GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Another Adult Industry Moratorium Effective Immediately (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1128019)

JFK 12-08-2013 03:54 PM
Fitty sad state of affairs :2 cents:

Robbie 12-08-2013 04:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumbledog (Post 19901112)
You missed my point, but that's ok.

This response is just like a torrent or tube owner justifying how they steal our content in one way or another.

Why do you stop your car at red light? Because its the law or ignorant? or simply both?
So what was your point? I'm not being combative. I just have a very strong opinion.

I don't believe that you can blame producers. Performers are not their children. They are grown men and women.

Think about this:
In the 1980's AIDS was a death sentence. And it was an epidemic. Nobody was sure what the hell was going to happen next.
John Holmes...arguably the "biggest" male porn star of all time, even died from it (along with a few other IV drug user/performers).

Nobody called for "mandatory condoms" or for the govt. to get involved or blamed producers for people's "safety" when they are filming people fucking.

By the time the 1990's got around, if you got diagnosed with HIV you could take medication and stop it from ever becoming AIDS. It was no longer an automatic death sentence.
People have been living with it for decades and these day take ONE pill a day. Just like taking a vitamin in the morning. They are perfectly healthy and live normal lives.

And in the 1990's, nobody was screaming all this bullshit. They didn't even do mandatory testing.

Mandatory testing didn't even start until a few years back.

I just think that everybody should stop knee-jerk reacting and take a deep breath.
Testing does allow folks to stop the spread of it. (too bad that "civilians" don't test every once in a while too)

You're never gonna stop people from doing IV drugs and sharing needles. It's just a fact. Been happening since our great grandparents were young.
You're also never gonna stop guys from fucking other guys. It just happens. Nobody wants to admit it...but it happens all the time.

And you have to keep in mind, these guys and girls who are "performers" work in the sex industry for a reason: They are good at fucking, and they enjoy fucking a lot more than the average human being.

You can't expect Michael Phelps to not go swimming when he's not doing the Olympics. He probably is in a pool more than anybody on Earth. LOL
And you can't expect good looking, young people to not fuck and have fun.

All of us can rail about it and demand that they always use condoms (which is the WORST sex in the world...you can't feel shit) on set AND in their personal lives.

They won't.

And you can't blame a guy holding the camera and paying out the money and taking all the legal risks when you have extremely sexual people who voluntarily are fucking in front of your camera.

If you really think about it...minus the knee-jerk reactions and "outrage", it's kind of silly to think that anybody can command people to wear a condom or not fuck in their private lives.

It's a goddamn miracle that people are willing to allow blood to be drawn and their medical records passed around like cliff notes.

But what isn't silly...is ALLOWING the govt. to take step one into our sex lives.

Our founding fathers NEVER envisioned that.
And before you tell me that AIDS didn't exist then, I'd like to remind you that Syphilis & Gonorrhea were death sentences up until antibiotics were made.

I don't recall George Washington or Thomas Jefferson saying that the govt. had any right to tell prostitutes of the 18th and 19th century that they had to wear a condom.
Because they KNEW it's not the govt.'s place to do so.

It's YOUR place and MY place to make that decision for OURSELVES. And not for others.

Porno Dan 12-08-2013 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumbledog (Post 19901068)
Thankfully, it is not up to you for our safety.

However, this will slow down all the so-called producers from just simply using this industry to get laid and make a little extra money by over looking the logistics and safety.

I can count at least 20 producers who are more motivated by sex rather than doing the right thing.
It is was up to me all shoots would be permitted, talent would be tested and they would use condoms, there is nothing safer than that.

Robbie 12-08-2013 04:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porno Dan (Post 19901133)
It is was up to me all shoots would be permitted, talent would be tested and they would use condoms, there is nothing safer than that.
And we would all eat govt. approved diets, nobody would be allowed to drink alcohol, cars would be made of all rubber and not go faster than 15 mph.

And life would just fucking suck.

I hope that what you are suggesting never, ever happens. I know that you are being forced to operate that way because you moved to L.A.

But could you imagine having to do all this shit when you were living in Maryland and shooting swinger porn for all those years? Ughhh...

Giving govt. the right to force you to pay them big bucks for a permit doesn't make anybody safer. It just puts money in corrupt politicians hands. And then if you do make any money off of your work, they will double dip and tax you on top of it.

