who travels with jars of honey?

yes. terrorists get on planes with a plan to blow it up, using equipment that makes those chances about 1% in succeeding

I've heard he's a real fan of you though.

Fixed your typo.

The Constitution is not a supernatural fairy tale nor is anyone claiming that it was created by some supernatural creature. It is a legal document created by men. It can in fact be changed.

You have somehow missed ALL of the points so I am assuming you are a Christian. :1orglaugh

you assume wrong, I'm not religious even in the slightest. You missed my point though, surprise surprise.

Pigshit. Iraq oil is not owned by the U.S. and never was. The Chinese get the bulk of Iraq oil.

Richard Dawkins is a CUNT.

I'm glad he got his honey jacked ;)

Anyone ever watch that documentary with Ben Stein on evolution? Great watch.

I stand corrected.

I realized the terrorist won, the other day when watching the news and they reported that cameras had been installed at a local park to stop terrorism... People are just letting the govt both federal and local, strip away their freedom all in the name of 9/11.

:2 cents:

That is a hard pill for many to swallow, especially brainwashed, delusional Americans like theking, but it's the painful truth.

When your wife and 10 year old daughter are getting their tits and hooch groped at the airport to board a plane, while you stand there watching, unable to say a word about it, the "terrorists" not only won, but they knocked it out of the fucking park.

So what we drop bombs on them in return, they still won on an epic level. We can bomb them to rubble and dust, but they still turned the world, especially the USA, into a police state, CCTV and drone having, fear zone.

Muslim extremists are in this for the long haul. The western world is not, nor do they even understand what that means. In the end, way down the line, Muslims win globally. And every one the western world kills or wrongly imprisons, his martyrdom breeds more extremists willing to die for the cause. You can't win against an enemy like that.

It is a hard fight certainly...intelligence against human stupidity which is why all atheists should become outspoken militant atheists. We need to make as much noise as those assholes. We have numbers of fellow atheists in the shadows who are taught to respect religion...well FUCK ALL RELIGIONS.

They ALL need to be destroyed for us to progress. Show them no mercy and mock those who perpetuate these superstitious ridiculous practices and rituals...they do not deserve any special treatment. Their time has come and gone.

The world needs to rid itself of organized religion, there is no doubt about that. But it is the ultimate form of control, so I doubt it's going anywhere. :Oh crap

Thanks for posting that. I've watched several of Dawkin's interviews and debates..but hadn't seen that one.

47 mins. well spent. :)

I find it difficult to believe that anyone would think that putting cameras in your local park will stop terrorism...or did they intend to say..."to stop terrorism in your local park". How many terrorist attacks have you had in your local park/parks. I would think that cameras might...at the least...be a help in reducing the number of terrorists attacks in your local park. What city do you live in that terrorists have been been making attacks in your local park? I can't recall any national news reports about terrorist attacks in any city's local park/parks.

Educate me and explain to me how putting cameras in a local park is letting the government...local or otherwise...strip away anyone's freedom? What freedom does the cameras deny you?

you mean to say, your mother was afraid of the cold war

and now she's afraid of some other 'war' that is more applicable to her daily life?

that's an unfortunate coincidence

Of course we can win against an enemy like that...on any given day...we just have to get angry enough to do it.

The U.S. is not a police state in any way...shape...fashion or form.

You can - but you'd have to be willing to think and act with equal fervour as they do. Fight fire with fire...so to speak. And for the most part the West doesn't have the stomach for that sort of eye-for-an-eye determination.

Some would say we'd be compromising our ideals by lowering ourselves to their level. That two wrongs don't make a right.

There'd be no winners in the final outcome.

