GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   No, Walmart doesn?t create jobs (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1118070)

_Richard_ 08-12-2013 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19756063)
Delusion is not a river in Egypt.

denial. 'denile is not a river in egypt'

rhythms with 'senile'

Tom_PM 08-12-2013 09:29 AM

What? Low minimum wages COST the country money, keeps people dependent on government and keeps taxes higher? But but but but but..

KillerK 08-12-2013 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyRandy (Post 19755924)

I often wonder why people have such a hard-on for Walmart and not Home Depot or any of the fast food chains? .

When home depot starts selling groceries, baby clothes & video games, sports equipment.

Walmart puts tons of different businesses out of business.

sperbonzo 08-12-2013 09:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerK (Post 19756075)
When home depot starts selling groceries, baby clothes & video games, sports equipment.

Walmart puts tons of different businesses out of business.

Actually, Walmart doesn't have the power to put anyone out of business. It's the customers that all decide that they would rather shop at Walmart then at their competitors, that causes those other shops to go out of business. Obviously, for whatever reason, customers feel that Walmart provides them with a better value than the other stores.


Just pointing that out....



:2 cents:



.

_Richard_ 08-12-2013 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19756079)
Actually, Walmart doesn't have the power to put anyone out of business. It's the customers that all decide that they would rather shop at Walmart then at their competitors, that causes those other shops to go out of business. Obviously, for whatever reason, customers feel that Walmart provides them with a better value than the other stores.


Just pointing that out....



:2 cents:



.

so if one shop is using a government subsidy to put others out of business..

Rochard 08-12-2013 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony286 (Post 19755798)
I will explain for you. First someone who works shouldn't have to be on gov programs to pick up the slack but when people get paid next to nothing and no fixed schedules so forget getting a second job. You are paying part of Walmart expenses. Its corporate welfare.
I find it funny here, people here will scream about someone on food stamps buying cigarettes and beer but Walmart fucking you up the ass . Oh thats cool . lol

It's not corporate welfare at all. There are lots of jobs that are part time and minimum wage.

It's just like saying that families in the military live below the poverty level. When I was in the military I lived like a king; I got a paycheck and all of my major expenses were covered - housing, food, medical, even transportation and to a degree clothes. But if you are eighteen years old and have two kids and a wife, no, it's not going to be enough to live off of. If you are eighteen and married and have two kids chances are you'll be living in poverty no matter what.

I worked these crappy part time jobs too, making minimum wage. At one point I was working full time at a restaurant, part time at fast food and part time at Target on a push crew and (please don't laught) also a newspaper route.

The entire point of these crappy jobs are so that you get experience and eventually move up in the world.

_Richard_ 08-12-2013 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19756086)
It's not corporate welfare at all. There are lots of jobs that are part time and minimum wage.

It's just like saying that families in the military live below the poverty level. When I was in the military I lived like a king; I got a paycheck and all of my major expenses were covered - housing, food, medical, even transportation and to a degree clothes. But if you are eighteen years old and have two kids and a wife, no, it's not going to be enough to live off of. If you are eighteen and married and have two kids chances are you'll be living in poverty no matter what.

I worked these crappy part time jobs too, making minimum wage. At one point I was working full time at a restaurant, part time at fast food and part time at Target on a push crew and (please don't laught) also a newspaper route.

The entire point of these crappy jobs are so that you get experience and eventually move up in the world.

it's corporate welfare.

Mutt 08-12-2013 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 19755471)
Our small town has a similiar example - a local family-owned grocery store that pays its employees barely subsistent wages with no benefits. The owners are verbally abusive to their staff because they know the high unemployment rate in town guarantees they can easily replace someone. Their grocery prices are very high in comparison to other stores and their brand selection is poor.

My daughter worked there for a short while - and often came home with stories of abusive bosses. And she's not prone to exaggeration...a very level-headed, reasonable kid.

I've always tried to buy local and not deal with big box stores like Wal-Mart. But this particular grocery store has had a monopoly in town for generations...they've never felt the pressure to improve their treatment of employees.

what's the name of the family owned store? wanna see if i remember it.

sperbonzo 08-12-2013 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19756084)
so if one shop is using a government subsidy to put others out of business..

Referring back to my other post above.... the government has been raising the income levels, and lowering the restrictions and qualifications on government assistance programs...

