GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Ex-CIA man says exposed U.S. spy scheme for better world (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1112022)

dyna mo 06-10-2013 09:01 AM

meanwhile, while richard is focused on usa

http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/report-...ance-1.1319096

NewNick 06-10-2013 09:03 AM

This is really bizarre. For once the conspiracy freaks really have something to get excited about. IT REALLY IS THE CIA !!!

But instead they have to make some even wilder accusations.

So not only have govt's used major digital corps to harvest data - they actually created those entities !

Oh and by the way :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I am laughing at the juxtaposition of peeps getting worked up about the govt using the interwebs to harvest data for national security reasons, but blind to the fact that the entities that they have used are harvesting so much more for their own murky intentions.......

dyna mo 06-10-2013 09:06 AM

hahahahahahah

canadaians haven't even had a major terrorist attack and your government is going full-bore snooping on y'all.

meanhwhile, you continue with the attempted potshots here.

_Richard_ 06-10-2013 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19663192)
This is really bizarre. For once the conspiracy freaks really have something to get excited about. IT REALLY IS THE CIA !!!

But instead they have to make some even wilder accusations.

So not only have govt's used major digital corps to harvest data - they actually created those entities !

Oh and by the way :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I am laughing at the juxtaposition of peeps getting worked up about the govt using the interwebs to harvest data for national security reasons, but blind to the fact that the entities that they have used are harvesting so much more for their own murky intentions.......

are we? you can laugh at whatever make believe bullshit you want

but there is what a 'current dialogue is', and what we 'know'

currently, you're 12 years behind. keep laughing.

dyna mo 06-10-2013 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19663192)
This is really bizarre. For once the conspiracy freaks really have something to get excited about. IT REALLY IS THE CIA !!!

But instead they have to make some even wilder accusations.

So not only have govt's used major digital corps to harvest data - they actually created those entities !

Oh and by the way :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I am laughing at the juxtaposition of peeps getting worked up about the govt using the interwebs to harvest data for national security reasons, but blind to the fact that the entities that they have used are harvesting so much more for their own murky intentions.......

i went to review an app in the google playstore this weekend, when i tried, it said i needed to log in now to my google+ account, i messed up trying to reverse out of that and accidently instantly created a google+ account.

it took me quite a while to figure out how to disable that account. i like google, i can accept some of the lack of anon, but google cloud- no. google+ - no. facebook - no. twitter - business only.

dyna mo 06-10-2013 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19663199)
are we? you can laugh at whatever make believe bullshit you want

but there is what a 'current dialogue is', and what we 'know'

currently, you're 12 years behind. keep laughing.

richard your government is snooping on you with no justification whatsoever!!



:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugglaugh:1org laugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

and here you are!


jfc.

NewNick 06-10-2013 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19663199)
are we? you can laugh at whatever make believe bullshit you want

but there is what a 'current dialogue is', and what we 'know'

currently, you're 12 years behind. keep laughing.


So the point I make has no merit ?

faxxaff 06-10-2013 09:15 AM

The guy deserves to get paid well for this.

dyna mo 06-10-2013 09:17 AM

50 years from now:

americans, why did you let your government monitor your shit? well, we had the 9/11 and fell for a strategy of surveillance and war.

canadians, why did you let your government monitor your shit? eh, we were too busy loling @ americans, eh.

_Richard_ 06-10-2013 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19663216)
So the point I make has no merit ?

12 years ago the people talking about this were conspiracy nutters. now it's 'look who tried to warn us', and you're still calling people conspiracy nutters.

i am no longer interested in trying to communicate with people who only communicate with TV

best of luck with what you discover 12 years from now.

onwebcam 06-10-2013 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19663192)
This is really bizarre. For once the conspiracy freaks really have something to get excited about. IT REALLY IS THE CIA !!!

But instead they have to make some even wilder accusations.

So not only have govt's used major digital corps to harvest data - they actually created those entities !

Oh and by the way :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I am laughing at the juxtaposition of peeps getting worked up about the govt using the interwebs to harvest data for national security reasons, but blind to the fact that the entities that they have used are harvesting so much more for their own murky intentions.......

You seem to be hell bent on turning seeding into creation.. Or are you just that stupid?


Quote:

Originally Posted by faxxaff (Post 19663220)
The guy deserves to get paid well for this.