I fear this is a 'battle' that's already been lost.

bin laden was a man who would gouge out your eye balls for looking at the naked body. richard dawkins is a man who will sell himself out to the highest bidder for his own sake. so he makes a point on the face of it about liberty but i stopped reading when it was over a jar of honey. the united states government are a tyranny just a freak show. talk about freedom and liberty? seriously? if the united states wants to be a dictatorship let them i say, because the people will either be with them or not, and if not, then they will just not withstand an overthrow. those politicians are just on a power trip they think will never end.

im sorry, are you referring to genocide?

In a fight to the death...there is always a winner and a loser. One is dead...the other is not...even if the one that is not dead eventually dies of wounds received...he still is alive when the fight ended...thus the winner.

And just what has the 'winner' (who dies of his wounds anyway) - actually won?

Victory...and I am a fan of General MacArthur...who once said "there is no substitute for victory".

:2 cents: ... I look down on vulgar atheists.

Victory?

So, despite a mutually assured destruction...as last man briefly standing - you've won...a word?

Does the systematic extermination of fanatical terrorists qualify as genocide?

If it needs to go that far to obtain victory...then yes. That has been my philosophy in the military...on the battle field and it has been my philosophy as a civilian...with me there is no substitute for victory.

no, she wasn't afraid of the cold war. that was my point.

My folks brought me some wild honey with truffles from Tasmania. Fucking delicious. We don't have the liquid ban though.

hard to say, when the obvious result would be funding more terrorists

could be a way for the master race/s to take over tho

ahh, it seemed like you were saying her fears had changed

my understanding of the time was 'the nuke', was what everyone was afraid of

BTW...seldom...if ever...is there the possibility of "mutually assured destruction". The term was used during the "cold war" because between the U.S.S.R. and the U.S. each side had around 25,000 nuclear weapons among other weapons...but even then the term was not necessarily true.

If not 'mutually assured destruction' - then at least large scale casualties and collateral damage on both sides that would render any claims of winning - a rather hollow victory.

Our real enemy is standing behind both sides of the 4 wars we are already in. In fact they have funded both sides of almost every war in history. These people are also on record eugenicists and on top of inbreeding in an attempt to make super humans, also have killed more people in history than anything else ever has through democide. Democide by the way is the killing of people by there goverment and the numbers do not include military deaths or anything like that. These people have been slowly succeeding where folks like Hitler failed. This is not my opinion. They write about it often.

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/i...AdQuuwawwsGO2w

You tell me.. Obviously there is about zero chance for terrorism in a random park, yet I'm sure the cameras will come in quite handy monitoring whom is hanging out there..as it was in a not so up class area..

Ironically the day after the same news station reported that one of the local cities was taking down "red light" cameras at the busiest intersection in that town.. The city was claiming that accidents had decreased dramatically due to the cameras because people stopped running red lights. The reporter asked why take them down if they were solving a problem.. The city official claimed it was a UN-needed expense at that point..

Turns out that the city police were not writing as many tickets after the camera went active , but of course the city official wouldn't admit they were removing the cameras to increase ticket revenue.

Both of these were around the Orlando area.

Well...I don't think your "explanation" educated me...that the cameras in the park are taking away freedom...unless you feel that people in a shady neighborhood should have the right to practice shady things in the local park.

look at it militarily- if you are not winning a war/battle........you are losing it. and that's a fact. war is a zer-sum game, you are the victor or the vanquished.

sucks to write that but, no matter how i try and dice it, this is a post-9/11 world and that means fear. fear means terrorism has won/is winning.

well, she did practice desk drills growing up but that was in the 1950s and the nuke thread dissipated........the enemy was *the evil empire*. communism. that was a long way from home. this war on terror is right here at home and the enemy isn't an amorphous construct like communism, it's some chechnyan rebels, it's al quada, et al, on&on, it's terrorism of all sorts to be concerned about.

i'm keeping it real how about you. that is how prison is like, i already knew all that before i went in. divided by race, it just seems that is all they know. it comes in and off the street, in to the prisons. out of the prisons, on to the street, in to our communities. this neighbourhood i live in, a gang neighbourhood. you name it it happens.