It's one of the reasons that people have so much trouble setting up brick and mortar business in city limits. Everybody has their hand out.

We opened a used car lot and a restaurant/bar when I lived in South Carolina a few years back.

After a lot of due diligence (almost a year), we opened both businesses just outside of the city limits of the town I lived in. It was way too much hassle and expense to run inside the city with all of it's "permits" and "fees".

I think I'd probably leave the country to shoot if we allow the govt. to just take over our business.

I do agree that if folks want to use a condom because it makes them feel safer...they should be able to.
And I should be able to choose whether I want to shoot condom porn or bareback porn.
Freedom and personal choice.

I will also say, that IF a concensus were to develop that everybody wants to start shooting condom only and keep the govt. out of our lives...then I would go along with it.
It will definitely suck balls though. Not only does it destroy the whole "breeding" niche for interracial sex, and takes away the fantasy aspect of porn...but it also would leave Claudia Marie very sore because a lot of guys take forever to cum when they have to wear a condom.

And our scenes don't "jerk to cum". What I film is REAL. They are both fucking...and both Claudia Marie and the male talent have orgasms from the actual sex in every scene. It's part of what differentiates "hot" sex from generic boring sex.

And with a condom...it's gonna be a long, long shoot for a lot of these guys, and some of them will have trouble keeping it hard too (like me if I had to use a condom)

For us, shooting porn with condoms would take our jobs from being enjoyable and profitable...to being very un-enjoyable and not as profitable. :(
Which I believe is exactly what the AHF wants.

They want us shut down...period.

Rumbledog 12-08-2013 04:57 PM
When was the last time you went into a bar and observed people using needles at the bar?
The establishment would never allow this. Because they would in fact be responsible by law.

The same should be applied to producers. It is your set and your responsibility as to what happens on your set.

Do not cut corners in safety, otherwise sooner or later in one way or another you will regret it. Disease or fines.

Robbie 12-08-2013 05:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumbledog (Post 19901156)
When was the last time you went into a bar and observed people using needles at the bar?
The establishment would never allow this. Because they would in fact be responsible by law.

The same should be applied to producers. It is your set and your responsibility as to what happens on your set.

Do not cut corners in safety, otherwise sooner or later in one way or another you will regret it. Disease or fines.
A bar and a hotel room are two different things. A bar is a public place that is highly regulated for people to get drunk. A hotel room is where people sleep and fuck in private.

And yeah, people at bars DO sneak into the bathroom and out to their cars and do all kinds of drugs. You know that. It's just human nature.

Look, I understand where you are coming from.

But as a person who shot content since 1998...a "set" is most time somebodies house or a hotel room (unless you are rich enough to buy a building and create a studio).

I have never encountered any safety issues in a hotel room or a bedroom or a living room.

This ain't like a bunch of steel workers 1000 feet in the air building a skyscraper. :1orglaugh

It's a couple of people having sex in a bed or on a couch.

If that was a "safety" issue...none of us would exist because nobody would have sex. lol

I just think that a lot of folks are way over-reacting.

It seems to be the way our society is in the last decade. As I pointed out earlier...back when AIDS was 1000 times worse, nobody acted like this.

Hell, our govt. has spent TRILLIONS of dollars and forces us to be searched like criminals to fly an airplane...all over a dozen guys with box cutters hijacking some airplanes. (even though in the 1960's, 1970's, 1980's hijackings were taking place all the time).

Seems like we've become a society that as a whole is just plain out...scared. And wants to be "protected".

I personally do not WANT to be "protected" by the govt.
The govt. is generally a bunch of criminals voted in by religious nutcases.

They are just itching to close us down. God knows they've tried for decades, but that pesky constitution wouldn't allow it.

BUT...if fear could motivate us to give the govt. the power to search us at airports and spend money that we don't have to do so...then it's an easy one for everybody to think they need "protecting" for their own "safety".

How about this: I'll take care of myself thank you. I don't need some bureaucrat "regulating" fucking.

Now if I decide to shoot a scene with 2 people fucking while jumping out of an airplane, or fucking on top of an active volcano, or fucking while driving 100 mph...then YEAH, there's a safety issue.

2 (or more) people fucking in a living room or a hotel room?
Just doesn't scare me enough to think my "safety" would be in danger.

