I hope you posted that as a joke of irony and not in seriousness. The last 3 Republican pres haven't even come close to balancing the budget, only a democrat has (Bill Clinton)
Not to mention ,, AAA credit rating are they fucking mad or just delusional? Is anyone actually stupid enough to not know that it was Republicans that held the budget hostage until our credit rating was lowered acting like a bunch of spoiled brats saying they wouldn't sign it.
Soon as the US credit rating was dropped they then signed it, costing every tax payer in this country money for higher interest rates and came out looking like a bunch of fucking jackasses.
Please tell you you aren't serious with that picture..
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
it has been entertaining watching the memes coming out of these debates and then trying to figure out who won and what went down
from what it seems like so far, romney won the first, the second was a close loss for romney, and whatever happened now seems like romney lost bad
Romney won the first, Obama might have won the second but it was close, and while I didn't watch all of the third it seems like Obama had a clear win, but I wouldn't say Romney lost bad in the third debate.
it has been entertaining watching the memes coming out of these debates and then trying to figure out who won and what went down
from what it seems like so far, romney won the first, the second was a close loss for romney, and whatever happened now seems like romney lost bad
The current president always has the upper hand when it comes to the foreign policy debate. The experience four years brings to the table is hard to beat.
Nobody is making their decision on foreign policy grounds...
Obama easily won the debate and Romney failed on several opportunities.
The first thing Romney *should have said* was 'Mr. President, four years ago Hillary and McCain tried to claim you had no experience in foreign policy. Do you honestly think you trying to claim the same thing about me now is somehow any less ridiculous than it was then when they said the same things about you?'
$2 gas, lmao. How about just promising to go back to 15 cent gas. Maybe people are just that dumb.
I thought it was great how he said many times Gas prices will go down etc.. Then last night he talked about more sanctions on Iran and specifically that Iranian Oil ships and Oil will be banned from the US...
Nobody is making their decision on foreign policy grounds...
Obama easily won the debate and Romney failed on several opportunities.
The first thing Romney *should have said* was 'Mr. President, four years ago Hillary and McCain tried to claim you had no experience in foreign policy. Do you honestly think you trying to claim the same thing about me now is somehow any less ridiculous than it was then when they said the same things about you?'
I think you are wrong on that matter. I know for one as I said in some other topic here, I made my choice biased mainly on foreign policy in the last election. In fact that was one of the major reasons Obama won the election, is because he promised to get us out of Iraq and refocus the war on terror.
In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
I thought it was great how he said many times Gas prices will go down etc.. Then last night he talked about more sanctions on Iran and specifically that Iranian Oil ships and Oil will be banned from the US...
How you going to drop those oil prices like that
Selective hearing I guess. Iran plays nice, gets sanctions removed, more gas available.
Originally posted by Adult Insider Dave
But to remain on topic of GFY, lets all remember that Romney is against our business, unless your business is offshore like Mitt's was rofl...
I think you are wrong on that matter. I know for one as I said in some other topic here, I made my choice biased mainly on foreign policy in the last election. In fact that was one of the major reasons Obama won the election, is because he promised to get us out of Iraq and refocus the war on terror.
We are leaving Iraq... no matter who wins.
We are leaving Afghanistan... no matter who wins.
The country does not have the stomach for another war of choice... no matter who wins.
Either candidate will use our military to defend our interests.
Either candidate will back Israel.
Either candidate will do all he can to prevent nuclear proliferation.
Both candidates will do the same things to prevent terrorist attacks and respond to them.
Now... go make your voting decision based on foreign policy.
The other 99.999999999% of the voting public will make their decision in this election on economic or social issues. The economy favors Romney, if it was strong Obama would be winning by 20% of the vote. Social issues favor Obama, if Romney wasn't so disingenuous about them he would be winning by 20% of the vote.
The choice is a simple one:
Do you want a faster recovery NO MATTER WHAT negative side effects come with it, and a return to the boom/bust cyclical crashes?
OR
Do you want a slower recovery with sane social issue policies and much better long term prospects for real growth?
Nobody is making their decision on foreign policy grounds...
Obama easily won the debate and Romney failed on several opportunities.
The first thing Romney *should have said* was 'Mr. President, four years ago Hillary and McCain tried to claim you had no experience in foreign policy. Do you honestly think you trying to claim the same thing about me now is somehow any less ridiculous than it was then when they said the same things about you?'
Romney does have a little experience, he went on a 3 day trip to the UK. Three days was enough for him to be dubbed "Mitt the Twit" by right wing The Sun.
Selective hearing I guess. Iran plays nice, gets sanctions removed, more gas available.
