FBI Banned from Iceland - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

dyna mo · 02-03-2013, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

but thats not what i meant with "we" or "me"...

The NATO provides protection, Iceland pays into the NATO budget.

Just like any NATO country provides help when any other NATO country is attacked.

And the NATO is more than just the US (the general secretary is a danish dude for example)

i don't need an education on nato.

i can assure you the white helmets will not be defending a a nation anytime soon and you know that too. if iceland were attacked, nato would be sending emails and issuing press releases.

MaDalton · 02-03-2013, 02:31 PM

funky - Germany just sent missiles and personnel to Turkey in case of any new attacks from Syria ;)

and btw - i dont want to educate anyone - but you kept repeating something that is simply not true - at least not after 2006

dyna mo · 02-03-2013, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

funky - Germany just sent missiles and personnel to Turkey in case of any new attacks from Syria ;)

and btw - i dont want to educate anyone - but you kept repeating something that is simply not true - at least not after 2006

it's your choice, you can continue thinking nato is a viable defense strategy going into to 21st century or not. but there's a lot out there showing otherwise.

not sure what you are referring to that i am incorrect about after 2006? that the u.s. covers iceland's ass?

that u.s. covers 70% of the nato defense budget and even more of its strategy?

that austerity measures are wiping out the puny defenses european countries have to begin with due to them letting the u.s. cover that?

dyna mo · 02-03-2013, 02:44 PM

Obama administration officials warned last year that European members of NATO could no longer expect the United States to shoulder a disproportionate burden of maintaining the 28-member alliance, the bedrock of trans-Atlantic security and diplomacy since the end of World War II. The United States accounts for 75 percent of all NATO defense spending, up from 50 percent during the Cold War.
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2...ropean-members

Norwegian Defense Minister Espen
Barth Eide has claimed that “exercises
have shown that NATO’s ability to conduct
conventional military operations has
markedly declined. […] Not only is NATO’s
ability to defend its member states
questionable, it might actually deteriorate
further as financial pressures in Europe and
the US force cuts in military spending”.4
http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/res...odonnell%20pdf

Mr Pheer · 02-03-2013, 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

who would want to have Iceland and for what?

Well if nobody else wants it, I'll gladly take it.

MaDalton · 02-03-2013, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

it's your choice, you can continue thinking nato is a viable defense strategy going into to 21st century or not. but there's a lot out there showing otherwise.

not sure what you are referring to that i am incorrect about after 2006? that the u.s. covers iceland's ass?

that u.s. covers 70% of the nato defense budget and even more of its strategy?

that austerity measures are wiping out the puny defenses european countries have to begin with due to them letting the u.s. cover that?

oh jeeez... i didnt want to go all political over this - just stating a fact

actually i am not interested in defense strategies, i chose to wipe asses instead of carrying a gun. i despise military.

but i think that 95% of all worldwide military is useless anyways against a few people with nothing to lose and a bag of explosives

dyna mo · 02-03-2013, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton

- just stating a fact

what fact did you state?

02-03-2013, 02:31 PM	#52
MaDalton I am Amazing Content! Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 39,822	funky - Germany just sent missiles and personnel to Turkey in case of any new attacks from Syria ;) and btw - i dont want to educate anyone - but you kept repeating something that is simply not true - at least not after 2006 __________________ AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003 Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you! Skype: madalton02826 - Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com Last edited by MaDalton; 02-03-2013 at 02:32 PM..

02-03-2013, 02:44 PM	#54
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 64,419	Obama administration officials warned last year that European members of NATO could no longer expect the United States to shoulder a disproportionate burden of maintaining the 28-member alliance, the bedrock of trans-Atlantic security and diplomacy since the end of World War II. The United States accounts for 75 percent of all NATO defense spending, up from 50 percent during the Cold War. http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2...ropean-members Norwegian Defense Minister Espen Barth Eide has claimed that “exercises have shown that NATO’s ability to conduct conventional military operations has markedly declined. […] Not only is NATO’s ability to defend its member states questionable, it might actually deteriorate further as financial pressures in Europe and the US force cuts in military spending”.4 http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/res...odonnell%20pdf