I'm not arguing with you by the way. Just debating it with you and trying to present the other side of the coin. :)

It's a good discussion to have.

Trend 12-08-2013 05:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19899354)
Believe what you all want to believe man but it's porn roulette with all the escorting and off-set nonsense going on.
Please identify one case where a WOMAN in this industry has contracted and transmitted HIV or for that matter any STD because of escorting or "off set nonsense".

Like it or not .. this is a male issue. And a crossover one at that. :2 cents:

mPz 12-09-2013 04:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trend (Post 19901185)
Please identify one case where a WOMAN in this industry has contracted and transmitted HIV or for that matter any STD because of escorting or "off set nonsense".

Like it or not .. this is a male issue. And a crossover one at that. :2 cents:
Agreed !!!

gabe100 12-09-2013 03:04 PM
Blowing up on twitter ATM. Not sure i'm reading this right but it looks like he contacted her after he knew.

https://twitter.com/CarterPressley/s...715329/photo/1

Porno Dan 12-09-2013 10:35 PM
Looks like this moratorium is going to last than I initially thought.

Regulation of the adult industry is going to be inevitable.

RyuLion 12-09-2013 10:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porno Dan (Post 19902766)
Looks like this moratorium is going to last than I initially thought.

Regulation of the adult industry is going to be inevitable.
:2 cents::2 cents::thumbsup

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 12-10-2013 12:48 AM
http://www.agi.it/uploads/newson/rG/...a-contagio.jpg

Quote:
What You Know About the Porn Moratorium is Wrong

By Diane Duke

On Friday (Dec 6th), one of the testing facilities that serve the adult industry alerted us to a positive HIV test by an adult film performer. While we don't yet know if the performer acquired the virus in his or her personal life, or while working in adult film, we?ve called a moratorium and immediately halted all production.

Unfortunately, I've seen a lot of misinformation in the media, and some truly reprehensible behavior on social media over the past few days, and felt it was necessary to explain how a moratorium works, and call for compassion for the positive performer.

A moratorium is a preventative measure used to protect adult performers. Over the past year, we've called two other moratoriums when performers who wished to work tested positive for HIV. In each case, the virus was acquired offset and was prevented from entering the performer pool by our testing system (known as PASS).

Like a ringing car alarm, a moratorium is a sign of a working system, not a broken one. Adult performers ? like all of us ? have personal lives. We cannot control, and should not look to control, people's private lives. What we can do is make sure that HIV is stopped at the gate by testing protocols.

Once a moratorium is called, all production stops so the genealogy of the virus can be traced. The performer who tested positive is interviewed. All sexual partners ? on-screen or off ? who fall within the transmission window are contacted and tested. This allows doctors to trace the transmission history of the virus: how it was acquired, if any other performers were exposed, and if there is any further threat to the performer pool. What doctors don?t disclose is the performer?s identity.

Sadly, almost immediately after the moratorium was called, members of the media began searching for the positive performer's name, in what can be described as a witch hunt. This weekend, on social media and on blogs, a man was 'outted' as the positive performer. This is disgraceful.

First, we don't know if the named performer was the source of the positive test or not. HIPPA regulations rightly prevent the testing clinic from disclosing a patient's identity to anyone, even the Free Speech Coalition, unless the performer allows it. And we shouldn't need to know a name. We only need to know if people are at risk. Everything else about the performer?s health should be between the performer, that performer's partners, and a doctor.

HIV is a virus, not a moral issue. Yet both blogs and mainstream media unwittingly rushed to blame the victim. By assuming that adult film work is responsible for the virus, the mainstream media essentially resorts to slut-shaming. On the blogosphere and social media, it can be even worse ? unfounded assumptions about escort work, or drug use, or "cross-over" sex (that is, sex with men or transgender performers) are the most common scapegoat.

At a time when we most need to support someone in need, we rush to find a villain. I understand that at a difficult time like this, everyone wants to find an explanation. But in doing so, we must respect the performer's privacy, and restrain ourselves from moralizing over a medical issue.

Whoever the performer is, we need to be there to support them ? not shame or attack them. No matter how the virus was acquired, the performer is one of our own. If the performer does choose to speak publicly, the industry needs to rally behind him or her ? perhaps provide interim support or help find work elsewhere in the business.

