GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Business Thread... For those of you that don't have a mobile site why don't you? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1123155)

brassmonkey 10-09-2013 10:31 PM

can i borrow a million dollars?

baddog 10-09-2013 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19828911)
I used to redirect to the mobile site.

But since the advent of tablets becoming so popular...the Android users were pissed off.

Their tablets are HUGE and flash works just fine on them. They wanted the full "normal" site and not the stripped down mobile site.

As a once in a while Xoom user, yep. I did not really like looking at my own site's mobile version.

fuzebox 10-09-2013 11:18 PM

This thread is interesting :pimp

Paully 10-09-2013 11:19 PM

Also, I think now that the Galaxy note and similar fecking phablets along with higher resolution and just an overall better image are going to make their way, even the best responsive designs are gonna die out before not too long.

Html5 and css3 was a pretty big jump and for good reason but people and tech don't always move that fast. Still the most viewable media is a flash player with mp4 video. Mac guys have lots of workarounds and are usually pretty tech savvy.

Hate to think I'm leaving money on the table but for the head aches, not sure it's worth it. Maybe I just missed the boat.

Paully

Robbie 10-09-2013 11:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axeman (Post 19829036)
Does CM bring in more of an older mature customer base? I would factor in that older surfers are slower adapters to the tablets and smart phones. I know for Karups OW, we do the most technical support for the older members who are not that proficient with computers. We are just starting in the last year to see a rise of these members starting to use the iPad, and emailing asking us how to make it work etc.

No, mostly younger guys...early 20's to mid 40's are the majority of her members. I talk to most of them online (we are like a mini-social network in the members area), and they post their own pics in their profiles in the members area for her to see too. And I can't think off the top of my head of any "older" members (60 years old and older).

Kinda surprising to me that your Karups Older Women site would be getting older guys though. My experience in selling mature porn on Grampland.Com has been that the younger guys with "mommy" fantasies are the ones who really like the old women (older than CM that is...she's 39)

Also, it always seemed like the dirty old men who bought the teen stuff.

Kind of like the reverse of what they are is what they want. lol

The only thing I could ever figure about that over the years was: Young guys can pick up young women all the time at clubs. And old men are usually married to old women.

So when they fantasize...it's about the women they DON'T usually get.
That's my theory anyway.

Femjoy Michael 10-10-2013 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 19828246)
I was just checking out a few big paysites and noticed they don't have mobile sites.

So my question is for those of you with no mobile site why don't you?

I really like what Michael P did with ZTOD.com. Have you seen it?

As a former webmaster of one of Sean's sites, I agree with him. I'm constantly amazed how many program owners still question whether mobile is important or not.

The president of Time Warner and the president of Sky UK are both pouring money into mobile. They have said, it's the single biggest return on investment for relatively little money (The Economist July 2013)

I've seen one program owner generate 33% more revenue from rebills after launching a mobile version.

Another Alexa 12k site I worked on grew by over 100% within 2 months of refining the mobile experience. All organic. The mobile traffic eclipsed desktop in less than a year.

The Porn Nerd 10-10-2013 05:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Femjoy Michael (Post 19829153)
I really like what Michael P did with ZTOD.com. Have you seen it?

As a former webmaster of one of Sean's sites, I agree with him. I'm constantly amazed how many program owners still question whether mobile is important or not.

The president of Time Warner and the president of Sky UK are both pouring money into mobile. They have said, it's the single biggest return on investment for relatively little money (The Economist July 2013)

I've seen one program owner generate 33% more revenue from rebills after launching a mobile version.

Another Alexa 12k site I worked on grew by over 100% within 2 months of refining the mobile experience. All organic. The mobile traffic eclipsed desktop in less than a year.

Great - want to work with me on my mobile sites?
Oh wait, I can't afford you. :D

Zuzana Designs 10-10-2013 05:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smut (Post 19829054)
Nobody is going to browse the internet on their phones! Don't be silly.

Pretty soon it will be browsing the internet with watches :)

PR_Glen 10-10-2013 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks (Post 19828813)
This whole mobile stuff.... A whole upcomming generation of people on tablets, phones, etc... all accustomed to watching STREAMING videos since youtube, etc...

Will it kill the demand for downloadable files at some point?

And is this incidentally going to kill the torrents? file-sharers?

even if it did there would just be illegal streaming sites up instead. piracy problems don't go away, they just find new ways to deliver. You just have to find ways to earn in spite of that.

epitome 10-10-2013 06:08 AM

Adaptive designs are where its at. Not dedicated mobile sites.

And for the love of God, please let mobile users select the desktop version of your site if that is what they want. Nothing more frustrating to me than being forced to use the mobile version on a tablet.

Shap 10-10-2013 06:18 AM

Agreed. I should have clarified. i didn't mean MOBILE sites as much as I meant adaptive/responsive site. IE if you visit it on a computer, ipad or iphone it looks great

The Porn Nerd 10-10-2013 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 19829418)
Agreed. I should have clarified. i didn't mean MOBILE sites as much as I meant adaptive/responsive site. IE if you visit it on a computer, ipad or iphone it looks great

The problem, as I see it, is as soon as you go responsive what happens when new devices, OS, tablet hybrids, etc emerge? The race to force new tech down our throats every six months is beginning to reach overwhelm and I see a backlash coming.

