This makes perfect sense as someone else posted above, philly is almost 100% democrat, did you every watch the wire where carcetti only has to win the democratic primary? It is the same thing for real in Philly, no one votes in the general mayoral election, the only election is the democratic primary. Philly is about 85% Black with the remaining being spanish, arabs, indians etc. The only white people in this city are in the gayborhood in the center of center city and they are obviously for the most part 100% democrats as well, the only other white people are the jews in rittenhouse square and also 100% very liberal and democratic with the exception of conservative views on Israel. So the fact that Mittens didn't get even 1 vote is not at all surprising lol.

I, too, am filled with impotent rage at the perceived loss of my white privilege.

What? What city are you talking about, Philadelphia, Mississipppi? Pt. Richmond is white, Fishtown is white, South Philly is largely white, a shitload of neighborhoods in the Northeast are white, Manayunk and Roxborough are largely white, parts of Kensington are white, University city is partially white. In the entire city, Obama got 85 percent of the vote. There's 1,687 voting divisions. In 59 of those (or 3.5%) Romney got 0 votes. So this is not some inconceivable statistic - they were minority neighborhoods. In South Philly the president only garnered 52.3 percent of the vote, compared to 46.6 percent for Romney.

Tonight I cling tightly to my guns and bible... for tomorrow secession is at hand! To the online petitions, gentlemen!

Romney is Rockefeller, Obama is Rothschild. Keep in mind that Rockefeller answers to Rothschild. Romney was also representing the interests of a number of other American based Billionaires, less significant than Rockefeller.

Rockefeller and Rothschild would have already agreed the outcome in advance, that is why the voter fraud is needed, as they already have the new president decided well in advance. Sometimes the voter fraud doesn't quite work out, like with Bush/Gore, Bush was lined up to be in the throne for the 9/11 False Flag, but the voter fraud didn't quite do it's job. The 2000 election was a great chance to see what happens when the smoke and mirrors are switched off. The people do not decide anymore, those days are long gone. All that matters is that you think you decide.

:thumbsup:thumbsup

Odd how this moron buzzard shows up out of nowhere and posts his bullshit in every conspiracy thread lately.

I don't know why but gfy attracts so many nutters lately...
There isn't a single day where there is no conspiracy thread on the frontpage.

some funny lines there man.

---

whine whine whine, all they ever do is fucking whine.

what a bunch of limp dick couch warriors. boo hoo hoo.

heads up their asses too much to run a decent campaign, and now they cry.

In our lifetimes we will never see even a half-hearted attempt by any state to secede from the Union. This is just a bunch a whining nut-jobs cooking up bogus petitions, mostly using fake names and emails - how this stuff even makes the news is beyond me.

Clairly biased article.

Intertionally, there is a lot of talk about voter supression in the US. There have been a few documentaries about it that aired in Canada before the elections.

All of them were talking about the republican party voter supression schemes.

Get your head out of your ass.

his lies are exactly the same as that other psychopaths so either the same guy or he got his whack job board buddy to buy an old account from someone to sound legit. In turn developed their own conspiracy to spread their own psychosis. Either that or its just him talking to himself--which most of us wouldn't be too surprised.

He sounds extra desperate lately. Maybe the end is near for him alone?

If you believe that's statistically possible, you need to go back to school... or finish school, or start school, or sue the school district/state that failed you so badly.

Didn't Romneys son own the company who makes the counting machines?
IF so, this does even more to make these claims look foolish.

I have been finding it interesting that in St Lucie county here in Florida, 145% of the voters voted.



Now that's some enthusiastic turn-out right there!





LOLOLOLOL!!!




.

Oh my!


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

I believe everything I read on the internet.

I got about 6 of them before I couldn't even fathom it being true.

The one about the vote machine changing from Romney to Obama, pretty sure the video showed the exact opposite.

What do you mean, a lot of them aren't even facts just hearsay.

People in Ohio were shocked to learn that election day they had already voted.

That's not a fact of any kind...

Everything his master David Icke tells him is a fact to this guy.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh
Oh My Gawd that is funny as hell! :thumbsup

Really? That's your argument? Please tell me which esteemed institute of higher learning you acquired your intelligent and articulate debating skills at.

So in a city with over 1 million voters, 85% of which are registered Democrats, it is inconceivable to you that 19,605 of them voted for President Obama? That's statistically impossible? Amazing. I really don't know what to say other than that denial ain't just a river in Egypt.

You might also find it interesting that every right-wing news outlet that ran that story has since printed a retraction. And also that the St. Lucie County supervisor of elections has clarified the results right on their website.

From the St. Lucie County supervisor of elections:
That is, if you were interested in the truth. But then again, you are a self-proclaimed Libertarian and free-market capitalist who likes to pretend that profit is the sole metric for building a just and inclusive society, so it's understandable that you've grown accustomed to dealing in fantasy.

Huh? Who said 19,605 couldn't have voted for Obama?

Ending up with 19,605 Obama vs. 0 Romney is so highly improbable, that it is not even worth doing the math to demonstrate. It wouldn't happen if the same election was repeated millions of times.

And i'm not defending or attacking either. I couldn't fucking care less who finally drives the USA off the cliff its headed towards. I was simply commenting on the math and seemingly obvious fact that its nearly impossible to have 19,605 votes for one candidate and 0 for the other.

My girlfriend's parents were some of those who were shocked to learn on election day that they had already voted in Ohio. They forgot that we all went down to the Board of Elections and voted early!

