My Streamate wl receive a penalty on google - GoFuckYourself.com

VforVendetta · 10-09-2013, 10:53 PM

Today i received an email from google webmaster tools that say i received a manual spam action for thin content/no value on my streamate wl:

---------------
Google has detected that some of your pages may be using techniques that are outside our Webmaster Guidelines.

As a result of your site having thin content with little or no added value, Google has applied a manual spam action to +++++++. There may be other actions on your site or parts of your site.

Recommended action

Update your site so that it meets Google's Webmaster Guidelines.
Once you've made these changes, submit a reconsideration request.
For an updated list of manual actions currently applied to your site, visit the Manual Actions page. If no manual actions are listed, there is no longer a need to file a reconsideration request.

If we determine your site is no longer in violation of our guidelines, we'll revoke the manual action.

If you have any questions about how to resolve this issue, please visit the Webmaster Help Forum.
----------------

socialerts · 10-09-2013, 11:34 PM

What type of links did you send to the site?

freecartoonporn · 10-09-2013, 11:41 PM

tell them to go fuck themselves.

livesexoncams · 10-10-2013, 12:34 AM

This happened to all (or almost all) stremate wl's. Exactly the same story that happened few months ago with LJ wl's.

livesexoncams · 10-10-2013, 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by socialerts

What type of links did you send to the site?

This type of penalty has nothing to do with the links, but with the content of the site.

PornDiscounts-V · 10-10-2013, 01:00 AM

I am wondering if the cam companies are involved.

socialerts · 10-10-2013, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livesexoncams

This type of penalty has nothing to do with the links, but with the content of the site.

True... just realized it's not penguin. My bad. That's the exact same message as the Livejasmin WLs got isn't it?
So, all the streamate WLs got this message?

TumblrPRO · 10-10-2013, 01:19 AM

Same here. Few days ago my StreaMate whitelabel went from page 1 in gugol, for many terms, to nowhere to be found for those terms...

What other cam whitelabels are gugol friendly?

I see whitelabels like VideoSecrets or ACWM suck so much in gugol. Both of them block all pages in gugol. They are both anti-gugol-friendly.

Any others?

baggg · 10-10-2013, 01:46 AM

Your whitelabel has the very same content like another 1000s,no wonder it doesnt rank in 2013

oppoten · 10-10-2013, 01:57 AM

I can totally understand why penalties are being applied to WL's, but that message looks so autocratic.

socialerts · 10-10-2013, 02:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TumblrPRO

Same here. Few days ago my StreaMate whitelabel went from page 1 in gugol, for many terms, to nowhere to be found for those terms...

What other cam whitelabels are gugol friendly?

I see whitelabels like VideoSecrets or ACWM suck so much in gugol. Both of them block all pages in gugol. They are both anti-gugol-friendly.

Any others?

I have been successful using Webcam wiz white labels Both revshare and PPS.

livesexoncams · 10-10-2013, 03:21 AM

I assume that eventually all whitelabels will suffer the same penalty, even though they escaped for the moment.

VforVendetta · 10-10-2013, 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baggg

Your whitelabel has the very same content like another 1000s,no wonder it doesnt rank in 2013

Yes right, which other people received a penalty on their streamate wls ? Some months ago all the livejasmin wls were banned in the same moment

livesexoncams · 10-10-2013, 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VforVendetta

Yes right, which other people received a penalty on their streamate wls ? Some months ago all the livejasmin wls were banned in the same time

That's exactly what happened now with streamate whitelabels. It was probably applied based on the ip all these sites are sharing.

VforVendetta · 10-10-2013, 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livesexoncams

That's exactly what happened now with streamate whitelabels. It was probably applied based on the ip all these sites are sharing.

i thought this thing could happen, but if i browse the "cam" serps i can see a lot of streamate wls yet

livesexoncams · 10-10-2013, 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VforVendetta

i thought this thing could happen, but if i browse the "cam" serps i can see a lot of streamate wls yet

This penalty does not de-index the sites affected. From my observation, it just shows them about -40 or -50 positions lower than they should be in serps.

geedub · 10-10-2013, 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvvvv

I am wondering if the cam companies are involved.

Yes streamate wants to make less money

DamianJ · 10-10-2013, 05:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by geedub

Yes streamate wants to payout less money to affiliates and keep it themselves

fixed your typo.

bns666 · 10-10-2013, 05:48 AM

argh mine got penalized yesterday...

3xmedia · 10-10-2013, 05:51 AM

IMO, this will happen to all WL's, just a matter of time... 1000's of domains on the same IP with the same content?

who will be the next? webcamwiz? hostedtube?

time to built the sites with real content.

pinkz · 10-10-2013, 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zdeneczek

IMO, this will happen to all WL's, just a matter of time... 1000's of domains on the same IP with the same content? who will be the next? webcamwiz? hostedtube?

time to built the sites with real content.

