It serves the purpose,but i kind a got impression how they recycled old movies/tv series into one piece.Still,visual work is amazing.
Star trek "into the darkness" review
Collapse
X
-
I loved how the first one basically re wrote history, I'm going to see the movie soonCarbon is not the problem, it makes up 0.041% of our atmosphere , 95% of that is from Volcanos and decomposing plants and stuff. So people in the US are responsible for 13% of the carbon in the atmosphere which 95% is not from Humans, like cars and trucks and stuff and they want to spend trillions to fix it while Solar Panel plants are powered by coal plants
think about thatComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
For real? Hollywood keeps re-making the same fucking movies over and over again. Do we really need Khan as the villain in Star Trek again? It's the same with the superhero movies. The same damn origin story re-told every time they reboot the franchise with a new director. The same most popular villain yet *again*- the Joker for Batman played by a new actor in each generation; Lex Luthor for Superman over and over and over again. Why can't they ever advance the story for crying out loud?Comment
-
I will be going to see this tomorrow! After Oblivion I need a little pick me up ;)

Create your own Private Label Dating Site TODAY!
ICQ: 641942104 Skype: lanenaj_v e-mail: j.gonzalez at datingfactory.com
Comment
-
You forgot amazing spiderman and king kongFor real? Hollywood keeps re-making the same fucking movies over and over again. Do we really need Khan as the villain in Star Trek again? It's the same with the superhero movies. The same damn origin story re-told every time they reboot the franchise with a new director. The same most popular villain yet *again*- the Joker for Batman played by a new actor in each generation; Lex Luthor for Superman over and over and over again. Why can't they ever advance the story for crying out loud?
But that is how things working now,use same story,go left instead right to make a difference,and use awesome new visuals.And that equal profit $$$
Last edited by Klen; 05-10-2013, 12:01 AM.Comment
-
aw shit I was hoping for a new story too...i hate it when they recycle a movie...For real? Hollywood keeps re-making the same fucking movies over and over again. Do we really need Khan as the villain in Star Trek again? It's the same with the superhero movies. The same damn origin story re-told every time they reboot the franchise with a new director. The same most popular villain yet *again*- the Joker for Batman played by a new actor in each generation; Lex Luthor for Superman over and over and over again. Why can't they ever advance the story for crying out loud?
Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
-
even if it is the same bad guy Im going to watch it and enjoy it damn it.PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic
AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!Comment
-
people take things too seriously...
i dont give a crap as long the movie per se is good
last night i saw Iron Man 3 - and while surely not the best movie i have ever seen, i was still very much entertained and really liked it
then i go to IMDB and people write crap reviews because the Mandarin is not like the Mandarin from the comic books bla bla bla...
i dont give a shit, i never read the comics anywaysComment
-
-
gonna see it the weekend

Scarlett Content - Adult Content Provider - High Quality Adult Stock Content for your Websites, Mobile Media and Print.
Over 3 Million Images (14,000 photo sets) over 5000 Videos - Many Niches, US-2257, Awesome Prices.
Over 40 years in the adult industry.
[email protected] Follow us on twitter.Comment
-
I'm a huge Star Trek fan and still watch the original series whenever it's on. I know it borders on campy but it's still good TV to me :-)
-- BillNational Net Hosting. Handled.
See our new line of inexpensive Dedicated Servers | Cabinets starting at $795 | CDN
[email protected] | 888-4-NATNET | www.nationalnet.comComment
-
Most of the next generation (the Roddenberry ones anyway) were rehashes of original series stories for the most part. Same with the movies. Vger was just nomad all over again and Star Trek 5(6?) was a rehash of the search for Eden, except this time across the barrier and some half brother of Spock was leading them to God.. etc. Wouldn't have expected much different really. They've done so many cool stories; might as well.43-922-863 Shut up and play your guitar.
Comment
-
Star Trek was always "reality based" meaning, the people in the film are real human beings. (no offense to Vulcans) Which is what gives the series a real sense and we can relate to it.
The trailer looks like an action movie and they are turning Kirk and Spock into action heroes. Jumping off cliffs, etc... doing stunts that are not humanly possible, for shock value.
I haven't seen it yet, but I fear they are losing the Star Trek "feel" and turning the series into Mission Impossible 5 with space ships and aliens.
I hope the new movie has a script.
Remember "City on the Edge of Forever" written by Harlan Ellison?..... now THAT is Star Trek. These new movies don't come near the intellect or substance as the old series did.
Just a lot of flash and explosions for all the kids lit up on sugar to zone out on.Last edited by NewOldPlayer; 05-10-2013, 05:28 PM.Comment
-
Well they did call Superman 7 .... "Man of Steel" this time. Does that count?For real? Hollywood keeps re-making the same fucking movies over and over again. Do we really need Khan as the villain in Star Trek again? It's the same with the superhero movies. The same damn origin story re-told every time they reboot the franchise with a new director. The same most popular villain yet *again*- the Joker for Batman played by a new actor in each generation; Lex Luthor for Superman over and over and over again. Why can't they ever advance the story for crying out loud?
Comment


Comment