Steve Wynn didn't say he favored Romney.

What he said is EVERY BUSINESS GUY I KNOW IN THE COUNTRY IS FRIGHTENED OF BARACK OBAMA AND THE WAY HE THINKS.

And if you are unwilling to look back to Obama's campaign promises and the record of breaking most of them then you are correct. You are brainwashed.

That's actually kind of pathetic.

I live here in Vegas...from buying and renovating The Golden Nugget on Fremont...to changing the Casino industry when he built the Mirage in 1994...to building The Wynn and Encore....do you have ANY idea how many people have raised their families and bought homes and realized their dreams thanks to the jobs that Steve Wynn provides?

This is a classic example of a person who is extremely liberal Democrat being un-friendly to business and not having compassion or understanding for hard working people who depend on guys like Steve Wynn.

I'm no Steve Wynn...but before piracy eliminated the need for me to have employees for my TGP's...I was responsible for my people. Even when times were lean, I had to make sure they got their paychecks on time. They had families to take care of, dreams to fulfill.

But you just see Steve Wynn as a "mega-rich casino mogul". And that's the core problem with liberalism.

So listen up fellas, we need to change our public image.

From now on we'll refer to ourselves as "Job Creators"

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tgOvFlxqJr...sters%252B.jpg

Capish?

Just imagine how much better off the country would be if the Obama administration had even made a slight effort to try and work with the job creators.

It would be better if Congress could work together and get bills passed.

Thank goodness for pictures with biased captions.

That certainly changed my mind! Turns out that Obama's reason for running for a second term has nothing to do with his record.
The reason he is running is he's trying to save us from Ronald Reagan! Everybody remember how BAD things were when Reagan was president?
And why isn't Clinton's picture in there? His policies were not really different.

We MUST elect Obama for four more years because the last four have been so great?
No.
We must elect him because Democrats have convinced themselves that trickle down economics is "bad" and TRICKLE DOWN GOVT. is "good".

The real liberals of the 1960's (you know the ones that protested AGAINST govt.) are now rolling in their graves with the real republicans (you know the ones who believed in spending less).

I'm going to take a seat over here with the Libertarians. http://garyjohnson2012.com
</thread>

I'm with you on this - if you don't like Obama, Vote for Gary Johnson!

(of course the race will be won by Obama or Romney, but at least if you vote for GJ you can spend the next 4 years claiming you had nothing to do with the outcome)

Gary Johnson! Gary Johnson!

I'm sure you have convinced 100's if not 1000's of confused GFYers to see the Obama light.

Trickle down government, LOL, I've never heard that before. I like it.

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...ssed-ugliness/

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newswee...ain-drain.html

Not only for Gary Johnson..but I will be voting for Libertarian candidates for local, state, and federal positions.

Unlike the Democrats and Republicans who make "party platforms" that they don't follow or believe in..Libertarians by the very definition of who they are, actually believe in what they stand for.

You are just voting Democrat because that's what you do.

I'm different than you are. I voted for Clinton in my first vote ever for President. Voted for him again in 96

Voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004 (if Hillary had run in 04 I would have went with her)

Voted for Obama in 2008

How about you? What's your voting record if you don't mind me asking? Are you a strict Democrat no matter what?

It's more than clear that the incumbent is not a job creator. Unless you count adding more payroll for unnecessary government jobs.