GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   US Could Strike Syria Within Hours; Russia Warns Against Attack (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1119420)

2012 08-28-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CAHEK (Post 19777293)


J. Falcon 08-28-2013 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J. Falcon (Post 19777353)
Nope, it's freedom.

That's from Amistad

pornmasta 08-28-2013 04:29 PM

i wonder how efficient is this russian anti-missile system.

2012 08-28-2013 05:03 PM

:warning:warning:warning:helpme:helpme:helpme

Defense Secretary Panetta tells Senator Sessions that military gets its authority from UN or NATO



http://misterdangerous.files.wordpre...eing-eye-2.jpg


femdomdestiny 08-28-2013 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black All Through (Post 19777316)
The Russians? Absolutely nothing!
They made a statement with the same identical tone before the attack on the Balcans, then in Afghanistan, then Iraq and now in Syria, its simply old rusty CCCP style, they need to get their voice out to show the world they still exist.

I am afraid also that Russians won't do shit and that is terrible mistake (for them at first place). One mistake, this happened in Balkans (copy paste from Wikipedia):

On the night of 12 June 1999, 200 Russian airborne troops arrived in Yugoslavia to assist their ally and occupied Pristina International Airport Adem Jashari ahead of the arrival of NATO troops. NATO Command had closed airspace, making it impossible to send support and ammunition from Russia to Serbia, which could have led to confrontation involving Russia and the block CIS. NATO eventually gave control of the airport to Russia.

The Kosovo War ended on June 11, 1999, and a joint NATO-Russian peacekeeping force was to be installed in Kosovo. Russia had expected to receive a peacekeeping sector independent of NATO, and were angered when this was refused.
A contingent of 200 Russian troops deployed in Bosnia and Herzegovina then crossed into Kosovo and occupied Pristina International Airport in Pristina, the capital city of Kosovo.

Upon hearing of the deployment, American NATO commander Wesley Clark called NATO Secretary-General Javier Solana, and was told "you have to transfer authority" in the area. Clark then ordered a contingent of 500 British and French paratroopers to seize the airport by force, an order that is still debated. British officer James Blunt, who commanded the contingent, questioned and did not carry out this order. His delay was sanctioned by British General Mike Jackson. Jackson refused to enforce Clark's orders, reportedly telling him "I'm not going to start the Third World War for you." Jackson instructed the paratroopers to encircle the airport instead.

Russia placed several airbases on standby, and prepared battalions of paratroopers to depart for Pristina on Il-76 military transport planes. Fearing that Russian aircraft were heading for the airport, General Clark planned to order British tanks and armored cars to block the runway, and requested American Admiral James O. Ellis for helicopter support. His orders were not carried out, and the United States instead put political pressure on neighboring states not to allow Russia to use their airspace to ferry in the reinforcements. Russia was forced to call off the reinforcements after Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania refused requests by Russia to use their airspace

onwebcam 08-28-2013 06:02 PM

Just a recap

US 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt': Report

http://in.news.yahoo.com/us-backed-p...045648224.html

winter_ 08-28-2013 06:26 PM

this is exactly it, when something like this happens in the world everyone has to expect the united states to do something about it.

if opinion polls in the past about the war on terrorism are true americans aren't as stupid as they are often thought of by people from overseas. that war has gone on so long now it is still raging it wasn't even an election issue between romney and obama last year.

Rochard 08-28-2013 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 19777469)
Just a recap

US 'backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria, blame it on Assad govt': Report

http://in.news.yahoo.com/us-backed-p...045648224.html

Um.... "According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was...."

Be serious already.

onwebcam 08-28-2013 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19777509)
Um.... "According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was...."

Be serious already.

Why don't they want the UN Investigators investigating? Why did Kerry say "It doesn't matter who used them."?

"Syria's deputy foreign minister said on Wednesday that the United States, Britain and France helped "terrorists" use chemical weapons in Syria, and that the same groups would soon use them against Europe."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...97R0N220130828

_Richard_ 08-28-2013 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19777509)
Um.... "According to Infowars.com, the December 25 email was...."

