I have to hand it to some of these POV shooters

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jim_Gunn
    Confirmed User
    • Feb 2003
    • 5702

    #16
    Originally posted by ReggieDurango
    HDPOV.com IS the samples.
    Site has not launched yet, but 90 second scenes trailers are definitely there for "consumption"
    Curious, is there a reason why all those POV scenes are shot at night outside or in rooms with dark un-lit backgrounds? Just seems like an odd stylistic choice to make for every scene on the tour.

    Comment

    • Harmon
      ( ͡ʘ╭͜ʖ╮͡ʘ)
      • Mar 2004
      • 20012

      #17
      Originally posted by Jim_Gunn
      Curious, is there a reason why all those POV scenes are shot at night outside or in rooms with dark un-lit backgrounds? Just seems like an odd stylistic choice to make for every scene on the tour.
      Jim Gunn has spoken
      [email protected]

      Comment

      • ReggieDurango
        Confirmed User
        • Nov 2007
        • 4784

        #18
        Originally posted by Jim_Gunn
        Curious, is there a reason why all those POV scenes are shot at night outside or in rooms with dark un-lit backgrounds? Just seems like an odd stylistic choice to make for every scene on the tour.
        Well since that is the stylistic look of the entire site, I felt it appropriate to show proper samples of the content that users will be getting if they sign up. Literally every scene on the site will be shot with that style: ring light on the camera and one light on the side.
        Last edited by ReggieDurango; 07-31-2013, 11:07 AM.

        Comment

        • slapass
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Nov 2002
          • 14625

          #19
          I get what you mean. The style does nothing for me because of how awkward it normally looks.

          Comment

          • Jim_Gunn
            Confirmed User
            • Feb 2003
            • 5702

            #20
            Originally posted by ReggieDurango
            Well since that is the stylistic look of the entire site, I felt it appropriate to show proper samples of the content that users will be getting if they sign up. Literally every scene on the site will be shot with that style: ring light on the camera and one light on the side.
            Well, you've answered the question quite literally so I can't fault you for that. I suppose you could even take it one step further if pressed and say that's what the specs said or that's what client wanted if that's the case, which would seem odd to me. But it still begs the question- why? Why did anyone make that choice instead of say, a mix of different lighting scenarios to feature on the tour such as a few bright daylight scenes, some indoors under daylight or mixed lighting, some at twilight, one or two in the relative dark etc. Something about the sameness of those dark scenes just seems kind of claustrophobic to me or something and not even in a moody purposefully done way. I'm not saying the sex action is bad. Just the repeated dark backgrounds look unusual to me. Just my opinion.

            Comment

            • CDSmith
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • May 2001
              • 51460

              #21
              Originally posted by NaughtyRob
              Thanks! It does take practice....
              I tried to have one of the male talent that I use try it and he just can't do it.
              Originally posted by fitzmulti
              I agree...it's not something that "everyone" can do, or has a knack for.
              As Rob said above, one of the male talents that Rob & I have shot, and another one we shoot sometimes that just came to mind, can't do it at all.
              Interesting. Our friend Harmon seems to think that's worth laughing at.

              Hopefully this clues him in, but somehow I kind of doubt it will.
              Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

              ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

              Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
              ICQ me at: 31024634

              Comment

              • Lace
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Mar 2004
                • 16116

                #22
                Originally posted by Jim_Gunn
                Well, you've answered the question quite literally so I can't fault you for that. I suppose you could even take it one step further if pressed and say that's what the specs said or that's what client wanted if that's the case, which would seem odd to me. But it still begs the question- why? Why did anyone make that choice instead of say, a mix of different lighting scenarios to feature on the tour such as a few bright daylight scenes, some indoors under daylight or mixed lighting, some at twilight, one or two in the relative dark etc. Something about the sameness of those dark scenes just seems kind of claustrophobic to me or something and not even in a moody purposefully done way. I'm not saying the sex action is bad. Just the repeated dark backgrounds look unusual to me. Just my opinion.
                I have to agree with you here. I'd stick to natural light any day over strobes, ring lights, etc. Looks like it was shot by a first timer with their new slr with the flash on.

                Not saying it's bad, just not my style.
                Last edited by Lace; 07-31-2013, 11:46 AM.
                Your Paysite Partner
                Strength In Numbers!
                StickyDollars | RadicalCash | KennysPennies | HomegrownCash

                Comment

                • ReggieDurango
                  Confirmed User
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 4784

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Lace
                  I have to agree with you here. I'd stick to natural light any day over strobes, ring lights, etc. Looks like it was shot by a first timer with their new slr with the flash on.

