GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   88 year old WW2 vet beat to death by teens (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1119146)

Vendzilla 08-23-2013 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771002)
A seventeen year old kid who goes to the store to skittles is a kid who wants a snack.

Two sixteen year old boys who brutally murder an older man for kicks are in fact punk ass thugs.

I went in the Navy at 17, I don't see where my choice of candy would have made a difference in that. If I remember right, you joined the Marines at an early age too right?

Right after boot camp, I was drinking on base legally!

Captain Kawaii 08-23-2013 01:21 PM

Trayvon deserved what he got and these guys will deserve what they get.

Just trying to fit into the agenda. :upsidedow Go team!

TheSquealer 08-23-2013 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771000)
How does this make me a racist? Martin was black and I believe he was innocent; These two kids are being charged with murdering an older man without reason and without cause.

He was innocent except that the evidence, trial, eye witness testinony and jury said he wasn't..

Captain Kawaii 08-23-2013 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771002)
A seventeen year old kid who goes to the store to skittles is a kid who wants a snack.

Two sixteen year old boys who brutally murder an older man for kicks are in fact punk ass thugs.

You left out the Purple Drank Mixing kit he was making. Lots of it found in his blood stream in the autopsy. I was on the fence til I read that.

Grapesoda 08-23-2013 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 19770586)
teen = 10 to 19 ?

13-19 :winkwink:

Robbie 08-23-2013 01:39 PM

Sorry Rochard...Couldn't help myself.

But you kept saying that it was very doubtful that Trayvon Martin attacked and beat up Zimmerman because Trayvon was a "child". You even said that the age difference was "stunning".

I kept telling you that a teenage boy is probably the most dangerous creature on Earth. Violent, short tempered, full of testosterone, irresponsible, and they just plain out don't give a fuck about anything.

You were just so damn pig-headed about it that I couldn't help myself when you turned right around and called these teenage boys who are YOUNGER than Trayvon Martin "punk ass thugs".

It just seems like a bit of selective outrage on your part and comes across a bit hypocritical.

If YOU were taking the "punk ass thugs" side of this story you would twist it like this:
"2 young children had to team together to fight off an experienced trained military killer who is much older than they are and luckily the two toddlers were able to kill this experienced commando killing machine."

Sorry man...lol. But on this one you left your balls hanging down nice and low. And they were just right there in front of me...so I had to bust 'em a bit. :)

Lichen 08-23-2013 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks (Post 19770664)
I absolutely don't have a problem with him being a veteran. That's not my point... my point is how manipulative media operates...

yeah, because the NewLibs did milk the "No Limit" Trayvon hysteria

oh wait

Marcus Aurelius 08-23-2013 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 19770578)
The man served his country, those kids should get life and put in open population and gang raped on a daily basis.

GO FUCK YOURSELF

Ignore the trolls

They always have a reason why a White person deserves something bad to happen to them.

They said similar things about the Australian baseball player.

Just Alex 08-23-2013 02:15 PM

Where did all hood crew go? I don't see twerktube, black monsters or chimpanzee posting in this topic?

Relentless 08-23-2013 02:31 PM

For all we know, the old vet paid these two to kill him or it was a lovers quarrel among the three of them.

This 'news' is devoid of facts. It's not news. It's a lead to what might be news eventually if anyone actually did some investigative reporting before going to press.

Lichen 08-23-2013 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19771118)
For all we know, the old vet paid these two to kill him or it was a lovers quarrel among the three of them.

This 'news' is devoid of facts. It's not news. It's a lead to what might be news eventually if anyone actually did some investigative reporting before going to press.

Or maybe you're just a whiny, nigga apologist, Mandingo Party faggot.

Nikki_Licks 08-23-2013 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19771118)
For all we know, the old vet paid these two to kill him or it was a lovers quarrel among the three of them.

This 'news' is devoid of facts. It's not news. It's a lead to what might be news eventually if anyone actually did some investigative reporting before going to press.

So true......:thumbsup

Rochard 08-23-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 19771021)
He was innocent except that the evidence, trial, eye witness testinony and jury said he wasn't..

You couldn't be further from the truth. Martin was never on trial; Zimmerman was. Zimmerman was found "not guilty" which does not mean Martin was guilty of anything.

Rochard 08-23-2013 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19771045)
Sorry Rochard...Couldn't help myself.