Be serious already.

he's serious. that information was around before infowars ran it.

Rochard 08-28-2013 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19777566)
he's serious. that information was around before infowars ran it.

I'll never believe anything infowars prints. Ever.

Rochard 08-28-2013 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 19777518)
Why don't they want the UN Investigators investigating? Why did Kerry say "It doesn't matter who used them."?

"Syria's deputy foreign minister said on Wednesday that the United States, Britain and France helped "terrorists" use chemical weapons in Syria, and that the same groups would soon use them against Europe."

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...97R0N220130828

So what you are saying is... The Syria's deputy foreign minister claims the US is behind it and you just automatically believe him?

Sure thing.

onwebcam 08-28-2013 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19777599)
So what you are saying is... The Syria's deputy foreign minister claims the US is behind it and you just automatically believe him?

Sure thing.

So what you're saying is the US Government (given their record) is saying Syrian government is behind it and you just believe it?



Exclusive: CIA Files Prove America Helped Saddam as He Gassed Iran
The U.S. knew Hussein was launching some of the worst chemical attacks in history -- and still gave him a hand.

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/article... _gassed_iran

onwebcam 08-28-2013 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19777599)
So what you are saying is... The Syria's deputy foreign minister claims the US is behind it and you just automatically believe him?

Sure thing.


Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attack?
http://oilprice.com/Geopolitics/Inte...al-Attack.html

winter_ 08-28-2013 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19777597)
I'll never believe anything infowars prints. Ever.

why would you they have only been banging the end of the world drum for the last fifteen years or so.

2012 08-28-2013 11:23 PM


mikesinner 08-29-2013 01:14 AM

It looks to me like no military action will be taken. Britain has already said they are out.

onwebcam 08-29-2013 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesinner (Post 19777781)
It looks to me like no military action will be taken. Britain has already said they are out.

And what would we do without Britain?

Lykos 08-29-2013 04:53 AM

Truly hope there wont be new wars:(

winter_ 08-29-2013 08:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesinner (Post 19777781)
It looks to me like no military action will be taken. Britain has already said they are out.

good! i mean how does it really make sense the united states has to intervene at all? even great britain? what about turkey? can't turkey invade and do something about this? what about russia or china who aren't a land and an ocean away from the conflict?

its terrible people are dying it really is and it almost makes me upset but perhaps assad will be going down and taking a lot of people with him no matter what. i have seen an interview with him on russia today, the full length, twice. this man is mad, or, mentally ill, it must be too much hookah or mk ultra or something.

_Richard_ 08-29-2013 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesinner (Post 19777781)
It looks to me like no military action will be taken. Britain has already said they are out.

that would be a nice change.. are they withdrawing their SAS?

CamTraffic 08-29-2013 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19774535)
The only thing worse than being French is... Being French Canadian. I mean, I love Canadians over all, but I don't get the French Canadians.

You are so ignorant !! Wow!!

stephane76 08-29-2013 08:38 AM

edit ------------

nikki99 08-29-2013 09:03 AM

stock market is going up

Bryan G 08-29-2013 09:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19774535)
The only thing worse than being French is... Being French Canadian. I mean, I love Canadians over all, but I don't get the French Canadians.

What is it you don't get? They are not American? I'd say most people here don't get you you because you are easily one of the most ignorant fools on this board. Well done!

Rochard 08-29-2013 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryan G (Post 19778217)
What is it you don't get? They are not American? I'd say most people here don't get you you because you are easily one of the most ignorant fools on this board. Well done!

Your sense of humor eludes you this morning. (It's a joke silly.)

Rochard 08-29-2013 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamTraffic (Post 19778126)
You are so ignorant !! Wow!!