This reminds me of when I used to design 8 different websites for 8 different browsers. LOL Fun times.

Shap 10-10-2013 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19829432)
The problem, as I see it, is as soon as you go responsive what happens when new devices, OS, tablet hybrids, etc emerge? The race to force new tech down our throats every six months is beginning to reach overwhelm and I see a backlash coming.

This reminds me of when I used to design 8 different websites for 8 different browsers. LOL Fun times.

you adapt as best you can

webgurl 10-10-2013 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zuzana Designs (Post 19829377)
Pretty soon it will be browsing the internet with watches :)

Watches are pretty much becoming obsolete, so no this most likely won't happen. :error

potter 10-10-2013 06:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19829432)
The problem, as I see it, is as soon as you go responsive what happens when new devices, OS, tablet hybrids, etc emerge? The race to force new tech down our throats every six months is beginning to reach overwhelm and I see a backlash coming.

This reminds me of when I used to design 8 different websites for 8 different browsers. LOL Fun times.

Obviously you don't understand what responsive/adaptive actually means. You should go to a conference, or read a book.

Shap 10-10-2013 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by webgurl (Post 19829455)
Watches are pretty much becoming obsolete, so no this most likely won't happen. :error

I think her point was how smart watches are going to be the next way.

Roald 10-10-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Porn Nerd (Post 19829432)
The problem, as I see it, is as soon as you go responsive what happens when new devices, OS, tablet hybrids, etc emerge? The race to force new tech down our throats every six months is beginning to reach overwhelm and I see a backlash coming.

This reminds me of when I used to design 8 different websites for 8 different browsers. LOL Fun times.

Thats the beauty of responsive designs less worrying about these things.

Read into it.

The Porn Nerd 10-10-2013 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter (Post 19829459)
Obviously you don't understand what responsive/adaptive actually means. You should go to a conference, or read a book.

Thanks for the feedback, I'll try that new fangled thing called 'reading' sometime.

Axeman 10-10-2013 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19829104)
Kinda surprising to me that your Karups Older Women site would be getting older guys though. My experience in selling mature porn on Grampland.Com has been that the younger guys with "mommy" fantasies are the ones who really like the old women (older than CM that is...she's 39)

Also, it always seemed like the dirty old men who bought the teen stuff.

Oh for sure Karups OW has a lot of younger members with the fantasy of cougars/teachers etc. But compared to Karups Hometown Amateurs or Karups Private Collection, the site has a big base of older members, which seems to result in less mobile users than the other two sites.

kristin 10-10-2013 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy (Post 19829047)
Its extremely expensive to have it done and complicated. I got 3 quotes and all of them were 5 figures.
And its extremely difficult to learn to program mobile. I dont want to have to learn Objective C or Java.
I took a class on PhoneGap and it was hard as fuck. and Titanium is even worse.

I could go to elance/oDesk etc and have Indians do a shitty job, but no thanks. And if I did outsource and I needed to update or change something It would be very hard to do so.

Hit me up, we can do it for way cheaper than that. We can make all the sites responsive so regardless of device it's optimized and always stays on one URL. No m.sitename.com or anything.

ICQ#: 147-945-440
kristin @ tbmediaservices.com

kristin 10-10-2013 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by potter (Post 19829459)
Obviously you don't understand what responsive/adaptive actually means. You should go to a conference, or read a book.

All of our new sites are now responsive, it really is the best way to go.

Achmed's Wife Halimah 10-10-2013 01:04 PM

GFYers who live in the New York area who have experience with mobile traffic I want to hear from you! Mobile traffic, Account management, affiliate management, and media buyer experience, submit your resumes on 3littlebirdsinteractive.com/ or email your resume to [email protected]
You can thank Halimah later.

epitome 10-10-2013 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 19829418)
Agreed. I should have clarified. i didn't mean MOBILE sites as much as I meant adaptive/responsive site. IE if you visit it on a computer, ipad or iphone it looks great

I knew you got it, you were always ahead of the curve on those types of things. :thumbsup

Even still, in 2013 I see people asking about developing standalone mobile sites. If you already have them there is nothing wrong with keeping them, but if you're going mobile in the future it should be responsive. Apparently a lot of people (in mainstream, too... perhaps more so there) don't even know that is an option.

BareBacked 10-10-2013 01:33 PM

Ipad site
Iphone Site
its all huge now

Certain people are killing it with Ipad targetted banners

BareBacked 10-10-2013 02:05 PM

adaptive/responsive sites

I think are hard to make tours.

mineistaken 10-10-2013 03:08 PM

Because surfers can open non mobile versions of the site with their mobile devices?

kristin 10-10-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19830236)
Because surfers can open non mobile versions of the site with their mobile devices?

Doesn't mean it works or is remotely optimized for a phone user.

Have Flash on your website? Welp that doesn't translate to mobile.

mineistaken 10-10-2013 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 19830255)
Doesn't mean it works or is remotely optimized for a phone user.

