GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum
Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3456 >
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Romney took charge last night! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1086470)

wehateporn 10-23-2012 11:49 AM
The two guys have almost identical views, this is just a mirage of democracy. :2 cents:

Robbie 10-23-2012 11:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 19269539)
Dude, since blacks make up 13.1% of the population in America, the truth is that most of Obama voters are whites. That's his best niche.
Never said he didn't have a lot of white voters. You're missing my point.
If he already has the votes of 13.1% sewn up (blacks), the majority of 16.4% (Latinos) and the majority of women (at least 50% mabye more) right out of the gate...without any campaigning...it makes it kinda tough to beat.

That's a lot of people voting for him before he even has to try to convince everyone else. :)

And it's the fault of the Republican Party Platform. They fill it with such nonsense to placate the religious right that it makes them an easy target.

Matt 26z 10-23-2012 12:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19269383)
Oh, and Obama is pro-adult?
Care to list the DOJ actions against the porn industry over the past 4 years? I won't hold my breath waiting for you to list any because there haven't been any.

crockett 10-23-2012 12:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19269525)
Was watching analysts on CNN breaking down the numbers.

Obama has a lead with women (though it is closing)

But Obama's big strength are blacks and hispanics. Blacks are nearly 100% voting for Obama no matter what. They interviewed some black folks and they didn't even care if he did stupid shit...they were voting for him because he is black.

Hispanics are voting for him by 30% margin over Romney. The Republicans tough talk about building a wall on the Mexican border is coming back to bite them on the ass. Especially here in Nevada. The Hispanic electorate will probably decide this state and many others as well.

So Obama has women sewed up (thanks to the Repubs insane stance on abortion & women's rights), blacks voting on racial grounds, and Hispanics because of Repub idiocy over mexico.

Makes it real tough for Romney to win with that stacked against him right out the gate. It's a testament to how much of a failure Obama is that this race is so close and could still go to Romney.
The only reason it's even close is because much as your statement saying Blacks will vote for Obama no matter what the same holds true for the tea party & religious right. They will vote for Mitt Romney no matter what simply because he's Republican.

It doesn't matter who they put in front of them.. I mean really these are the people who voted for MacCain after he made the choice to run Sarah Palin for gods sake. It wouldn't matter if they put a monkey in front of the TV, as long as he wore a shirt that had a big "R" on it's chest then they would vote for them.

That's the issue with Conservative's.. They vote for their party vs who might do a better job for the country. Now of course the Left has some of this same mentality but it's no where near as in-trenched as it is on the right. On the left it tends to be this way more with the Minorities out of any other specific group.

pornmasta 10-23-2012 12:43 PM

HelmutKohl 10-23-2012 12:55 PM
I shall bring you Mormon cult :helpme

http://i.huffpost.com/gadgets/slides...?1351018956000

Rochard 10-23-2012 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19269506)
From Feb. to Oct. of 2008 you are right. For the other 7 1/2 years you are 100% wrong.
You do like to cherry pick your numbers, huh?

Oil production is down on federal land for 2011. However, if you compare all of Obama's term oil production on federal land is up.

Gas was at it's highest price while a Republican was in office. Period.

baddog 10-23-2012 01:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19269582)
"Charge!!!" is what you scream when commanding people with bayonets. :2 cents:
I guess Obama's demographic is the only one that does not realize we still use bayonettes.

KillerK 10-23-2012 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19269803)

Gas was at it's highest price while a Republican was in office. Period.
Provided this data is correct, you are full of shit

George Bush?s average annual gas prices

2001 ? $1.61
2002 ? $1.47
2003 ? $1.69
2004 ? $1.94
2005 ? $2.30
2006 ? $2.51
2007 ? $2.64
2008 ? $3.01

Average price for gas over Bush?s eight years = $2.14/gal

Barack Obama?s average annual gas prices

2009 ? $2.14
2010 ? $2.52
2011 ? $3.57
2012 ? $3.72 (through August)

Average price for gas over Obama?s four years to date = $2.99/gal

Captain Kawaii 10-23-2012 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 19269127)
Well played, monsieur.

Juicy J 10-23-2012 01:25 PM
Gas is $10.25 here

Barry-xlovecam 10-23-2012 01:40 PM
These debates probably had little real effect other than reinforcing peoples opinions that were already formed.

I listened to the second and third debates.

Romney again avowed his desire to repeal Obamacare.

Obama went off topic in the last debate to justify the need for spending on higher education and basic research.

Surprisingly, Romney objected to the federal grants to private business for some of this research to be done outside of higher educational institutions. So, government owned or supported institutions are more capable that private business? Hypocritical to Romney's confessed position and that of his party.