Don't you guys understand a joke when you see one? Holy crap, I've always poked fun at Canadians. Jesus.

winter_ 08-29-2013 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19778230)
Don't you guys understand a joke when you see one? Holy crap, I've always poked fun at Canadians. Jesus.

hey i was on another site online this morning i happened to find something about french used as slang, similar to dutchie i guess or bugger. but not similar to bugger as a deragatory, you would call someone french if they are liberal for starters. you would say, "oh he is so french". sorry i don't have the link.

mstyanda 08-29-2013 11:07 AM

Reality is we have so much sickness, hunger, homelessness and unnecessary death right here in the U.S. that the last thing we need to be doing is intervening elsewhere. This country always wants to jump in to fight other countries battles, control other countries politics and even financially support other countries at the drop of a hat. Regardless if our intentions are good or bad in these individual efforts we should be staying our ass at home right here on U.S. soil. Keep our troops, money and efforts right here. Our deficit is phenomenal, the elderly lady living right next door to me can't afford her medication and there are hungry children living under the freeway a mile from my house. How about we help some of those issues first for a change.

oppoten 08-29-2013 11:25 AM

Britain won't be out.

2012 08-29-2013 11:32 AM

If you're not with Obama you're with the Racists
 
Q. In what circumstances, if any, would the president have constitutional authority to bomb Iran without seeking a use-of-force authorization from Congress? (Specifically, what about the strategic bombing of suspected nuclear sites — a situation that does not involve stopping an IMMINENT threat?)

Obama: The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/...ateQA/ObamaQA/

http://24.media.tumblr.com/4924a5f10...6aebo1_500.jpg

CAHEK 08-29-2013 01:11 PM

http://cs319228.vk.me/v319228973/a38b/QsQzUlU5eA4.jpg

onwebcam 08-29-2013 02:40 PM

http://i.imgur.com/GyS2PdW.jpg

2012 08-29-2013 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CAHEK (Post 19778598)

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 19778731)

http://31.media.tumblr.com/f26950891...wqrdo1_400.gif


bronco67 08-29-2013 06:23 PM

Here's what will happen. Obama will heed Congress' advice to let them "share the burden" of the decision. They will vote against action, because it's the opposite of what Obama wants.

Two months later, the conservative narrative about the whole Syria thing will be Obama was soft on Syria.

winter_ 08-29-2013 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oppoten (Post 19778412)
Britain won't be out.

as much as i wish they were actually out this time round with still a labour party leader? i remember blair, i can tell you right now he went with the decision to invade iraq partly because of murdochs media ties. murdoch still has an absolute monopoly on the media there, in the united kingdom, and also in the united states. psssttt, the feds are still investigating him for phone hacking on american soil.

mikesinner 08-29-2013 10:04 PM

I'm thinking now that the U.S won't drop 1 single bomb on Syria

onwebcam 08-29-2013 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikesinner (Post 19779219)
I'm thinking now that the U.S won't drop 1 single bomb on Syria

https://sphotos-a-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/h...96618263_n.jpg

Obama has backed himself into a corner and has to go through with it otherwise he looks like the weakling he is.

Also it now seems that once again this is about business and not humanitarianism. Apparently Qatar inked a deal with Exxon to sell natural gas to the UK and cutting Russia out. The only thing in the way of finalizing the deal is Syria. Which also explains Russia's real concern in the matter as well.

2012 08-30-2013 10:47 AM

http://i.imgur.com/4xR7kAD.jpg



that makes no sense, Ron Paul must be crazy and dumb ... Syria has weapons of mass destruction:warning i mean, chemical weapons... fool me once ... can't get fooled again. they hate you for your freedom : get molested at the airport to protect you from Al Qaeda .... now we work with Al Qaeda this makes perfect sense to me

http://troll.me/images/brick-tamland/lmao-seriously.jpg

xxxRumor 08-30-2013 11:50 AM

"the government issued a detailed intelligence assessment outlining evidence based on intercepts, satellites, and human spying to make its case that the Assad regime was responsible for the chemical attack last Wednesday."

"We assess with high confidence that the Syrian government carried out the chemical weapons attack against opposition elements in the Damascus "


Quote:

"None of the actual evidence was released."
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...997133480.html

Sold


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123