:1orglaugh

No logical explanation given, the conspiracy theory is far more logical :2 cents:

It's not the cross-hairs which would have been added

:1orglaugh :1orglaugh ...

'Moon rock' given to Holland by Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin is fake

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/s...n-is-fake.html


I suppose they wanted to keep the real moon rocks for themselves so they did a switch...right? :1orglaugh

(or aliens did it) :helpme

So basically what you are saying is that every single moon mission was faked. The 100's probably 1000's of people who worked on them were part of this hoax. All the videos and photos of all the missions were faked. This is what you are saying right? But at the same time you are not a conspiracy nutter. Let me know if i'm wrong somewhere.

one way or the other, some things never change :1orglaugh

Just the same as the Thunderbirds, that was faked too, all of it! Didn't you ever notice the wires, just like the wires on the 'lunar landing' astronauts?

Will you please answer me? I'm really curious.

The question is: are you saying all moon missions were faked? Thanks for answering me.

LOL the conspiracy theory only seems more logical to wackjobs - amazing how the conspiracy theory is never more logical to people who actually have years of specialized education and have become leading authorities in their fields.

And if the moon landing were faked why didn't we hear it from the leading scientists in the Soviet space program? The Soviets were in on the conspiracy? Hmmm........... could it be the entire Cold War was actually a ruse masterminded by Jewish bankers who have always played both ends against the middle!?!?!



1. In some photos, crosshairs seem to be behind objects. The cameras were fitted with a reseau plate (a clear glass plate with crosshairs etched on), making it impossible for any photographed object to appear "in front" of the grid. This suggests that objects have been "pasted" over them.

This only appears in copied and scanned photos, not the originals. It is caused by overexposure: the bright white areas of the emulsion "bleed" over the thin black crosshairs. The crosshairs are only about 0.004 inch thick (0.1 mm) and emulsion would only have to bleed about half that much to fully obscure it. Furthermore, there are many photos where the middle of the crosshair is "washed-out" but the rest is intact. In some photos of the American flag, parts of one crosshair appear on the red stripes, but parts of the same crosshair are faded or invisible on the white stripes. There would have been no reason to "paste" white stripes onto the flag.[60

The retard will ignore facts like this. It doesn't fit his believe.
All these conspiracies are debunked over and over again. But they don't care. It's very sad group of people.

Richard, you are gonna answer me, right?

One of the biggest mistakes I see is that when you hear them talk to the guys in the lander which is almost touching down there's not a sound from the roaring rocket engine just beneath them.. and in later interviews the astronauts mention that the noise from the very same engine was very very loud..

Yup, you solved it. Every moon landing must've been a hoax.

The funny thing is that you don't even question it.. everything daddy tells you must be true, no need to think for yourself..

Going to bed :pimp

The typical truther answer. You forgot to add slave though.

Truly amazing how more and more people here turn out to be conspiracy idiots.

Richard is not going to answer my question. And we all know why. Because then he has to admit believing all 6 moon landings were faked. Including all the footage. Which even he realizes is insane. This would make him a crazy conspiracy idiot. So the best thing he can do is just ignore my questions.

Of course they were all faked, they can't even go there now even after decades of exponential technological advance

http://global3.memecdn.com/cant-thin...e_o_180839.jpg

Arguing with a conspiracy theory nutjob is like throwing rocks at the moon. :smiling_b

ADG

actually i was driving home from work

that's a whole lotta messages

Do i believe the moon landings were faked? I believe it is possible.

Do i find trying to discuss it extremely hilarious?

you bet your ass.

calm down...

You "believe it's possible".
That's odd. Earlier in the thread you made it clear going to the moon is impossible:


What's the problem Richard? Why do you simply refuse to say what you really believe in? Just say it man. You believe all 6 moon landings were faked. All the footage was faked. Everybody who read this thread has come to that conclusion by now so you can stop hiding the fact that you are just another conspiracy theorist.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

all serious aside Franck.. all serious aside :1orglaugh

Was Gilligan really on a island in the pacific or was he in a movie set in Hollywood?
Conspiracy nutters say he was just an actor:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Why would they fake it?

Gilligans car left no tracks! Must have been faked:mad:
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/9419/picture8pnc.png

BEST.
ADVICE.
EVER.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

What is wrong with you people? Yes. you.

My point about the in the article it talks about the amount of time spent within the van allen belts. Today's satellites have problems because they spend months and years within the radiation, rather then just a few hours, as in the case of the moon shots.

Also, in many ways, the simple mechanical gauges, valves, and verniers that made up the computers in those moon shots were much more robust in their resistance to radiation than today's electronics. They didn't have much in the way of micro processors, or RAM or hard drives.



.:2 cents:



.

look i'm am fly and i almost land on the moon :1orglaugh

definitely, it's just interesting how this conspiracy theory gets looped into 'radiation' sickness. Its also interesting how fanatical people get about simple discussion on the topic. There is obviously three parties regarding these landings, and those parties became rather defined when the Europeans found all the water

The other thought about this theory is the fact the Van Allen Belt is a shield for radiation, solar flares etc one of the Russian attempts had all the astronauts coming back black lol

Talked about wash out effect in the last thread on this cross hair thing.

"I want to believe" should be "I want to believe only the things that I want to believe."

that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7s4_4pm95K...Explorer_1.jpg

and his belt hasn't affected the camera film at all.:winkwink:

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Conspiracy theory looks like a weatherbaloon to me.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-tZKZ5tVcPK...er+balloon.gif

You're alive Dyna Mo :thumbsup

now I understand why some people are the way they are by reading this thread haha. They are just that fucking stupid, I get it now