GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Business Thread... For those of you that don't have a mobile site why don't you? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1123155)

The Porn Nerd 10-09-2013 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Why (Post 19828884)
usually by checking the headers server side for the browser type and using redirect headers. otherwise you can check it with javascript client side and redirecting then.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Jel (Post 19828892)
I do it in htaccess https://gist.github.com/chrillo/1403965

Remember to have a separate htaccess on your mobile landing page/folder


Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19828850)
One way is by seeing the OS they are using.

But that sucks too. Somebody on a big Android tablet is using the same OS as a guy on an Android smart phone.

Same for Iphones and a user on a big IPad.

And the css3/html5 coding isn't quite there yet in my opinion. It's getting there. But "getting there" isn't good enough.

So for now...I just make my mobile site in the K.I.S.S. mode (keep it simple stupid). No attempts at streaming on it. Just basic and easy to use with .mp4 vids.

I am hoping that within the next year that perhaps things will shake out a bit more and I can rev up the mobile site's aesthetics and put a little more sizzle in with the steak. But until then...it works across everything.


OK I understood about 3% of all that above. LOL That's why I like Robbie's K.I.S.S. approach. I have a mobile design for www.erosexotica.com but the "PC" version displays well on most devices, including tablets, so I don't even bother with re-directing to the mobile design. Wrong move?

bean-aid 10-09-2013 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robwod (Post 19828762)
Beaner, at its most basic description, it's a design technique that auto scales to the current viewport of the end user. Images, css containers, etc. scale while legibility remains.

Thus, you basically see the same site on a Desktop PC / Mac as you would on a tablet as you would on a smart phone, etc. Obviously it reaches a point where you need to specify a minimum viewing width, but at the point, each section begins to "stack" on top of one another (for example... if you have two lead features side by side... they will scale down to fit inside a user's viewport until a specific point, then it will auto render with one feature above the other.

Here's a Wikipedia Link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Responsive_web_design

Here's a good example:
http://mashable.com/2012/12/11/responsive-web-design/

With your cursor on the right edge of the window... drag it towards the left to make your screen width smaller. You can see the design "respond" to the current viewing width without forcing you to scroll sideways.

Ty for explanation

Robbie 10-09-2013 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19828901)
I don't even bother with re-directing to the mobile design. Wrong move?

I used to redirect to the mobile site.

But since the advent of tablets becoming so popular...the Android users were pissed off.

Their tablets are HUGE and flash works just fine on them. They wanted the full "normal" site and not the stripped down mobile site.

So I got rid of the redirect.

And I just went "old school" and put a link to the mobile site on the tour.
That solved that problem and stopped the complaints.

http://claudia-marie.com/tour/ Look at the nav bar at the top. There is a link for the mobile site.

Simple, but effective and works across all platforms. lol

The Porn Nerd 10-09-2013 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19828911)
I used to redirect to the mobile site.

But since the advent of tablets becoming so popular...the Android users were pissed off.

Their tablets are HUGE and flash works just fine on them. They wanted the full "normal" site and not the stripped down mobile site.

So I got rid of the redirect.

And I just went "old school" and put a link to the mobile site on the tour.
That solved that problem and stopped the complaints.

http://claudia-marie.com/tour/ Look at the nav bar at the top. There is a link for the mobile site.

Simple, but effective and works across all platforms. lol


I like "old school" sometimes because most people (people who BUY) are old school to some extent. Nice solution!

I like simple and effective because I'm simple. Still working on the effective part tho....:D

Grapesoda 10-09-2013 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19828279)

Kinda makes me wonder why I'm shooting HD video for a 3 inch screen! LOL!

it does doesn't it? I tell girls just to use their phones :2 cents:

Axeman 10-09-2013 09:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19828293)
Not only did I not see a whole lot of mobile sales for my site back then...but as an affiliate I couldn't make a mobile sale to save my soul 4 years ago.

And when I say "taking off"...I only mean it's getting much, much bigger now.
I haven't seen it explode overnight into something big.

Just watching it grow slowly and getting bigger and bigger.

Does CM bring in more of an older mature customer base? I would factor in that older surfers are slower adapters to the tablets and smart phones. I know for Karups OW, we do the most technical support for the older members who are not that proficient with computers. We are just starting in the last year to see a rise of these members starting to use the iPad, and emailing asking us how to make it work etc.

