webmasters have no standards anymore - GoFuckYourself.com

MetaformX · 02-17-2003, 10:25 PM

I see it everyday on this board...Someone posts a picture of a girl with skanky hair and bad teeth and ugly face, and just because she is naked, everyone sais she is fine.

I think that people's standards go to hell once you look at porn for a long time.

UnseenWorld · 02-17-2003, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX
I see it everyday on this board...Someone posts a picture of a girl with skanky hair and bad teeth and ugly face, and just because she is naked, everyone sais she is fine.

I think that people's standards go to hell once you look at porn for a long time.

Hmm. I have found the opposite as well: Put up a girl that you know 90% of these guys would walk on glowing coals for the privilege of chewing on her undies, and they will pretend that she's the ugliest skag they've ever seen.

They just enjoy getting other people riled up by stating and then defending the opposite of the truth.

Kris · 02-17-2003, 10:28 PM

i agree with meta... i see so many fucking dogs that ppl here say are incredible. it's about time someone said something.. way to go meta!

Zorgman · 02-17-2003, 10:29 PM

2 holes and a heartbeat is all that is needed for some.

MetaformX · 02-17-2003, 10:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by UnseenWorld

Hmm. I have found the opposite as well: Put up a girl that you know 90% of these guys would walk on glowing coals for the privilege of chewing on her undies, and they will pretend that she's the ugliest skag they've ever seen.

They just enjoy getting other people riled up by stating and then defending the opposite of the truth.

perhaps. I guess al0ot depends on who is posting the picture, but from my experience, usually it's ugly girls who everyone thinks they are fine.

Either way though, is prolonged exposure to porn clouding our judgments?

Lethal · 02-17-2003, 10:30 PM

Unseen World: all of your bitches are skank.

Zorgman: who needs a heartbeat?

Zorgman · 02-17-2003, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Lethal
Zorgman: who needs a heartbeat?

Whatever gets you off I guess. You sick bastard.. MaHahahahah

Pipecrew · 02-17-2003, 10:47 PM

I agree with meta... I wonder if you are going to get attacked again for saying this

G Sharp · 02-17-2003, 10:50 PM

Some questions:

Do all traffic sources subscribe to the same "standard" of beauty?

Is there a difference between "amateur" beauty and Mac & Bumble type beauty? Will this difference translate to differing traffic pools/ sources?

Do some traffic pools equate young age [18 to 21] with beauty? As the model gets older, does the standard become more stringent?

jim manly · 02-17-2003, 10:50 PM

Did this post from Dugmor make you finally say this?
How cute is this girl?

MetaformX · 02-17-2003, 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Kris
i agree with meta... i see so many fucking dogs that ppl here say are incredible. it's about time someone said something.. way to go meta!

hehe, thank you Kris
This is a epidemic in the webmaster community, and I am worried about the well being of everyone

MetaformX · 02-17-2003, 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Pipecrew
I agree with meta... I wonder if you are going to get attacked again for saying this

heh, I have taken the neccesary percautions, such as wearing protective head gear and knee pads(knee pads are for the BJ's after)

MetaformX · 02-17-2003, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jim manly
Did this post from Dugmor make you finally say this?
How cute is this girl?

Funny you say that, because yes, that is the post that inspired it. Nothing against dugmore and the boys ofcourse.

Just that chick has the ugliest face....and everyone is saying how cute she is.
I'll quote john stossel...Gimme a break!

p00p · 02-17-2003, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX
I see it everyday on this board...Someone posts a picture of a girl with skanky hair and bad teeth and ugly face, and just because she is naked, everyone sais she is fine.

I think that people's standards go to hell once you look at porn for a long time.

Surfers standards do, too. There are a lot of 'ugly' women on the net making bank big time. And lot of perfect 10's making nada, nothing, zilch.

G Sharp · 02-17-2003, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by p00p

Surfers standards do, too. There are a lot of 'ugly' women on the net making bank big time. And lot of perfect 10's making nada, nothing, zilch.

Thank You! Key is--it totally depends on your traffic. Its really hard converting a traffic pool used to "Perfect 10" content with "Hood Ratz" pics...and vice versea

badmunchkin · 02-17-2003, 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX

Funny you say that, because yes, that is the post that inspired it. Nothing against dugmore and the boys ofcourse.

Just that chick has the ugliest face....and everyone is saying how cute she is.
I'll quote john stossel...Gimme a break!

I think people were being a bit generous because the girl was right there viewing all the responses. I know this is gfy but there's no reason to be an a-hole & insult a girl to her face. She wasn't a supermodel, but she wasn't Mimi from Drew Carey or anything. She was cute enough & with some well-applied makeup she could look very doable. A lot of the online audience I think prefers seeing obtainable "real" girls now over glossed over supermodels IMO. There is a market for it, there's tons of amateur sites making serious cash doing this.

chodadog · 02-17-2003, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX
Just that chick has the ugliest face....and everyone is saying how cute she is.
I'll quote john stossel...Gimme a break!