                  Not saying it's bad, just not my style.
                  Strobes??? Huh? I thought we were talking about video not Stills.
                  Jim,, I am the one that made the decision and developed the look for the video content on the site. In fact I developed this look a few years ago for erospov.com

                  Comment

                  • fitzmulti
                    I Like Depth Of Field!
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 14861

                    #24
                    Originally posted by CDSmith
                    Interesting. Our friend Harmon seems to think that's worth laughing at.

                    Hopefully this clues him in, but somehow I kind of doubt it will.
                    Like Molly Hatchett says in "Flirtin' With Disaster"...
                    "It ain't for everybody"...

                    All I know is, that it works for me and I have a TON of my own DVDs with it on VOD sites, my own websites, etc...and people like 'em!
                    ;-)
                    *note my avatar here, too! <<~~~~~~~~~~


                    www.SexyGirlsCash.com


                    CONTACT // FITZMULTI AT GMAIL.COM //
                    {Please include a message so I know you are from GFY! I get too many spam "add requests"!}

                    Comment

                    • CDSmith
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • May 2001
                      • 51460

                      #25
                      Originally posted by fitzmulti
                      Like Molly Hatchett says in "Flirtin' With Disaster"...
                      "It ain't for everybody"...

                      All I know is, that it works for me and I have a TON of my own DVDs with it on VOD sites, my own websites, etc...and people like 'em!
                      ;-)
                      *note my avatar here, too! <<~~~~~~~~~~
                      Truthfully, POV was never my favorite style, from a viewer's point of view of course. The webmaster in me however has always known of it's marketable value. I just never got into it much personally. But I've come to realize over the years since it first became popular that when it's done by someone who knows what he's doing it can be downright incredible.

                      I think what likely put me off was all the really BAD pov that's been floating around since post-2000. Grainy, poor lighting, horrible camera angles, poorly executed sex even. If the chemistry is off with any of that in fact it becomes a train wreck.
                      Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

                      ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!

                      Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket.
                      ICQ me at: 31024634

                      Comment

                      • Lace
                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                        • Mar 2004
                        • 16116

                        #26
                        Originally posted by ReggieDurango
                        Strobes??? Huh? I thought we were talking about video not Stills.
                        Jim,, I am the one that made the decision and developed the look for the video content on the site. In fact I developed this look a few years ago for erospov.com
                        Just giving overall examples. I think XArt's style is by far the best. All natural. Just my opinion though
                        Your Paysite Partner
                        Strength In Numbers!
                        StickyDollars | RadicalCash | KennysPennies | HomegrownCash

                        Comment

                        • fitzmulti
                          I Like Depth Of Field!
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 14861

                          #27
                          Originally posted by CDSmith
                          Truthfully, POV was never my favorite style, from a viewer's point of view of course. The webmaster in me however has always known of it's marketable value. I just never got into it much personally. But I've come to realize over the years since it first became popular that when it's done by someone who knows what he's doing it can be downright incredible.

                          I think what likely put me off was all the really BAD pov that's been floating around since post-2000. Grainy, poor lighting, horrible camera angles, poorly executed sex even. If the chemistry is off with any of that in fact it becomes a train wreck.
                          Ya...with the sudden influx in the early 2000's of "anyone can snag a video camera @ Best Buy and do POV"...web camming from home, etc...w/o the right tools/lighting, or some sort of photo/video shooting background, it can get sloppy.
                          Although, I must admit, sometimes I have done that intentionally...but not usually.
                          And I do realize some folks do that intentionally, as well...but you can tell those instances, from people who just don't know what they are doing.


                          www.SexyGirlsCash.com


                          CONTACT // FITZMULTI AT GMAIL.COM //
                          {Please include a message so I know you are from GFY! I get too many spam "add requests"!}

                          Comment

                          • Peace
                            Confirmed User
                            • Sep 2004
                            • 5668

                            #28
                            Very interesting one.....
                            Need custom or licensed content? PhotoVideoContent.com
                            Traffic/affiliates: PrimeAdult.net | ClassyContent relaunch
                            [email protected] | TG @romAtibet | Teams Peace888

                            Comment

                            • bronco67
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Dec 2006
                              • 29032

                              #29
                              I like POV as long as you can see almost the whole girl sometimes. Too close does nothing for me.

                              Comment

                              • adendreams
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jul 2009
                                • 1887

                                #30
                                The unsung hung heros thank you
                                Aden - Your Content Shooter Superfreak
                                ADEN CONTENT · HD Video · Ex-GF · Am Content · Pro Content · PHP Programming · Package Deals
                                • Skype or ICQ available on request •

                                Comment

                                Working...