Barry-xlovecam 10-09-2013 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19828911)
I used to redirect to the mobile site.

But since the advent of tablets becoming so popular...the Android users were pissed off.

Their tablets are HUGE and flash works just fine on them. They wanted the full "normal" site and not the stripped down mobile site. ...

We solved this problem with a flexible design for our mobile cam site -- the layout adjusts to the viewport size so it is proportionate to the device's display resolution.

http://mobile.xlovecam.com/ it is proportionate in a browser too, resizing the layout with the window size, but the design elements are minimal and geared toward mobile device rendition.


Paully 10-09-2013 10:01 PM

I was more inclined to get a mobile version up but honestly browser architecture for mobile has sort of killed it for me. You can download Dolphin browser for iPhone or Android and mimic iphone, android, desktop or even customize it.

I think the more popular Dolphin and alike will be,(btw it's pretty damn popular) strict mobile and responsive design will be less important.

Except maybe for the wap payment on mobile. Cool feature but it isn't available everywhere and may become less so due to the ability for kids to just click a button.

Who knows. I do have mobile payment options and that has definitely picked up.

Paully

clickhappy 10-09-2013 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 19828246)
So my question is for those of you with no mobile site why don't you?

Its extremely expensive to have it done and complicated. I got 3 quotes and all of them were 5 figures.
And its extremely difficult to learn to program mobile. I dont want to have to learn Objective C or Java.
I took a class on PhoneGap and it was hard as fuck. and Titanium is even worse.

I could go to elance/oDesk etc and have Indians do a shitty job, but no thanks. And if I did outsource and I needed to update or change something It would be very hard to do so.

Smut 10-09-2013 10:29 PM

Nobody is going to browse the internet on their phones! Don't be silly.

brassmonkey 10-09-2013 10:31 PM

can i borrow a million dollars?

baddog 10-09-2013 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19828911)
I used to redirect to the mobile site.

But since the advent of tablets becoming so popular...the Android users were pissed off.

Their tablets are HUGE and flash works just fine on them. They wanted the full "normal" site and not the stripped down mobile site.

As a once in a while Xoom user, yep. I did not really like looking at my own site's mobile version.

fuzebox 10-09-2013 11:18 PM

This thread is interesting :pimp

Paully 10-09-2013 11:19 PM

Also, I think now that the Galaxy note and similar fecking phablets along with higher resolution and just an overall better image are going to make their way, even the best responsive designs are gonna die out before not too long.

Html5 and css3 was a pretty big jump and for good reason but people and tech don't always move that fast. Still the most viewable media is a flash player with mp4 video. Mac guys have lots of workarounds and are usually pretty tech savvy.

Hate to think I'm leaving money on the table but for the head aches, not sure it's worth it. Maybe I just missed the boat.

Paully

Robbie 10-09-2013 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axeman (Post 19829036)
Does CM bring in more of an older mature customer base? I would factor in that older surfers are slower adapters to the tablets and smart phones. I know for Karups OW, we do the most technical support for the older members who are not that proficient with computers. We are just starting in the last year to see a rise of these members starting to use the iPad, and emailing asking us how to make it work etc.

No, mostly younger guys...early 20's to mid 40's are the majority of her members. I talk to most of them online (we are like a mini-social network in the members area), and they post their own pics in their profiles in the members area for her to see too. And I can't think off the top of my head of any "older" members (60 years old and older).

Kinda surprising to me that your Karups Older Women site would be getting older guys though. My experience in selling mature porn on Grampland.Com has been that the younger guys with "mommy" fantasies are the ones who really like the old women (older than CM that is...she's 39)

Also, it always seemed like the dirty old men who bought the teen stuff.

Kind of like the reverse of what they are is what they want. lol

The only thing I could ever figure about that over the years was: Young guys can pick up young women all the time at clubs. And old men are usually married to old women.

So when they fantasize...it's about the women they DON'T usually get.
That's my theory anyway.

Femjoy Michael 10-10-2013 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 19828246)
I was just checking out a few big paysites and noticed they don't have mobile sites.

So my question is for those of you with no mobile site why don't you?

I really like what Michael P did with ZTOD.com. Have you seen it?

As a former webmaster of one of Sean's sites, I agree with him. I'm constantly amazed how many program owners still question whether mobile is important or not.