"So then by the logic in this thread, every company in the US that pays minimum wage is being supported by taxes because their employees qualify for government assistance. I hope that every person in this thread that rails against WalMart is also boycotting :

restaurants,
fast food places,
quick oil change places
income tax preparation services,
etc....


They all have employees that make minimum wage.

In fact these days if you make less then $17 per hour and you have a family then you qualify for some form of government assistance, so I guess the minimum wage needs to be $17 per hour, eh?


(of course when that happens then the government will simply raise the levels under which you qualify for some form of federal assistance again, and the cycle will go around and around.... After all we can't have people NOT relying on government assistance, that might make them self-reliant!)"


.:2 cents:







So by your logic, then every restaurant, and fast food place, etc.... that pays minimum wage, is using government assistance to put other business out of business....



:upsidedow
.

sandman! 08-12-2013 09:53 AM

:thumbsup:thumbsup

xNetworx 08-12-2013 09:53 AM

50 obvious threads

_Richard_ 08-12-2013 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19756094)
Referring back to my other post above.... the government has been raising the income levels, and lowering the restrictions and qualifications on government assistance programs...

"So then by the logic in this thread, every company in the US that pays minimum wage is being supported by taxes because their employees qualify for government assistance. I hope that every person in this thread that rails against WalMart is also boycotting :

restaurants,
fast food places,
quick oil change places
income tax preparation services,
etc....


They all have employees that make minimum wage.

In fact these days if you make less then $17 per hour and you have a family then you qualify for some form of government assistance, so I guess the minimum wage needs to be $17 per hour, eh?


(of course when that happens then the government will simply raise the levels under which you qualify for some form of federal assistance again, and the cycle will go around and around.... After all we can't have people NOT relying on government assistance, that might make them self-reliant!)"


.:2 cents:







So by your logic, then every restaurant, and fast food place, etc.... that pays minimum wage, is using government assistance to put other business out of business....



:upsidedow
.

my logic?

by your logic, according to a free market, that's exactly what should happen

what blows my mind, is you think this is YOUR argument.

Captain Kawaii 08-12-2013 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19756070)
denial. 'denile is not a river in egypt'

rhythms with 'senile'

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:thumbsup - Americans always love a good rapist. Wak-Mart, Congress et al.

sperbonzo 08-12-2013 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19756111)
my logic?

by your logic, according to a free market, that's exactly what should happen

what blows my mind, is you think this is YOUR argument.

How do you get that statement? By my logic, in a free market, I don't think that there should be a minimum wage at all..... but since there is one, and Walmart is complying with it, then what are they doing wrong? If you want everyone who is now getting government assistance to have a wage that doesn't qualify them for it, you need to raise that minimum to something about $17 per hour..... of course that will drive prices up, and then people will again demand more government assistance...

The whole "controversy" is a sham really. If people don't want to work there, then they don't have too. If people don't want to shop there then they don't have too. If Walmart wants to offer 10 cents per hour, and no one come to work for them, then that is their right also. If they want to only have people work for them who have PHDs, then this is also their right. The only thing that is being forced in this situation is that the government is forcing some people to give up their money in order to give it to other people. Mark my words, if the minimum wage was raised to $20 tomorrow, then the income level that was qualified for some type of government assistance would be raised to $60k per year next week.




.:2 cents:


.


.

ThunderBalls 08-12-2013 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19756063)
Delusion is not a river in Egypt.


Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19756070)
denial. 'denile is not a river in egypt'

rhythms with 'senile'


Give him a break, the Nile River didnt exist the first time he heard this expression.

_Richard_ 08-12-2013 10:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19756120)
How do you get that statement? I don't think that there should be a minimum wage at all..... but since there is one, and Walmart is complying with it, then what are they doing wrong? If you want everyone who is now getting government assistance to have a wage that doesn't qualify them for it, you need to raise that minimum to something about $17 per hour..... of course that will drive prices up, and then people will again demand more government assistance...

The whole "controversy" is a sham really. If people don't want to work there, then they don't have too. If people don't want to shop there then they don't have too. If Walmart wants to offer 10 cents per hour, and no one come to work for them, then that is their right also. If they want to only have people work for them who have PHDs, then this is also their right. The only thing that is being forced in this situation is that the government is forcing some people to give up their money in order to give it to other people. Mark my words, if the minimum wage was raised to $20 tomorrow, then the income level that was qualified for some type of government assistance would be raised to $60k per year next week.




.:2 cents:


.