They will all get penalized in the same way eventually, it's only a matter of time.

Barry-xlovecam · 10-10-2013, 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvvvv

I am wondering if the cam companies are involved.

I can only speak for ourselves: We view Affiliate White Labels as a part of the overall traffic conversion funnel. Were is the logic in destroying your own Affiliate products? If you want Affiliates you need to honor your agreements within reason toward business needs and circumstance.

We do not use "tricks" (canonical links, noindex robots.txt) as part of our XWL White Label or XClone programs. That said, when you have a large number of templated white labels with identical content these Search Engine issues will arise.

If you want to use a white label of a cam site: Provide your own traffic as SEO of these type of products is precarious with hit or miss results a lot of the time. Take advantage of the brand value of established cam sites and take advantage of the customer trust they have earned -- they convert.

If you have your own pay-site or a network to send traffic to your own white label that makes sense too.

Sometimes, with the "right" domain name SEO may work but the SEO game has changed dramatically this year in favor of real providers of content -- to be successful today affiliate type sites must have their own value added content and not just be sites with thin content and ads for sponsors.

Matyko · 10-10-2013, 06:13 AM

i received the same shit as well..

adultmobile · 10-10-2013, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vvvvv

I am wondering if the cam companies are involved.

Cam companies can not be involved that much, even if they wanted.

pinkz · 10-10-2013, 06:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile

Cam companies can not be involved that much, even if they wanted.

it's a gewgoooool thing!

oppoten · 10-10-2013, 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam

to be successful today affiliate type sites must have their own value added content and not just be sites with thin content and ads for sponsors.

The problem is that the perception of value and spamming have also changed dramatically.

In the eyes of Google and the social web, everyone's a spammer unless they're offering up content for free. Even camgirls who provide quality content get called out for spamming. It's becoming a witch hunt, with users empowered by a crusader mentality that binds their loyalty to Google and the soicial sites.

Mediamix · 10-10-2013, 07:05 AM

Ask a question on Twitter seems like a good idea

Jel · 10-10-2013, 07:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oppoten

The problem is that the perception of value and spamming have also changed dramatically.

In the eyes of Google and the social web, everyone's a spammer unless they're offering up content for free.

Yup.

8char

adultmobile · 10-10-2013, 07:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oppoten

In the eyes of Google and the social web, everyone's a spammer unless they're offering up content for free. Even camgirls who provide quality content get called out for spamming.

I am not sure google can tell if a site provides for free or for pay cams. But users can, and they click and return on for free sites only, so google guess (via cookies , clicked links and analisys) these sites are what users searched for. You should blame users, not google - google simply automates putting up the sites that people is happy with and searched for. Who really seaches for "site where you must pay to get anything" ?

freecartoonporn · 10-10-2013, 07:24 AM

its time now, cam companies should allow whitelabels on dedicfated ips for few $$/month

pinkz · 10-10-2013, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freecartoonporn

its time now, cam companies should allow whitelabels on dedicfated ips for few $$/month

with "G's" algo updating as often as it does I seriously doubt this would make that much difference. After all dupe content is exactly that and stands out like a sore thumb to a gewgool spider.

livesexoncams · 10-10-2013, 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pinkz

with "G's" algo updating as often as it does I seriously doubt this would make that much difference. After all dupe content is exactly that and stands out like a sore thumb to a gewgool spider.

Totally agree with this opinion!

Stephen · 10-10-2013, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freecartoonporn

its time now, cam companies should allow whitelabels on dedicfated ips for few $$/month

It wouldn't make a bit of difference IMHO, as Google's algo will easily spots numerous copycat sites that are only differentiated by category names and the like, even if they are on unique IPs.

3xmedia · 10-10-2013, 08:07 AM

unique IPs might help a bit, maybe... anyway, now it's very easy for them to find out there is a lot of domains with the same content on an IP and penalize all of those domains on that IP at once.

adultmobile · 10-10-2013, 09:45 AM

Instead of WLs you could build sites with API's incorporating just the video/chat pieces into your "unique" own layout, but is not so fast or easy to do.
Or, use an iframe and include the cam site main url with your affil id, lots of our affiliates does this because we do not provide WLs, examples str8video.com , 656cams.com , www.assclap.org , I am unsure how google ranks a domain with another site in an iframe?

pinkz · 10-10-2013, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile

Instead of WLs you could build sites with API's incorporating just the video/chat pieces into your "unique" own layout, but is not so fast or easy to do.
Or, use an iframe and include the cam site main url with your affil id, lots of our affiliates does this because we do not provide WLs, examples str8video.com , 656cams.com , www.assclap.org , I am unsure how google ranks a domain with another site in an iframe?

Iframes as far as I know have no seo value whatsoever, someone can correct me if I'm wrong but am pretty sure that the spiders see them as a blank space.