The president of Time Warner and the president of Sky UK are both pouring money into mobile. They have said, it's the single biggest return on investment for relatively little money (The Economist July 2013)

I've seen one program owner generate 33% more revenue from rebills after launching a mobile version.

Another Alexa 12k site I worked on grew by over 100% within 2 months of refining the mobile experience. All organic. The mobile traffic eclipsed desktop in less than a year.

The Porn Nerd 10-10-2013 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Femjoy Michael (Post 19829153)
I really like what Michael P did with ZTOD.com. Have you seen it?

As a former webmaster of one of Sean's sites, I agree with him. I'm constantly amazed how many program owners still question whether mobile is important or not.

The president of Time Warner and the president of Sky UK are both pouring money into mobile. They have said, it's the single biggest return on investment for relatively little money (The Economist July 2013)

I've seen one program owner generate 33% more revenue from rebills after launching a mobile version.

Another Alexa 12k site I worked on grew by over 100% within 2 months of refining the mobile experience. All organic. The mobile traffic eclipsed desktop in less than a year.

Great - want to work with me on my mobile sites?
Oh wait, I can't afford you. :D

Zuzana Designs 10-10-2013 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut (Post 19829054)
Nobody is going to browse the internet on their phones! Don't be silly.

Pretty soon it will be browsing the internet with watches :)

PR_Glen 10-10-2013 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks (Post 19828813)
This whole mobile stuff.... A whole upcomming generation of people on tablets, phones, etc... all accustomed to watching STREAMING videos since youtube, etc...

Will it kill the demand for downloadable files at some point?

And is this incidentally going to kill the torrents? file-sharers?

even if it did there would just be illegal streaming sites up instead. piracy problems don't go away, they just find new ways to deliver. You just have to find ways to earn in spite of that.

epitome 10-10-2013 06:08 AM

Adaptive designs are where its at. Not dedicated mobile sites.

And for the love of God, please let mobile users select the desktop version of your site if that is what they want. Nothing more frustrating to me than being forced to use the mobile version on a tablet.

Shap 10-10-2013 06:18 AM

Agreed. I should have clarified. i didn't mean MOBILE sites as much as I meant adaptive/responsive site. IE if you visit it on a computer, ipad or iphone it looks great

The Porn Nerd 10-10-2013 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 19829418)
Agreed. I should have clarified. i didn't mean MOBILE sites as much as I meant adaptive/responsive site. IE if you visit it on a computer, ipad or iphone it looks great

The problem, as I see it, is as soon as you go responsive what happens when new devices, OS, tablet hybrids, etc emerge? The race to force new tech down our throats every six months is beginning to reach overwhelm and I see a backlash coming.

This reminds me of when I used to design 8 different websites for 8 different browsers. LOL Fun times.

Shap 10-10-2013 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19829432)
The problem, as I see it, is as soon as you go responsive what happens when new devices, OS, tablet hybrids, etc emerge? The race to force new tech down our throats every six months is beginning to reach overwhelm and I see a backlash coming.

This reminds me of when I used to design 8 different websites for 8 different browsers. LOL Fun times.

you adapt as best you can

webgurl 10-10-2013 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zuzana Designs (Post 19829377)
Pretty soon it will be browsing the internet with watches :)

Watches are pretty much becoming obsolete, so no this most likely won't happen. :error

potter 10-10-2013 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19829432)
The problem, as I see it, is as soon as you go responsive what happens when new devices, OS, tablet hybrids, etc emerge? The race to force new tech down our throats every six months is beginning to reach overwhelm and I see a backlash coming.

This reminds me of when I used to design 8 different websites for 8 different browsers. LOL Fun times.

Obviously you don't understand what responsive/adaptive actually means. You should go to a conference, or read a book.

Shap 10-10-2013 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webgurl (Post 19829455)
Watches are pretty much becoming obsolete, so no this most likely won't happen. :error

I think her point was how smart watches are going to be the next way.

Roald 10-10-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19829432)
The problem, as I see it, is as soon as you go responsive what happens when new devices, OS, tablet hybrids, etc emerge? The race to force new tech down our throats every six months is beginning to reach overwhelm and I see a backlash coming.

This reminds me of when I used to design 8 different websites for 8 different browsers. LOL Fun times.

Thats the beauty of responsive designs less worrying about these things.

