50 x 20000 = 1,000,000
Judge orders return of stripper's 1 Million Dollars
Collapse
X
-
Yes they did "take it upon themselves".
They were chomping at the bit to do it for years but could not. Many cases were thrown out of court over the years because of illegal search and seizure.
I'm tired of arguing this with you. We are derailing the thread. Think whatever you want to. Your thought processes and mine are the reasons we are in our respective places in life after all.
I KNOW what I'm talking about. You are still talking about laws.
Yes, I think that the "War On Drugs" and subsequent LAWS passed by legislators are insane.
But I also know that law enforcement is always pushing for more power...power to spy on you, power to frisk you, power to search you anytime they want, etc., etc.
And NO....no politicians sat down and wrote a law called "Let's Search People".
Cops just did it. It was challenged in court. And for over 200 years it was considered unconstitutional.
I don't want to discuss this with you anymore. I still don't think you realize we aren't even discussing the same topic.
I'm talking about police protocol. You're talking about politicians and laws.
You are comparing a LAW to what type of uniform a cop wears, how they are trained to approach someone, how they conduct an arrest, what they ate for lunch, searching people...in other words, the shit they do everyday on their job.
Searching people hasn't got anything to do with laws, it is how they are ENFORCING the law that I'm talking about.
It has to do with constitutionality. It WAS unconstitutional. Then the Supreme Court ruled it "okay". And the floodgates opened and now we are searched everywhere we go, watched everywhere we go, etc.
Let me just say one more time: Every halfwit kid who ever took a civics class in middle school knows what you are saying about branches of govt.
It is NOT what I'm talking about. Okay?
Jesus Fucking Christ...only on GFY...Last edited by Robbie; 07-24-2013, 11:23 PM.-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.ComComment
-
I am older than you are and just as well educated and knowledgeable...thus we will just agree to disagree...and you are right...Jesus fucking Christ...only on GFY.Yes they did "take it upon themselves".
They were chomping at the bit to do it for years but could not. Many cases were thrown out of court over the years because of illegal search and seizure.
I'm tired of arguing this with you. We are derailing the thread. Think whatever you want to. Your thought processes and mine are the reasons we are in our respective places in life after all.
I KNOW what I'm talking about. You are still talking about laws.
Yes, I think that the "War On Drugs" and subsequent LAWS passed by legislators are insane.
But I also know that law enforcement is always pushing for more power...power to spy on you, power to frisk you, power to search you anytime they want, etc., etc.
And NO....no politicians sat down and wrote a law called "Let's Search People".
Cops just did it. It was challenged in court. And for over 200 years it was considered unconstitutional.
I don't want to discuss this with you anymore. I still don't think you realize we aren't even discussing the same topic.
I'm talking about police protocol. You're talking about politicians and laws.
You are comparing a LAW to what type of uniform a cop wears, how they are trained to approach someone, how they conduct an arrest, what they ate for lunch, searching people...in other words, the shit they do everyday on their job.
Searching people hasn't got anything to do with laws, it is how they are ENFORCING the law that I'm talking about.
It has to do with constitutionality. It WAS unconstitutional. Then the Supreme Court ruled it "okay". And the floodgates opened and now we are searched everywhere we go, watched everywhere we go, etc.
Let me just say one more time: Every halfwit kid who ever took a civics class in middle school knows what you are saying about branches of govt.
It is NOT what I'm talking about. Okay?
Jesus Fucking Christ...only on GFY...When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
How do you know you are older than me? Just 'cause I'm handsome as a movie star doesn't mean that I'm not old.
So now we're gonna have a pissing contest over who is older and smarter?


How about we just call a truce.
We've totally derailed this thread and ruined the conversation with our back and forth. Let's just stop.
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.ComComment
-
You have stated your age before as well as your education and I am aware that you are intelligent. A truce it shall be.How do you know you are older than me? Just 'cause I'm handsome as a movie star doesn't mean that I'm not old.
So now we're gonna have a pissing contest over who is older and smarter?


How about we just call a truce.
We've totally derailed this thread and ruined the conversation with our back and forth. Let's just stop.
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
-
Comment
-
i agree but unfortunately cops have right to search your car pretty much by having any suspicion of illegal activities, not like your home where they need a warrant.
cops confiscate lots of stuff using this method."Obscenity is whatever gives the Judge an erection." -- Author UnknownComment


Comment