Stephen · 10-10-2013, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile

Or, use an iframe and include the cam site main url with your affil id, lots of our affiliates does this because we do not provide WLs

I've done this with outdated WL designs that are intended for an 800x600 screen ( i.e. DG's WCC), incorporating the WL into a fluid design intended for hi-def+ displays -- but note that some WLs (AWE) breakout of frames, so your mileage may vary.

Framesets, when used correctly, can have enormous SEO benefits, although much of this is diminished in HTML5

VS_Jeff · 10-10-2013, 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile

Cam companies can not be involved that much, even if they wanted.

+1, it's a constant battle for all webcam companies.

Our WLs have been doing fine since the last update. We have a lot of SEO features on our WLs that we launched 3-4 months ago.

adultmobile · 10-10-2013, 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen

I've done this with outdated WL designs that are intended for an 800x600 screen

In fact we made the page autoresizable along with all the components. Some smart affiliate even made a framing that hides the site logo and overwrite with theirs, but I could not remember the url

_Richard_ · 10-10-2013, 01:35 PM

thought wl were getting hammered

leboobs · 10-10-2013, 08:20 PM

WLs are essentially duplicate content from the main site with different branding, I'm surprised you managed to get them ranking at all.

GAMEFINEST · 10-10-2013, 08:45 PM

It will only get worse with more updates..

TumblrPRO · 10-11-2013, 01:56 AM

Even Free Ones received the penalty... Try searching for free ones cams... No longer to be found. Now only their Stream RAY shows up.

adultmobile · 10-11-2013, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leboobs

WLs are essentially duplicate content from the main site with different branding, I'm surprised you managed to get them ranking at all.

If this is the case also the main sites should go down, for example streamate.com , livejasmin.com, cams.com, flirt4free.com etc. should be out of results because of the whitelabels they provided?

BareBacked · 10-11-2013, 11:45 AM

was bound to happen
1000 clones of the same site. What do you expect ?

BareBacked · 10-11-2013, 11:48 AM

Dont cry that is happened now . Smile you got away with it for so long

Profits of Doom · 10-11-2013, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freecartoonporn

its time now, cam companies should allow whitelabels on dedicfated ips for few $$/month

I like that idea a lot and would happily pay it. I don't know if it's possible to incorporate, but I'd also like to see the option to place a sub folder on the white label with the ability to blog on it. So if the site is camwhitelabel.com, you can have camwhitelabel.com/blog to post unique content...

freecartoonporn · 10-11-2013, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Profits of Doom

I like that idea a lot and would happily pay it. I don't know if it's possible to incorporate, but I'd also like to see the option to place a sub folder on the white label with the ability to blog on it. So if the site is camwhitelabel.com, you can have camwhitelabel.com/blog to post unique content...

i use subdomains for that.

create
blog A record => your ip.

Profits of Doom · 10-11-2013, 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by freecartoonporn

i use subdomains for that.

create
blog A record => your ip.

You're way better off with a sub folder, since a sub domain is seen as it's own separate site in Google...

anexsia · 10-11-2013, 06:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Profits of Doom

You're way better off with a sub folder, since a sub domain is seen as it's own separate site in Google...

Yeah my sub-domain blogs work great and are a good way to bring some major traffic to the main blog.

10-09-2013, 10:53 PM	#1
VforVendetta Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 2,525	My Streamate wl receive a penalty on google Today i received an email from google webmaster tools that say i received a manual spam action for thin content/no value on my streamate wl: --------------- Google has detected that some of your pages may be using techniques that are outside our Webmaster Guidelines. As a result of your site having thin content with little or no added value, Google has applied a manual spam action to +++++++. There may be other actions on your site or parts of your site. Recommended action Update your site so that it meets Google's Webmaster Guidelines. Once you've made these changes, submit a reconsideration request. For an updated list of manual actions currently applied to your site, visit the Manual Actions page. If no manual actions are listed, there is no longer a need to file a reconsideration request. If we determine your site is no longer in violation of our guidelines, we'll revoke the manual action. If you have any questions about how to resolve this issue, please visit the Webmaster Help Forum. ---------------- __________________ Free the world

10-09-2013, 11:41 PM	#3
freecartoonporn Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: NC Posts: 7,683	tell them to go fuck themselves. __________________ SSD Cloud Server, VPS Server, Simple Cloud Hosting \| DigitalOcean

10-10-2013, 12:34 AM	#4
livesexoncams Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Europe Posts: 675	This happened to all (or almost all) stremate wl's. Exactly the same story that happened few months ago with LJ wl's. __________________ AdultWebmasterEmpire - The best converting cam sponsor Money Tree - Great conversion ratios, great support. ICQ: 27-498-542