An adult performer who tests positive for HIV faces not only a life-changing diagnosis, but the loss of his or her livelihood. If we truly care about performers, we need to do so not only when they are on a box cover, but also when they are at their most vulnerable.

Any positive test rightly spurs discussions as to how to make the industry safer for the performers. (Currently, every fourteen days, a performer must be tested for a full slate of STIs, including HIV, in order to be cleared to work in adult film.) We can have honest disagreements as to how to best do this.

I only ask that these discussions involve the performers themselves, rather than politicians and pundits who sometimes claim to speak for them. We have a vital, intelligent, engaged performer base with strong opinions about their own health and sexuality. We ? the media, the industry, the doctors ? need to listen to them, and accord them the respect they deserve.

Over the next few days, we'll learn more about the current positive test. If the virus was prevented from entering the performer pool, retests will begin and the industry will slowly return to work.

I only hope that the discussions that come are substantive, not sanctimonious ? and that everyone remembers that we're dealing not with a cautionary tale or a talking point, but a real person who is struggling, and needs our compassion and support now more than ever. Thank you.
:stoned

ADG

DWB 12-10-2013 03:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19901163)

I just think that a lot of folks are way over-reacting.
The problem is that the people who are over reacting are people who want others to protect them. I get where you are coming from, and I'm the same way, it's my life and I'll deal with the consequences of my actions. But very few people are like that and want to be taken care of instead of accepting responsibility. These are the types who always freak out, because they can point the finger to someone else and say, "IT'S YOUR FAULT, NOT MINE!"

And while you are correct about never stopping drug users and gay sex, the fact remains that no one has to hire those people. That is a choice everyone has to make, and after they make that choice they can't be surprised if they hire one of them, or fuck one of them, and it turns out that he has HIV. But by relying on others to protect them, they don't have to swallow that pill and take blame themselves. That is how the majority of people are. Blame the FSC, blame Porno Dan, blame Mike South, blame TTS, blame whoever. But don't blame yourself for making a horrible decision.

Grapesoda 12-10-2013 07:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rumbledog (Post 19901156)
When was the last time you went into a bar and observed people using needles at the bar?
The establishment would never allow this. Because they would in fact be responsible by law.

The same should be applied to producers. It is your set and your responsibility as to what happens on your set.

Do not cut corners in safety, otherwise sooner or later in one way or another you will regret it. Disease or fines.
when is the last time you went in a bar and didn't see dealing going on? :2 cents:

Grapesoda 12-10-2013 07:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabe100 (Post 19902236)
Blowing up on twitter ATM. Not sure i'm reading this right but it looks like he contacted her after he knew.

https://twitter.com/CarterPressley/s...715329/photo/1
yes Gabe, this is the issue... the girls know what this cat has been up to shooting content trades while the grownups don't... the models and agencies/producers out here want everything checked and double checked... there are people at GFY not involved in any aspect of the situation that try and make it worse than is it, stating falsehoods like the industry doesn't care blah blah blah....

we are voluntary losing money everyday to get this sorted out, while the creeps aren't losing a fucking penny... and they are screaming the loudest.... makes you wonder how they asshats would really react if they were bleeding money :2 cents:

Grapesoda 12-10-2013 07:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19901163)
A bar and a hotel room are two different things. A bar is a public place that is highly regulated for people to get drunk. A hotel room is where people sleep and fuck in private.

And yeah, people at bars DO sneak into the bathroom and out to their cars and do all kinds of drugs. You know that. It's just human nature.

Look, I understand where you are coming from.

But as a person who shot content since 1998...a "set" is most time somebodies house or a hotel room (unless you are rich enough to buy a building and create a studio).

I have never encountered any safety issues in a hotel room or a bedroom or a living room.

This ain't like a bunch of steel workers 1000 feet in the air building a skyscraper. :1orglaugh

It's a couple of people having sex in a bed or on a couch.

If that was a "safety" issue...none of us would exist because nobody would have sex. lol

I just think that a lot of folks are way over-reacting.

It seems to be the way our society is in the last decade. As I pointed out earlier...back when AIDS was 1000 times worse, nobody acted like this.

Hell, our govt. has spent TRILLIONS of dollars and forces us to be searched like criminals to fly an airplane...all over a dozen guys with box cutters hijacking some airplanes. (even though in the 1960's, 1970's, 1980's hijackings were taking place all the time).

