Photo galleries : Stop making 1999 size pics.

[blackmonsters]

These galleries with small over compressed pics make absolutely no sense anymore.
They lack quality.

Bandwidth is too cheap.

Stop shooting ugly chicks; I don't need that.

I want pics like this with hot chicks like this :

[mineistaken]

cute ass

[- Jesus Christ -]

http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/

[blackmonsters]

http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/

So what, every decent browser/OS has re-size and zoom.

The pic can be smaller than that but too much compression is not working anymore.

[purecane]

for once i agree with you...now go bite a dick, fucker.

[- Jesus Christ -]

So what, every decent browser/OS has re-size and zoom.

The pic can be smaller than that but too much compression is not working anymore.

Was trying to add something of value to a pointless thread.

[blackmonsters]

Was trying to add something of value to a pointless thread.

The most valuable thing you can do is STFU.

[SilentKnight]

What about poor 'ole Jethro in Arkansas - still on 14.4baud dialup modem?!

It's a bitch d/ling Hegre-sized pics of sheep on the 'ole USRobotics thinga-mah-jiggy.

[iwantchixx]

Problem I ran into is some TGP scripts are rejecting submissions if pics are of too high file size. It's actually quite difficult to retain image quality under 250KB at anything over 1200xXXXX

So tot hat, I said fuckit and removed them from my list heh.

[SilentKnight]

Problem I ran into is some TGP scripts are rejecting submissions if pics are of too high file size. It's actually quite difficult to retain image quality under 250KB at anything over 1200xXXXX

Agreed - especially if its an outdoor scene with lots of foliage/lawn/grass in the background.

[- Jesus Christ -]

The most valuable thing you can do is STFU.

How Rude.

[2MuchMark]

http://browsersize.googlelabs.com/

Wow! This has to be the most useful post on GFY I have seen in a while. Thanks for sharing!

[spiederman]

[sarettah]

I am not a program owner, just a free site/galley buoilder (some times)

Back in the day we did the thumbs like 100px and the big pics 500px on the long side.

These days I do my thumbs at around 250px and my big pics at 1000px on the long side. Decent quality but not hi-def by any means.

They want the good stuff they can click the link and go to a sponsor or search elsewhere.

But thats just me, of course.

.

[fitzmulti]

Wow! This has to be the most useful post on GFY I have seen in a while. Thanks for sharing!

Agreed! I had not seen that before!

[blackmonsters]

I am not a program owner, just a free site/galley buoilder (some times)

Back in the day we did the thumbs like 100px and the big pics 500px on the long side.

These days I do my thumbs at around 250px and my big pics at 1000px on the long side. Decent quality but not hi-def by any means.

They want the good stuff they can click the link and go to a sponsor or search elsewhere.

But thats just me, of course.

.

That's exactly my point.
You make bigger pics now with reasonable compression.

I still see pics 500px on the long side with photoshop compression quality set to 3.



When surfers are on the tubes getting hours of free video, fuzzy small photos are useless.
The damn video has a clearer image.

[blackmonsters]

Agreed! I had not seen that before!

Yeah it's cool because it's like looking at pictures, no reading involved.

Otherwise everybody just used this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_resolution

[privatesociety]

Thanks for the tip!

[yuu.design]

good point

[pornguy]

To opt images check out the tool Fotosizer. does really great work on images.