10-10-2013, 01:00 AM	#6
PornDiscounts-V Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: L.A. Posts: 5,744	I am wondering if the cam companies are involved. __________________ Blog Posts - Contextual Links - Hardlinks on 600+ Blog Network * Handwritten * 180 C Class IPs * Permanent! * Many Niches! * Bulk Discounts! GFYPosts /at/ J2Media.net

10-10-2013, 01:19 AM	#8
TumblrPRO So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Earth Posts: 296	Same here. Few days ago my StreaMate whitelabel went from page 1 in gugol, for many terms, to nowhere to be found for those terms... What other cam whitelabels are gugol friendly? I see whitelabels like VideoSecrets or ACWM suck so much in gugol. Both of them block all pages in gugol. They are both anti-gugol-friendly. Any others? Last edited by TumblrPRO; 10-10-2013 at 01:20 AM..

10-09-2013, 11:34 PM	#2
socialerts Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Posts: 264	What type of links did you send to the site?

10-10-2013, 01:46 AM	#9
baggg So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: EEA Posts: 1,432	Your whitelabel has the very same content like another 1000s,no wonder it doesnt rank in 2013 Last edited by baggg; 10-10-2013 at 01:49 AM..

10-10-2013, 01:57 AM	#10
oppoten NAME THE JEW Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 4,793	I can totally understand why penalties are being applied to WL's, but that message looks so autocratic.

10-10-2013, 03:21 AM	#12
livesexoncams Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Europe Posts: 675	I assume that eventually all whitelabels will suffer the same penalty, even though they escaped for the moment. __________________ AdultWebmasterEmpire - The best converting cam sponsor Money Tree - Great conversion ratios, great support. ICQ: 27-498-542

10-10-2013, 05:48 AM	#19
bns666 Confirmed Fetishist Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Fetishland Posts: 11,523	argh mine got penalized yesterday... __________________ ⭐ CAM SODA ⭐ STRIPCHAT ⭐ ⭐ CHATURBATE ⭐ X LOVE CAM ⭐

10-10-2013, 05:51 AM	#20
3xmedia Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 5,721	IMO, this will happen to all WL's, just a matter of time... 1000's of domains on the same IP with the same content? who will be the next? webcamwiz? hostedtube? time to built the sites with real content.

10-10-2013, 06:13 AM	#23
Matyko PsyHead Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Hungary Posts: 8,667	i received the same shit as well.. __________________ -=- Register with our ref link and we help you with the setup! -=- AdSpyglass.com - Double your profit from brokers

10-10-2013, 07:05 AM	#27
Mediamix Dutch Webmaster! Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Netherlands Posts: 3,228	Ask a question on Twitter seems like a good idea __________________ Sig too big

10-10-2013, 07:24 AM	#30
freecartoonporn Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: NC Posts: 7,683	its time now, cam companies should allow whitelabels on dedicfated ips for few $$/month __________________ SSD Cloud Server, VPS Server, Simple Cloud Hosting \| DigitalOcean

10-10-2013, 08:07 AM	#34
3xmedia Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2004 Posts: 5,721	unique IPs might help a bit, maybe... anyway, now it's very easy for them to find out there is a lot of domains with the same content on an IP and penalize all of those domains on that IP at once.

10-10-2013, 09:45 AM	#35
adultmobile No, I am not banned Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: ChatGF.com Posts: 5,345	Instead of WLs you could build sites with API's incorporating just the video/chat pieces into your "unique" own layout, but is not so fast or easy to do. Or, use an iframe and include the cam site main url with your affil id, lots of our affiliates does this because we do not provide WLs, examples str8video.com , 656cams.com , www.assclap.org , I am unsure how google ranks a domain with another site in an iframe? __________________ TubeCamGirl.com

10-10-2013, 01:35 PM	#40
_Richard_ Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Vancouver Posts: 30,985	thought wl were getting hammered

10-10-2013, 08:20 PM	#41
leboobs Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Australia Posts: 14	WLs are essentially duplicate content from the main site with different branding, I'm surprised you managed to get them ranking at all.

10-10-2013, 08:45 PM	#42
GAMEFINEST Make STACK$ Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: sexy time Posts: 14,422	It will only get worse with more updates.. __________________ Compound interest.

10-11-2013, 01:56 AM	#43
TumblrPRO So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Earth Posts: 296	Even Free Ones received the penalty... Try searching for free ones cams... No longer to be found. Now only their Stream RAY shows up.

10-11-2013, 11:45 AM	#45
BareBacked Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: www.BareBacked.com Posts: 3,685	was bound to happen 1000 clones of the same site. What do you expect ? __________________ NEW SITE PAYING $30 for a $1 TRIAL Selfies

10-11-2013, 11:48 AM	#46
BareBacked Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: www.BareBacked.com Posts: 3,685	Dont cry that is happened now . Smile you got away with it for so long __________________ NEW SITE PAYING $30 for a $1 TRIAL Selfies