Seems like we've become a society that as a whole is just plain out...scared. And wants to be "protected".

I personally do not WANT to be "protected" by the govt.
The govt. is generally a bunch of criminals voted in by religious nutcases.

They are just itching to close us down. God knows they've tried for decades, but that pesky constitution wouldn't allow it.

BUT...if fear could motivate us to give the govt. the power to search us at airports and spend money that we don't have to do so...then it's an easy one for everybody to think they need "protecting" for their own "safety".

How about this: I'll take care of myself thank you. I don't need some bureaucrat "regulating" fucking.

Now if I decide to shoot a scene with 2 people fucking while jumping out of an airplane, or fucking on top of an active volcano, or fucking while driving 100 mph...then YEAH, there's a safety issue.

2 (or more) people fucking in a living room or a hotel room?
Just doesn't scare me enough to think my "safety" would be in danger.

I'm not arguing with you by the way. Just debating it with you and trying to present the other side of the coin. :)

It's a good discussion to have.
Robbie doesn't waste your time with these guys... they don't have a fucking clue and probably have never even see a woman nude except on video

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 12-10-2013 03:41 PM
http://images.tlavideo.com/images/z/cg/6/1/308516.jpg

TJ Cummings speaks (posted @ Mike South's blog)"

Quote:
I just got off the phone with T.J. Cummings who wanted to ?set the record straight?

He indicated that he ?has NOT read this site and that everything he was responding to was coming to him from elsewhere and that it is full of lies and misrepresentations?

He said that he was set to shoot for Wicked pictures on Fri, Dec 6th, and went to get tested at TTS on Tuesday, Dec 3rd. he said that TTS called him on Wednesday, December the 4th, and notified him that there was a problem with his test. They sent him the results of everything BUT his HIV test. He said they told him that ?this was not unusual and that he had nothing to worry about? and that they hod gotten no results from his first test. (added from my notes)

He said the next day, Thursday, Dec the 5th, TTS Florida called him and asked him to come in and retest and they they never told him he should not have any sexual contact until he retested. He said that Sergio at TTS could back all of this up. He restated that they told him he ?had nothing to worry about.?

He booked the webcam scene with Pressley around 7PM on Thursday, Dec 5th, he did confirm that date and time. (7PM ish)

He did so thinking that his test was fine and that there was nothing to worry about even though he had been told to come in and retest because ?TTS doesnt like to have inconclusive tests on the books?.

He chose to retest at CET instead and was notified by CET on Friday, Dec 6th, at 1030 AM (approx) that he had tested positive for HIV.

He said that he has never in his life escorted and that any ads that appear to be him are fraudulent.

He also stated that he has done NO cam shows in the last 6 months and that all of his sexual partners, both on and off camera since October 1 have been notified and have retested at CET.
Quote:
posted by christianxxx

a few things from someone who probably understands the situation better than anyone.
look, he was forthcoming in that he was getting fucked off camera by a few women, a few TS, and a lot of guys. In private he was a complete bottom and that?s pretty clear to anyone who can view his picture collection on his twitter, much less those who knew him in this industry.

so if you are bottoming without condoms for untested or tested men and TS in real life and you are sick as a dog, and then you test on the 3rd and it comes back inconclusive for HIV on the 4th?.and you try to sell to people that you had no idea in the world that HIV was possible and you were still booking content/cam shows not even paid shoots, well then I have a bridge I would like to sell you in AZ.

This is a man who has been in the biz for over 10 years and has done gay/TS scenes in the past and has been with gay/TS girls privately for years long after he stopped doing scenes. This isn?t someone who was unaware of the risks he was taking in real life.

1. why did he choose to go to CET on the 5th when TTS told him his test was inconclusive?

2. how does he think he contracted HIV?
Quote:
posted by mikesouth:

There has been a little breaking news.

I have evidence again of first generation exposures who have not been contacted. most, understandably do not wish to come forward except to say they havent heard from either TJ or the FSC

I have LOTS of evidence that TJ?s statement the he never escorted is not necessarily true, lots of people contacting me with ads, phone recordings of him quoting rates etc.

It is also clear that he wasn?t truthful when he said he hadnt done any cam shows for the last 6 months, there are cam shows he did last week online.

