Afterlife Affiliate Announcement‏

[pornmasta]

I received this message:

First I would like to thank you for your help and support in growing my website. As we all know, occasionally and for many reasons, some girls decide they no longer want to be featured online in their images or with their name. As a website owner I receive many such requests, and while many are easily handled on my end, I have recently encountered a few exceptional examples in which I need your help. Below is a list of six names. If you have their names or images currently in use, I need you to please remove the images, names, and links of these models at your convenience. If you are not using their names or images, you do not need to take any actions and you can disregard this email. Thank you for your time and I appreciate your cooperation.



Thank you,

Angel Afterlife

www.angelafterlife.com



Baby Delice

Felfette

Floofie

Liliane

Phoebe Lamour

Rachel Rankin

So if you receive a mail asking that you need to delete a link of one of these girls above, that's because of that.

[nikki99]

good name for a program that is going to eventually die

[georgeyw]

The other day I received a removal request from a model (claimed to be). I had removed the images at the request of the sponsor many moons ago and now because their name still created a page ie domain.com/dumbassmodel.html - they made threats about ''using'' their name.

It is just a dynamically generated page and because of that any name.html will display with content of some sort.

[pornmasta]

Link pulled...
I'm happy that i didn't promote them more.

[mechanicvirus]

Link pulled...
I'm happy that i didn't promote them more.

Can you prove you made a lot of money with them so we can figure out if you're full of shit or not?

[My Fucking Traffic]

Link pulled...
I'm happy that i didn't promote them more.

Yeah because anybody who makes any type of money with a sponsor is just gonna up and pull all links because they requested the removal of content that they own from your sites.

So either A) you're an idiot, or B) you don't make shit and just want people to think you do.

I go with B.

[Qbert]

I'm going to assume any hosted galleries with that content will go 404 or 302 in the near future. If I have any of them in my databases the next scan will flag them. Not worth spending a bunch of time hunting for them.

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

I received this message:

So if you receive a mail asking that you need to delete a link of one of these girls above, that's because of that.

Pulling content for six models?!? What is this guy in business for, and does he not know how to do paperwork?

In case anyone needs help placing a face to the half dozen names:

Baby Delice:



Felfette:



Floofie:



Liliane:



Phoebe Lamour:



Rachel Rankin:



Dick pulled...



ADG

[pornmasta]

Yeah because anybody who makes any type of money with a sponsor is just gonna up and pull all links because they requested the removal of content that they own from your sites.

So either A) you're an idiot, or B) you don't make shit and just want people to think you do.

I go with B.

in fact i made 2 galleries with them, that i submitted.
I had to remove 1 of these galleries (Phoebe Lamour, so link pulled) and i didn't promote them because the girls were hard to list (for me).
And i didn't make money with them... ($0, or not far)

Also i don't give a fuck of what you think because you are NOT important.
However i wonder why there is suddently 6 women to remove in the same time ?
Weird...

[My Fucking Traffic]

However i wonder why there is suddently 6 women to remove in the same time ?
Weird...

Because porn whores are fucking unstable as fuck with severe daddy issues?

[pornmasta]

Because porn whores are fucking unstable as fuck with severe daddy issues?

you mean, you listen to them when they signed an agreement ?

[newB]

In case anyone needs help placing a face to the half dozen names:

Liliane:

That helps.

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

That helps.

To the discerning eye...

I was going to quip that it was her best side, but after checking other pix of her, I realized maybe not...



So all 6 of these models just decided one day that they no longer wish to have their pix online, and that's that - sounds like there is more to the story.

I've shot hundreds of models over the course of more than a decade, and I have had very few such requests. When I did, they were far in between, and they were most often declined (which is why I have a discussion about copyrights, and have models sign a release agreement, prior to any projects).

Only one such case in the past 5+ years. Better for everyone that way.



ADG

[EddyTheDog]

If he shoots his own then it does seem odd for 6 to get cold feet at once - Either that or he bought some content that should not have been for sale...

[CampHost]

I received this message:



So if you receive a mail asking that you need to delete a link of one of these girls above, that's because of that.

You have one of the best if not the best looking sites I've ever seen. Man alive your girls are incredible!!.. All the best... Wow...

[AsianDivaGirlsWebDude]

You have one of the best if not the best looking sites I've ever seen. Man alive your girls are incredible!!.. All the best... Wow...

Reading comprehension is apparently not one of your strengths - the site mentioned does not belong to the OP (he is/was just an affiliate).



ADG

[pornmasta]

exactly...

[Mutt]

something definitely not right - 6 models at once

two possibilities

1)the guy is a pushover, 6 girls have asked him to take their content down, and he's a softie and is doing it.

2)the guy has a bad/inadequate model release and 6 girls with advice from lawyer(s) have intimidated him into removing them

my guess is the latter - 6 girls having regrets after having been paid and signing a legit model release is way beyond normal.

[Qbert]

something definitely not right - 6 models at once

two possibilities

1)the guy is a pushover, 6 girls have asked him to take their content down, and he's a softie and is doing it.

2)the guy has a bad/inadequate model release and 6 girls with advice from lawyer(s) have intimidated him into removing them

I can think of several others, but how 'bout this one:
Content for those six models sold to someone else under the agreement they would be exclusive. To make that happen content removed from his site.