GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   9/11 Finally Solved (Names, Connections, Motives) (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1103774)

dgraves 03-24-2013 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 19543144)
WTC 7 did not fall into its own footprint. It did not fall down uniformly. It did not fall down entirely straight.

Are we even talking about the same building? We're talking about WTC 7 right? The one that collapsed into it's own footprint in all the video angles. The one that was reduced to rubble within seconds. It collapsed with little to no resistance. There is no way a steel building could do that. It's a mathematical impossibility.

This was their major screw up and the irrefutable evidence of guilt. WTC 7 is the smoking gun.

dyna mo 03-24-2013 12:10 PM

Why people refuse to read is beyond me. Wow.

A mathmatical impossibility? Where do people come yp with this nonsense.

dyna mo 03-24-2013 12:23 PM

http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/71226.html

DBS.US 03-24-2013 12:25 PM

The numbers don't add up?
Everyone see thing differently.

Someone ask me:
A porn stars makes $10,000 per movie
There are average of two porn stars in each movie.
Add crew and editing/webmaster cost.
100,000 free movies on tube sites.

How the fuck do the porn companies make any money?

theking 03-24-2013 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19543323)
Why people refuse to read is beyond me. Wow.

A mathmatical impossibility? Where do people come yp with this nonsense.

I find it to be almost intolerable to accept that some humans are really that stupid.

EonBlue 03-24-2013 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dgraves (Post 19543313)
Are we even talking about the same building? We're talking about WTC 7 right? The one that collapsed into it's own footprint in all the video angles. The one that was reduced to rubble within seconds. It collapsed with little to no resistance. There is no way a steel building could do that. It's a mathematical impossibility.

This was their major screw up and the irrefutable evidence of guilt. WTC 7 is the smoking gun.

Are you a structural engineer? A demolition expert? A metallurgist? A mathematician? An investigator who somehow had access to all of the data and evidence for the collapse of WTC 7? What is the source of your certainty over the whole issue?

Is it just because you don't think it could happen the way it did?

You keep saying it is irrefutable but it has been thoroughly refuted. Several times just in this thread alone.

If you tried to bring this issue to a court of law you would be laughed out of the building because you have zero evidence for any of your claims.

dyna mo 03-24-2013 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 19543335)
I find it to be almost intolerable to accept that some humans are really that stupid.

Even when given an opportunity to learn and grow, they cling to fAlsehoods and then try and back that up with silly comments like mathmatecail impossibility.

Dirty F 03-24-2013 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EonBlue (Post 19543336)
Are you a structural engineer? A demolition expert? A metallurgist? A mathematician? An investigator who somehow had access to all of the data and evidence for the collapse of WTC 7? What is the source of your certainty over the whole issue?

A Youtube video made by a 16 year old. Which they consider fact and truth without even thinking twice. After all it's on Youtube.

Dirty F 03-24-2013 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19543339)
Even when given an opportunity to learn and grow, they cling to fAlsehoods and then try and back that up with silly comments like mathmatecail impossibility.

Because it NEEDS to be a conspiracy. So they are very selective in what to believe and what not.
First they find a believe, then they try to fit in all their "evidence".
Exactly the opposite of how science works.

dyna mo 03-24-2013 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19543380)
Because it NEEDS to be a conspiracy. So they are very selective in what to believe and what not.
First they find a believe, then they try to fit in all their "evidence".
Exactly the opposite of how science works.

it's so nutty. that's partly why i decided to just be a dick about it. that and the fact i spent years trying to have adult level debate about it with them and just got treated like a dick anyway.

Jel 03-24-2013 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19543380)
Because it NEEDS to be a conspiracy.

Most insightful comment in this thread.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123