Many of you have thanked me for providing this information, to that I say you are welcome, I believe you have a right to know this and I dont believe there is any way the The FSC could do a complete exposure list, particularly not get the exposures and get them all retested in less than 24 hours as they have claimed.

In the last 24 hrs I have been called sanctimonious by none other than Bill Margold, I consider that a badge of honor?thank you Bill. I have also been called everything but a white boy by Diane Duke, the single most reprehensible and irresponsible sub human being in this industry. I just consider that one par for the course?.
:stoned

ADG

Porno Dan 12-10-2013 06:30 PM
Now the entire industry is shut down while we wait for the results one person to return!

http://freespeechcoalition.com/index.ph

"At this point, we are awaiting one final test result from a performer who went to a personal physician whose testing system does not have as swift a turnaround time as industry clinics. If the results of that final are clear, we will establish a date to lift the moratorium. Until then, it remains in place"

xxxjay 12-10-2013 08:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porno Dan (Post 19903869)
Now the entire industry is shut down while we wait for the results one person to return!

http://freespeechcoalition.com/index.ph

"At this point, we are awaiting one final test result from a performer who went to a personal physician whose testing system does not have as swift a turnaround time as industry clinics. If the results of that final are clear, we will establish a date to lift the moratorium. Until then, it remains in place"
Bingo. One person gets it. :)

Go Dan!

RyuLion 12-10-2013 09:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 19903988)
Bingo. One person gets it. :)

Go Dan!
:2 cents::thumbsup:2 cents:

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 12-11-2013 11:20 AM
http://ibokawp.files.wordpress.com/2..._a2_poster.png

Quote:
Some Questions The FSC Wont Answer
By Mike South
December 11th, 2013

It?s an interesting time in this biz, very interesting.

The FSC won?t admit to it right now but they intend to lift the shooting moratorium on Monday. Interesting move?And since I just outed it they will prolly change it, it wouldnt be the first time.

the rationale is that they claim to have tested everyone who is a first generation exposure and are waiting on one result to come back. they claim that the ?window period? for the test they use is 7 to 10 days and that they are making sure that everyone has at least a 14 day test.

I dunno about y?all but sounds like to me someone flunked first grade math seing that TJ Cummings didnt even test positive til less than a week ago?.But theres a bigger problem and that is that the HIV test we use has a 7-10 day window only in optimal conditions, the real window for it to be 98% accurate is 30 days. Dont believe me? Look it up.

Now lets talk about that first generation exposure list. I have more than one person who says they had direct exposure to TJ Cummings in November and have never been notified, they only found out from my blog that they had been exposed. Lukeisback has a similar story, I have no idea if the people are the same ones. But I have a pretty good idea that the exposure list is FULL of holes.

Lets face it TJ has been less than forthright in this whole thing, it certainly wouldn?t surprise me if he ?forgot? some of these encounters.

But there?s even a more glaring hole.

Who would be the best people to consult to find out his on screen exposures? Maybe the agents?

I talked to a LATATA Board member tonight and was told that LATATA has had two long meetings in the last two days and one of the topics is that not one single LATATA agency has been contacted to help with an exposure list. EIGHT Licensed agencies and not one was consulted?

For anyone crying ?privacy? thats stupidity exemplified, TJ Cummings has already given me an on the record interview. I would like to point out that AVN and XBiz have yet to acknowledge that he is the infected performer, when i asked Helmy at XBiz about this his response was ?We believe in privacy? Ummm he has already come forward man?himself?.In a public forum. You are waiting on permission from The FSC to make this public? REALLY?

Allow me to remind you that if you got your industry news from XBiz or AVN all you would know is that someone tested positive a week ago and that you dont know what a fucking moratorium is?.SMFH?

Somehow I would bet if Helmy or Theo had been screwing around with porn people off camera they?d feel they had a right to know if they had been exposed, I cant imagine they are that beholden to The FSC.

They would probably have been reading my blog every ten minutes to get the info?hell they probably do anyway.