Edward Snowden: Republicans call for NSA whistleblower to be extradited

Politicians denounce whistleblower's actions while civil libertarians hail him as a courageous hero

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013...edward-snowden

NewNick 06-10-2013 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19663230)
12 years ago the people talking about this were conspiracy nutters. now it's 'look who tried to warn us', and you're still calling people conspiracy nutters.

i am no longer interested in trying to communicate with people who only communicate with TV

best of luck with what you discover 12 years from now.



Are you saying you do not understand the point I made, that you disagree with it, or that you are simply ignoring it ?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Still Laughing !

Mutt 06-10-2013 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19663087)
well that saves me from digging up the info, thank you

bwahahahhaha - you are such a loon. and this is a perfect example of how you loons distort and amplify your wacked out beliefs.

Loon #1 asserted that Facebook received seed money from In-Q-Tel implying that the CIA was/is directly involved in Facebook. Of course the evidence that actually does exist shows nothing but an indirect connection whereby Facebook received funding from a venture capital firm that has a board member who was chairman of the board of an association that the CEO of In-Q-Tel was a member of.

As for the CIA's involvement with Google, the truth again is mundane and self-explanatory and we all know that the MUNDANE is the conspiracy loon's Kryptonite - you people are powerless pissants with a sad need to see the world as a vast conspiracy from a comic book movie where you are the crusaders for truth and justice through whose tireless efforts to wake up the comatose masses will save the world from evil.

Now we will wait for the kooks to run around the Internet gathering more shreds of more conspiracies just as flimsy in their vain attempt to build their case when all it does it make you all look like bigger fools and make things harder for those who really do care about these issues.

The irony of the kook phenomena is that the powers that be will end up using these idiots to advance their agendas, the culmination of the self fulfilling kook prophecy you clowns are unaware of - self awareness is never a strong point of those who spend their lives pointing fingers at others.

_Richard_ 06-10-2013 09:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 19663271)
bwahahahhaha - you are such a loon. and this is a perfect example of how you loons distort and amplify your wacked out beliefs.

Loon #1 asserted that Facebook received seed money from In-Q-Tel implying that the CIA was/is directly involved in Facebook. Of course the evidence that actually does exist shows nothing but an indirect connection whereby Facebook received funding from a venture capital firm that has a board member who was chairman of the board of an association that the CEO of In-Q-Tel was a member of.

As for the CIA's involvement with Google, the truth again is mundane and self-explanatory and we all know that the MUNDANE is the conspiracy loon's Kryptonite - you people are powerless pissants with a sad need to see the world as a vast conspiracy from a comic book movie where you are the crusaders for truth and justice through whose tireless efforts to wake up the comatose masses will save the world from evil.

Now we will wait for the kooks to run around the Internet gathering more shreds of more conspiracies just as flimsy in their vain attempt to build their case when all it does it make you all look like bigger fools and make things harder for those who really do care about these issues.

The irony of the kook phenomena is that the powers that be will end up using these idiots to advance their agendas, the culmination of the self fulfilling kook prophecy you clowns are unaware of - self awareness is never a strong point of those who spend their lives pointing fingers at others.

while you point fingers at me?

seriously? do you guys think before typing?

dyna mo 06-10-2013 09:46 AM

maybe the ct nutters are embarrassed re: the fact they completely missed an actual real conspiracy while they were focused on 7wtc.


so they resort to their tried and true logic: dodge & deflect.


lolzocoptermobilerollercoaster

dyna mo 06-10-2013 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19663277)
while you point fingers at me?

seriously? do you guys think before typing?

this coming from you, the guy who just brought up my drug use from 15+ years ago in an attempt to discredit and insult me for absolutely no reason whatsoever.

got it.

winter_ 06-10-2013 09:58 AM

maybe he thought since the u.s.a. has gone to hell china must be still a whole load of a lot better.

_Richard_ 06-10-2013 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19663297)
this coming from you, the guy who just brought up my drug use from 15+ years ago in an attempt to discredit and insult me for absolutely no reason whatsoever.

got it.

it wasn't an attempt.

dyna mo 06-10-2013 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19663303)
it wasn't an attempt.

ok, what was it?

BFT3K 06-10-2013 10:27 AM

Here's the cliff notes version for you...



