![]() |
Quote:
It is his fault and his fault alone that his dog was shot and I would tell him to his face. No one can suggest I am not a dog lover so it can't be that. When I heard about this video I did not want to watch but I had to; I was blown away at how dumb the owner was. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Remember they have a gun ... why would the guy not do that? They can handcuff him again later if that is what they want to do. Sorry but I still disagree with how they handled the situation. To much "rambo" and "robocop" attitude in this action. They could have handled it different. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Extremely dangerous? C'mon .. I see 4 cops there all with a gun lol. |
dont fuck with police.
|
Quote:
would you believe me? |
Quote:
http://ahab.com/images/jack/con.jpg A biker, my ass. |
Quote:
I did have a gfy account from day one, but at some point I lost password and started a new one cause the email address was on a expired domain. It was easyer to start a new account. There was a time Lensman blocked IP's from half europe LOL :1orglaugh |
Nevermind.
|
Quote:
You know that does not happen anywhere; nor should it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I see you giving suggesting to police what would be better for them to do...who are you? You judging from your point of view, but you don't know all the facts. Why do you think black dude didn't do anything? Because you didn't see it? |
Quote:
|
they should have frisked that doggie and read him his miranda
http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Fuc...08_4025256.png |
Quote:
You only get handcuffed here if you already are in prison (and they have to transport the prisoner to the court and back) ... or when you are arested for a "REAL CRIME" ... No handcuffs here for small crimes .. NEVER. If I fight with someone on the streets and cops are comming -> No handcuffs If I punch you in the face and cops are comming -> No handcuffs When I drive my car while I'm drunk and cops stop the car -> No handcuffs (NEVER) and so on ... Here cops only use handcuffs when someone commited a REAL HEAVY crime. Handcuffs for a dude filming some cops action with his cellphone? C'mon lol ... What a fucking joke. Just my opinion, :winkwink: . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Don't obey police orders -> No handcuffs here ... They give you a ticket here (that you have to come to court) if you don't obey police orders (thats about it). In court they will give you like 2 weeks on probation or a fine to pay (if it is your 3th time lol) The risk of getting a ticket is enough already to make people do what cops say ... they don't need to handcuff you here and drop you on the ground. |
O btw we also don't know "Bounty Hunters" ...
We only know that shit from Far West Movies lol |
Quote:
It was police operation and guy was annoying. Just like you. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
drug dealer? free pass. apparently laws only apply to people who care about records everyone else it's a free for all |
Cops don't think in the same terms as most of you armchair critics sitting out there in publicland viewing them on youtube and calling their every move into question like you know better how to handle a situation. Yes the guy was a heckler, but all it takes is one douchebag heckler at a scene to rally a bunch of others to join in and start adding to an already tense situation.
Plus, the cops don't know this guy's agenda or what his intentions are. They treat every loudmouth at any scene the same, and if for some unknown reason he does something extra stupid like bring his dog into the fray I'm sorry but baddog's right on this one, they are going to get the matter under control as fast as possible. Suggesting they unculf someone who is in custody at a scene is just plain ridiculous. Not because I think so, but because that's the way cops are trained. Bitching about it on the interwebs is not going to change that. Learn to understand the cop mentality and these things become a lot clearer, and less agravating to watch. I'm not saying cops are infallible, of course they aren't. We all know that. In plenty of cases cops deserve the critisism levied at them. But in this case I'd have to agree that the idiot has only himself to blame for getting his dog killed. But no, let's all go on bitching about this idiot's "rights". |
Quote:
tell us more about how cops think |
Quote:
Once again, I've noticed you, now run along. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You don't need my permission Richard, you'll go on stalking my posts with your mindlessness as you will. Carry on. |
Quote:
Quote:
So my 'not making sense' had more to do with your inability to properly process information sitting right in front of you? Shocking. Take whatever liberties you can afford. However with this 'purchase', id suggest reviewing your own spelling. |
Bla ... bla ... bla ... |
It is perfectly legal to video the police on duty, it has been taken to the supreme court and won. You never have to turn off your camera. Look it up.
Also, the guy thought the cops were overstepping their bounds and he told them about it. I saw this guy mouthing off to the cops telling that they were racist. This is not a crime or a reason to put handcuffs/arrest a the guy. (we all know that talking shit to cops will get you arrested or get the fuck beat out of you. BUT THAT IS WRONG AND ILLEGAL USE OF FORCE.) The way I see it the cops put this guy in handcuffs for no (legal) reason and then killed his fucking dog that was doing his job protecting his owner. COPs were wrong all the way down the line. They should have taken the dog into consideration long before putting the cuffs on his owner for nothing. |
Quote:
dude won't be taking anymore pictures for some time. |
Enjoy your ban!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If you think police was wrong, then go put fucking complaint to police bosses or media, just stay away from them while they working. Or you think is OK to take your dog and start bitching and cross the line? Look at him - it was showoff challenge. He deserved to be handcuffed. |
If that guy gave a fuck about his dog he would have taken the dog home instead of messing around the cops.
|
Quote:
|
dog hahahah
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
The man failed to secure his dog in the vehicle. The dog got loose and attacked officers. But you blame the officer for not carrying some sort of "anti-dog weapon" - instead having to shoot the dog to defend himself. And from what I saw in the video...he didn't shoot the dog as a first option. The owner was fully responsible for the dog being shot. End of story. |
I have to ask, what is an anti-dog weapon? A hose?
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123