.


i don't wanna interfere with your programming.

however, keep banging the libertarian party rhetoric, while you promote big business, no mimimum wage, working in finance.

L-Pink 08-12-2013 10:19 AM

Middle America is what pulls up low paid entry level workers not big business. And right now no one is hurting more than the middle class.

Rochard 08-12-2013 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19756090)
it's corporate welfare.

It's not corporate welfare at all; It's a part time job. If you aren't making enough money at your part time job to make ends meet, you look for a better job.

If this is corporate welfare then nearly half of the businesses we use are guilty of this. I am friendly with the chick who works as a cashier - she's a single mother and doesn't make enough money working full time to make ends meet. Should I not buy gas there because they don't pay their employees enough? Should she go work at another gas station where they will pay her the same amount?

baddog 08-12-2013 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19756094)
Referring back to my other post above.... the government has been raising the income levels, and lowering the restrictions and qualifications on government assistance programs...

"So then by the logic in this thread, every company in the US that pays minimum wage is being supported by taxes because their employees qualify for government assistance. I hope that every person in this thread that rails against WalMart is also boycotting :

restaurants,
fast food places,
quick oil change places
income tax preparation services,
etc....


They all have employees that make minimum wage.

In fact these days if you make less then $17 per hour and you have a family then you qualify for some form of government assistance, so I guess the minimum wage needs to be $17 per hour, eh?


(of course when that happens then the government will simply raise the levels under which you qualify for some form of federal assistance again, and the cycle will go around and around.... After all we can't have people NOT relying on government assistance, that might make them self-reliant!)"


.:2 cents:







So by your logic, then every restaurant, and fast food place, etc.... that pays minimum wage, is using government assistance to put other business out of business....



:upsidedow
.

You are wasting your breath with that bimbo. :2 cents:

_Richard_ 08-12-2013 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19756141)
It's not corporate welfare at all; It's a part time job. If you aren't making enough money at your part time job to make ends meet, you look for a better job.

If this is corporate welfare then nearly half of the businesses we use are guilty of this. I am friendly with the chick who works as a cashier - she's a single mother and doesn't make enough money working full time to make ends meet. Should I not buy gas there because they don't pay their employees enough? Should she go work at another gas station where they will pay her the same amount?

ah, so you can't admit it's corporate welfare on the basis of how prevalent corporate welfare is?

odd.

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19756145)
You are wasting your breath with that bimbo. :2 cents:

the level of maturity i have come to expect from your generation.

thanks for not disappointing.

Rochard 08-12-2013 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19756152)
ah, so you can't admit it's corporate welfare on the basis of how prevalent corporate welfare is?

So the sandwich shop down the street who hires people part time for the lunch rush and pay crappy wages is engaged in corporate welfare?

I'm not saying I agree with the way Wal Mart operates, but if you give them the option to get out of spending billions on healthcare this is what happens. If I had it my way, ALL employers would be required to carry full time health benefits for ALL employees, including part time.

SilentKnight 08-12-2013 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 19756091)
what's the name of the family owned store? wanna see if i remember it.

Pupos grocery.

RyuLion 08-12-2013 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19756079)
Actually, Walmart doesn't have the power to put anyone out of business. It's the customers that all decide that they would rather shop at Walmart then at their competitors, that causes those other shops to go out of business. Obviously, for whatever reason, customers feel that Walmart provides them with a better value than the other stores.


Just pointing that out....



:2 cents:



.

:2 cents::2 cents::2 cents:

sarettah 08-12-2013 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink (Post 19755906)
Year after year the biggest retailer taking money out of a town does reduce the living standard in that town.

At least with Walmart that money is staying in the U.S. (I think Arkansas is still part of the U.S., isn't it? I always get confused about Arkansas, Kentucky and Tennessee)

.

TheSquealer 08-12-2013 08:02 PM

They have 2.2 million employees

Phoenix 08-12-2013 08:04 PM

walmart shoppers love meatspin

http://facepalm.naurunappula.com/org.../0/1112501.gif

sarettah 08-12-2013 08:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yngwie (Post 19755598)
we have 2 walmarts in the small city (160 000 or so population) which I find very stupid and pointless.

I must live in "Walmart Country"

http://www.madspiders.com/images/walmart_map.jpg

Edited in: just for reference, I can generally drive east to west or north across that entire area in about a half hour. North or south, the same thing. So, I have 20 Walmarts available in a half hour drive from my house.

