The NRA Myth of Arming the Good Guys

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • AdultPornMasta
    Confirmed User
    • May 2012
    • 1506

    #16
    Originally posted by Rochard
    There were armed guards in Columbine and that didn't change a damn thing.

    I'm okay with the good guys having the firearms. We need to figure out way to prevent the mentally ill from getting them. That's the key.
    BULLSHIT!

    "Yes, Columbine Had Armed Guards?And They Saved Lives!"

    http://news.investors.com/ibd-editor...ves.htm?p=full

    From the cited article:

    "Yes, the critics respond, and there was an armed security guard at Columbine High School in 1999. Yet, 12 students and a teacher were killed by two armed intruders, as if that disqualified the solution of placing armed guards, possibly unemployed army veterans, at each of our nation's 100,000-plus schools.

    Yes, there was, and it was the guard's presence and the resistance he and others offered that kept the carnage less than it might have been.

    On April 20, 1999, Neil Gardner, an armed sheriff's deputy who had been policing the school for almost two years, was eating lunch when Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold arrived at Columbine with their deadly arsenal and deadlier intentions.

    Gardner said he got a call from a custodian that he was needed in the school's back parking lot. A few minutes later, he encountered Harris, and the two exchanged gunfire. The exchange with Harris lasted for an extended period of time, during which Harris' gun jammed.

    The deputy and the backup he immediately called for exchanged fire with the shooters a second time and helped begin the evacuation of students, all before SWAT teams arrived, and before Harris and Klebold eventually killed themselves in the library."

    Stop it with your liberal lies already!

    "The world is full of obvious things which nobody by any chance ever observes."

    Comment

    • martinsc
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Jun 2005
      • 27047

      #17
      Make Money

      Comment

      • crockett
        in a van by the river
        • May 2003
        • 76818

        #18
        Originally posted by Mr Pheer






        Why shoould I have to give up my rights? So I can just become a helpless victim?

        I dont think so. Arm more citizens.
        How many times do you think an accidental shooting occurs by a gun carrier vs how many hero stories unfold? I will bet you anything accidental shooting are a far larger number..


        Here I'll help.. The first sentence says that it's "slowly" declining, but still 680 deaths by accidental gun fire in the US during 2008. How many hero's saved he day with their gun in 2008?

        The number of accidental shooting deaths in the United States has been slowly declining for many years, although there was a slight jump in the number of deaths in 2008, the last year for which we have statistics. In 2008 there were 680 accidental shooting deaths in the United States, with more than 15,500 shooting injuries. Most disturbing, perhaps, is the number of children involved in accidental shootings. Every day approximately five children are injured or killed on a nationwide basis as a result of handguns. The primary cause of youth-involved shooting rests with the fact that children find loaded handguns in the home – and natural curiosity leads them down the road to disaster

        Each year approximately 100 people are injured or killed while cleaning a firearm and failing to exercise proper caution.

        Hunting accidents account for approximately 160 accidental shootings each year, with an average of 50 fatalities.


        source: http://www.thesurvivorsclub.org/extr...ental-shooting
        In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

        Comment

        • Grapesoda
          So Fucking Banned
          • Jul 2003
          • 46238

          #19
          Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
          10K 20K 30K 50K -- that would start a civil war here.

          The guy who lit the house on fire and laid in ambush for the firefighters was a shitstain ex-murderer that should have never been paroled -- as a convicted murderer he was banned from holding a firearm -- what good did it do? He had killed his grandmother with a hammer I read so he was a confirmed psycho-killer and is a best case argument for capital punishment.

          I was reading some death row stats a few months ago, almost every person on death row had already been convicted of manslaughter, served time and was released. and that's a very interesting statistic that should really guide the legal system.

          Comment

          • OneBallJohn
            Confirmed User
            • May 2002
            • 262

            #20
            Originally posted by NETbilling
            Start by banning assault weapons except for military and peace officers
            That was more or less done in 1934 then strengthened in 1986. In 1994 an "Assault Weapons Ban" was put in place to cover what you are mistakenly referring to as an "Assault Weapon" and that did nothing to stop crime. Maybe if you paid attention to history and current laws instead of the media you would know these things.

