Rochard can go to heck.

Your mom does.

I take it it's your birthday and you're drunk?

Love thy neighbor, Donny. Still inviting wayward single Mom's to your apartment so you can ply them with cash for God knows what?

Haha Rochard is mainstream and wants to hurt no ones feelings. Have respect

If rochard could turn brains into cash, he'd still be a welfare recipient.

OOOOhhhhh Rochardddddd....

Wonder if Rochard still has a crush on Belinda.

If it's female and not his wife, Roc has a crush on it.

AaronM likes me. Always Has. That HUGE testimonial.

You know the Roc.

True. True.

Debil that guy.

lol this fool said "heck"

I smoke it

haha 'heck' is great!

You smoke what?

Don't worry...he'll rot in H-E-double hockey sticks!

Hey wack job... Don't you have some guns to play with

Do they have mustangs in "Heck" ?

hard to meet someone that doesnt exist

HEll + fuCK = HECK

Oh my, the language around here.

The jesus freak probably had some wine and then the real self comes out, and goes back to the porn board. Why are you fooling yourself?

Is this that fag guy donny who found god years ago and quit adult after being fucked in the ass by a porn star with a strap-on and really thinks god will forgive him since he is not in porn anymore but still looks at it and reads this board because his wife is out fucking other guys and his excuse is he is trying to save others by making posts of hate like the devil would do? Is this him?

You have most of it right yourself. About half if it actually.

who? Who is rocking hard?

Ah so that's where I recognize this actor from

Yes, several. Wanna play?

Did homeboy wake up from his druken slumber yet ?

sounds very sane

hilarious

Just wondering if his momma would let him come out to play. He brought it up so I was sorta hopin' she'd let him.

its christmas eve don't you have a stage to go stand on and a basket to pass around to the sheep? i thought this was the ripe time of the year to rake in the donations. why are you wasting time on here shouldn't you be passing the collection basket ?

I can send you my PayPal info if it makes you feel better.

Donny, you're a fucking trainwreck. Get your shit together.

Wow.

Pretty much an annual tradition for the squirrel, eh?
.

at least you could've said "Go to fucking to heck"

The title was an attempt at humor. It worked: I laughed.

So did everyone else, AT you.

I think the house cleaner missed a spot...

makes me cringe I tell you

Says the grown man who still believes in fairy tales.

Sorry 'bout that. I was trying to shock.

There's more evidence for Jesus' existence than there is for most historical figures you read about in class.

lol

but Jesus might have existed, why not

i just very much doubt he could walk on water or do any other miracles and was the virgin birth of some non-existing god

My belief in God is based on science. When you study complexity it demonstrates that 14 billion years, the commonly held belief of the age of the universe, is not enough time for us to be here. And life never arises from non-life. An intelligent First Cause MUST have been involved.

My belief in Christianity flows from there:
An intelligent First Cause, who I'll call God, would likely care about His creation. Long story short: the Jesus story is the most loving story of any religion, and makes the most sense.

How difficult do you think it would be for the creator of the universe and all of the laws that hold it together to break those laws from time to time? Walking on water, miracles and virgin births pale in comparison to creating all that exists.

SINCE WE'VE NOW BROUGHT UP THE EXISTENCE OF GOD, HERE ARE SOME STATS FOR MY ATHEIST FRIENDS:

In one of his books, Richard Dawkins uses the Infinite Monkey Theorem as an example when writing about how elements can eventually be arranged at random, supposedly resulting in life. The Theorem states this, basically:

If you put a group of monkeys in a room in front of typewriters, given enough time (if they could live forever) they would end up typing out the complete works of Shakespeare.

This is a perfect example of how biologists, even intelligent ones the likes of Richard Dawkins, don't comprehend probability and complexity. Mathematics shows this Theorem is a very BAD example of what Dawkins was trying to prove. The facts are that to produce just one SONNET (never mind all of Shakespeare's works), would require more time in total years than there are particles in the universe.

Again, RICHARD DAWKINS uses the Infinite Monkey Theorem as an example, so don't give me grief for mentioning it.

Here's how the math breaks down for just one SONNET:

All sonnets are 14 lines long. Let's take the sonnet that begins with "Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?" There are 488 letters in that sonnet. What is the likelihood of a monkey pounding away on a keyboard and getting all 488 letters in sequence? There are 26 letters of the alphabet, right? The odds would therefore be 26 to the 488th power... which in scientific notation (base 10) is 10 to the 690th power.

Now for comparison on how HUGE that number is:
The number of particles in the entire universe - not grains of sand, I'm talking protons, electrons and neutrons - is 10 to the 80th power. 10 to the 690th is larger than all the particles in the entire universe. There are not enough particles in the entire universe to write down all the trials these monkeys would have to go through in order to finally type out a single sonnet.

If you took the entire universe and converted it to computer chips - forget the monkeys - each one weighing a millionth of a gram and had each computer chip able to spin out 488 trials at, say, a millions times a second; if you turn the entire universe into these microcomputer chips and these chips were spinning a million times a second, producing random letters, the number of trials you would get since the beginning of TIME would be 10 to the 90th trials. That's off by a factor of 10 to the 600th of what you'd need to put out ONE SONNET by chance.

In other words, you will NEVER get a sonnet by random chance. Richard Dawkins didn't comprehend this, although I'm sure someone has set him straight since the book that used that example was published, as he no longer uses that example.

Life is far, far more complex than a Shakespearean sonnet. Life would need far, far more time to arise at random than would a single Shakespearean sonnet. Study the complexity of just a cell, never mind a sentient life form. Without intelligent guidance, again, we simply would not be here. There hasn't been enough time.

And consider this: life never arises from non-life. Never, ever.