![]() |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
overview and analysis of the members of the 9/11 Truth movement community.
The authors find that the people involved in this movement, which seemingly is a disparate group with very diversified backgrounds, could be classified into three groups. Hardcore: The organizers and active members of the various 9/11 truth movement organizations. While they claim to be only interested in facts and to use scientific method, they commit the logical fallacy of confirmation bias by pre-determining the outcome, then searching for corroborating evidence while ignoring the vast body of peer-reviewed, independent, consensual research which contradict their theories. Critically turned: They are the political activists affiliated with the 9/11 truth movement Illiterati: They are the movement’s mass membership backbone, a large, diffuse group which give the movement exaggerated claims of popularity and influence. Participation in the 9/11 truth movement, to this group of people, is as much a social and recreational pursuit as the quest for truth. Their partaking is mostly through web 2.0 social networking and hits on the YouTube video. Their commentaries often are emotional and they make no pretense to be accurate, balanced or to show genuine intent to find truth. Involvement with the movement that fit their worldview gives them a sense of identity and belonging, which they find more appealing than the facts and evidences of the 9/11 terrorist attack itself |
Quote:
He had two kids. The older of the two was in school. He would say thing like, "My daughter had to do a history report last night. So we used the text book and she did the report that would make the teachers happy then I took her to the internet and showed her the truth." I felt bad for his kids. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
That's just stupid. Btw, i just got my computer parts...gonna start building now...will mail you later :winkwink: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
|
It's always the smart ones isn't it, always into their 9/11 Truth, why can't they just relax and watch Big Brother like everyone else :upsidedow
|
Quote:
On one hand you're basically saying "look, here's what the experts are saying so it must be true." while on the other hand you're completely ignoring the fact that they are far and away the minority of said experts. Like I said, your inability to see simple facts and rigid dedication to your conformation bias stands out like a candle in a dark room. Every time you make a post, like this one claiming a "huge court victory" out of what was actually a loss, you weaken your own position. A totally unsupported position that was never strong to begin with. I know you wish you weren't a total and complete failure at life but pretending the entire World is working against you isn't helping your case. :1orglaugh |
In 2013 you've got to be pretty dumb or lazy not to question the 9/11 official story :2 cents:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I understand the severe paranoia and run of the mill delusions - what is odd is how he claims those who post a well formed response and challenge the obvious wrongs of his thinking and "logic"are bots as a response when that is so clearly untrue.
|
Did they ever find body remains?
|
Quote:
MANY people here have met me and/or done business with me for years and years. |
Quote:
Real life Idiocracy in the making. :( |
Quote:
No, you've got to be pretty lazy to back the truther conspiracy theory because all you have to do is post ridiculous allegations without providing proof for any of them. Posting a statement and calling it a fact does not make it a fact. From the image above - give the names of the people who had direct access to the wreckage to be able to make all of those determinations. Were they allowed to examine the debris and take measurements and samples directly? Please post proof of their findings. Who were the numerous eyewitnesses who reported seeing "flowing molten metal" in the rubble? Provide a list of names and explain how they got close enough to see it. Who is the retard who decided to use the term pyroclastic flow to describe the dust clouds? That is a phenomenon uniquely attributable to volcanoes. Seeing such misuse of terminology certainly raises questions of credibility. Where is the independently verified proof of thermite/thermate? And why can't they seem to keep their story straight on which one it was? There are way too many holes in this stupid conspiracy theory to even bother going on. All of these retarded conspiracy theorists claim knowledge of everything but provide proof of nothing. |
Quote:
I also love it when morons try to use physics to back up their claims when they clearly have zero understanding of them haha Off your meds again I see whp? |
it's why i posted this::::::::
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
seems to be a lot of opinion about how wrong people are, who are posting evidence
if you have only opinion to add.. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123