And how exactly do you apply mathematical statistics to voter tendencies? Please demonstrate the mathematical equation that shows us which candidate a voter casts a ballot for. I'd love to see this. Again, if you can't understand that there are countless voting divisions in Philadelphia which are exclusively black and entirely politically homogeneous in voting Democrat, I don't know what to tell you.

Yeah,... "exclusively black". That's it.

Are you implying that people are voting based solely on race? I.e. blacks vote only for blacks with no other possible outcomes? Or that there are no black Republicans in the State? Which is it?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

You sure are enlightened!

Probably by a website that any bat shit crazy sitting at home on disability with nothing to do can put up.

Seems they re-elected all the other Republicans... and according to the OP, no one voted for Romney. Get it now? Or do you still think you can flip a 2 sided coin, where one side has a marginal advantage 19,000+ times and have only one outcome, 100% of the time?

This is basic stuff, if this is too much for you to handle then you'll be best off staying in your safe bubble :thumbsup

IIRC about 90% of the black vote went towards Obama. A lot, for sure, but if you apply that as an average, then for every 10 black voters, you would expect 1 Romney vote. So if you take for instance a district or whatever of 19,605 voters, you'd expect about 1,960 Romney votes, not 0. In fact, let's say this is a ridiculously pro-Obama district where it's 99%. You'd still expect 196 votes for Romney. To the contrary would be a probability of .99 to the 19,605th power. If you want to get a calculator and put in .99 x .99 x .99 x .99...19,605 times, you'll see how statistically ridiculous that would be.

That said, the story could be full of shit, and/or a legitimate mistake happened, and/or it was fraud but both sides were doing it. Any of those to me seems a lot more likely than Obama stole the election and Romney was some kind of angel throughout the whole process.

What have you done with this knowledge you possess? Nothing.

the us is not a democracy..

You're changing the subject. We're not talking about the state of Pennsylvania or black Republicans. We're talking about the city of Philadelphia; more specifically, the 59 voter divisions - which only make up 3.5% of the total - in that city that voted exclusively Democrat. I don't find it surprising at all that black Democrats would vote for a black Democratic presidential candidate.

What other Republican Representatives were elected in Philadelphia County? Oh, right - none. And you can't compare human behavior to flipping a coin.

Nationally, Obama got 93% of the black vote. So it's not entirely impossible that there are a handful of black voter districts that he won 100%. Improbable? Maybe. Impossible? No.

Oh, no? What is it then, a Plutocracy?

are you not american?

ohhhh Glennnn.. you're so much very observant. I should make you my External Authority from now on...

move on guys

WTF :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

If Republican values and ideas were rejected (which is more likely why they lost) and there's a shift to more liberal thinking, then some people are going to cry about that being the beginning of the end. It's actually progress to have those nutbags shut down for a while until they can get on the same page with people who live in reality.

What does the right stand for that has any value to regular folk? They appear to hate women, immigrants, government aid(not handouts). The only thing they seem to care about is business, business, business, bootstraps yada yada. They can keep trumpeting that bullshit for the next four years, and watch what it'll get them. It'll be the first woman in the White House next.

I saw a video of the Republican governors, and they were sitting around trying to figure out why they lost, and coming up with ideas for new strategies. It was a bunch of old, fat white men which tells you a lot right of the bat -- but there was no self-blame for their crappy message. They're oblivious to the fact that they're a bunch of old white assholes, and we're going to be better off when they start dying off in a couple of years. Good riddance.

It's all fun and games until YOUR foodstamps stop coming. Just keep that in mind. It's not the Obama voters and supporters that are paying for them.

Here is what simpletons refuse to grasp. The "right this...", "the left that..". The pendulum will swing from left to right forever. Each side making the same whining complaints and each side doing all the same simplistic finger pointing and laying blame where it doesn't belong. It's the whole "left vs right" thinking that allows both to be totally and completely ineffectual and have an eternal excuse for failure.

Your simplistic distillation of the views of 1/2 of the population of a nation perfectly exemplifies that. "they hate...", "they this",... "they the other thing",... "they they they they they...". "They are so terrible", yet "they" will spend the same amount of time in the White House over time as those you support. It's a funny way to see the world. It makes no sense and the logic is wrought with such obvious flaws. Interestingly, you've boxed yourself in with such twisted reasoning and the only way you can reconcile the obvious flaws in this thinking (namely, relying heavily the idea that 1/2 of a countries population must be crazy, hateful and mean), since they don't agree with you and you can't make sense of it. Such denial and arrogance.

Are you saying Obama learned from the Bush's? As I remember they invented voter fraud.

I don't think the country needs to be democratic. Common sense appeals to me, and the Republicans don't seem to have any of it these days -- and I've been mostly conservative my entire life. Ultimately, a good balance of both ideas are needed to get things right, but not when one side seems like unstable lunatics. And I know there's some common sense voices in the Republican party, but they'll be drowned out and shut down by the rest of their party. I just think overall their values suck...and they've displayed their message as being what I characterized it as.

it's the major corporations whom keep investments offshore, at the expense of the very country they live in?

Them and all the individuals and small businesses that make $250,000 annually.

Yeah, and - what's your point?

Please, buddy, to speed up the trend with which the conservative movement in America continues to marginalize itself, I ask that you maintain your allegiance to the Republican Party and that you speak forcefully about what you feel in the language that comes so naturally to you. I urge you to do this on every possible forum and message board, and certainly, at key points in the electoral cycles going forward.

Please, continue to speak your mind and encourage your candidates to speak as you do.


For the well being of the nation and for the possibility of a real American future, it is the least you can do.

If you aren't American and aren't paying any share, your opinion has no merit. It's always easy to spend someone elses money.

Learn what provisional ballots are and then get back to us.