Have Flash on your website? Welp that doesn't translate to mobile.

I thought only crapple mobile devices did not support flash (they are notorious for making life of their users as hard as possible).

Anyway in many cases not optimized regular version of the site is still better or on par than not full mobile version.

epitome 10-10-2013 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19830257)
I thought only crapple mobile devices did not support flash (they are notorious for making life of their users as hard as possible).

Anyway in many cases not optimized regular version of the site is still better or on par than not full mobile version.

It's not just them. Flash doesn't have a high mobile adoption rate in general. Apple was smart to leave it out as it forced lazy webmasters to adapt better streaming solutions. Best solution to reach the most users is to have a responsive site, HTML5 player and MP4 as the default stream.

kristin 10-10-2013 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mineistaken (Post 19830257)
I thought only crapple mobile devices did not support flash (they are notorious for making life of their users as hard as possible).

Anyway in many cases not optimized regular version of the site is still better or on par than not full mobile version.

Anything after Jelly Bean on Android OS no longer supports Flash. HTML5 all the way.

bean-aid 10-10-2013 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 19830264)
Anything after Jelly Bean on Android OS no longer supports Flash. HTML5 all the way.

I was told differently... I never thought flash was popular at all on any phones.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1122455

scroll down

kristin 10-10-2013 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 19830269)
I was told differently... I never thought flash was popular at all on any phones.

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1122455

scroll down

Games are a bit different and not our specialty... that would be Bonetown. But for regular paysites - HTML5.

Adam_M 10-10-2013 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 19829769)
I think her point was how smart watches are going to be the next way.

I think the smart watch will remain a gimmick and ever take off but that is just my :2 cents:

bean-aid 10-10-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 19830272)
For games, sure, JS. For regular paysite - HTML5.

Yeah... but some of the comments eluded that flash was just fine. Made me think... for 1 second... and realized you don't want flash at all... JS is not flash.

I'm just saying... the thread kinda was eluding that flash was ok... and I don't think it is at all.

btw... I have a proven 3 year record of doing very well selling adult games and need a developer. I've asked so many people and just can't find anyone to develop my latest ideas. Maybe you may be interested as I see your site in sig :thumbsup

bean-aid 10-10-2013 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 19830272)
Games are a bit different and not our specialty... that would be Bonetown. But for regular paysites - HTML5.

It's like you already knew what I was thinking... lol ^^

thumbuilderic 10-10-2013 03:43 PM

We're implementing a mobile site now. I can't find a good reason not to!

kristin 10-10-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beaner (Post 19830281)
It's like you already knew what I was thinking... lol ^^

Let me see what I can find for you. Can you shoot me over some brief details?
kristin @ tbmediaservices.com

bean-aid 10-10-2013 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kristin (Post 19830338)
Let me see what I can find for you. Can you shoot me over some brief details?
kristin @ tbmediaservices.com

email sent... left you a PM as well. For every 100 ideas I have typically a couple of them pan out. I (cross fingers and hope to die) hope someone like yourself can make it happen. It will happen either way, it would be great sooner... rather then later. :thumbsup

clickhappy 10-10-2013 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam_M (Post 19830273)
I think the smart watch will remain a gimmick and ever take off but that is just my :2 cents:

eventually they will become holograms so youll have a bigger screen.
I saw a presentation a few weeks ago on holograms and the presenter could push buttons in the air and have a reaction to it. It was super freaking cool.

that'll be the iphone 9 lol

BareBacked 10-10-2013 07:10 PM

The biggest problem I found when trying to make a reponsive tour is you end up pushing the join forms WAY under the fold when the site is viewed on a phone ( narrow width ).
Maybe you have some solution.
Check out the join form on http://ftvgirls.com/update/romi-391.html

for an example

Shap 10-11-2013 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adam_M (Post 19830273)
I think the smart watch will remain a gimmick and ever take off but that is just my :2 cents:

I agree 100% it will take off with a certain crowd but for apple's high end user base watches are a fashion accessory.

Shap 10-11-2013 01:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by clickhappy (Post 19830409)
eventually they will become holograms so youll have a bigger screen.
I saw a presentation a few weeks ago on holograms and the presenter could push buttons in the air and have a reaction to it. It was super freaking cool.

that'll be the iphone 9 lol

I'm surprised holograms haven't been mentioned more and haven't started to surface. When holograms happen porn companies that hop on that are going to do well.

The Porn Nerd 10-11-2013 07:59 AM

In the future all devices will come with 'responsive translaters' so the device will automatically resize and reformat the pages.

Holograms and 3D sense-memory porn are the future.

Lichen 10-11-2013 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shap (Post 19828246)
So my question is for those of you with no mobile site why don't you?

There is no need for a mobile site. Current mobile devices can view regular sites just fine.

Shap 10-13-2013 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lichen (Post 19831349)
There is no need for a mobile site. Current mobile devices can view regular sites just fine.

Absolutely not. Go to MetArt on an iphone then go to FtvGirls tell me which is viewed just fine and which is a pain in the ass.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123