| EonBlue |
03-24-2013 12:26 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by dgraves
(Post 19543313)
Are we even talking about the same building? We're talking about WTC 7 right? The one that collapsed into it's own footprint in all the video angles. The one that was reduced to rubble within seconds. It collapsed with little to no resistance. There is no way a steel building could do that. It's a mathematical impossibility.
This was their major screw up and the irrefutable evidence of guilt. WTC 7 is the smoking gun.
|
Are you a structural engineer? A demolition expert? A metallurgist? A mathematician? An investigator who somehow had access to all of the data and evidence for the collapse of WTC 7? What is the source of your certainty over the whole issue?
Is it just because you don't think it could happen the way it did?
You keep saying it is irrefutable but it has been thoroughly refuted. Several times just in this thread alone.
If you tried to bring this issue to a court of law you would be laughed out of the building because you have zero evidence for any of your claims.
|