Finally I got this first hand account via email from an industry insider:

Quote:
You may be interested to know that on Wed Dec 4th ? TJ Cummings was on a set waiting to shoot and was calling TTS annoyed they had not yet sent him his test as he needed it to shoot his sex scene. On set he was told he had a ?reactive? (not positive) test result and to come in immediately as they needed a second sample to conduct a new test. He refused to do that and went to CET the next day,
:stoned

ADG

Porno Dan 12-11-2013 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xxxjay (Post 19903988)
Bingo. One person gets it. :)

Go Dan!
This system is broken and needs to change.

DWB 12-11-2013 12:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porno Dan (Post 19904818)
This system is broken and needs to change.
What would you do to change the system if you were given the power to do so?

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 12-11-2013 08:05 PM
http://www.trbimg.com/img-52a4bb42/t...ve-shu-001/600

Quote:
How the porn industry is putting its performers ? and finances ? at risk

With a fourth performer testing positive for HIV, refusing to use condoms is only hurting the industry

Since Los Angeles County's condom mandate for pornographic film sets passed last November, the adult film industry has been fighting it tooth and nail.

After an initial campaign against the measure failed to convince voters, some companies and performers challenged the law in court, claiming it was unconstitutional (and with some success). But the vast majority have moved their shoots outside of Los Angeles, or at least don't file for permits with the city.

However, with the announcement that the fourth porn performer since August has been diagnosed HIV positive, the adult film industry should consider a radical new strategy: Embracing the law.

The protocol for the heterosexual porn industry has been to eschew condoms for regular STD testing every 14 to 28 days and halting production whenever a performer tests positive. The method has actually has been praised in the past. Dr. Allan Ronald, a Canadian AIDS specialist, told the New York Times, "I don't think there's any questions that it works."

Indeed, the few times performers were diagnosed as HIV positive in the past ten years, it was quickly isolated and the virus was not found to be transmitted to anyone else the industry.

That is why the porn industry has taken such umbrage at the new law. And as threatened, adult film companies appear to have largely left Los Angeles County. Last month, it was reported that just 24 permits for adult films had been filed in the county, compared to 480 within the same period last year. By either refusing to apply for permits or moving shoots, the county has lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax revenue.

But while the industry has thumbed its nose at the county, it may only be hurting itself.

This year has seen a relatively huge spike in positive HIV tests among performers. While last year featured a syphilis outbreak, prior to 2013 there had only been two HIV cases in the adult film industry ? one in 2010 and the other in 2009.

Of course, 2013's increase may be an unfortunate coincidence. But the fact that four performers have tested positive since August is disturbing, and suggests the industry needs to be doing even more to manage STIs. (A fifth potentially positive result remains in question.)

For one, it is unfair to performers. Although many of them are against condom use on porn sets, others feel pressure to go along with the industry standards and fear speaking out. Also, aside from the health risks, there is certainly an emotional toll of having to repeatedly wait and wonder. Porn star Aurora Snow wrote at The Daily Beast:

There have been several HIV scares when I had to make those phone calls and figure out for myself how close I was to patient zero. There are no groups within porn protecting performers; it's always been up to performers to keep track of their scene partners, to check tests for themselves, and to make those phone calls no one wants to make. [The Daily Beast]

And not to be crude, but failing to use condoms has the potential to seriously hurt the adult film industry's bottom line. Under the current system, when an actor tests positive, all porn shooting stalls while performers are tested and the cases are isolated. During that period, not only performers, but all crew members are out of work.

The adult film industry has made a strong case against mandatory condoms on set. But now that it has largely rendered the law moot, it should considering voluntarily imposing the condom mandate upon itself.
Source: http://theweek.com/article/index/253...-mdash-at-risk

:stoned

ADG

Rumbledog 12-11-2013 09:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 19903096)
Robbie doesn't waste your time with these guys... they don't have a fucking clue and probably have never even see a woman nude except on video
Who are you speaking for?

Personally been shooting adult content since 1994.
Never once had an issue with disease simply because it is not worth the risk of cutting corners to make a buck.

Porno Dan 12-11-2013 11:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DWB (Post 19904879)
What would you do to change the system if you were given the power to do so?
I've been working OSHA for the last three years and hopefully they will be amending 5193 in mid-2014.

Robbie 12-11-2013 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porno Dan (Post 19905686)
I've been working OSHA for the last three years and hopefully they will be amending 5193 in mid-2014.
Engrish Prease....


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:44 PM.
Page 2 of 2 < 1 2
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123