Read into it.

The Porn Nerd 10-10-2013 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter (Post 19829459)
Obviously you don't understand what responsive/adaptive actually means. You should go to a conference, or read a book.

Thanks for the feedback, I'll try that new fangled thing called 'reading' sometime.

Axeman 10-10-2013 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19829104)
Kinda surprising to me that your Karups Older Women site would be getting older guys though. My experience in selling mature porn on Grampland.Com has been that the younger guys with "mommy" fantasies are the ones who really like the old women (older than CM that is...she's 39)

Also, it always seemed like the dirty old men who bought the teen stuff.

Oh for sure Karups OW has a lot of younger members with the fantasy of cougars/teachers etc. But compared to Karups Hometown Amateurs or Karups Private Collection, the site has a big base of older members, which seems to result in less mobile users than the other two sites.

kristin 10-10-2013 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy (Post 19829047)
Its extremely expensive to have it done and complicated. I got 3 quotes and all of them were 5 figures.
And its extremely difficult to learn to program mobile. I dont want to have to learn Objective C or Java.
I took a class on PhoneGap and it was hard as fuck. and Titanium is even worse.

I could go to elance/oDesk etc and have Indians do a shitty job, but no thanks. And if I did outsource and I needed to update or change something It would be very hard to do so.

Hit me up, we can do it for way cheaper than that. We can make all the sites responsive so regardless of device it's optimized and always stays on one URL. No m.sitename.com or anything.

ICQ#: 147-945-440
kristin @ tbmediaservices.com

kristin 10-10-2013 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter (Post 19829459)
Obviously you don't understand what responsive/adaptive actually means. You should go to a conference, or read a book.

All of our new sites are now responsive, it really is the best way to go.

Achmed's Wife Halimah 10-10-2013 01:04 PM

GFYers who live in the New York area who have experience with mobile traffic I want to hear from you! Mobile traffic, Account management, affiliate management, and media buyer experience, submit your resumes on 3littlebirdsinteractive.com/ or email your resume to [email protected]
You can thank Halimah later.

epitome 10-10-2013 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 19829418)
Agreed. I should have clarified. i didn't mean MOBILE sites as much as I meant adaptive/responsive site. IE if you visit it on a computer, ipad or iphone it looks great

I knew you got it, you were always ahead of the curve on those types of things. :thumbsup

Even still, in 2013 I see people asking about developing standalone mobile sites. If you already have them there is nothing wrong with keeping them, but if you're going mobile in the future it should be responsive. Apparently a lot of people (in mainstream, too... perhaps more so there) don't even know that is an option.

BareBacked 10-10-2013 01:33 PM

Ipad site
Iphone Site
its all huge now

Certain people are killing it with Ipad targetted banners

BareBacked 10-10-2013 02:05 PM

adaptive/responsive sites

I think are hard to make tours.

mineistaken 10-10-2013 03:08 PM

Because surfers can open non mobile versions of the site with their mobile devices?

kristin 10-10-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19830236)
Because surfers can open non mobile versions of the site with their mobile devices?

Doesn't mean it works or is remotely optimized for a phone user.

Have Flash on your website? Welp that doesn't translate to mobile.

mineistaken 10-10-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 19830255)
Doesn't mean it works or is remotely optimized for a phone user.

Have Flash on your website? Welp that doesn't translate to mobile.

I thought only crapple mobile devices did not support flash (they are notorious for making life of their users as hard as possible).

Anyway in many cases not optimized regular version of the site is still better or on par than not full mobile version.

epitome 10-10-2013 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19830257)
I thought only crapple mobile devices did not support flash (they are notorious for making life of their users as hard as possible).

Anyway in many cases not optimized regular version of the site is still better or on par than not full mobile version.

It's not just them. Flash doesn't have a high mobile adoption rate in general. Apple was smart to leave it out as it forced lazy webmasters to adapt better streaming solutions. Best solution to reach the most users is to have a responsive site, HTML5 player and MP4 as the default stream.

kristin 10-10-2013 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19830257)
I thought only crapple mobile devices did not support flash (they are notorious for making life of their users as hard as possible).

Anyway in many cases not optimized regular version of the site is still better or on par than not full mobile version.

Anything after Jelly Bean on Android OS no longer supports Flash. HTML5 all the way.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123