that the consequences of picking up one of these viruses would be a whole lot worse than any risk by not having them. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Your last sentence summarizes the topic pretty fukkin well, congrats! |
I haven't had shots since I was an infant. Had the flu 2 maximum 3 times in the last 14 years
|
i have a severely supressed immune system, flu shots work for me ever since i started them 3-4 seasons ago
i wouldn't think of getting on an airplane without one. |
Many years ago, no child was "autistic" - but there were tons of retards.
Today, no child is a "retard" - but there are tons with "autism spectrum disorder," various types of "ADHD" etc. Isn't is just a label? Are the ratios between the two eras any different? In society's panic to label a cause, many are foregoing vaccinations. Now we have fucking medieval diseases breaking out here and there. For a while, these folks were merely relying on other people's vaccination to protect their children from outbreaks. But once the unvaccinated hit a certain number, larger outbreaks are sure to follow. |
Quote:
Autism rates are higher, exponentially so!! because they didn't diagnose it so fucking broadly and specifically before! Dan Ackroyd just found out he has aspergers or a mild form of it. He didn't get it from vaccines, they just didn't have the definitions to diagnose it at the time. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
the extra bowl is for getting that wheatgrass down the hatch right? :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Look, we got plenty of experts here.
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
lofling is ongoing
|
Quote:
Black Death AKA Bubonic Plague kills at least 20 in Madagascar |
Quote:
Like you say, 40 years ago they would have made a blanket diagnosis of retarded, but now we know a lot more and they can be more specific with a diagnosis. |
Quote:
here i thought simple AB would do the trick |
Quote:
50 years ago, nobody wanted the world to know that their child had "problems." It was kept secret. And on top of that, a lot of children that are alive today would have never lived 50 years ago, due to modern medicine. I am 30 and I know that if the medicine I needed when I was a baby wasn't around at that time, I would never be here. Comparing stats today and 50 years ago is very rough at best. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now with social media everyone knows everything about everyone and it is much more common knowledge. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
From your article:- "Dr. Gary Goldstein, scientific adviser to the national advocacy group Autism Speaks, said the explanation for the rising autism prevalence is probably complex. Labeling and diagnosing probably play a role, as do genetics, but he believes the increase surpasses those two explanations. "I'm seeing more children with autism than I ever would have expected to see," said Goldstein, who is chief executive of the Kennedy Krieger Institute, a treatment center for pediatric developmental disabilities in Baltimore." |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is actually massive correlation between autism and the age of the parents. A 35 year old male is something like 15 times more likely to have an autistic child than a 25 year old male. And what's happening atm? Everyone's waiting longer and longer to have kids... more autism, better diagnosis. And a few whackjobs on the internet who couldn't recognise a fact is it sat on their face and suffocated them. They all cried "Mercury - Mercury!" then they took mercury out of the scheduled childhood vaccinations and autism kept going up proving any link was total bullshit.. then they moved onto something else.. It's just whackamole with crazy, you can't win, you knock one down and they shift to something else and then forget you knocked the other one down and start using it again. It's just a shame you can't round up all the people that think "measles is safe" even though it's thousands of times less safe than a vaccine and put them on an island where their kids can die, become infertile, deaf etc and not harm the rest of us. |
Quote:
"Men aged 35 to 39 years and 40 to 49 years raise their risk of having a child with autism by 40 and 50 percent, respectively, compared with men aged 20 to 24 years, the researchers found." http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/he...enia.html?_r=0 Also correlation is not causation, it could be that the kids of older parents are more susceptible to vaccine damage, or that older parents give more Tylenol around the time of vaccination. :2 cents: Quote:
They replaced it with Aluminium which is even worse. However, it's not the job of the parents to work out if it's the Mercury in vaccines causing Autism, it's the job of the CDC to find out what's causing Autism, unfortunately they are derelict of their duties. Quote:
|
Quote:
You might actually be correct about something one day, but after all the bile you spout, and given that there is not a single loon theory that you dont believe, you are nothing more than the village idiot. So your latest crazed rantings have the medical industry (which is certainly not perfect) plotting to enslave us all. Despite the fact that life expectancy in the medicated west has nearly doubled in the last 150 years, and despite the fact that infant mortality rates have reduced by 90%, you still believe every crank theory. Big Oil/Big pharma/Big Food. It is all so lame. What is amusing is the believe one, believe them all syndrome, and the fact that it is you that thinks he is the enlightened free thinker. :1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123