            Educate yourself.
            http://washingtonexaminer.com/media-...e#.UN42t-qQ1fo
            Last edited by OneBallJohn; 12-29-2012, 06:07 AM.

            Comment

            • crockett
              in a van by the river
              • May 2003
              • 76818

              #21
              Originally posted by AdultPornMasta
              BULLSHIT!

              "Yes, Columbine Had Armed Guards—And They Saved Lives!"

              http://news.investors.com/ibd-editor...ves.htm?p=full

              From the cited article:

              "Yes, the critics respond, and there was an armed security guard at Columbine High School in 1999. Yet, 12 students and a teacher were killed by two armed intruders, as if that disqualified the solution of placing armed guards, possibly unemployed army veterans, at each of our nation's 100,000-plus schools.

              Yes, there was, and it was the guard's presence and the resistance he and others offered that kept the carnage less than it might have been.

              On April 20, 1999, Neil Gardner, an armed sheriff's deputy who had been policing the school for almost two years, was eating lunch when Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold arrived at Columbine with their deadly arsenal and deadlier intentions.

              Gardner said he got a call from a custodian that he was needed in the school's back parking lot. A few minutes later, he encountered Harris, and the two exchanged gunfire. The exchange with Harris lasted for an extended period of time, during which Harris' gun jammed.

              The deputy and the backup he immediately called for exchanged fire with the shooters a second time and helped begin the evacuation of students, all before SWAT teams arrived, and before Harris and Klebold eventually killed themselves in the library."

              Stop it with your liberal lies already!

              I know you are responding to what Rochard said, but the point you guys always miss in these hero defender situations, is more times than not a successful defense by a gun carrier is usually at the hands of someone in law enforcement not some random guy carrying a gun hoping to be a hero.

              I do support gun ownership, but honestly it does scare me at times that pretty much any idiot can get their hands on a gun in this country. I also have never been in a situation where I felt having a gun would help the situation.

              The chances of ever needing to defend one's self with a gun for the average American is probably along the same lines of your chance of being in a plane crash. Of course your chances go up if you are in bad areas, but you always have the choice to remove yourself from that area.

              I can tell you I've worked in some pretty bad areas before and never once did I feel my life was threatened just because I was there or that I needed a gun to protect myself.
              Last edited by crockett; 12-29-2012, 06:01 AM.
              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

              Comment

              • Grapesoda
                So Fucking Banned
                • Jul 2003
                • 46238

                #22
                Originally posted by crockett

                Here I'll help.. The first sentence says that it's "slowly" declining, but still 680 deaths by accidental gun fire in the US during 2008.
                ---- According to an annual report published by the National Safety Council, there were 39,800 deaths last year related to motor vehicles in 2008.

                so what's you're point? people with cars are stupider than people with guns?

                Comment

                • Grapesoda
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 46238

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Rochard
                  There were armed guards in Columbine and that didn't change a damn thing.

                  I'm okay with the good guys having the firearms. We need to figure out way to prevent the mentally ill from getting them. That's the key.
                  the armed guards changed a lot of stuff, saved very many lives... and yes the mentally ill should not be allowed to have weapons...

                  how about this though. say when you're about 20 you get drunk and start a fight in bar, get arrested and spend the night in jail... no big deal happens all the time to kids, life goes on... never get in any more trouble

                  BUT with 'rigorous mental health laws in effect' you are labeled unstable, prone to violence and assigned a negative mental health profile that follows you the rest of your life. put on medication. you have problems finding work, no bank loans, health ins denied etc... AND your kids will be labeled a genetically unstable, put on a watch list and possible medicated as well

                  you're are supposed to be a smart guy... think about it... all these 'kids' at GFY have all these 'one stop shopping solutions' with out any life experience or understanding of the complexities of the situation.... this is the fucking reality of 'sorting out the fucking nuts'
                  Last edited by Grapesoda; 12-29-2012, 06:10 AM.

                  Comment

                  • Grapesoda
                    So Fucking Banned
                    • Jul 2003
                    • 46238

                    #24
                    Originally posted by crockett
                    I know you are responding to what Rochard said, but the point you guys always miss in these hero defender situations, is more times than not a successful defense by a gun carrier is usually at the hands of someone in law enforcement not some random guy carrying a gun hoping to be a hero.