Oh, and Obama is pro-adult?
compared to Mitt yes. I know you hate that. He broke up the obscenity task force that was started under bush. Dems arent pro porn but its not on their list of things to do.
Romney does have a little experience, he went on a 3 day trip to the UK. Three days was enough for him to be dubbed "Mitt the Twit" by right wing The Sun.
Was part of the same trip, it's the Palestinians he pissed off I think. but that he went there with Adelson fishing for Jewish donors implying a commitment to a foreign country is what bothers me more
_________________
Last edited by Slappin Fish; 10-23-2012, 10:01 AM.
Was watching analysts on CNN breaking down the numbers.
Obama has a lead with women (though it is closing)
But Obama's big strength are blacks and hispanics. Blacks are nearly 100% voting for Obama no matter what. They interviewed some black folks and they didn't even care if he did stupid shit...they were voting for him because he is black.
Hispanics are voting for him by 30% margin over Romney. The Republicans tough talk about building a wall on the Mexican border is coming back to bite them on the ass. Especially here in Nevada. The Hispanic electorate will probably decide this state and many others as well.
So Obama has women sewed up (thanks to the Repubs insane stance on abortion & women's rights), blacks voting on racial grounds, and Hispanics because of Repub idiocy over mexico.
Makes it real tough for Romney to win with that stacked against him right out the gate. It's a testament to how much of a failure Obama is that this race is so close and could still go to Romney.
It's a testament to how much of a failure Obama is that this race is so close and could still go to Romney.
And a testament to how horrible a candidate Romney is, that he can't even build a lead against an incumbent with such a weak economy. If the GOP ran anyone worth electing, this would have been a Republican landslide months ago. Bloomberg and the rest of the sane Republicans aren't crazy enough to get votes in the primary. Only crazies and liars can win the GOP nomination these days.
Santorum, Bachman, Newt, Romney, Herman Cain, GWB, Palin, McCain.... there has not been a serious conservative on the Republican ticket since Bob Dole/Jack Kemp in 1996. Think about that... Many voters today were less than 5 years old the last time the Republican party had sane fiscal conservatives as their nominees.
Run a real fiscal conservative with progressive views on social issues (like Bloomberg) and he has no chance of getting nominated... so Bloomberg, Christie, Rubio etc won't even run for election. It's pathetic. I'd love to vote Republican... just as soon as the GOP actually nominates one.
Dude, since blacks make up 13.1% of the population in America, the truth is that most of Obama voters are whites. That's his best niche.
Never said he didn't have a lot of white voters. You're missing my point.
If he already has the votes of 13.1% sewn up (blacks), the majority of 16.4% (Latinos) and the majority of women (at least 50% mabye more) right out of the gate...without any campaigning...it makes it kinda tough to beat.
That's a lot of people voting for him before he even has to try to convince everyone else.
And it's the fault of the Republican Party Platform. They fill it with such nonsense to placate the religious right that it makes them an easy target.
Care to list the DOJ actions against the porn industry over the past 4 years? I won't hold my breath waiting for you to list any because there haven't been any.
Was watching analysts on CNN breaking down the numbers.
Obama has a lead with women (though it is closing)
But Obama's big strength are blacks and hispanics. Blacks are nearly 100% voting for Obama no matter what. They interviewed some black folks and they didn't even care if he did stupid shit...they were voting for him because he is black.
Hispanics are voting for him by 30% margin over Romney. The Republicans tough talk about building a wall on the Mexican border is coming back to bite them on the ass. Especially here in Nevada. The Hispanic electorate will probably decide this state and many others as well.
So Obama has women sewed up (thanks to the Repubs insane stance on abortion & women's rights), blacks voting on racial grounds, and Hispanics because of Repub idiocy over mexico.
Makes it real tough for Romney to win with that stacked against him right out the gate. It's a testament to how much of a failure Obama is that this race is so close and could still go to Romney.
The only reason it's even close is because much as your statement saying Blacks will vote for Obama no matter what the same holds true for the tea party & religious right. They will vote for Mitt Romney no matter what simply because he's Republican.
It doesn't matter who they put in front of them.. I mean really these are the people who voted for MacCain after he made the choice to run Sarah Palin for gods sake. It wouldn't matter if they put a monkey in front of the TV, as long as he wore a shirt that had a big "R" on it's chest then they would vote for them.
That's the issue with Conservative's.. They vote for their party vs who might do a better job for the country. Now of course the Left has some of this same mentality but it's no where near as in-trenched as it is on the right. On the left it tends to be this way more with the Minorities out of any other specific group.
Comment