Romney offered no real alternatives to any of the above in spite of the opportunity to do so.

Draw your own conclusions ...

What is really key to the next 2 or 4 years is the make-up of the congress that either candidate will have to work with as President. If Obama is re-elected the majority of the Congress may change. Conversely, if Romney is elected the current make-up of the Congress may be similar. If the latter happens it is not good for people in the adult industry -- that is a given.

No, the world won't end but your USA based businesses might very well or at least be mired in government bureaucracy. (More hypocrisy).

2012 10-23-2012 01:42 PM
Tagg, Mitt, Skitt and Shittle

KillerK 10-23-2012 01:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry-xlovecam (Post 19269910)
These debates probably had little real effect other than reinforcing peoples opinions that were already formed.

I listened to the second and third debates.

Romney again avowed his desire to repeal Obamacare.

Obama went off topic in the last debate to justify the need for spending on higher education and basic research.

Surprisingly, Romney objected to the federal grants to private business for some of this research to be done outside of higher educational institutions. So, government owned or supported institutions are more capable that private business? Hypocritical to Romney's confessed position and that of his party.

Romney offered no real alternatives to any of the above in spite of the opportunity to do so.

Draw your own conclusions ...

What is really key to the next 2 or 4 years is the make-up of the congress that either candidate will have to work with as President. If Obama is re-elected the majority of the Congress may change. Conversely, if Romney is elected the current make-up of the Congress may be similar. If the latter happens it is not good for people in the adult industry -- that is a given.

No, the world won't end but your USA based businesses might very well or at least be mired in government bureaucracy. (More hypocrisy).
You act as if we have a real industry anymore, that the average webmaster actually makes any serious money. The Tubes have so much traffic its sick, and they don't share it. Atleast in the past the tgp/mgp sites shared the traffic.

Drake 10-23-2012 02:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19269525)
But Obama's big strength are blacks and hispanics. Blacks are nearly 100% voting for Obama no matter what. They interviewed some black folks and they didn't even care if he did stupid shit...they were voting for him because he is black.
This is an interesting statistic but I think it has more to do with policy and personality than race, but I could be wrong. How much black support did Herman Cain (Republican), Al Sharpton (Democrat), or Alan Keyes (Republican) get when they ran as presidential candidates? I've read that White presidential candidates who are Democrats normally get around 90% of the black vote.

epitome 10-23-2012 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by baddog (Post 19269855)
I guess Obama's demographic is the only one that does not realize we still use bayonettes.
Use is down and the last bayonet charge was in Korea in 1951.

Obama's exact quote was "We also have fewer horses and bayonets."

Now the Army used to use them more and hardly does now. The only ones left are the Marine's and they don't really use them that much... last real time was in 1951.

So was Obama lying?

Are there not less bayonets in use today?

You've posted numerous times on bayonets in this thread so it must really be eating you up. Just wanted to set you straight.

I'm sure somewhere on some military base or out in the mountains of Afghanistan someone is on a horse right now... doesn't mean we do not have less.

epitome 10-23-2012 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drake (Post 19270010)
This is an interesting statistic but I think it has more to do with policy and personality than race, but I could be wrong. How much black support did Herman Cain (Republican), Al Sharpton (Democrat), or Alan Keyes (Republican) get when they ran as presidential candidates?
They didn't get much support but since Robbie says they interviewed a few it must be 100% voting for Obama! :1orglaugh

Barry-xlovecam 10-23-2012 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerK (Post 19269935)
You act as if we have a real industry anymore, that the average webmaster actually makes any serious money. The Tubes have so much traffic its sick, and they don't share it. Atleast in the past the tgp/mgp sites shared the traffic.

The past is gone and it's not coming back.

Gas prices are not going to be $1.50 again no matter who is elected.

Some adult businesses are making money and there is a consolidation of this industry going on.

Tubes should share their traffic? Wouldn't that be "socialism?" They monetize it and sell it that is raw capitalism.

madm1k3 10-23-2012 02:35 PM
You fucking idiots Romney is right, Syria is Iran's path to the sea!!!!

This debate was meaningless, I mean when has the USA ever been concerned about foreign policies. Its not like they go around the world spending trillions of dollars on wars, nope this was a waste of everyone's time.