But you kept saying that it was very doubtful that Trayvon Martin attacked and beat up Zimmerman because Trayvon was a "child". You even said that the age difference was "stunning".

I kept telling you that a teenage boy is probably the most dangerous creature on Earth. Violent, short tempered, full of testosterone, irresponsible, and they just plain out don't give a fuck about anything.

You were just so damn pig-headed about it that I couldn't help myself when you turned right around and called these teenage boys who are YOUNGER than Trayvon Martin "punk ass thugs".

It just seems like a bit of selective outrage on your part and comes across a bit hypocritical.

If YOU were taking the "punk ass thugs" side of this story you would twist it like this:
"2 young children had to team together to fight off an experienced trained military killer who is much older than they are and luckily the two toddlers were able to kill this experienced commando killing machine."

Sorry man...lol. But on this one you left your balls hanging down nice and low. And they were just right there in front of me...so I had to bust 'em a bit. :)

I did not "keep on saying that it was doubtful Martin attacked Zimmerman". In fact, I believe he did. I believe that Martin was acting in self defense - a full grown man was stalking him for twenty minutes and Martin, who was no angel, felt the need to protect himself by striking first. No matter what, Martin was walking home from the store - period. The difference is when you say "seventeen year old shot day" I hear "my kid was shot dead because she was walking between houses in the dark".

It's not selective outrage at all. No matter what, Martin was do nothing more than walking home from the store. These two kids killed a man only because they could.

Rochard 08-23-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19771118)
For all we know, the old vet paid these two to kill him or it was a lovers quarrel among the three of them.

This 'news' is devoid of facts. It's not news. It's a lead to what might be news eventually if anyone actually did some investigative reporting before going to press.

Of course it's news. A man died, and that in itself is news.

Penny24Seven 08-23-2013 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771002)
A seventeen year old kid who goes to the store to skittles is a kid who wants a snack.

Two sixteen year old boys who brutally murder an older man for kicks are in fact punk ass thugs.

he was not buying those skittles to snack on them though

Penny24Seven 08-23-2013 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19771045)
Sorry Rochard...Couldn't help myself.

But you kept saying that it was very doubtful that Trayvon Martin attacked and beat up Zimmerman because Trayvon was a "child". You even said that the age difference was "stunning".

I kept telling you that a teenage boy is probably the most dangerous creature on Earth. Violent, short tempered, full of testosterone, irresponsible, and they just plain out don't give a fuck about anything.

You were just so damn pig-headed about it that I couldn't help myself when you turned right around and called these teenage boys who are YOUNGER than Trayvon Martin "punk ass thugs".

It just seems like a bit of selective outrage on your part and comes across a bit hypocritical.

If YOU were taking the "punk ass thugs" side of this story you would twist it like this:
"2 young children had to team together to fight off an experienced trained military killer who is much older than they are and luckily the two toddlers were able to kill this experienced commando killing machine."

Sorry man...lol. But on this one you left your balls hanging down nice and low. And they were just right there in front of me...so I had to bust 'em a bit. :)

you can say it, HAHA he got owned. Nice one

baddog 08-23-2013 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771201)
I did not "keep on saying that it was doubtful Martin attacked Zimmerman". In fact, I believe he did. I believe that Martin was acting in self defense

You seriously have no idea what the definition of self defense is I guess.

Rochard 08-23-2013 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brian837 (Post 19771222)
he was not buying those skittles to snack on them though

What he was going to do with the skittles means nothing to anyone. He was walking home from a store with skittles. If Zimmerman didn't stalk him, Martin would still be alive today.

Rochard 08-23-2013 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19771243)
You seriously have no idea what the definition of self defense is I guess.

You seriously have no idea about anything.

Martin clearly thought he was threatened. He ran from Zimmerman. He tried to flee, and when that didn't work he had to stand his ground.

Relentless 08-23-2013 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771205)
Of course it's news. A man died, and that in itself is news.

Any idea how many people die each year?

Each of those events is News?

Sorry, unless you live in the specific neighborhood where it happened (so you might know the people involved or be affected by increased traffic congestion on your way home due to the investigation) it is not news every time someone dies.

It's a way for the media to kill time when there is no news, or to distract from complicated stories that would actually require journalism expertise to cover.

Phoenix 08-23-2013 04:41 PM

They arrested one of them just now.

i hope he never sees the light of day if he is actually one of them

Relentless 08-23-2013 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19771269)
They arrested one of them just now.
i hope he never sees the light of day if he is actually one of them

You mean....