                    I do support gun ownership, but honestly it does scare me at times that pretty much any idiot can get their hands on a gun in this country. I also have never been in a situation where I felt having a gun would help the situation.

                    The chances of ever needing to defend one's self with a gun for the average American is probably along the same lines of your chance of being in a plane crash. Of course your chances go up if you are in bad areas, but you always have the choice to remove yourself from that area.

                    I can tell you I've worked in some pretty bad areas before and never once did I feel my life was threatened just because I was there or that I needed a gun to protect myself.
                    I really support gun ownership with tactical training and a fail clause that denies the gun

                    Comment

                    • crockett
                      in a van by the river
                      • May 2003
                      • 76818

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Grapesoda
                      ---- According to an annual report published by the National Safety Council, there were 39,800 deaths last year related to motor vehicles in 2008.

                      so what's you're point? people with cars are stupider than people with guns?
                      Cars are used far more often than guns, anyone with half a brain could figure that is going to cause for a more deaths due to accidents.
                      In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                      Comment

                      • Grapesoda
                        So Fucking Banned
                        • Jul 2003
                        • 46238

                        #26
                        Originally posted by crockett
                        Cars are used far more often than guns, anyone with half a brain could figure that is going to cause for a more deaths due to accidents.
                        I would say there are more guns than cars in the US, anyone with half a brain should be able to figure that out

                        Comment

                        • crockett
                          in a van by the river
                          • May 2003
                          • 76818

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Grapesoda
                          I really support gun ownership with tactical training and a fail clause that denies the gun
                          I do too, but truth of the matter is that it won't stop the mass type shooting. In just about every one of these cases the attacker could likely get the guns regardless if it were a little harder.

                          More training, stricter registration & focusing on criminals/unregistered guns will have the biggest effect on deaths & shootings. It's just not gonna solve these mass type shootings like the one in Conn.

                          Meaning I don't support a ban as a knee jerk reaction to a random mass shooting, but rather looking at the overall picture to see what could have the larger affect in curbing gun crime/violence.
                          In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                          Comment

                          • MakingItPay
                            Confirmed User
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 1922

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Mr Pheer
                            Why is everybody worried about assault weapons?

                            The percentage of crime committed with assault weapons is minimal compared to the amount committed with handguns.

                            Adam Lanza didnt even use an assault weapon, the media just jumped all over it, and the sheep believed it, because it was stated that he had a bushmaster AR15 in his car.

                            NEWSFLASH: He didnt shoot those kids in his car.
                            They just want to start there. Then they start including handguns as "assault pistols." These guys see opportunity to grab guns everytime this happens. And it doesn't happen often. But when it does, it occurs in a "Gun Free Zone." These were created by anti gun politicians, not the NRA.
                            Giant Boob High Def Trifectas
                            http://www.TrifectaBucks.com

                            3D Super Sites that Sell
                            http://www.ThrillBucks.com

                            Giant Boobs Anyone?
                            http://www.MakingitPay.com

                            ICQ me at 213177906

                            Comment

                            • crockett
                              in a van by the river
                              • May 2003
                              • 76818

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Grapesoda
                              I would say there are more guns than cars in the US, anyone with half a brain should be able to figure that out
                              There is roughly the same number. It's about 250-300 mil registered cars in the US and about the same number of guns. However those 250 mil guns are spread out across roughly 50 million households.

                              That's roughly 45-50% of US household that have a gun meanwhile it's only about 9% of the households in the US that don't have a car or roughly 91% that do.

                              Meaning it's far more likely for a gun owner to own more than one gun than it is for a car owner to own more than one car and simply put cars are used far more often by more people than guns, which is why they are involved in more deaths.
                              Last edited by crockett; 12-29-2012, 06:32 AM.
                              In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                              Comment

                              • fatfoo
                                ICQ:649699063
                                • Mar 2003
                                • 27763

                                #30
                                We are not living in the caveman age, stone age, bronze age or whatever. We are technologically advanced right now. Still, some humans act like apes. Think about Darwin. These humans are thinking about the first time they saw a hammer, axe or metal gun. How violent can they become… Guns are most dangerous because they can create mass shootings. Are defenses really defenses? The courts are there to decide. Good luck.
                                Send me an email: [email protected]

                                Comment

                                Working...