Now for you Idiots who say war is important this isn't 2008, that was 4 years ago. I mean four fucking years, that's like all of high school yo. Quit acting like Bush is president, this is the now! Romney seems pretty credible, now I have to go the wallet inspector is at my door

Robbie 10-23-2012 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19270022)
They didn't get much support but since Robbie says they interviewed a few it must be 100% voting for Obama! :1orglaugh
Nope, since Robbie watches the news and that was front page stuff a few weeks ago. I didn't "say" anything. I just repeated the same info that we are all given. Grow up and stop attacking me. Address the issues instead. Have an interesting conversation instead of cackling to yourself and thinking how "clever" and "witty" you are. :)

Rochard 10-23-2012 03:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerK (Post 19269867)
Provided this data is correct, you are full of shit

George Bush?s average annual gas prices

2001 ? $1.61
2002 ? $1.47
2003 ? $1.69
2004 ? $1.94
2005 ? $2.30
2006 ? $2.51
2007 ? $2.64
2008 ? $3.01

Average price for gas over Bush?s eight years = $2.14/gal

Barack Obama?s average annual gas prices

2009 ? $2.14
2010 ? $2.52
2011 ? $3.57
2012 ? $3.72 (through August)

Average price for gas over Obama?s four years to date = $2.99/gal
You are cherry picking stats again. I said highest price for gas, not yearly average cost.
The highest national price for gas was September 2008 at $4.12.

http://66.70.86.64/ChartServer/ch.ga...&Unit=US%20$/G

keysync 10-23-2012 03:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 19270180)
You are cherry picking stats again. I said highest price for gas, not yearly average cost.
The highest national price for gas was September 2008 at $4.12.

http://66.70.86.64/ChartServer/ch.ga...&Unit=US%20$/G
It was $5.79 here a few weeks ago so.....

ThunderBalls 10-23-2012 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19269525)
But Obama's big strength are blacks and hispanics. Blacks are nearly 100% voting for Obama no matter what. They interviewed some black folks and they didn't even care if he did stupid shit...they were voting for him because he is black.
Got a link to that interview?

Robbie 10-23-2012 03:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderBalls (Post 19270206)
Got a link to that interview?
Nope. There have been dozens of those on the news over the last few months.

epitome 10-23-2012 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19270178)
Nope, since Robbie watches the news and that was front page stuff a few weeks ago. I didn't "say" anything. I just repeated the same info that we are all given. Grow up and stop attacking me. Address the issues instead. Have an interesting conversation instead of cackling to yourself and thinking how "clever" and "witty" you are. :)
You think I have more invested in these threads than I actually do.

ThunderBalls 10-23-2012 03:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19270210)
Nope. There have been dozens of those on the news over the last few months.
FOX News is not news. :2 cents:

2012 10-23-2012 03:53 PM

JP-pornshooter 10-23-2012 04:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KillerK (Post 19269867)
Provided this data is correct, you are full of shit

George Bush?s average annual gas prices

2001 ? $1.61
2002 ? $1.47
2003 ? $1.69
2004 ? $1.94
2005 ? $2.30
2006 ? $2.51
2007 ? $2.64
2008 ? $3.01

Average price for gas over Bush?s eight years = $2.14/gal

Barack Obama?s average annual gas prices

2009 ? $2.14
2010 ? $2.52
2011 ? $3.57
2012 ? $3.72 (through August)

Average price for gas over Obama?s four years to date = $2.99/gal
take those numbers and look when the highest % increases happened.
and/or adjust these numbers for inflation/CPI
or perhaps you would not like the outcome?

JP-pornshooter 10-23-2012 04:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Relentless (Post 19269549)
And a testament to how horrible a candidate Romney is, that he can't even build a lead against an incumbent with such a weak economy. If the GOP ran anyone worth electing, this would have been a Republican landslide months ago. Bloomberg and the rest of the sane Republicans aren't crazy enough to get votes in the primary. Only crazies and liars can win the GOP nomination these days.

Santorum, Bachman, Newt, Romney, Herman Cain, GWB, Palin, McCain.... there has not been a serious conservative on the Republican ticket since Bob Dole/Jack Kemp in 1996. Think about that... Many voters today were less than 5 years old the last time the Republican party had sane fiscal conservatives as their nominees.

Run a real fiscal conservative with progressive views on social issues (like Bloomberg) and he has no chance of getting nominated... so Bloomberg, Christie, Rubio etc won't even run for election. It's pathetic. I'd love to vote Republican... just as soon as the GOP actually nominates one. :2 cents:
they should split the party
make one party a real republican party without the religious rights and the other nut cases.

Robbie 10-23-2012 04:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderBalls (Post 19270223)
FOX News is not news. :2 cents:
Are you just trying to troll people?

Watch MSNBC, CNN, your local news, etc. If you've watched any news at all you have seen analysts asking black folks why they would vote for Obama when black unemployment is so high and he hasn't done anything for them yet. The answer is that they are going to vote for him anyway.

Last night after the debate there was a black new analyst on MSNBC who said that she was "sure" that in his second term Obama would finally address the needs of the black community.