If he is actually one of them and
If he did something wrong and
If he didn't have any valid reason for doing it and
If it can all be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court

*You could say the same of every person in our population who may or may not have committed a crime

None of this is News... Yet.

livexxx 08-23-2013 06:52 PM

I was at Nijmegn this morning , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Market_Garden

101st

and then drove to arnhem, fucking awestruck

some people have no idea of history and what was done, fair enough to the tossers, but some people laid it down and stood up fair and square

probably does not mean a lot , I never knew nothing, my dad only flew in a boulton paul defiant twice before he was grounded as a reservist as he made perry(?) bomb sights for lancasters so wasnt allowed to go up again

but me and my son stood on those bridges today with the traffic going by and we tried to imagine what it must have been like. we played a little bit of the war games , dodging in and out of the bridge supports. Looked at the buildings with the bullet holes still in them. Hope a little of the respect runs down the generations

told him about when the germans came to ask for surrender terms and the paras agreed , but the germans said , no , we were asking for your surrender and they then told them to F Off

Rochard 08-23-2013 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19771261)
Any idea how many people die each year?

Each of those events is News?

Sorry, unless you live in the specific neighborhood where it happened (so you might know the people involved or be affected by increased traffic congestion on your way home due to the investigation) it is not news every time someone dies.

It's a way for the media to kill time when there is no news, or to distract from complicated stories that would actually require journalism expertise to cover.

Yeah, and sometimes fluffy cats make the national news too.

livexxx 08-23-2013 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19771118)
For all we know, the old vet paid these two to kill him or it was a lovers quarrel among the three of them.

This 'news' is devoid of facts. It's not news. It's a lead to what might be news eventually if anyone actually did some investigative reporting before going to press.

Yawn, define news

Phoenix 08-23-2013 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19771351)
You mean....

If he is actually one of them and
If he did something wrong and
If he didn't have any valid reason for doing it and
If it can all be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in court

*You could say the same of every person in our population who may or may not have committed a crime

None of this is News... Yet.

Let's be real for a second.
it is highly unlikely an 80 year old man gave two 16 year olds any reason to beat him to death.

They are scumbags...stop apologizing for scumbags.

zuffa 08-23-2013 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Struggle4Bucks (Post 19770664)

I absolutely don't have a problem with him being a veteran. That's not my point... my point is how manipulative media operates...


I agree 100%. What they should say is that once again, as is too often the case, two black males were involved in a senseless murder.

Struggle4Bucks 08-23-2013 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zuffa (Post 19771433)
I agree 100%. What they should say is that once again, as is too often the case, two black males were involved in a senseless murder.

I agree 100%. Black males are more often involved in senseless murder then black girls.

Relentless 08-23-2013 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by livexxx (Post 19771409)
Yawn, define news

From my POV:
Relevant facts from first hand knowledge or reliable sources that informs people about events which matter to their own lives in some way beyond voyeuristic curiosity.

This is not news. It's something that shoud be assigned to a reporter who would then investigate and see if it leads to something newsworthy.

At best this is very local news to someone wondering why thy were stuck in traffic near the scene, or someone who knew the decedent.

Relentless 08-23-2013 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19771421)
Let's be real for a second.
it is highly unlikely an 80 year old man gave two 16 year olds any reason to beat him to death.
They are scumbags...stop apologizing for scumbags.

Based on zero facts you are ready to convict them?
I'm a big fan of innocent until proven guilty.

adultchatpay 08-23-2013 09:26 PM

I love GFY!!! Current events, news and humor is compiled here.

baddog 08-23-2013 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771256)
You seriously have no idea about anything.

Martin clearly thought he was threatened. He ran from Zimmerman. He tried to flee, and when that didn't work he had to stand his ground.

Please show me that evidence. That is not even close to being the story presented by the prosecution. :2 cents:

How soon they forget. :helpme

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19771421)
Let's be real for a second.
it is highly unlikely an 80 year old man gave two 16 year olds any reason to beat him to death.

They are scumbags...stop apologizing for scumbags.

If they are the ones that did it, they are indeed scumbags. :thumbsup

Quote:

Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19771450)
Based on zero facts you are ready to convict them?
I'm a big fan of innocent until proven guilty.

I believe he was suggesting that they are not going to be able to claim self defense if they were involved. I tend to agree with him and we are usually on opposite sides for these topics.