US Citizen: The government is totally over-reaching. Having no privacy is not what Americans should consider freedom.

Government: Hey, arrest that guy! He's a traitor!



...you're welcome.

Rochard 06-10-2013 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19663192)
This is really bizarre. For once the conspiracy freaks really have something to get excited about. IT REALLY IS THE CIA !!!

But instead they have to make some even wilder accusations.

So not only have govt's used major digital corps to harvest data - they actually created those entities !

Oh and by the way :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh I am laughing at the juxtaposition of peeps getting worked up about the govt using the interwebs to harvest data for national security reasons, but blind to the fact that the entities that they have used are harvesting so much more for their own murky intentions.......

It seems to me this is blown completely out of proportion. The way the media is selling this is that the US Government had direct access to track everyone at any time for any reason. The companies involved are saying that the US Government does not have "direct access" to their servers. The US government is telling us this has nothing to do with Americans, and in any case warrants need to be issued - which is done by a panel of judges appointed by Congress?

So if warrants are required, and are issued by judges appointed by Congress, and not for Americans but for terrorists in other countries.... Seems like a non story to me.

dyna mo 06-10-2013 10:43 AM

warrants?

pfft.

it already is happening. warrants are not being used. the data is already being recorded.

you have every ceo/president such as zuckerberg & flag saying they were not aware the gov was able to and is in fact tapping that shit.

think about that.

youare entitled to your opinion. but the warrantless tapping is in effect.

_Richard_ 06-10-2013 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19663368)
It seems to me this is blown completely out of proportion. The way the media is selling this is that the US Government had direct access to track everyone at any time for any reason. The companies involved are saying that the US Government does not have "direct access" to their servers. The US government is telling us this has nothing to do with Americans, and in any case warrants need to be issued - which is done by a panel of judges appointed by Congress?

So if warrants are required, and are issued by judges appointed by Congress, and not for Americans but for terrorists in other countries.... Seems like a non story to me.

you guys are drone striking americans

what due process exists?

baddog 06-10-2013 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19663187)
well, i've been suckered in. sorry to the op and those trying to have a serious chat about it.

:-(

I was just getting ready to make a comment; but I think you like dealing with these loonies. :1orglaugh

dyna mo 06-10-2013 10:52 AM

interesting angle on this


Quote:

of the 25,000 employees of Booz Allen Hamilton, whistleblower Edward Snowden's employer, "76% have government security clearances allowing them to handle sensitive national security information."
http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/digi...personal_data/


http://blogs.wsj.com/corporate-intel...ret-workforce/


so how much of our shit is up for sale?

dyna mo 06-10-2013 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19663392)
I was just getting ready to make a comment; but I think you like dealing with these loonies. :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh

:upsidedow

without wehateporn though it's too easy.

Zeiss 06-10-2013 11:06 AM

I saw this on the news lol

JP-pornshooter 06-10-2013 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19662363)
LOL. He is so fucking dead.

you find it funny that people are strong enough to stand up and protect our civil rights knowing that it could easily cost him his life?


Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19662402)
This is what I don't get - why take such risks to expose information that was already known by those who read about such things.

Did he just want his name in the newspaper or something?

Yeah, this was in the news weeks before he blew the whistle, I am sure he wanted to loose his job and put his life on the line so he could get his name in the paper.

Quote:

Originally Posted by - Jesus Christ - (Post 19662408)
The spineless losers projecting their fear of death are pathetic and viscerally disgusting to me.

couldnt agree more, some American must have forgotten what their great forefathers were fighting and lost their lives for.

Grapesoda 06-10-2013 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nexcom28 (Post 19662328)
A former CIA employee working as a contractor at the U.S. National Security Agency said he was the man who had leaked details of a top secret U.S. surveillance programme, acting out of conscience to protect "basic liberties for people around the world."

Holed up in a hotel room in Hong Kong, Edward Snowden, 29, said he had thought long and hard before publicising details of an NSA programme code named PRISM, saying he had done so because he felt his country was building an unaccountable and secret espionage machine that spied on every American.

The CIA declined to comment.

Both the Washington Post and Britain's Guardian newspaper - to whom he gave the documents he had purloined - published Snowden's identity on Sunday after he sought to be identified.

