Originally Posted by Brian837 (Post 19280462)

HA exactly, I was reading waiting for that by someone

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19280400)

i think you should spend more time being mad about what i say for fun on here
and less time working.

enjoy
i used to do it full time...im bored as fuck in china right now.
i put moon landing conspiracy into google and spout off whatever the first site says.

then...let franck go to work.


dont get caught up in the sideshow dude.

however...i do stand by my proclamation...they filmed some stuff on earth...because it is just easier....not all the film shot up on the moon was good enough to release.
btw...since this isnt an actual science forum...i am free to say such things without proof.

the board is called gofuckyourself..lol

i win...now im going to sleep:)

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19280468)

no.. you don't get credibility by saying: "go watch this random home made video from the internet." That isn't evidence, that isn't a sound argument and that's not how adults come to conclusions.

The only thing I don't have faith in is the future of society if people like yourself continue to confuse mindless drivel such as this as evidence for anything.

Originally Posted by devilspost (Post 19280655)

Did you watch the documentary I posted above?

The best evidence he showed is that it would have been impossible for the astronauts to move around inside and get in and out of the capsule with all their gear. Not to mention all the other dumb shit.

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19280468)

no.. you don't get credibility by saying: "go watch this random home made video from the internet." That isn't evidence, that isn't a sound argument and that's not how adults come to conclusions.

Originally Posted by devilspost (Post 19280426)

The set designers didn't think of it.

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 19280737)

I haven't seen the video, but presumably it's more than some guy saying "I don't think we got to the moon", but rather someone looking at available evidence and questioning it.

Of course, if it was, say, a Youtube video of the Mythbusters guys, with the help of NASA, actually demonstrating step by step that the Moon landings can be simulated on earth, while arguing that it really happened, that's different, right? Because they're saying what you want to believe.

Originally Posted by devilspost (Post 19280655)

Did you watch the documentary I posted above?

The best evidence he showed is that it would have been impossible for the astronauts to move around inside and get in and out of the capsule with all their gear. Not to mention all the other dumb shit.

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19280862)

That doesn't make sense. They didn't need to think of it. They wheeled the rover into the studio, it's sand, with gravity, and thus in the studio there would be tracks.

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19280905)

yeah, you are right, they figured out how to travel in space but overlooked the part where they exit the fucking capsule.. you cracked the case sherlock. We better tell 60 minutes so they can run the expose.

are the video dwellers available for comment on their earth shattering discovery?

Originally Posted by PR_Glen (Post 19280892)

did you really think i was going to come back here using fucking mythbusters as credible evidence? :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by PAR (Post 19280883)

Phoenix:
You mean the same area that NASA uses to test, film etc in AZ and has for years...
The one they are constantly showing testing on TV, Press and their own site..
You mean that 2 mile staging area... The same area they tested the MARs rover...

Cinder Lake - Black Point Lava Flow in Arizona

Because NASA has never staged or tested anything in AZ nor have they documented any of this testing because they would never have a testing and staging area...
We must now all bow down to Frank as their is no proof of NASA ever having a staging grounds in AZ...

And such an area would never be public knowledge
http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/anal...s/archive.html

Originally Posted by devilspost (Post 19280929)

They could have wheeled it on set, then raked out the sand later. Because some dummy didn't think about how it would not make sense. If you have ever been on a set you know shit happens :1orglaugh

Originally Posted by DBS.US (Post 19281207)

The mission was real but the rocks where fake?
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/worl...ake-22067.html

Originally Posted by helterskelter808 (Post 19278941)

If the rover is light enough, and it would presumably be lighter on the moon than on earth, it could have been picked up and moved by the astronauts themselves. After all, even if it was faked on earth, there'd be marks where it was pushed on to the set. What would be the point in covering them up?

Anyway here's an example LRO image showing the rover was capable of leaving track marks still visible to this day (if you believe it):

http://i.imgur.com/pE85l.jpg

Originally Posted by PAR (Post 19280883)

Phoenix:
You mean the same area that NASA uses to test, film etc in AZ and has for years...
The one they are constantly showing testing on TV, Press and their own site..
You mean that 2 mile staging area... The same area they tested the MARs rover...

Cinder Lake - Black Point Lava Flow in Arizona

Because NASA has never staged or tested anything in AZ nor have they documented any of this testing because they would never have a testing and staging area...
We must now all bow down to Frank as their is no proof of NASA ever having a staging grounds in AZ...

And such an area would never be public knowledge
http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/anal...s/archive.html

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19281499)

ha...thanks man...but as you know im only in this thread to fuck around.

mission accomplished

Originally Posted by VenusBlogger (Post 19279681)

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19281523)

I noticed how you have this same excuse for quite a while now. And it's total bullshit.
You are just another dumb fucking conspiracy theorist who always shows up in threads like this to give your imbecile 2 cents. Adding a quick disclaimer that you are just fucking around won't fool anybody, believe me.

The nonsense posted in this thread once again shows what a retarded group of losers conspiracy nutters are. And ofcourse as always not proof whatsoever. This is the one thing that will never change in these threads.

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19281531)

I like how #2 destroys the credibility of #3.

Puriodd.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19281532)

frank people who actually know me, know im fucking around.
i have met you once....you were sleeping on the floor of someones room, juicys i believe, i came in, saw what you looked like, enjoyed a chuckle and left.

happy to avoid you...as you have nothing of value to add to anything.

i feel sorry for you actually...because i think this is the most attention you get in life
here on this board.

enjoy it man..soak it in.

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19281549)

Was that before or after the dinner you invited me to?

Full of shit, as always.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19281542)

i dont follow you?

what does his point #2 have to do with point #3??

Originally Posted by Sly (Post 19281571)

If Hollywood was used to fake a moon landing, why should they be believed when they blame Bush for one of the biggest terrorist attacks ever?

#2 They are liars.

#3 They are truth speakers.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19281532)

i feel sorry for you actually...because i think this is the most attention you get in life
here on this board.

Originally Posted by SilentKnight (Post 19281598)

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

:2 cents:

Astute observation - and probably very, very close to the mark. :thumbsup

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19281578)

now....to be clear....i don't believe this, however there is a rumour that Stanley Kubrick
was in on the filming

Originally Posted by candyflip (Post 18305028)

My friends are writing a screenplay about Stanley Kubrick and the rumor that he directed the fake moon landing.

There is some interesting info to support the theory, but the movie will be entirely fictional.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 18305149)

he 100% shot the film...the reasons behind it are unclear though

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19281611)

Jesus christ! You're so full of shit it's almost dripping out of my screen.

What did i just tell you? Skip the disclaimers because nobody believes you. It just makes you look like a bigger nutjob.





Fucking loser.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 19281578)

now....to be clear....i don't believe this, however there is a rumour that Stanley Kubrick
was in on the filming

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 10218934)

the moon landing was kubrick....he filmed the whole thing...while i do believe they went there....they didnt get any footage as their cameras were not treated for space radiation..they wouldnto h ave had one piece of filme evidence.

I hope they went..or we are a truly pathetic species.


You of all people should understand the puppet strings going on in the governement...fuck explain how half the so called 9/11 terrorists are alive and well..hell one even works for an airline.

Originally Posted by Phoenix (Post 9381302)

i firmly believe we never went to the moon

we didnt even know about the radiation that would have killed the astronauts

suck it up...believe what the government tells you and do as you are told


stanley kubrick hid in his home for years fearing the us governement would kill him as he was the one that filmed the fake landings

Originally Posted by Dirty F (Post 19281623)

Now think hard before you reply, dumb nutter. Because i will make you look like the idiot you are over and over again. And it's so easy, i could do it in my sleep.