Don't know if that is good or bad.

sarettah 08-12-2013 08:29 PM

Growth of Walmart in the US from 1961 through 2010.



.

qwe 08-12-2013 08:30 PM

as a customer I don't give a fuck as long as shit that I buy is cheaper... fuck mom and pops shops, they all used to charge way too much for products... why is everyone in love with mom and pops stores ? does everyone love to bend over and pay more ?

KillerK 08-12-2013 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19756200)
So the sandwich shop down the street who hires people part time for the lunch rush and pay crappy wages is engaged in corporate welfare?

I'm not saying I agree with the way Wal Mart operates, but if you give them the option to get out of spending billions on healthcare this is what happens. If I had it my way, ALL employers would be required to carry full time health benefits for ALL employees, including part time.


The problem...

They come in and offer lower prices, then slow increase the prices after they've defeated the competition (which there isn't any because a roll of Bounty papertowels at warlmart will be like .99c where the mom and pop its $2). Then later the .99c deal becomes $1.79.

Phoenix 08-12-2013 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qwe (Post 19756809)
as a customer I don't give a fuck as long as shit that I buy is cheaper... fuck mom and pops shops, they all used to charge way too much for products... why is everyone in love with mom and pops stores ? does everyone love to bend over and pay more ?

the issue is cheaper...means cheaper in every way.

garbage produced with who knows what from who knows where.

when i buy products especially stuff for my kids i like to know where it comes from and what is in it.

L-Pink 08-12-2013 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by qwe (Post 19756809)
as a customer I don't give a fuck as long as shit that I buy is cheaper... fuck mom and pops shops, they all used to charge way too much for products... why is everyone in love with mom and pops stores ? does everyone love to bend over and pay more ?

Aren't you tired of limited selection and buying cheap crap that comes from china? Thank walmart.

Rochard 08-12-2013 10:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerK (Post 19756832)
The problem...

They come in and offer lower prices, then slow increase the prices after they've defeated the competition (which there isn't any because a roll of Bounty papertowels at warlmart will be like .99c where the mom and pop its $2). Then later the .99c deal becomes $1.79.

In this case the competition was defeated before WalMart got here. The Rainbow Market was the anchor of a small mall, and all of the other businesses went down with it - including our Taco Bell (fuck!).

baddog 08-12-2013 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerK (Post 19756832)
The problem...

They come in and offer lower prices, then slow increase the prices after they've defeated the competition (which there isn't any because a roll of Bounty papertowels at warlmart will be like .99c where the mom and pop its $2). Then later the .99c deal becomes $1.79.

I presume you have examples of that happening in real life.

mikesinner 08-12-2013 11:07 PM

Right now they are hiring people and then laying them off after 3 months.

mikesinner 08-12-2013 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yngwie (Post 19755598)
we have 2 walmarts in the small city (160 000 or so population) which I find very stupid and pointless.

120k here and we have 3

Captain Kawaii 08-12-2013 11:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19756845)
the issue is cheaper...means cheaper in every way.

garbage produced with who knows what from who knows where.

when i buy products especially stuff for my kids i like to know where it comes from and what is in it.

What you said plus also nice to know that children are not being chained inside factories or the paints are not radioactive...

The Walton heirs have a much wealth as 40% of the US population. 40%. That number may be low now.

There is an all out war against the middle and working classes and said classes are expected to pay for it.

sperbonzo 08-13-2013 05:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19756850)
I presume you have examples of that happening in real life.

No one ever has examples of it..... because when if it was to happen, then another competitor would come along and undercut THEIR prices. People always seem to forget that if one can do it, so can another.

...but hey, it SOUNDS like a good "evil corporation" scenario, so people love to run with it.




.:1orglaugh



.

nico-t 08-13-2013 07:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19755613)
I'd venture to guess that they would not have two stores if they could not justify it in sales.

I don't think anyone has more annoying comments on gfy than you. Congrats :thumbsup

_Richard_ 08-13-2013 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19756200)
So the sandwich shop down the street who hires people part time for the lunch rush and pay crappy wages is engaged in corporate welfare?

I'm not saying I agree with the way Wal Mart operates, but if you give them the option to get out of spending billions on healthcare this is what happens. If I had it my way, ALL employers would be required to carry full time health benefits for ALL employees, including part time.

walmart closes places like 'that sandwich shop down the street', and does so while posting huge profits and impoverishing everyone

the examples you are using are.. not accurate


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123