"I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things ... I do not want to live in a world where everything I do and say is recorded. That is not something I am willing to support or live under," he told the Guardian, which published a video interview with him on its website.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...0EL0PQ20130609

guys can always find an excuse or justification for being disloyal and dishonest :2 cents:

purecane 06-10-2013 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 19663350)
Here's the cliff notes version for you...



US Citizen: The government is totally over-reaching. Having no privacy is not what Americans should consider freedom.

Government: Hey, arrest that guy! He's a traitor!



...you're welcome.

yep, that about sums it up.

dyna mo 06-10-2013 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grapesoda (Post 19663453)
guys can always find an excuse or justification for being disloyal and dishonest :2 cents:

fortunately, his excuse was to inform americans. i would think it is a major security risk having these privatized intel companies providing the intel.

~80% of the nsa budget is for privatized services, that's $6 billion worth of data via 10s of thousands of employees with full security clearance.

i'm not the sharpest tool in the shed but even i can see this being exploited to the highest bidder.

helterskelter808 06-10-2013 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 19663438)
couldnt agree more, some American must have forgotten what their great forefathers were fighting and lost their lives for.

TV and Facebook and iPhones didn't exist then; they had nothing to lose.

Evil1 06-10-2013 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19662833)
I find the power of google et al a lot more worrying. Google is snooping and logging everything you do in display more ads and sell you more useless shit. Apple are turning into the thought police with their neo-con attitudes to naked women.

Google/apple/microshaft can't kick in your door with full auto weapons, take you away, and not have to answer to anyone anywhere about it.

Socks 06-10-2013 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19663226)
50 years from now:

americans, why did you let your government monitor your shit? well, we had the 9/11 and fell for a strategy of surveillance and war.

canadians, why did you let your government monitor your shit? eh, we were too busy loling @ americans, eh.

C'mon dyna, we have a conservative government in power who think the best environment to live in is one firmly rooted in the colon of America. There's no place they'd rather be than up your ass.

Whatever we're doing, we're doing for you.

_Richard_ 06-10-2013 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Socks (Post 19663701)
C'mon dyna, we have a conservative government in power who think the best environment to live in is one firmly rooted in the colon of America. There's no place they'd rather be than up your ass.

Whatever we're doing, we're doing for you.

:winkwink::winkwink:

now try and find a party that won't go to war as soon as nato says jump :upsidedow

The Sultan Of Smut 06-10-2013 02:49 PM

I'll just leave this here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

_Richard_ 06-10-2013 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Sultan Of Smut (Post 19663759)

i don't think he intended that nazi reference to be the godwin law itself

but hey

whatever one needs to do..

Si 06-10-2013 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NewNick (Post 19663192)
This is really bizarre. For once the conspiracy freaks really have something to get excited about. IT REALLY IS THE CIA !!!

But instead they have to make some even wilder accusations.

This is excactly what I hate about these loonies. There is actually a real conspiracy at work here, even though most people probably knew already their phones were not totally private. They don't like it when they haven't predicted something and, a real conspiracy or, evidence of something "shady" happens or, is happening.

Anyway, All this kind of "tapping" does, especially when made as public as it now is, is it will lead to people creating ways around it anyway. While ordinary people will be the only one's with data (wrongfully, in my eyes) being collected.

I'm pretty sure drug dealers do not send text messages saying: "Hey the coke has arrived, meet me at the quayside at the harbour on the blue and white boat, i'll be there at 9am" etc.

Rochard 06-10-2013 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 19663438)
you find it funny that people are strong enough to stand up and protect our civil rights knowing that it could easily cost him his life?

He didn't stand up to protect our civil rights. He stood up and reminded us corporate America is tracking our every fucking movement, and when the US government gets a warrant it can legally get all of that information. This isn't fucking new; I worked for the phone company in the early 1990s and our office had a switching station and the FBI was there four times a week.

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 19663438)
Yeah, this was in the news weeks before he blew the whistle, I am sure he wanted to loose his job and put his life on the line so he could get his name in the paper.

To remind us that the government has been doing this to us since the 1960s?

He made it sound dramatic like the US Government was tracking each and every one of us and that the CIA was doing something highly illegal. Looks like he over stated everything.

dyna mo 06-10-2013 03:04 PM

can someone tell rochard that this is warrantless data gathering already happening, no warrant needed to gather the data. i think he has me ignore.

