always thought my 200 2.0 was a bad mother fucker, little did I know... - GoFuckYourself.com

Grapesoda · 07-26-2013, 07:34 AM

"Mounted on a 36Mpix D800 the lens achieves a DxOMark Lens Score of 39, making it one the best performing lenses ever measured in our labs. What?s more with a Sharpness score of 28P-Mpix this lens is the sharpest Nikon mount lens we?ve tested, putting ahead of lenses like the Nikon 85mm f/1.4 and f/1.8 models but also the Sigma 35mm/1.4 and the recently tested 300mm and 400mm f/2.8 telephotos. Additional individual lens metrics scores reveal the lens to have negligible distortion, mild vignetting and reasonably low levels of chromatic aberration. Transmission is very good, though not quite matching the theoretical f/2.0 maximum."

Read more on NikonRumors.com: http://nikonrumors.com/2013/07/25/ne...#ixzz2aA8vwylZ

http://nikonrumors.com/2013/07/25/ne...r-tested.aspx/

dyna mo · 07-26-2013, 07:41 AM

i had that sigma 35 1.4 and returned it. and that was after sending it to sigma usa WITH my camera body to have them calibrate it. snagged the 28mm 1.8 and love it.

dyna mo · 07-26-2013, 07:49 AM

hah, dx0 is showing my 28mm 1.8 is sharper than my 85mm 1.8!

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Len...-Metric-Scores

extremely snappy for the price.

07-26-2013, 07:34 AM	#1
Grapesoda So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Montana Posts: 46,238	always thought my 200 2.0 was a bad mother fucker, little did I know... "Mounted on a 36Mpix D800 the lens achieves a DxOMark Lens Score of 39, making it one the best performing lenses ever measured in our labs. What?s more with a Sharpness score of 28P-Mpix this lens is the sharpest Nikon mount lens we?ve tested, putting ahead of lenses like the Nikon 85mm f/1.4 and f/1.8 models but also the Sigma 35mm/1.4 and the recently tested 300mm and 400mm f/2.8 telephotos. Additional individual lens metrics scores reveal the lens to have negligible distortion, mild vignetting and reasonably low levels of chromatic aberration. Transmission is very good, though not quite matching the theoretical f/2.0 maximum." Read more on NikonRumors.com: http://nikonrumors.com/2013/07/25/ne...#ixzz2aA8vwylZ http://nikonrumors.com/2013/07/25/ne...r-tested.aspx/

07-26-2013, 07:41 AM	#2
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,376	i had that sigma 35 1.4 and returned it. and that was after sending it to sigma usa WITH my camera body to have them calibrate it. snagged the 28mm 1.8 and love it.

07-26-2013, 07:49 AM	#3
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,376	hah, dx0 is showing my 28mm 1.8 is sharper than my 85mm 1.8! http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Len...-Metric-Scores extremely snappy for the price.