Why are you trying to make a big deal out of that? Black people are rightfully proud of the first black American president. And they are going to vote for him no matter what. It's human nature and I don't blame them one bit.

Robbie 10-23-2012 04:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 19270264)
they should split the party
make one party a real republican party without the religious rights and the other nut cases.
I think that Libertarians represent that. Fiscally conservative, small govt., and socially liberal. Real freedom.

Relentless 10-23-2012 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP-pornshooter (Post 19270264)
they should split the party make one party a real republican party without the religious rights and the other nut cases.
And do the same with the Democrats.... Al Sharpton and Pelosi in one.... Hillary, Obama and Booker in the other...


Honestly... an election next time around between Hillary and Bloomberg... we can't lose.
I'd take either of them over this hot mess of liars and incompetents.

ThunderBalls 10-23-2012 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 19270269)
Are you just trying to troll people?

Watch MSNBC, CNN, your local news, etc. If you've watched any news at all you have seen analysts asking black folks why they would vote for Obama when black unemployment is so high and he hasn't done anything for them yet. The answer is that they are going to vote for him anyway.

Last night after the debate there was a black new analyst on MSNBC who said that she was "sure" that in his second term Obama would finally address the needs of the black community.

Why are you trying to make a big deal out of that? Black people are rightfully proud of the first black American president. And they are going to vote for him no matter what. It's human nature and I don't blame them one bit.

I'm not denying any of that, but you made a statement that black people were giving interviews saying they didn't give a shit what Obama did they were voting for him because he was black. I asked for a link and you failed to provide, yea I'm trolling. :1orglaugh

SuckOnThis 10-23-2012 04:31 PM
Anyone that disagrees with Robbie is trolling.

Even though he's ashamed to admit he's a republican and loves Romney he's on here daily defending him.

Robbie 10-23-2012 04:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThunderBalls (Post 19270282)
I'm not denying any of that, but you made a statement that black people were giving interviews saying they didn't give a shit what Obama did they were voting for him because he was black. I asked for a link and you failed to provide, yea I'm trolling. :1orglaugh
Sorry I can't provide a link for interviews I saw on CNN and other news outlets while I ate lunch or was channel surfing. Search for yourself. I'm not your slave. :)

Minte 10-23-2012 04:33 PM
Romney looked and acted liked a president. Obama looked and acted like a smartass.

His line about the aircraft carrier and submarine was something I would expect from a GFY'er.

KillerK 10-23-2012 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by keysync (Post 19270204)
It was $5.79 here a few weeks ago so.....
I doubt he will comment on your ownage.

Relentless 10-23-2012 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte (Post 19270327)
Romney looked and acted liked a president. Obama looked and acted like a smartass. His line about the aircraft carrier and submarine was something I would expect from a GFY'er.
Romney looked out of his element. He knows zero about military engagement or foreign policy. That's not his fault, it's not something he has had to deal with as a venture capitalist. He stood to lose zero of the people planning to vote for him and had no chance to win any from Obama. Meanwhile Obama knew he could not get Romney voters to side with him based on foreign policy, so he used the time to rev up his base and get Obama supporters more motivated to actually show up on election day. Romney and Obama had the same amount of support before and after the debate, but Obama likely improved voter turnout for his side while Romney did not.

The smart ass lines were not intended to make you change your mind, they were intended to make apathetic supporters more likely to go vote... and they seem to have been executed very effectively. :2 cents:

baddog 10-23-2012 04:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by epitome (Post 19270013)
Use is down and the last bayonet charge was in Korea in 1951.

Obama's exact quote was "We also have fewer horses and bayonets."

Now the Army used to use them more and hardly does now. The only ones left are the Marine's and they don't really use them that much... last real time was in 1951.

So was Obama lying?

Are there not less bayonets in use today?

You've posted numerous times on bayonets in this thread so it must really be eating you up. Just wanted to set you straight.

I'm sure somewhere on some military base or out in the mountains of Afghanistan someone is on a horse right now... doesn't mean we do not have less.
I take it you did not read the link provided where it was suggested we use more bayonets now than in 1916.

tony286 10-23-2012 04:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Minte (Post 19270327)
Romney looked and acted liked a president. Obama looked and acted like a smartass.

His line about the aircraft carrier and submarine was something I would expect from a GFY'er.
oh stop please stop. lets not kid ourselves Mitt could get up and piss all over the desk. You would say he acted like a leader when he has to go he just goes. Not excusing himself not like that weak muslim , socialist ,communist, business hating ultra liberal. lol


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:42 PM.
Page 2 of 6 < 1 2 3456 >
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123