GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Manwin Buying Faploid (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1119489)

adultmobile 08-29-2013 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by signupdamnit (Post 19777855)
I've observed that 80'% of the people who give him crap are the same people who like to publicly defend Manwin. I think it's more that they don't want to hear anything bad about them and in many cases they have a business relationship with them which they want to strengthen.

I am unsure why others reply to Mike South posts, but in my case it is 100% for fun and not for business. Especially when he wrote completely wrong and funny things about Vassili K. which is the accountant of partners of mine (not Manwin), or other people/companies I know directly. I am sure there are others who reply his threads just for 100% pure fun, and no any business (or manwin ass-kissing) agenda.

Far-L 08-29-2013 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile (Post 19778235)
I am unsure why others reply to Mike South posts, but in my case it is 100% for fun and not for business. Especially when he wrote completely wrong and funny things about Vassili K. which is the accountant of partners of mine (not Manwin), or other people/companies I know directly. I am sure there are others who reply his threads just for 100% pure fun, and no any business (or manwin ass-kissing) agenda.

You could include me in that group. I like Mike and I know he can dish it out as well as he can take it...

His fiendish little sycophant anon disenfranchised hater minions though... now those I do have an issue with...

Magnetron 08-29-2013 10:35 AM

Mike could always post photos of 17 year olds.
Or polls about who should get banned.
Or troll fellow users.
Or obsess about Chris Buttler.
Or drop some race bait.
Or make another post about Miley Cyrus.
Or blindside you with some gore photos.
Or a million other things that are irrelavant to the industry.

Far-L 08-29-2013 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adultmobile (Post 19778235)
I am unsure why others reply to Mike South posts, but in my case it is 100% for fun and not for business. Especially when he wrote completely wrong and funny things about Vassili K. which is the accountant of partners of mine (not Manwin), or other people/companies I know directly. I am sure there are others who reply his threads just for 100% pure fun, and no any business (or manwin ass-kissing) agenda.

You could include me in that group. I like Mike and I know he can dish it out as well as he can take it...

His fiendish little sycophant anon disenfranchised hater minions though... now those I do have an issue with...

Magnetron 08-29-2013 10:39 AM

And so what if his blog looks like it was designed by a cat swatting at a moth on a keyboard?

Far-L 08-29-2013 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19777522)
you a betting man? I will wager on it

http://www.icftechnology.com/

thats streamate owner

Well, I wouldn't call myself a betting man, because I prefer a sure thing... which is why I would be more than happy to take this bet.

How much you putting up? Doesn't have to be cash but should be something substantial... just putting a retraction on your blog is not going to cut it. Also, you need to be clear about what you will or will not accept as firsthand and factual. Assumptions drawn from 2257 statements on white labels, theories about DMCAs, and other rabbit hole tin foil hat postulates won't cut it for me.

The bet is for "bought", no wiggle room on "offered" btw... I don't disagree with that part of the story.

Mike, I hope you know me well enough to know not to take the bet but if your pride swells and arrogance compels you anyway then I understand - even if I am critical of it as obtuse folly; however, that is why it has to be something worthy. The bet needs to be something that if you lose you end up paying a steep price to gain a lesson from it.

Far-L 08-29-2013 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 19778377)
Well, I wouldn't call myself a betting man, because I prefer a sure thing... which is why I would be more than happy to take this bet.

How much you putting up? Doesn't have to be cash but should be something substantial... just putting a retraction on your blog is not going to cut it. Also, you need to be clear about what you will or will not accept as firsthand and factual. Assumptions drawn from 2257 statements on white labels, theories about DMCAs, and other rabbit hole tin foil hat postulates won't cut it for me.

The bet is for "bought", no wiggle room on "offered" btw... I don't disagree with that part of the story.

Mike, I hope you know me well enough to know not to take the bet but if your pride swells and arrogance compels you anyway then I understand - even if I am critical of it as obtuse folly; however, that is why it has to be something worthy. The bet needs to be something that if you lose you end up paying a steep price to gain a lesson from it.