Jim_Gunn 08-23-2013 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornmasta (Post 19770586)
teen = 10 to 19 ?

13 to 19 literally, right?

Mr Spock 08-23-2013 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771000)
How does this make me a racist? Martin was black and I believe he was innocent; These two kids are being charged with murdering an older man without reason and without cause.

Actually Martin was a thug, and its just the media blitz after the shooting that creates the perception that he was an innocent kid getting good grades. The prosecution surpressed evidence that he was suspended from school, had burglary tools and was just an all round CUNT. He got what he deserved and the world is better off with one less Trayvon.

DWB 08-24-2013 04:28 AM

Media sensationalism aside, people who attack children and the elderly honestly need to be locked in a cage for life. End of story, no chance for parole, rot in a box until you die.

TheSquealer 08-24-2013 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771201)
I did not "keep on saying that it was doubtful Martin attacked Zimmerman". In fact, I believe he did. I believe that Martin was acting in self defense - a full grown man was stalking him for twenty minutes and Martin, who was no angel...

Yes, a full grown fat boy at 5'7", was stalking an innocent child that was 5'11"

You killed a 1,000,000 pixels trying to say again and again that Martin was just a harmless little boy BECAUSE of his age. You kept saying again and again and again that he was just a child. Child. Your word... used countless times.

L-Pink 08-24-2013 06:49 AM

WTF! When the head neighborhood watch guy sees a stranger in the neighborhood and follows him its hardly stalking.

brassmonkey 08-24-2013 06:52 AM

another kkk meeting :Oh crap :helpme (slowing leaving the thread) :1orglaugh

TheSquealer 08-24-2013 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 19771771)
WTF! When the head neighborhood watch guy sees a stranger in the neighborhood and follows him its hardly stalking.

Not only that, he wasn't following him for amusement. He was on the line with the police dispatcher almost the entire time and guiding police to his location.

TheSquealer 08-24-2013 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey (Post 19771775)
another kkk meeting :Oh crap :helpme (slowing leaving the thread) :1orglaugh

Yeah, nothing annoys a life long victim like facts.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Rochard 08-24-2013 07:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19771491)
Please show me that evidence. That is not even close to being the story presented by the prosecution. :2 cents:

You just don't give up do you old man?

During the 911 call Zimmerman said "He's running". Martin tried to flee.

Rochard 08-24-2013 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 19771756)
Yes, a full grown fat boy at 5'7", was stalking an innocent child that was 5'11"

You killed a 1,000,000 pixels trying to say again and again that Martin was just a harmless little boy BECAUSE of his age. You kept saying again and again and again that he was just a child. Child. Your word... used countless times.

From the start, this hasn't been for me "who was bigger". From the very first moment, this was a problem of maturity on the part of Zimmerman. From the very first moment Zimmerman saw Martin, every step he took was poor judgement and bad decisions that lead the death of a kid who was returning home from the store.

Martin was a teenager who had done nothing wrong. In this case, it was two teenagers who beat a man to death.

TheSquealer 08-24-2013 07:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771812)
From the start, this hasn't been for me "who was bigger". From the very first moment, this was a problem of maturity on the part of Zimmerman. From the very first moment Zimmerman saw Martin, every step he took was poor judgement and bad decisions that lead the death of a kid who was returning home from the store.

Martin was a teenager who had done nothing wrong. In this case, it was two teenagers who beat a man to death.

My point (and that of Robbie) is the incongruity of the language you use and the inaccurate picture you try to paint depending on your emotions.

Mr Spock 08-25-2013 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19771812)
From the start, this hasn't been for me "who was bigger". From the very first moment, this was a problem of maturity on the part of Zimmerman. From the very first moment Zimmerman saw Martin, every step he took was poor judgement and bad decisions that lead the death of a kid who was returning home from the store.

Martin was a teenager who had done nothing wrong. In this case, it was two teenagers who beat a man to death.

Wrong Martin was a thug - go do some research and I don't mean CNN.

Mr Spock 08-25-2013 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheSquealer (Post 19771756)
Yes, a full grown fat boy at 5'7", was stalking an innocent child that was 5'11"

You killed a 1,000,000 pixels trying to say again and again that Martin was just a harmless little boy BECAUSE of his age. You kept saying again and again and again that he was just a child. Child. Your word... used countless times.

Actually Martin was 6'4" a fact downplayed by the media.

TurboAngel 08-25-2013 10:43 AM

I hope they rot in jail.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123