Paging Dyna Mo ;)

from what i've read, including that link i provided, the planck observatory gathered data that scientists evaluated in terms of multi-universe hypothesis and concluded the data suggests the hypothesis is not valid.

i do have a general understanding of the planck constant, i understand limits extremely well.

my comment re: the speed of light and new science was re: the fact we still live in the einstein era of physics. the planck observatory has also proven a new understanding is needed, that understanding would have to be based on something beyond current science.

here's a bit of an article on where i was coming from with my comment.

http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/201...-a-new-physics

:)

This isn't my understanding of the current research. The opposite is apparently true for cosmology right now, in that it looks MORE like multiple universes, and from data coming from multiple disciplines.

Did you understand my explanation on why C couldn't be exceeded by something with mass based on our current models, and the ways we plan to (currently) get around that?