A For Real Petition On The Real White House Website!

[AdultPornMasta]

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pet...dment/prfh5zHD

"We petition the Obama administration to:

Deport British Citizen Piers Morgan for Attacking 2nd Amendment

British Citizen and CNN television host Piers Morgan is engaged in a hostile attack against the U.S. Constitution by targeting the Second Amendment. We demand that Mr. Morgan be deported immediately for his effort to undermine the Bill of Rights and for exploiting his position as a national network television host to stage attacks against the rights of American citizens."


Created: Dec 21, 2012

If you agree with it, please sign it.

If not, GFY!

[V_RocKs]

Piers Morgan is a fuck tard.

[BIGTYMER]

He has the same liberties. Freedom of speech.

[AdultPornMasta]

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

Piers Morgan is a fuck tard.

What you wrote!

[AdultPornMasta]

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

He has the same liberties. Freedom of speech.

Yes he does but he is also not a US citizen who is actively working to diminish the civil rights of ALL US citizens including MINE!

Deport the SOB!

[CurrentlySober]

Originally Posted by AdultPornMasta

Yes he does but he is also not a US citizen who is actively working to diminish the civil rights of ALL US citizens including MINE!

Yup but YOU fools ( & I pity the fools ) NEED the UK to guide you GUIDENCE... FACT

Originally Posted by AdultPornMasta

Deport the SOB!

I WAS deported but my mother is lovely thank you hairy crutch..

[AdultPornMasta]

Originally Posted by CurrentlySober

Yup but YOU fools ( & I pity the fools ) NEED the UK to guide you GUIDENCE... FACT



I WAS deported but my mother is lovely thank you hairy crutch..

As I recall the decision regarding the USA needing or accepting "guidance" from the UK was determined sometime around 1783.

"The northern, southern, and naval theaters of the war converged in 1781 at Yorktown, Virginia. Cornwallis, having been ordered to occupy a fortified position that could be resupplied (and evacuated, if necessary) by sea, had settled in Yorktown, on the York River, which was navigable by sea-going vessels. Aware that the arrival of the French fleet from The West Indies would give the allies control of the Chesapeake, Washington began moving the American and French forces south toward Virginia in August. In early September, French naval forces defeated a British fleet at the Battle of the Chesapeake, cutting off Cornwallis' escape. When Washington arrived outside Yorktown, the combined Franco-American force of 18,900 men began besieging Cornwallis in early October. For several days, the French and Americans bombarded the British defenses, and then began taking the outer positions. Cornwallis decided his position was becoming untenable, and he surrendered his entire army of over 8,000 men on October 19, 1781.[88]

With the surrender at Yorktown, King George lost control of Parliament to the peace party, and there were no further major military activities in North America. The British had 30,000 garrison troops occupying New York City, Charleston, and Savannah.[89] The war continued elsewhere, including the siege of Gibraltar and naval operations in the East and West Indies, until peace was agreed in 1783."

I also seem to remember something about a couple of world wars in which the UK found itself embroiled and had to be on both occasions fucking SAVED by the former colonists.

Now correct me if I am wrong but the UK doesn't seem to be able to find its ass with both hands lately, much less be able to offer advice to its betters!

It is also not that crazy bastard King George III on our fucking postage stamps!

[SpaceDoc]

Originally Posted by V_RocKs

Piers Morgan is a fuck tard.

fuck tard is worse then retard

[just a punk]

Please vote for this one too: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pet...y-act/q9LbTGRB

Identify Russian law-makers jeopardizing lives of Russian orphans responsible under "Magnitsky Act".

We, the undersigned,

- acknowledge the adoption of "Sergei Magnitsky Rule of Law Accountability Act of 2012" as a profoundly pro-Russian step which will help Russian citizens bring individuals involved in corruption and violation of human rights to justice;

- are outraged with the actions of Russian law-makers, who breached all imaginable boundaries of humanity, responsibility, or common sense and chose to jeopardize lives and well-being of thousands of Russian orphans, some of whom, the ill and the disabled ones, now might not have a chance of survival if the ban on international adoption is to be put in place;

- urge this Administration to identify those involved in adopting such legislature responsible under "Magnitsky Act" and thus included to the relevant list.

[Smut]

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER

He has the same liberties. Freedom of speech.

No he doesn't. Not unless he's a U.S. citizen, which he is not.

[AdultPornMasta]

Originally Posted by SpaceDoc

fuck tard is worse then retard

For sure!

[AdultPornMasta]

Originally Posted by CyberSEO

Please vote for this one too: https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/pet...y-act/q9LbTGRB

I have read about this and thank you for posting it!

Voted.

[Barry-xlovecam]

Originally Posted by Smut

No he doesn't. Not unless he's a U.S. citizen, which he is not.

No, you are misinformed;

THOMAS JEFFERSON LAW REVIEW
Vol. 25:367

1. ALIENS, CITIZENS, AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS The Constitution does distinguish in some respects between the rights of citizens and noncitizens: the right not to be discriminatorily denied the vote and the right to run for federal elective office are expressly restricted to citizens.

12 All other rights, however, are written without such a limitation. The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process and equal protection guarantees extend to all "persons."

12. U.S. CONST. art. I, §§ 2, 3; U.S. CON ST. art. II, § 1; U.S. CONST. amend. 15. The Constitution's limitation to citizens of the right against discriminatory denial of the vote does not mean that noncitizens cannot vote. If a state or locality chooses to enfranchise its noncitizen residents, it may do so. Indeed, until the early twentieth century, noncitizens routinely enjoyed the right to vote as a matter of state and local law. By contrast, the Constitution expressly restricts to citizens the right to hold federal elective office.

http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/297

He's entitled to his opinion but lacks any color of authority to take anyone's 2nd Amendment rights.

As for the UK "nanny state"

Victory for the tabloids! Online porn to be filtered by default in UK

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2...default-in-uk/

Freedom of some speech that the press likes?

Maybe, you understand the context of his rhetoric now?