GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Oh Twistys how ye have lost your way (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1127926)

CDSmith 12-06-2013 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CourtneyR_FFN (Post 19897709)
it should be a crime to operate on tits that are already so nice.

This.


My god some of these girls are comitting serious crimes with these needless horrendous wrecking of perfectly lovely titties.

Why lord, why?

Ramster 12-06-2013 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 19897669)
It's Manwin's content people, who should stick to Brazzers. Babes.com is great because it's essentially a tribute to Stephen Hicks, everything I see from that site has his style and influence all over it.

But Twistys and PlayboyPlus, just destroying both of them, a mish mash of different glamour photography styles/looks in a niche where fans have no use for 'variety' or 'edgy', frequently shooting models who aren't pretty or hot enough for a ride on the Bangbus let alone those two iconic glamour nude brands.

I wonder if they're intentionally sabotaging PlayboyPlus so they can get out of their deal with Playboy which is losing them a ton of cash.

FYI, before spouting off your mouth know the facts.

I worked for SHAP in Toronto before Manwin bought and have been in control of the content since! No one at Mindgeek tells me who to choose as Treat or what models to shoot!

Since Shap sold:
-we still use Tammy Sands, Holly Randall and the other photographers
-we brought back Dean Capture to shoot
-we upped the amount of exclusive content we shoot each month
-Manwin/Mindgeek gave me 20-30% more of a monthly budget than Shap allowed

Shap has always had models with scarred boobs in the past such as Angela Sommers and Samantha Saint to name a couple.

And in defense of Sammi, we chose her as Treat because she was ranked in the top 50 models inside Twistys WITHOUT ever masturbating. Now for Treat she is masturbating for the first time on video so this will be a "treat" for members and more importantly hopefully for sales too!

(note: I am not in charge of the photo editors any longer and I do agree they did a bad job on these photos sets. I am having them all redone though if will not matter for the hosted galleries, only members area content updates)

Ramster 12-06-2013 08:16 AM

I would also like to add each month we get praise for the treats but not everyone likes the girls chosen from month to month, members included. It goes with the territory and that's ok. We try to choose Treats that will increase sales so a girl that is masturbating for the first time that is hot and fairly new to the industry (how many have heard of her before this thread?) then we make the leap.

January Treat is a brand new 18 year old girl that is smoking hot... but I'm sure some will not like her as well.

Ramster 12-06-2013 08:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VikingMan (Post 19897981)
First of all I agree that she was hotter before the boob job.

Secondly I think that from time to time just about all publishers and glamour sites feature women who are questionable. I am not saying this model is questionable or not. She seems to be from the responses in this thread.

This model just like many other models have either tats or scars or some other body issue and the lighting and poses need to serve to compliment her stronger features.

I am thinking part of what people are responding to negatively is
how she was shot. As you can see in that other pic from another photographer she can be shot to look more appealing. PornMasta posted it:
http://timdir.com/sam_tye_red_dress_black_lingerie/

Well said :thumbsup

Nancy M00re 12-06-2013 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VikingMan View Post
First of all I agree that she was hotter before the boob job.

Secondly I think that from time to time just about all publishers and glamour sites feature women who are questionable. I am not saying this model is questionable or not. She seems to be from the responses in this thread.

This model just like many other models have either tats or scars or some other body issue and the lighting and poses need to serve to compliment her stronger features.

I am thinking part of what people are responding to negatively is
how she was shot. As you can see in that other pic from another photographer she can be shot to look more appealing. PornMasta posted it:
[url
http://timdir.com/sam_tye_red_dress_black_lingerie/[/url]

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramster (Post 19898574)
Well said :thumbsup

I second that :thumbsup

PornDiscounts-V 12-06-2013 08:53 AM

So amazed when girls fuck up perfectly good tits like that. Why, why, why?

Mediamix 12-06-2013 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramster (Post 19898537)
FYI, before spouting off your mouth know the facts.

I worked for SHAP in Toronto before Manwin bought and have been in control of the content since! No one at Mindgeek tells me who to choose as Treat or what models to shoot!

Since Shap sold:
-we still use Tammy Sands, Holly Randall and the other photographers
-we brought back Dean Capture to shoot
-we upped the amount of exclusive content we shoot each month
-Manwin/Mindgeek gave me 20-30% more of a monthly budget than Shap allowed

Shap has always had models with scarred boobs in the past such as Angela Sommers and Samantha Saint to name a couple.

And in defense of Sammi, we chose her as Treat because she was ranked in the top 50 models inside Twistys WITHOUT ever masturbating. Now for Treat she is masturbating for the first time on video so this will be a "treat" for members and more importantly hopefully for sales too!

(note: I am not in charge of the photo editors any longer and I do agree they did a bad job on these photos sets. I am having them all redone though if will not matter for the hosted galleries, only members area content updates)

Well said! :thumbsup

pimpmaster9000 12-06-2013 09:07 AM

it was not the surgeon it was her...the tits come out fine post op its how the girl sleeps and takes care of them that defines their symmetry...sleeping on the side fresh after surgery will sometimes move the implant...it needs time to "capsulate"...the scars can be removed but she should have gone though the belly button or armpits...oh well...

dyna mo 12-06-2013 09:12 AM

her tiddies will be fine. if she needs someone to massage them, i can lend a hand... or 2.

