GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Evidence of Aliens on the Moon (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1092653)

Mutt 12-13-2012 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wehateporn (Post 19368614)
No logical explanation given, the conspiracy theory is far more logical :2 cents:

LOL the conspiracy theory only seems more logical to wackjobs - amazing how the conspiracy theory is never more logical to people who actually have years of specialized education and have become leading authorities in their fields.

And if the moon landing were faked why didn't we hear it from the leading scientists in the Soviet space program? The Soviets were in on the conspiracy? Hmmm........... could it be the entire Cold War was actually a ruse masterminded by Jewish bankers who have always played both ends against the middle!?!?!



1. In some photos, crosshairs seem to be behind objects. The cameras were fitted with a reseau plate (a clear glass plate with crosshairs etched on), making it impossible for any photographed object to appear "in front" of the grid. This suggests that objects have been "pasted" over them.

This only appears in copied and scanned photos, not the originals. It is caused by overexposure: the bright white areas of the emulsion "bleed" over the thin black crosshairs. The crosshairs are only about 0.004 inch thick (0.1 mm) and emulsion would only have to bleed about half that much to fully obscure it. Furthermore, there are many photos where the middle of the crosshair is "washed-out" but the rest is intact. In some photos of the American flag, parts of one crosshair appear on the red stripes, but parts of the same crosshair are faded or invisible on the white stripes. There would have been no reason to "paste" white stripes onto the flag.[60

Dirty F 12-13-2012 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mutt (Post 19368696)
LOL the conspiracy theory only seems more logical to wackjobs - amazing how the conspiracy theory is never more logical to people who actually have years of specialized education and have become leading authorities in their fields.

And if the moon landing were faked why didn't we hear it from the leading scientists in the Soviet space program? The Soviets were in on the conspiracy? Hmmm........... could it be the entire Cold War was actually a ruse masterminded by Jewish bankers who have always played both ends against the middle!?!?!



1. In some photos, crosshairs seem to be behind objects. The cameras were fitted with a reseau plate (a clear glass plate with crosshairs etched on), making it impossible for any photographed object to appear "in front" of the grid. This suggests that objects have been "pasted" over them.

This only appears in copied and scanned photos, not the originals. It is caused by overexposure: the bright white areas of the emulsion "bleed" over the thin black crosshairs. The crosshairs are only about 0.004 inch thick (0.1 mm) and emulsion would only have to bleed about half that much to fully obscure it. Furthermore, there are many photos where the middle of the crosshair is "washed-out" but the rest is intact. In some photos of the American flag, parts of one crosshair appear on the red stripes, but parts of the same crosshair are faded or invisible on the white stripes. There would have been no reason to "paste" white stripes onto the flag.[60

The retard will ignore facts like this. It doesn't fit his believe.
All these conspiracies are debunked over and over again. But they don't care. It's very sad group of people.

Dirty F 12-13-2012 05:52 PM

Richard, you are gonna answer me, right?

biskoppen 12-13-2012 05:59 PM

One of the biggest mistakes I see is that when you hear them talk to the guys in the lander which is almost touching down there's not a sound from the roaring rocket engine just beneath them.. and in later interviews the astronauts mention that the noise from the very same engine was very very loud..

Dirty F 12-13-2012 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biskoppen (Post 19368724)
One of the biggest mistakes I see is that when you hear them talk to the guys in the lander which is almost touching down there's not a sound from the roaring rocket engine just beneath them.. and in later interviews the astronauts mention that the noise from the very same engine was very very loud..

Yup, you solved it. Every moon landing must've been a hoax.

biskoppen 12-13-2012 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19368732)
Yup, you solved it. Every moon landing must've been a hoax.

The funny thing is that you don't even question it.. everything daddy tells you must be true, no need to think for yourself..

Going to bed :pimp

Dirty F 12-13-2012 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biskoppen (Post 19368742)
The funny thing is that you don't even question it.. everything daddy tells you must be true, no need to think for yourself..

Going to bed :pimp

The typical truther answer. You forgot to add slave though.

Dirty F 12-13-2012 06:20 PM

Truly amazing how more and more people here turn out to be conspiracy idiots.

Dirty F 12-13-2012 06:29 PM

Richard is not going to answer my question. And we all know why. Because then he has to admit believing all 6 moon landings were faked. Including all the footage. Which even he realizes is insane. This would make him a crazy conspiracy idiot. So the best thing he can do is just ignore my questions.

wehateporn 12-13-2012 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19368465)
Facts, lets ignore them. As any conspiracy nutter does. Who needs facts. Believing in retarded conspiracies is way more fun, right?


wehateporn 12-13-2012 06:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19368755)
Richard is not going to answer my question. And we all know why. Because then he has to admit believing all 6 moon landings were faked. Including all the footage. Which even he realizes is insane. This would make him a crazy conspiracy idiot. So the best thing he can do is just ignore my questions.

Of course they were all faked, they can't even go there now even after decades of exponential technological advance

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 12-13-2012 06:49 PM

http://global3.memecdn.com/cant-thin...e_o_180839.jpg

Arguing with a conspiracy theory nutjob is like throwing rocks at the moon. :smiling_b

ADG

_Richard_ 12-13-2012 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19368755)
Richard is not going to answer my question. And we all know why. Because then he has to admit believing all 6 moon landings were faked. Including all the footage. Which even he realizes is insane. This would make him a crazy conspiracy idiot. So the best thing he can do is just ignore my questions.

actually i was driving home from work

that's a whole lotta messages

Do i believe the moon landings were faked? I believe it is possible.