I can see how some guys would go for her, but damn, not doing anything for me. And i was quite surprised by the overwhelming "yes, she is cute" response.

Gman.357 · 02-17-2003, 11:11 PM

It's all a matter of opinion. Personally, I'd take the average "girl next door" look over a fake, cookie-cut supermodel poser any day.

Perfect chicks bore me.

drunkdollars · 02-17-2003, 11:35 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Zorgman
2 holes and a heartbeat is all that is needed for some.

That would be gay no?
Girls have 2 holes I always thought

FlyingIguana · 02-17-2003, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX
I see it everyday on this board...Someone posts a picture of a girl with skanky hair and bad teeth and ugly face, and just because she is naked, everyone sais she is fine.

I think that people's standards go to hell once you look at porn for a long time.

please, you'd hit it too

MetaformX · 02-17-2003, 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by FlyingIguana

please, you'd hit it too

haha
hell no. Im sure she has a wonderfull personality and all...but I dunno

smut4all · 02-18-2003, 12:04 AM

Come on guys be nice, not every girl is going to look like a supermodel, that's why a lot of people like the girl next door type of a look or an amateur look. She's not ugly... I don't think she's hot but depending on what her niche is going to be for her site, she has potential to make some money. Good luck to her

MetaformX · 02-18-2003, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by smut4all
Come on guys be nice, not every girl is going to look like a supermodel, that's why a lot of people like the girl next door type of a look or an amateur look. She's not ugly... I don't think she's hot but depending on what her niche is going to be for her site, she has potential to make some money. Good luck to her

okay, maybe some clarification is needed.
I am not saying she has no business being in this biz...there prolly will be a niche for her and im sure she will do ok...

I am not singling her out by any means, if it's not her, its some other girl tomorow that will be average and everyone will fall in love with. Either everyone is just being nice for the sake of not offending anyone by saying she is 'hot' or they really think she is hot, which would mean peoples standards have changed for the worst

SleazyDream · 02-18-2003, 12:10 AM

since when did meta have standards?

smut4all · 02-18-2003, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MetaformX

okay, maybe some clarification is needed.
I am not saying she has no business being in this biz...there prolly will be a niche for her and im sure she will do ok...

I am not singling her out by any means, if it's not her, its some other girl tomorow that will be average and everyone will fall in love with. Either everyone is just being nice for the sake of not offending anyone by saying she is 'hot' or they really think she is hot, which would mean peoples standards have changed for the worst

agreed

MetaformX · 02-18-2003, 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by SleazyDream
since when did meta have standards?

I use to have standards...it is slipping though on a daily basis. I can just feel it.

02-17-2003, 10:25 PM	#1
MetaformX Confirmed User Join Date: Mar 2002 Posts: 6,704	webmasters have no standards anymore I see it everyday on this board...Someone posts a picture of a girl with skanky hair and bad teeth and ugly face, and just because she is naked, everyone sais she is fine. I think that people's standards go to hell once you look at porn for a long time. __________________

02-17-2003, 10:28 PM	#3
Kris Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2002 Posts: 940	i agree with meta... i see so many fucking dogs that ppl here say are incredible. it's about time someone said something.. way to go meta! __________________ I am the walrus.

02-17-2003, 10:29 PM	#4
Zorgman Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 6,103	2 holes and a heartbeat is all that is needed for some. __________________ ---

02-17-2003, 11:11 PM	#18
Gman.357 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: USA Posts: 2,796	It's all a matter of opinion. Personally, I'd take the average "girl next door" look over a fake, cookie-cut supermodel poser any day. Perfect chicks bore me. __________________ Ouch.

02-18-2003, 12:04 AM	#22
smut4all Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 583	Come on guys be nice, not every girl is going to look like a supermodel, that's why a lot of people like the girl next door type of a look or an amateur look. She's not ugly... I don't think she's hot but depending on what her niche is going to be for her site, she has potential to make some money. Good luck to her __________________ Party Poker $25 Free with your first deposit

02-17-2003, 10:30 PM	#6
Lethal Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 494	Unseen World: all of your bitches are skank. Zorgman: who needs a heartbeat?

02-17-2003, 10:47 PM	#8
Pipecrew Master of Gfy.com Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 14,887	I agree with meta... I wonder if you are going to get attacked again for saying this

02-17-2003, 10:50 PM	#9
G Sharp So Fucking Banned Join Date: May 2002 Posts: 1,343	Some questions: Do all traffic sources subscribe to the same "standard" of beauty? Is there a difference between "amateur" beauty and Mac & Bumble type beauty? Will this difference translate to differing traffic pools/ sources? Do some traffic pools equate young age [18 to 21] with beauty? As the model gets older, does the standard become more stringent?

02-17-2003, 10:50 PM	#10
jim manly Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Tacoma, WA Posts: 605	Did this post from Dugmor make you finally say this? How cute is this girl?

02-18-2003, 12:10 AM	#24
SleazyDream I'm here for SPORT Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Phone # (401) 285-0696 Posts: 41,470	since when did meta have standards? __________________ This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog! Now read without the word dog.