Tom_PM 12-06-2013 10:19 AM

There are still issues on that gallery regardless of opinion on the woman herself.

I would say to check the text and also pic 12 and 13.

dyna mo 12-06-2013 10:28 AM

50cc tiddies.

JayAllan 12-06-2013 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramster (Post 19898537)

And in defense of Sammi, we chose her as Treat because she was ranked in the top 50 models inside Twistys WITHOUT ever masturbating. Now for Treat she is masturbating for the first time on video so this will be a "treat" for members and more importantly hopefully for sales too!

(note: I am not in charge of the photo editors any longer and I do agree they did a bad job on these photos sets. I am having them all redone though if will not matter for the hosted galleries, only members area content updates)

Tammi Sands does great work and is a phenomenal photographer. I think the issue here is not the photography but the retouching. If these were retouched well she would look great. Most of my pictures look like hell until I retouch them too. And I see the logic in using this girl as well. :)

jódete 12-06-2013 01:13 PM

they got some scank crack hos at ndollars too. bruises, pimples on their ass, snatch ugly as fuck. how does that content sell ????

Jay-Rock 12-06-2013 01:14 PM

They didn't use a scrim on this shot the model could have been shot softer. This lighting just made her look worse. http://i.imgur.com/xifLMbl.jpg

slapass 12-06-2013 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jay-Rock (Post 19898922)
They didn't use a scrim on this shot the model could have been shot softer. This lighting just made her look worse. http://i.imgur.com/xifLMbl.jpg

But isn't that super bright light and photoshop to a blow up doll their thing? I can go way back and see girls shot in super bright light on Twistys.

Example off the front page - http://www.twistys.com/tour/models/v.../spencer-scott

NaughtyRob 12-06-2013 01:30 PM

She looks perfectly fine, its just that they didnt retouch good enough.

JFK 12-06-2013 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CourtneyR_FFN (Post 19897709)
it should be a crime to operate on tits that are already so nice.

agreed:thumbsup:thumbsup

Ramster 12-06-2013 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayAllan (Post 19898904)
Tammi Sands does great work and is a phenomenal photographer. I think the issue here is not the photography but the retouching. If these were retouched well she would look great. Most of my pictures look like hell until I retouch them too. And I see the logic in using this girl as well. :)

Yes you are 100% correct. These sets have all been redone but unfortunately the hosted gallery images were not replaced. I believe they are going to do this first thing Monday.

Nancy M00re 12-06-2013 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramster (Post 19898947)
Yes you are 100% correct. These sets have all been redone but unfortunately the hosted gallery images were not replaced. I believe they are going to do this first thing Monday.

Confirming this :winkwink:

DeanCapture 12-06-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JayAllan (Post 19898904)
Most of my pictures look like hell until I retouch them too.

Ahhhhhh so "that's" your secret? :winkwink:

JayAllan 12-06-2013 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeanCapture (Post 19899042)
Ahhhhhh so "that's" your secret? :winkwink:

Pretty much :1orglaugh

That and Nikon glass ;)

thumbuilderic 12-06-2013 07:41 PM

I'd still bang her.

Shap 12-07-2013 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gleem (Post 19897712)
Shap is rolling in his grave :upsidedow

hahahah damn i'm not dead :winkwink:

Shap 12-07-2013 02:57 PM

Picking Twistys Treat of the Month was always a pain in the ass. It's hard to find the right mix of girl that will sell like hot cakes and make the members happy. Sometimes you just blow it hard. I've blown it hard many times and picked more than a few stinkers ;)

With regards to this girl this set and this photoshop is obviously shit. I know Manwin fired all my Twistys photoshoppers when they bought Fabian out and I think this is the result of it. I had strict guidelines with my photoshoppers and video editors. I'm surprised you guys are only complaining about her tits. I think her face looks terrible. Over photoshopped around the nose. Not saying she's ugly just saying the photoshop around her face is distracting. I didn't even get down to her tits.

It's been 2.5 years since we sold. From what I've seen Twistys has maintained a great standard and the members seem to be very happy. It is honestly one of the few acquisitions I can remember where the site didn't take a dump after the sale. And that is 100% thanks to Ramster.

Shap 12-09-2013 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fitzmulti (Post 19897726)
Honestly, given all of that...can you not see how crappy the boob job editing is?
NONE would be better than that...just saying.
{quick redo them and re-upload them}

A sale person isn't the right person to be commenting on this. They always get stuck in trying to sell instead of just listening ;) :2 cents:

Ramster 12-09-2013 10:28 AM

Hey Shap! And thanks for the kind words :thumbsup

LAJ 12-09-2013 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fitzmulti (Post 19897697)

WOW she was perfect before :(


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123