Add anon tipsters not acceptable either of course...

boneprone 08-29-2013 07:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19777522)
you a betting man? I will wager on it

http://www.icftechnology.com/

thats streamate owner

Ill bet you.

mikesouth 08-29-2013 09:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 19778377)
Well, I wouldn't call myself a betting man, because I prefer a sure thing... which is why I would be more than happy to take this bet.

How much you putting up? Doesn't have to be cash but should be something substantial... just putting a retraction on your blog is not going to cut it. Also, you need to be clear about what you will or will not accept as firsthand and factual. Assumptions drawn from 2257 statements on white labels, theories about DMCAs, and other rabbit hole tin foil hat postulates won't cut it for me.

The bet is for "bought", no wiggle room on "offered" btw... I don't disagree with that part of the story.

Mike, I hope you know me well enough to know not to take the bet but if your pride swells and arrogance compels you anyway then I understand - even if I am critical of it as obtuse folly; however, that is why it has to be something worthy. The bet needs to be something that if you lose you end up paying a steep price to gain a lesson from it.

the bet is for OWNS Manwin Owns Streamate via ICF Technology They Own ICF technology and thus Streamate.

I should disclose though that I have inside info

like say maybe checks changed from FCI to ICF....

XXXtrailers 08-29-2013 09:59 PM

When they buy Playboy?

Nathan 08-29-2013 11:15 PM

Mike, so, answer far-l, what if you lose the bet.

I will bet you too, obviously I have inside knowledge also but you are so full of yourself, you would still bet against me on this.

Jel 08-30-2013 05:38 AM

Nathan - to sidetrack slightly - can you check your skype please, thanks :)

Far-L 08-30-2013 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesouth (Post 19779181)
the bet is for OWNS Manwin Owns Streamate via ICF Technology They Own ICF technology and thus Streamate.

I should disclose though that I have inside info

like say maybe checks changed from FCI to ICF....

"Inside info", "anonymous sources".

That is just a series of extrapolations based on unfounded assumptions which are precisely what I said would not be admissible as proof. I know you know the difference between hypothesis, theory, and fact.

I find it kind of telling that you aren't even putting up a bet but just relying on more innuendo and anonymity.

The sort of sophistry you are indulging in is only good for obfuscating the truth. But, then again, since you aren't concerned with truth, and feel your opinion is more valuable than facts, then I guess I shouldn't concern myself any further with trying to set you straight. Nothing wrong with letting you be the punchline to a joke everyone that knows better can laugh at.

The unfortunate thing is the more you place a higher value on your opinion the less integrity you have, especially when your conspiracy theories are debunked, and that means when you are actually "right" no one is going to take you seriously regardless.

I call it "Luke Ford Syndrome".

adultmobile 08-30-2013 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan (Post 19779272)
Mike, so, answer far-l, what if you lose the bet.

I will bet you too, obviously I have inside knowledge also but you are so full of yourself, you would still bet against me on this.

Must give Mike credit for letting lots of people reply his posts.

Alex1776 10-29-2013 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan (Post 19779272)
Mike, so, answer far-l, what if you lose the bet.

I will bet you too, obviously I have inside knowledge also but you are so full of yourself, you would still bet against me on this.

Who won the bet?

Penny24Seven 10-29-2013 03:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Magnetron (Post 19778333)
And so what if his blog looks like it was designed by a cat swatting at a moth on a keyboard?

HAHAHA fucking fuck that was a good line. I will have to remember that. Cant stop laughing hahaha

Penny24Seven 10-29-2013 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boneprone (Post 19779112)
Ill bet you.

yeah why did this thread die and Boneprone what is up with your lock bets man. I do not know you but took a chance on your so called lock bets and I think I won 6 of 7 and made enough to buy a new Vette cash.
I see you get trashed all the time and I don't even know your name but pass the lock bet info to me again.
6 of 7 or 7 of 8 I am not sure but I will let it ride :)

JFK 10-29-2013 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex1776 (Post 19851704)
Who won the bet?

the jury is still out :winkwink:

PornDiscounts-V 10-29-2013 05:18 AM

I...




.














.









.













.











.








don't care!


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123