I pointed out the captcha breakers earlier too but really you shouldn't have to do that in the first place and there is nothing preventing them from adding other measures to cause more problems ahead.

I don't know a lot about this but maybe it makes sense to batch it all together on a daily or weekly basis and send them a giant certified letter via snail mail with thousands of DMCAs to each tube? It'll cost more but on the plus side you have a far better paper trail. Then document your increased costs for later if it ever goes to court.

I wonder if they have to honor the DMCAs in the first place. The whole law is seriously fucked up. It needs more teeth like if foreign companies do not honor it all American ISPs must block their DNS from resolving. That would help.

Now that I think about it the certified snail mail might be the way to go. You have increased costs but so do they now. :) I'm not sure about the legal aspect but one would think that if they are required to act on DMCAs at all they cannot simply ignore certified letters.

Decent people.

30 minute trials, x-sales to fake flash games for kids and this biz supposed to be amused by some tricky dmca forms?

I'm not entirely sure you could say that an email sent to an address that auto-responds has not been "received" because the auto response is generated by a program that is started once mail addressed to a specific recipient arrives. ie, it's <accept email>-<generate response>-<send reply>, not <attempt receive>-<bounce with error>

They have the money... So in this industry that means they have the power.

like i said im not a attorney but i when i read the dmca stuff i did not see anything that requires anyone to accept dmca's by email.

dont matter to me personally my company rarely gets any dmca's