Rochard 06-10-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19663780)
can someone tell rochard that this is warrantless data gathering already happening, no warrant needed to gather the data. i think he has me ignore.

You are not on ignore at all.

He claims there is "no warrant needed". He is "defense contractor", not an attorney. Does he know if a warrant is issued or not? Does a judge need to show up at his desk holding a warrant, or maybe an attorney? Of course not. All of this is handled above him.

I used to work at the phone company. When the FBI came to our office to tap a phone line, didn't show up unannounced with a warrant. Instead, I got a phone call from my boss who a phone call from the legal department ordering us to install the tap.

And this isn't new either. It's been going on for a very long time.

klinton 06-10-2013 03:43 PM

http://tn.sawfnews.com/newsphotos/Ho...adingstill.jpg

dyna mo 06-10-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19663836)
You are not on ignore at all.

He claims there is "no warrant needed". He is "defense contractor", not an attorney. Does he know if a warrant is issued or not? Does a judge need to show up at his desk holding a warrant, or maybe an attorney? Of course not. All of this is handled above him.

I used to work at the phone company. When the FBI came to our office to tap a phone line, didn't show up unannounced with a warrant. Instead, I got a phone call from my boss who a phone call from the legal department ordering us to install the tap.

And this isn't new either. It's been going on for a very long time.

i was wondering.

again though, you are very much entitled to your opinion on the matter and for all we know, that could be more right than not.

nevertheless, the project doesn't require participation from the corporations the info is coming from. both zuckerberg and page have said they were not aware the nsa was gathering the data from them via booz.

_Richard_ 06-10-2013 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19663836)
You are not on ignore at all.

He claims there is "no warrant needed". He is "defense contractor", not an attorney. Does he know if a warrant is issued or not? Does a judge need to show up at his desk holding a warrant, or maybe an attorney? Of course not. All of this is handled above him.

I used to work at the phone company. When the FBI came to our office to tap a phone line, didn't show up unannounced with a warrant. Instead, I got a phone call from my boss who a phone call from the legal department ordering us to install the tap.

And this isn't new either. It's been going on for a very long time.

patriot act means there doesn't have to be a warrant.

dyna mo 06-10-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19663841)
patriot act means there doesn't have to be a warrant.

no, that's incorrect.

dyna mo 06-10-2013 03:48 PM

here is the facebook post from zuckerberg::::::


I want to respond personally to the outrageous press reports about PRISM:

Facebook is not and has never been part of any program to give the US or any other government direct access to our servers. We have never received a blanket request or court order from any government agency asking for information or metadata in bulk, like the one Verizon reportedly received. And if we did, we would fight it aggressively. We hadn't even heard of PRISM before yesterday.

When governments ask Facebook for data, we review each request carefully to make sure they always follow the correct processes and all applicable laws, and then only provide the information if is required by law. We will continue fighting aggressively to keep your information safe and secure.




in a nutshell: the government did not ask fb for the data or for access to the data.

_Richard_ 06-10-2013 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19663845)
no, that's incorrect.

you care to expand on that, or is this just more glass bullshit

dyna mo 06-10-2013 03:58 PM

no need to expand, i'd hate for you government to have you on record with that infos.

you do know they are recording your shit right? you've never even been attacked yet your government is monitoring and recording your shit 24/7/365.

why would they do that richard?

Jel 06-10-2013 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19663337)
ok, what was it?

a failed attempt :thumbsup

dyna mo 06-10-2013 04:04 PM

seems like the canadian government might be on to something

21st century canada conflicts

2001 - April 20?22: Police and Anti-globalization protestors battle in the streets of Quebec City during the Summit of the Americas.

2006 - February 28 to present: Caledonia land dispute

2009 - 2009 Vancouver gang war

2009 - March 15: Riots against police brutality in Montreal after a young minority immigrant is fatally shot by police.[citation needed]

2010 - June 26?27: Police crackdown on demonstrations in Toronto during the 2010 G-20 Toronto summit.

2011 - June 15: 2011 Stanley Cup Riot

2011 - September 17: The Occupy Movement protests

2012 - 2012 Quebec student protests (February 13?present): Students in the Province of Quebec oppose the hike of tuition fees.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123