Do i find trying to discuss it extremely hilarious?

you bet your ass.

travs 12-13-2012 08:20 PM

calm down...

Dirty F 12-13-2012 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19368815)
actually i was driving home from work

that's a whole lotta messages

Do i believe the moon landings were faked? I believe it is possible.

Do i find trying to discuss it extremely hilarious?

you bet your ass.

You "believe it's possible".
That's odd. Earlier in the thread you made it clear going to the moon is impossible:


Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19366653)
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

all serious aside, for any confusion on moon landings all one has to do is look at the Soviets failure to get through the Van Allen Belt

What's the problem Richard? Why do you simply refuse to say what you really believe in? Just say it man. You believe all 6 moon landings were faked. All the footage was faked. Everybody who read this thread has come to that conclusion by now so you can stop hiding the fact that you are just another conspiracy theorist.

_Richard_ 12-13-2012 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19368905)
You "believe it's possible".
That's odd. Earlier in the thread you made it clear going to the moon is impossible:




What's the problem Richard? Why do you simply refuse to say what you really believe in? Just say it man. You believe all 6 moon landings were faked. All the footage was faked. Everybody who read this thread has come to that conclusion by now so you can stop hiding the fact that you are just another conspiracy theorist.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

all serious aside Franck.. all serious aside :1orglaugh

DBS.US 12-13-2012 11:53 PM

Was Gilligan really on a island in the pacific or was he in a movie set in Hollywood?
Conspiracy nutters say he was just an actor:1orglaugh:1orglaugh Why would they fake it?

Gilligans car left no tracks! Must have been faked:mad:
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/9419/picture8pnc.png

2MuchMark 12-13-2012 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19368150)
No, he's just expressing the anger that such stupidity can bring about. That van allen bullshit has been debunked 100 times over, lay off the bong hits and get back to the fuckin books...

BEST.
ADVICE.
EVER.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

Jakke PNG 12-14-2012 12:02 AM

What is wrong with you people? Yes. you.

just a punk 12-14-2012 04:28 AM

http://www.deviantart.com/download/1...breadzilla.jpg

sperbonzo 12-14-2012 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_ (Post 19368407)
from what i read it was the protons/electrons being extremely oversized that wreaked a great deal of havoc on computer systems and the like

if our technology today can't seem to manage this, how was brand new technology 40 years ago no problem?

not so cut and dry, eh?

My point about the in the article it talks about the amount of time spent within the van allen belts. Today's satellites have problems because they spend months and years within the radiation, rather then just a few hours, as in the case of the moon shots.

Also, in many ways, the simple mechanical gauges, valves, and verniers that made up the computers in those moon shots were much more robust in their resistance to radiation than today's electronics. They didn't have much in the way of micro processors, or RAM or hard drives.



.:2 cents:



.

ZeroHero 12-14-2012 08:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CamBoss (Post 19366684)

look i'm am fly and i almost land on the moon :1orglaugh

_Richard_ 12-14-2012 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 19369537)
My point about the in the article it talks about the amount of time spent within the van allen belts. Today's satellites have problems because they spend months and years within the radiation, rather then just a few hours, as in the case of the moon shots.

Also, in many ways, the simple mechanical gauges, valves, and verniers that made up the computers in those moon shots were much more robust in their resistance to radiation than today's electronics. They didn't have much in the way of micro processors, or RAM or hard drives.



.:2 cents:



.

definitely, it's just interesting how this conspiracy theory gets looped into 'radiation' sickness. Its also interesting how fanatical people get about simple discussion on the topic. There is obviously three parties regarding these landings, and those parties became rather defined when the Europeans found all the water

The other thought about this theory is the fact the Van Allen Belt is a shield for radiation, solar flares etc one of the Russian attempts had all the astronauts coming back black lol

Tom_PM 12-14-2012 08:58 AM

Talked about wash out effect in the last thread on this cross hair thing.

"I want to believe" should be "I want to believe only the things that I want to believe."

dyna mo 12-14-2012 10:36 AM

that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7s4_4pm95K...Explorer_1.jpg

DBS.US 12-14-2012 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19369750)
that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7s4_4pm95K...Explorer_1.jpg

and his belt hasn't affected the camera film at all.:winkwink:

_Richard_ 12-14-2012 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19369750)
that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7s4_4pm95K...Explorer_1.jpg

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Frank21 12-14-2012 10:41 AM

Conspiracy theory looks like a weatherbaloon to me.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-tZKZ5tVcPK...er+balloon.gif

wehateporn 12-14-2012 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 19369750)
that's james van allen in the center, clearly his belt is not causing issue with the rocket.

You're alive Dyna Mo :thumbsup

Penny24Seven 12-14-2012 10:48 AM

now I understand why some people are the way they are by reading this thread haha. They are just that fucking stupid, I get it now

Dirty F 12-14-2012 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frank21 (Post 19369761)
Conspiracy theory looks like a weatherbaloon to me.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-tZKZ5tVcPK...er+balloon.gif

Where do all you idiots come from? I never seen you before and suddenly you are in every conspiracy post talking complete fucking shit.
Did i miss the memo or something? Why is gfy attracting so many of you idiots lately?
And why do you imbeciles insist on posting here? Can't you just piss off to the Icke forums?

Frank21 12-14-2012 11:19 AM

http://i50.photobucket.com/albums/f305/Flatu/awww.gif
http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w...u-mad-bro-.jpg

Dirty F 12-14-2012 11:29 AM

No, i just think you are goddamn fucking imbecile and wish you morons would fuck off.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123